SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 5300U + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

81 Score

Top 19% Ranking

81 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 19% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

CPU Bottleneck

CPU

68%

GPU

93%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 3 5300U

2,135 Benchmark Score

Top 32% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

27,435 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines a low-power mobile CPU with a high-end mobile GPU, creating a unique system profile that is heavily skewed toward graphics performance. The data shows a clear imbalance: the AMD Ryzen 3 5300U is a 4-core/8-thread part built for efficiency, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is a flagship-tier graphics processor. This analysis will rely strictly on the provided benchmark scores and specifications, with the explicit caveat that no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination.

FAQ

Q: What is the most significant performance gap between the CPU and GPU in this system?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 2135 places it in the 46th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU's average score of 27435 places it in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs. This 27-point percentile gap indicates that the GPU is substantially more powerful relative to its peers than the CPU is relative to its own peers.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival?

A: The Ryzen 3 5300U's average score of 2135 is virtually identical to the Intel Core i5-9400T, which scores 2136 with a 0% delta. It is also roughly on par with the AMD Ryzen 5 7520C (2127, 0.4% delta) and the Intel Core i7-1160G7 (2124, 0.5% delta).

Q: What is the GPU's performance tier based on the benchmark data?

A: The RTX 4070 Mobile's average score of 27435 puts it in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, which scores 27425 with a 0% delta, indicating the GPU performs at a desktop-class level.

Q: Does this system use a desktop or laptop class configuration?

A: The build class is listed as "laptop." The GPU is described as "IGP" in slot width and "Portable Device Dependent" for display outputs, confirming it is a mobile component.

Q: What is the CPU's memory bandwidth and how does it affect performance?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 memory on a dual-channel bus with 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a modest figure that aligns with its low-power design and may limit performance in memory-heavy workloads.

Q: Are there any FPS measurements available for this specific pairing?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for the Ryzen 3 5300U + RTX 4070 Mobile combination. All FPS discussions must be estimated from the benchmark scores.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this system?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 60, indicating that the system as a whole sits above the median of all tracked configurations, but is held back significantly by the CPU's lower relative performance.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data paints a picture of a system with two distinct performance personalities. The CPU's Geekbench multicore score of 4035 and single-core score of 1244 are modest figures that place it in the 46th percentile of all CPUs. In Cinebench R23, the CPU achieves 5341 multicore and 1115 single-core, which are typical results for a low-power mobile processor. The average CPU benchmark score of 2135 places it nearly exactly at the level of the Intel Core i5-9400T (2136, 0% delta), showing that the Ryzen 3 5300U punches at a mid-range desktop level from a few years ago.

The GPU tells a completely different story. The RTX 4070 Mobile's Geekbench OpenCL score of 109197 and Vulkan score of 108367 are massive numbers. Its Passmark G3D score of 19587 and GPU compute score of 8399 reinforce its high-end positioning. The average GPU score of 27435 places it in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs, putting it on par with the desktop AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (27425, 0% delta) and just 0.5% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 (27565). This is exceptional performance for a mobile part.

When combined, the system's overall percentile is 60, but this number hides the reality that the GPU is doing the heavy lifting. The CPU's 46th percentile ranking is a full 27 points below the GPU's 73rd percentile, creating a significant imbalance. In practical terms, the system will excel in graphics-bound tasks like gaming and 3D rendering, but will struggle in CPU-bound scenarios like physics simulation or heavy multitasking. The data suggests that this pairing is a graphics-first configuration where the GPU dominates the performance profile.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 3 5300U is a 4-core, 8-thread processor based on the Zen 2 architecture, codenamed Lucienne. It operates with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 3.80 GHz, all within a 15 W TDP. This is a low-power design intended for thin-and-light laptops, and the benchmark scores reflect that positioning. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 5341 is a decent result for a 15 W part, but it is far below what high-performance desktop CPUs achieve. The Geekbench multicore score of 4035 and single-core score of 1244 confirm that this is an entry-level performer by modern standards.

The CPU's cache hierarchy is modest: 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of shared L3 cache. This limited cache size, combined with the relatively low boost clock, means the CPU will struggle with heavily threaded workloads that require sustained high throughput. The 7 nm TSMC process node and 9,800 million transistors on a 156 mm² die are efficient, but efficiency does not translate into raw performance. The CPU's 46th percentile ranking places it below the median of all tracked CPUs, which is expected for a low-power mobile part.

In real workloads, this CPU will handle everyday tasks like web browsing, office applications, and light coding without issue. However, for demanding tasks such as video encoding, software compilation, or running multiple virtual machines, the 4-core/8-thread configuration will become a bottleneck. The single-core score of 1244 in Geekbench is adequate for basic responsiveness, but it is not competitive with modern high-performance CPUs. The CPU's average benchmark score of 2135 places it in the same league as the Intel Core i5-9400T (2136) and AMD Ryzen 3 3300X (2148, -0.6% delta), which are older desktop parts, indicating that this mobile CPU is roughly equivalent to a mid-range desktop processor from several years ago.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP6, which is a mobile-specific socket, meaning it is not user-upgradeable in the traditional desktop sense. The platform supports DDR4 memory on a dual-channel bus with a maximum bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. This is a mature memory standard, and the bandwidth is sufficient for the CPU's needs but may not be ideal for the GPU, which relies on its own dedicated memory. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 3 with 12 lanes, which is adequate for storage and peripheral connectivity but is a generation behind the GPU's PCIe 4.0 interface.

The GPU has a TDP of 115 W, while the CPU has a TDP of 15 W, creating a combined thermal envelope of approximately 130 W for the core components. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which provides ample bandwidth for most workloads. There is no suggested PSU listed in the data, and the GPU's power connectors are listed as "None," which is typical for a mobile part that uses the motherboard's power delivery system. This suggests the system is a laptop with integrated power delivery, so the upgrade path is limited to what the laptop's chassis and motherboard allow.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data points to the GPU as the component with more headroom. The CPU's 46th percentile ranking is the limiting factor, but since it is soldered to the motherboard in most laptops, upgrading it is not practical. Instead, users should focus on maximizing the GPU's potential by ensuring adequate cooling and power delivery. The GPU's performance is comparable to the desktop RTX 3090 (27565, -0.5% delta), so the system can handle demanding graphics workloads, but the CPU will hold back the overall experience in CPU-bound scenarios. The platform's DDR4 memory and PCIe Gen 3 support are adequate for the current configuration, but they do not offer headroom for future high-bandwidth components.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD106 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It features 4608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. The GPU is equipped with 36 ray tracing cores and 144 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for RT and AI workloads. The memory configuration consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 1395 MHz with a boost clock of 1695 MHz, and the memory runs at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The GPU's TDP is 115 W, and it uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

The benchmark scores show a GPU that performs at a very high level. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 109197 and Vulkan score of 108367 are strong indicators of compute capability. The Passmark G3D score of 19587 places it in the top tier of graphics processors, while the GPU compute score of 8399 shows solid compute performance. The average benchmark score of 27435 puts the GPU in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs, which is remarkable for a mobile part. Its nearest rival is the desktop AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (27425, 0% delta), and it is only 0.5% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 (27565), which is a flagship desktop card from a previous generation.

For rendering, the GPU's FP32 performance of 15.62 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 15.62 TFLOPS (1:1) are strong figures. The pixel rate of 81.36 GPixel/s and texture rate of 244.1 GTexel/s indicate that the GPU can handle high-resolution rendering with ease. The 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and DLSS, making this GPU well-suited for modern games and GPU-accelerated applications. The 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for most current games at 1080p and 1440p, though it may be limiting for very high-resolution textures or large 3D scenes. The GPU's performance is clearly the dominant feature of this system, and it will deliver excellent results in graphics-bound workloads.

Who Should Build It

This system is designed for users who prioritize graphics performance over CPU throughput. The data indicates that the RTX 4070 Mobile's 73rd percentile ranking far exceeds the CPU's 46th percentile, making this a graphics-first configuration. Gamers playing at 1080p or 1440p will benefit most, as the GPU's performance is comparable to desktop-class parts like the RX 6700 XT and RTX 3090. Content creators who work with GPU-accelerated rendering, such as video editors using hardware encoding or 3D artists using RTX-accelerated renderers, will see strong performance from the GPU's 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores.

Software developers and students will find the CPU adequate for everyday tasks like compiling small projects, running IDEs, and multitasking, but the 4-core/8-thread configuration may struggle with large codebases or heavy virtualization. Small business workstations that rely on GPU compute for tasks like data visualization or machine learning inference will benefit from the GPU's 15.62 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and its 144 tensor cores. However, users who need heavy multi-threaded CPU performance for tasks like video encoding or large-scale simulation will be disappointed by the CPU's 5341 Cinebench R23 multicore score.

The system is best suited for users who understand that the GPU is the star of the show. It is not a balanced workstation, but it is a powerful graphics machine. For gamers and creative professionals who spend most of their time in GPU-bound applications, this pairing will deliver excellent results. For users who need a balanced system for productivity and gaming, the CPU will be a noticeable bottleneck in CPU-intensive tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 73rd percentile ranking and performance comparable to the RTX 3090 (27565, -0.5% delta) suggest this system can drive high-refresh monitors at 1080p and 1440p in most games. However, the CPU's 46th percentile ranking may limit frame rates in CPU-bound titles, so users should expect consistent high FPS in GPU-bound games but potential drops in scenarios with heavy physics or AI.

Streaming: The GPU's 144 tensor cores and 36 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for encoding and AI-enhanced features. The 15.62 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is sufficient for encoding and streaming simultaneously, but the CPU's 4-core/8-thread configuration may struggle with the overhead of streaming software, so users should rely on the GPU's encoding capabilities to avoid CPU bottlenecks.

Video editing: The GPU's strong compute performance (Passmark GPU compute score of 8399) and 8 GB of VRAM make it capable of handling 4K video editing with hardware acceleration. The CPU's 4035 Geekbench multicore score is adequate for timeline editing but may slow down heavy effects processing or exports that rely on CPU rendering.

3D rendering: The GPU's 15.62 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 36 RT cores make it a strong choice for GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender or Octane. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM are sufficient for most scenes, but the CPU's 5341 Cinebench R23 multicore score will limit CPU-based rendering tasks.

Software development: The CPU's 8 threads and 3.80 GHz boost clock are sufficient for compiling small to medium-sized projects and running development tools. The 4 MB of L3 cache and 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth are adequate for most coding workloads, but large builds or heavy parallel testing will be slow.

Student and office work: The CPU's 46th percentile ranking and 15 W TDP make it efficient for everyday tasks like web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheets. The GPU's power is largely unused in these scenarios, but the system's overall 60th percentile ranking ensures smooth performance for standard office applications.

Build Overview

This configuration pairs the AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, a 4-core/8-thread mobile processor from the 5000 series, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile, a high-end mobile GPU from the 40-series. The build class is "laptop," confirming that this is a mobile system. The CPU is based on the Zen 2 architecture (Lucienne) on a 7 nm process, while the GPU is based on the Ada Lovelace architecture (AD106) on a 5 nm process.

The combined percentile of 60 indicates that the system as a whole is above average, but the imbalance is stark. The CPU's 46th percentile is well below the GPU's 73rd percentile, and the GPU's average score of 27435 is more than 12 times higher than the CPU's average score of 2135. This is a graphics-first system where the GPU dominates the performance profile. The GPU's performance is comparable to the desktop RX 6700 XT (27425, 0% delta) and RTX 3090 (27565, -0.5% delta), making this a high-tier graphics machine. However, the CPU's performance is comparable to older desktop parts like the Intel Core i5-9400T (2136, 0% delta) and AMD Ryzen 3 3300X (2148, -0.6% delta), which limits the overall system tier.

In terms of class, this is a laptop with a powerful GPU and a modest CPU. The GPU's 115 W TDP is high for a mobile part, suggesting the laptop is designed for gaming or creative work. The CPU's 15 W TDP is typical for an ultrabook, indicating a focus on efficiency. The result is a system that is powerful for graphics but limited in CPU-intensive tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data clearly shows that the CPU is the bottleneck in this system. The CPU's 46th percentile ranking is 27 points below the GPU's 73rd percentile, and the CPU's average score of 2135 is a fraction of the GPU's 27435. In GPU-bound workloads like gaming and rendering, the GPU will perform at a high level, but the CPU may limit frame rates in scenarios that require significant CPU processing.

The GPU's performance is comparable to the desktop RTX 3090 (27565, -0.5% delta), suggesting it can handle the most demanding graphics tasks. However, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 5341 is a limiting factor in CPU-bound workloads. For example, in games with heavy physics simulation or AI, the CPU's 4 cores and 8 threads may struggle to keep up with the GPU's output, leading to lower frame rates than the GPU alone could achieve.

In contrast, the GPU is not a bottleneck in any scenario. Its 73rd percentile ranking and high compute scores mean it will be the limiting factor only in the most extreme graphics workloads, such as 4K gaming with ray tracing enabled. The 8 GB of VRAM may also be a limitation in certain high-resolution scenarios, but it is generally sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming.

The FPS scaling from the benchmark scores suggests that the GPU will deliver high frame rates in most games, but the CPU will cause frame rate dips in CPU-heavy scenes. For a balanced experience, users should prioritize GPU-intensive settings like resolution and texture quality, while keeping CPU-intensive settings like physics and draw distance at moderate levels. The system is best used for graphics-first tasks, and users should avoid pairing this CPU with workloads that require high multi-threaded CPU performance.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 5300U + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 3 5300U

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds