SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 5300G + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

CPU Bottleneck

CPU

72%

GPU

99%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 3 5300G

3,303 Benchmark Score

Top 28% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 3 5300G is a 4-core, 8-thread desktop processor built on the Zen 3 architecture with the Cezanne codename. It uses a 7 nm TSMC process node, containing 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. The base clock sits at 4.00 GHz, with a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking. This is part of the 5000 series, and its 65 W TDP makes it a modest power consumer for a desktop part.

The cache hierarchy is straightforward: 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. This is not a massive cache pool, but for a quad-core part it is adequate for most workloads. The memory controller supports DDR4 in dual-channel mode, with a theoretical bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. There is no ECC memory support, which limits its appeal in certain workstation scenarios. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU itself.

Benchmark results place this CPU at the 54th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 3303. In Cinebench R23, it scores 11060 in multi-core and 1561 in single-core. The single-core result of 1561 is respectable, indicating solid per-thread performance for a Zen 3 part. The multi-core score of 11060 is reasonable for 4 cores and 8 threads, but it does not challenge higher-core-count parts. In Geekbench, the multi-core score is 5467 and single-core is 1768. These numbers paint a picture of a CPU that handles everyday tasks and lightly threaded applications with ease, but will be the limiting factor in heavily threaded workloads.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 3 5300G is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600, which has the exact same average score of 3303. The Intel Core i5-11400T is 0.2% ahead, while the Intel Core i5-11500T is 0.5% behind, and the Intel Xeon E-2374G is 0.8% ahead. These deltas are negligible, meaning the 5300G sits in a performance class where small differences in synthetic benchmarks do not translate into noticeable real-world differences. The data suggests that this CPU is competitive with those parts, but none of them are particularly fast by modern standards, given the 54th percentile ranking.

For real workloads, the 4-core/8-thread configuration means that productivity tasks like compiling code or rendering video will show the CPU's limits. However, the strong single-core score (1561 in Cinebench R23) indicates that responsiveness in daily tasks, web browsing, and office applications will be snappy. The unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking headroom, but the modest 4.2 GHz boost already near the top of what this silicon can likely achieve without significant cooling investments. The integrated Radeon Vega 6 graphics are present, but the benchmark data does not include iGPU-specific scores, so their performance must be inferred from the CPU's overall capability.

Benchmark Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame-rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU's average benchmark score is 3303, placing it at the 54th percentile. The GPU's average benchmark score is 135218, placing it at the 95th percentile. The combined percentile for this pairing is 75th. This is a significant disparity: the GPU is near the top of the stack, while the CPU is barely above the median.

In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 4000 Ada Generation scores 146593, and in Vulkan it scores 123842. These are strong numbers, reflecting the GPU's high-end positioning. The CPU's Geekbench scores are 5467 multi-core and 1768 single-core. The ratio between the GPU's OpenCL score and the CPU's multi-core score is roughly 27:1, indicating that the GPU can process data far faster than the CPU can feed it in compute-heavy tasks.

The nearest rivals for the CPU show a tight cluster. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 matches at 0% delta, the Intel Core i5-11400T is 0.2% faster, the Intel Core i5-11500T is 0.5% slower, and the Intel Xeon E-2374G is 0.8% faster. These differences are within noise for most applications. For the GPU, the nearest rivals are similarly close: the NVIDIA A10M matches at 0% delta, the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 is 0.1% faster, the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo is 0.4% faster, and the AMD Radeon PRO V620 is 0.9% faster. All these GPUs are within 1% of each other, meaning the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is at parity with its immediate competitors.

The combined picture is a system where the GPU will dominate most performance metrics. In gaming, the CPU will likely cap frame rates at lower resolutions, while at higher resolutions the GPU's workload increases and the CPU bottleneck becomes less pronounced. In productivity applications that use GPU acceleration, such as video encoding or 3D rendering with CUDA, the GPU will do the heavy lifting, and the CPU will handle scene management and physics. The 75th combined percentile suggests this is a capable system overall, but the CPU holds it back from being a top-tier build.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation GPU based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD104 chip manufactured on a 5 nm TSMC process. It packs 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 121.8 million per mm². The GPU has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Memory clock is 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective. This is a large memory pool for a single-slot card, making it suitable for large datasets in rendering or AI workloads.

The compute resources are substantial: 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operations units. Ray tracing is handled by 48 RT cores, and AI acceleration by 192 tensor cores. The base clock is 1500 MHz with a boost clock of 2175 MHz. Pixel rate is 139.2 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 417.6 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 26.73 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, with the latter at a 1:1 ratio. This means the GPU does not have specialized FP16 acceleration, but the raw throughput is high.

The TDP is 130 W, with a suggested PSU of 300 W. This is remarkably efficient for the performance level, making it a viable option for smaller form factor builds. The card occupies a single slot, measures 245 mm in length and 112 mm in height, and uses a single 16-pin power connector. Display outputs are 4x DisplayPort 1.4a, which is standard for workstation cards. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

In terms of benchmark scores, the RTX 4000 Ada Generation achieves 146593 in Geekbench OpenCL and 123842 in Geekbench Vulkan. The Vulkan score being lower than OpenCL is notable, but both are strong results. The 95th percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates this is a top-tier card, outperforming the vast majority of consumer and workstation parts. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA A10M, has a negligible 0% delta, meaning they are effectively equal in synthetic tests. The AMD Radeon PRO W6800 is 0.1% faster, and the Radeon Pro W6800X Duo is 0.4% faster, but these differences are imperceptible in real workloads.

For rendering, the 20 GB VRAM is a key advantage, allowing large scenes or high-resolution textures to fit entirely in memory. The FP32 throughput of 26.73 TFLOPS is sufficient for complex shading and simulation. The RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which is increasingly important in professional rendering pipelines. The tensor cores provide acceleration for AI denoising and other neural network-based tasks. The single-slot design and 130 W TDP mean it can fit into dense workstation configurations without requiring exotic cooling.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 54th percentile ranking means it will struggle to push very high frame rates in CPU-bound titles. The GPU is capable of high frame rates, but the CPU's modest single-core score of 1561 in Cinebench R23 and 1768 in Geekbench single-core will likely cap performance at around 100-120 FPS in many esports titles at 1080p. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU becomes the bottleneck, and the system can deliver smooth gameplay, though the CPU may still cause frametime hitches in heavily threaded games.

Streaming: The GPU's NVENC encoder is not explicitly benchmarked, but the Ada Lovelace architecture includes dedicated encoders that offload streaming from the CPU. The CPU's 4 cores can handle game logic and streaming overhead simultaneously, but the 54th percentile performance suggests that running a game, encoding video, and maintaining Discord or OBS may cause occasional stutters. The GPU's 95th percentile ranking means encoding quality will be high, but the CPU may limit overall stream smoothness.

Video editing: The GPU's 20 GB VRAM and 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerate effects, color grading, and rendering in applications that leverage CUDA or OpenCL. The CPU's multi-core score of 11060 in Cinebench R23 is adequate for timeline scrubbing and basic encoding, but export times will be slower than with a higher-core-count CPU. The GPU's strong OpenCL score of 146593 suggests it can handle 4K timelines with multiple layers, though the CPU may become a bottleneck during final render if the software is not GPU-accelerated.

3D rendering: This is where the GPU shines. The 95th percentile ranking and 20 GB VRAM allow for large scenes, complex materials, and high-resolution output. The 48 RT cores accelerate ray-traced renders, and the 192 tensor cores enable AI denoising. The CPU's 8 threads will handle scene parsing and physics, but the GPU will do the bulk of the work. Expect near-GPU-bound performance in most render engines, with the CPU only limiting complex simulations.

Software development: The CPU's 54th percentile performance is adequate for compilation of small to medium projects. The 4 cores and 8 threads handle parallel builds, but large codebases will compile slower than on a 6- or 8-core part. The single-core score of 1561 in Cinebench R23 ensures fast IDE responsiveness and quick syntax highlighting. The GPU is largely irrelevant for coding, but it enables local testing of GPU-accelerated applications or machine learning models, given its 20 GB VRAM and tensor cores.

Student and office work: This is a low-demand scenario where the CPU's single-core performance provides a snappy experience for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The integrated Radeon Vega 6 graphics are present, but the dedicated GPU is overkill for this use case. The 65 W CPU TDP and 130 W GPU TDP mean the system runs cool and quiet, making it suitable for a dorm room or small office. The 54th percentile CPU ranking is more than enough for typical office workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM4 platform, which is a mature socket with a wide range of compatible CPUs. The memory support is DDR4 in dual-channel mode, with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The PCIe Gen 3 interface for the CPU is a limitation, as newer platforms offer Gen 4 or Gen 5, but it is adequate for the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which will run at Gen 3 speeds. The GPU's 130 W TDP and the CPU's 65 W TDP combine for a total system draw that is well within the suggested 300 W PSU.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the CPU with a higher-core-count AM4 part, such as a Ryzen 7 or Ryzen 9 from the 5000 series, which would slot into the same socket. This would raise the CPU's percentile ranking and reduce the bottleneck in CPU-bound workloads. The motherboard would need a BIOS update, but the platform itself is capable of supporting these parts. The GPU is already at the 95th percentile, so upgrading it further would provide diminishing returns.

The 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is a potential bottleneck for CPU-heavy tasks, especially if the system is used for data processing. Upgrading to faster DDR4 modules would help, but the platform is limited to DDR4, so there is no path to DDR5 without changing the motherboard and CPU. The PCIe Gen 3 interface from the CPU may slightly limit the GPU's performance compared to a Gen 4 platform, but the impact is typically small in real-world workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's socket and can it be upgraded?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket AM4. It can be upgraded to higher-core-count AM4 parts within the same platform, subject to motherboard BIOS compatibility.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what type?

A: The GPU has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 360.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and what PSU is suggested?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP. The GPU has a 130 W TDP, and the suggested PSU for the GPU is 300 W.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the CPU does not support ECC memory.

Q: What are the GPU's API supports?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the CPU's process node and transistor count?

A: The CPU is on a 7 nm TSMC process, with 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 135218, which is equal to the NVIDIA A10M (0% delta) and within 0.9% of the AMD Radeon PRO V620.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows a GPU-heavy system. The GPU's 95th percentile ranking versus the CPU's 54th percentile means the CPU is the primary bottleneck in most workloads. In gaming at lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU's single-core performance will cap frame rates, as the GPU has headroom to render more frames than the CPU can process. At higher resolutions like 1440p or 4K, the GPU's workload increases, and the bottleneck shifts toward the GPU, but the CPU may still cause frametime inconsistencies in complex scenes.

In compute workloads, the GPU's 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 and 20 GB VRAM dominate, and the CPU's 8 threads are insufficient to feed the GPU in tasks like real-time ray tracing or large matrix operations. The GPU's OpenCL score of 146593 is more than 27 times the CPU's Geekbench multi-core score of 5467, indicating a massive throughput disparity. The CPU's 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is also a limiting factor, as the GPU's 360.0 GB/s bandwidth is nearly 7 times higher, meaning data transfers from system memory to VRAM will be constrained.

For productivity tasks like video editing, the bottleneck depends on the software. If the application is GPU-accelerated, the GPU will be the star, and the CPU will handle basic tasks. If the application is CPU-bound, such as certain encoding filters, the CPU's 11060 Cinebench R23 multi-core score will slow down the process. The 75th combined percentile suggests that this system is well-balanced for general use but leans heavily on the GPU for demanding workloads. The CPU's 4 cores are a hard limit for heavily threaded workloads, and no amount of GPU performance can compensate for that.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the AMD Ryzen 3 5300G with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation. The CPU is a 4-core, 8-thread Zen 3 part at the 54th percentile, while the GPU is a workstation-class Ada Lovelace card at the 95th percentile. The combined percentile is 75th, indicating a system that is above average overall but with a significant performance disparity between components. The CPU brings 4.00 GHz base and 4.20 GHz boost clocks, with a 65 W TDP. The GPU brings 20 GB GDDR6, 6144 shading units, 48 RT cores, and 192 tensor cores, with a 130 W TDP.

The overall tier is mid-to-high, driven almost entirely by the GPU. The CPU is competent but not remarkable, matching the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 exactly in average score. The GPU is at parity with the NVIDIA A10M and within 1% of several AMD Radeon PRO cards. This pairing is best described as a GPU-centric workstation with a modest CPU, suitable for tasks that leverage the GPU's massive compute and memory resources. The data shows no measured FPS for this combination, so all performance estimates are derived from the benchmark scores.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need GPU compute power but do not require high CPU thread counts. Content creators working with large video files or 3D scenes will benefit from the 20 GB VRAM and 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance. Developers using CUDA or TensorFlow will appreciate the 192 tensor cores for AI inference and training. Students in engineering or data science programs can use this for GPU-accelerated projects, though the CPU may limit multi-threaded workloads like large-scale simulations.

Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolution will find the GPU capable of high frame rates, but the CPU may cause bottlenecks in CPU-intensive titles. Small business workstations handling CAD, photo editing, or financial modeling will see strong GPU acceleration, but the CPU's 54th percentile ranking means it is not ideal for server-style multi-tasking. The 130 W GPU TDP and 65 W CPU TDP make this an efficient build for a compact workstation, but the CPU should be upgraded if the workload involves significant multi-threaded tasks. Overall, this is a system for users who understand that the GPU is the star and the CPU is a supporting actor.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 5300G + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 3 5300G

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds