SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 7320C + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
81%
VS
GPU
95%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 3 7320C

14,277 Benchmark Score
Top 19% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

38,135 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

FAQ

Q: What kind of processor is the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C and what architecture does it use?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 7320C is a 4-core, 8-thread mobile processor from the 7000 series. It is built on the Zen 2 architecture with the Mendocino codename, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. The CPU has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.10 GHz, with a TDP of 15 W.

Q: How much memory does the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective. It is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with 7424 shading units.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this laptop build is 75, meaning it outperforms 75% of all systems in the benchmark database. The CPU alone sits at the 69th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks at the 81st percentile among all GPUs.

Q: What is the socket and memory support for the Ryzen 3 7320C?

A: The Ryzen 3 7320C uses AMD Socket FT6. It supports dual-channel LPDDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 88.0 GB/s. The platform does not support ECC memory. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 3 with 4 lanes.

Q: Does the RTX 4080 Mobile support ray tracing and what APIs does it support?

A: Yes, the RTX 4080 Mobile has 58 ray tracing cores and 232 tensor cores. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The GPU has a boost clock of 1665 MHz and is based on the AD104 chip with 35,800 million transistors.

Q: How does the Ryzen 3 7320C compare to its closest rival in average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 3 7320C has an average benchmark score of 14277. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 3501U, scores 14320, which is 0.3% higher. The Intel Core i5-10400F scores 14185, which is 0.7% lower. The differences are within 1% across all nearest rivals.

Q: What is the TDP of the RTX 4080 Mobile and what is its bus interface?

A: The RTX 4080 Mobile has a TDP of 110 W. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface. The GPU has a base clock of 1290 MHz and a boost clock of 1665 MHz, with a pixel rate of 133.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 386.3 GTexel/s.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data presents a striking asymmetry between the two primary components in this laptop configuration. The AMD Ryzen 3 7320C achieves an average benchmark score of 14277, placing it at the 69th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 3501U, scores 14320, a delta of only -0.3%, meaning the 7320C is effectively tied with that processor. The Intel Core 7 160UL scores 14232 (0.3% higher than the 7320C), and the Intel Core i5-10400F scores 14185 (0.7% lower). This clustering within a 1% band indicates the 7320C is a solid mid-tier mobile processor, neither a standout nor a laggard in its segment.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile, conversely, is a heavyweight. Its average benchmark score of 38135 places it at the 81st percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 at 38299 (-0.4%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile at 38349 (-0.6%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 at 37648 (1.3% higher), and the NVIDIA Tesla P4 at 37628 (1.3% higher). The GPU’s raw compute power is substantial, with an FP32 throughput of 24.72 TFLOPS and a texture rate of 386.3 GTexel/s.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 75, reflecting the dominance of the GPU in lifting the overall system score. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 7025 and single-core score of 991 indicate a modestly capable processor, while the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 24926 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 159575 show exceptional graphics performance. The data suggests this is a system where the GPU far outstrips the CPU in relative capability, a pattern that will recur throughout this analysis.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 3 7320C is a 4-core, 8-thread processor based on the Zen 2 architecture, specifically the Mendocino codename. It operates at a base clock of 2.40 GHz and boosts up to 4.10 GHz, with a TDP of just 15 W — a figure that emphasizes efficiency over raw throughput. The 6 nm process node from TSMC and a die size of 100 mm² contribute to its low power envelope. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of shared L3 cache.

Benchmark results paint a picture of a processor that handles everyday tasks competently but is not designed for heavy multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 7025 and single-core score of 991 place it firmly in entry-level territory. The Passmark multithread score of 8265 and single-thread score of 2439 confirm this assessment. Data compression performance is a relative strength at 144465, while integer math scores 32247 and floating-point math scores 14071. The find prime numbers test yields a low score of 18, indicating limited sustained compute capability.

The 69th percentile ranking among all CPUs means the 7320C outperforms roughly two-thirds of all processors in the database, but its nearest rivals are all within 1% of its average score. The AMD Ryzen 5 3501U, Intel Core 7 160UL, and Intel Core i5-10400F all sit within this tight band. For real workloads, this translates to a processor that handles web browsing, office applications, and light coding without issue, but will struggle with sustained all-core loads like video rendering or large-scale compilation. The 15 W TDP is a clear indicator of its intended role in thin-and-light laptops where battery life and thermal management take precedence.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize graphics performance above all else but do not require significant CPU horsepower. The RTX 4080 Mobile’s 81st percentile GPU ranking makes it suitable for gamers seeking high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p resolutions. The CPU’s 69th percentile ranking means it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions where the GPU becomes the limiting factor.

Content creators working with GPU-accelerated workflows will find value here. The RTX 4080 Mobile’s 12 GB of VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth support large texture sets and complex 3D scenes. However, video editors relying on CPU-based rendering will find the 4-core processor a constraint. Software developers working on smaller projects or using GPU compute (CUDA) will benefit from the tensor cores and FP32 throughput, though large codebases will compile slowly.

Students and small business users running productivity suites, spreadsheets, and presentation software will find the system more than adequate, with the CPU’s 8 threads handling multitasking effectively. The low 15 W CPU TDP suggests excellent battery life for on-the-go use, while the GPU’s 110 W TDP indicates this is still a performance-oriented laptop that will require adequate cooling. The 75th combined percentile suggests this system sits above the median for all laptop builds.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 3 7320C uses AMD Socket FT6, a platform designed for low-power mobile processors. The CPU supports dual-channel LPDDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 88.0 GB/s, which is soldered on most implementations given the mobile form factor. The memory bus is dual-channel, and ECC memory is not supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 3 with 4 lanes, which is sufficient for the integrated Radeon 610M graphics and basic NVMe storage but is a limiting factor for high-bandwidth peripherals.

The RTX 4080 Mobile, by contrast, uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 3 lanes but will operate at reduced bandwidth. The GPU has a TDP of 110 W and uses no external power connectors, indicating it draws power from the motherboard. The suggested PSU is not specified in the data, but the combined TDP of 125 W (15 W CPU + 110 W GPU) suggests a laptop power adapter of sufficient capacity is required.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a CPU with a higher core count, but the FT6 socket is designed for the Mendocino series, which caps at 4 cores. In practice, the upgrade path is limited to storage and memory, both of which are likely soldered. The GPU is not upgradeable in a laptop. The platform’s 88.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for the CPU but may bottleneck the GPU in memory-intensive tasks, given the GPU’s own 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The PCIe Gen 3 x4 CPU lanes are a clear bottleneck for the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, potentially reducing peak throughput in data-transfer-heavy workloads.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is a high-end mobile GPU based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, built on a 5 nm TSMC process. The AD104 chip contains 35,800 million transistors across a 294 mm² die, with a transistor density of 121.8 million per mm². The GPU has 7424 shading units, 232 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation processors. It includes 58 ray tracing cores and 232 tensor cores, making it fully capable of hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS.

The memory subsystem consists of 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The GPU’s base clock is 1290 MHz with a boost clock of 1665 MHz. The pixel rate is 133.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 386.3 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 24.72 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 24.72 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

Benchmark scores reflect this hardware’s capability. The Passmark G3D score of 24926 places it at the 81st percentile among all GPUs. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 159575 and Vulkan score of 145807 confirm strong compute performance. The Passmark GPU compute score of 11191 indicates solid general-purpose compute capability. However, the nearest rival data shows the RTX 4080 Mobile is only 1.3% behind the RTX 4070 (37648 vs 38135) and 0.6% behind the RTX 5080 Mobile (38349), suggesting the performance gap between mobile generations is narrow.

The 110 W TDP is significant for a mobile GPU, indicating this is a full-power implementation designed for gaming laptops with robust cooling. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. For rendering workloads, the 58 RT cores will accelerate ray-traced scenes, while the 232 tensor cores provide AI-accelerated features like DLSS. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for high-resolution textures and complex 3D models at 1080p and 1440p.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps entries, so all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components. These estimates should be treated as indicative rather than definitive.

Based on the RTX 4080 Mobile’s 81st percentile GPU ranking and its Passmark G3D score of 24926, this system should deliver high frame rates in most modern titles at 1080p and 1440p with ultra settings. The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are well-suited for texture-heavy games. The 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggests the GPU can handle demanding rasterization workloads, while the 58 RT cores enable ray tracing at playable frame rates with DLSS enabled.

The CPU’s 69th percentile ranking and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 991 will be the limiting factor in CPU-bound scenarios. Many esports titles and older games that rely on single-thread performance may see frame rates capped by the 4-core processor. In GPU-bound scenarios, which are common at 1440p and above, the CPU will be less of a constraint. The 15 W TDP of the CPU indicates it will not sustain high clocks under prolonged load, which could cause frame pacing issues in CPU-intensive scenes.

For competitive gaming at high refresh rates (144Hz+), the system may struggle to maintain maximum FPS in CPU-bound titles. For single-player and visually demanding games at 60-100 FPS, the system is well-matched. The lack of measured data means these are estimates, but the component-level scores provide a solid foundation for these expectations.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining a low-power mobile CPU with a high-performance mobile GPU. The AMD Ryzen 3 7320C is an entry-level processor with a 15 W TDP, designed for efficiency. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is a high-end GPU with a 110 W TDP, designed for performance. The combined percentile of 75 places this system in the upper quartile of all laptop builds in the database.

The pairing is unusual: a CPU at the 69th percentile paired with a GPU at the 81st percentile. This creates a system that excels in GPU-accelerated tasks and gaming but lags in CPU-bound workloads. The CPU’s 4 cores and 8 threads are adequate for multitasking and productivity, but the GPU’s 7424 shading units and 58 RT cores are in a different performance class entirely.

The build class is explicitly laptop, confirming this is a mobile configuration. The GPU’s slot width is listed as IGP (integrated graphics processor), suggesting it is soldered to the motherboard. The display outputs are portable-device dependent, meaning the laptop manufacturer determines the available ports. The GPU uses no external power connectors, drawing all power from the motherboard. This is a coherent system for its intended use case, but the component imbalance is a defining characteristic.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a clear imbalance between CPU and GPU performance. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 14277 is at the 69th percentile, while the GPU’s 38135 is at the 81st percentile. The GPU outperforms the CPU in raw compute by a wide margin, which means the CPU will be the bottleneck in any workload that requires significant CPU processing.

In gaming, the bottleneck manifests depending on resolution and title. At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 991) will limit frame rates in CPU-bound games, particularly those that rely on a single core. At 1440p and above, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and the CPU’s relative weakness is less impactful. The GPU’s 432.0 GB/s bandwidth versus the CPU’s 88.0 GB/s memory bandwidth further highlights the disparity.

In productivity workloads, the bottleneck shifts. Tasks like data compression (Passmark score of 144465) and integer math (32247) are CPU-bound and will show the processor’s limitations. GPU-accelerated tasks like 3D rendering (Passmark G3D of 24926) and compute (11191) will leverage the GPU’s full capability, minimizing the CPU bottleneck. The combined percentile of 75 suggests the system is well-balanced overall, but this is driven almost entirely by the GPU’s high ranking.

The nearest rival data reinforces this: the CPU is within 1% of its rivals, while the GPU is within 1.3% of its rivals. The system’s performance ceiling is set by the CPU, but its performance floor is set by the GPU. For users who understand this dynamic, the system can be tuned to maximize GPU-bound workloads and accept CPU-bound limitations.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4080 Mobile’s 81st percentile ranking and 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest strong frame rates in most titles. However, the CPU’s 69th percentile and single-core score of 991 will cap FPS in CPU-bound scenarios, making 144Hz+ gaming inconsistent. At 1080p with competitive settings, expect 90-120 FPS in most titles, with lower numbers in CPU-heavy games.

Streaming: The GPU’s tensor cores and NVENC (implied by Ada Lovelace architecture) can handle video encoding offload. The CPU’s 8 threads will manage streaming software and game simultaneously, but the 4 cores may struggle with CPU-intensive games while encoding. The 15 W TDP suggests thermal headroom is limited, potentially affecting sustained performance.

Video editing: GPU-accelerated effects and rendering will benefit from the RTX 4080 Mobile’s 7424 shading units and 12 GB VRAM. Timeline scrubbing and preview will be smooth. However, CPU-based encoding and export will be slow due to the 4-core processor. The Passmark multithread score of 8265 indicates moderate multi-threaded capability.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 58 RT cores and 232 tensor cores make this system excellent for GPU-accelerated rendering (e.g., Blender Cycles, Octane). The 12 GB VRAM handles complex scenes. CPU-based rendering will be slow, but GPU rendering will be fast. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 159575 confirms strong compute capability.

Software development: Light coding and compilation will work well with the 8 threads and 4 MB L3 cache. Large project builds will be slow due to the 4 cores. The Passmark integer math score of 32247 indicates adequate general-purpose performance. Debugging and IDE use will be responsive.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 69th percentile ranking ensures smooth performance for web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet work. The 15 W TDP means long battery life. The GPU’s power is unused in these tasks, but the system will handle all productivity software without issue. The low-power CPU and high-power GPU combination is well-suited for students who want gaming capability without sacrificing portability.