NVIDIA Xbox GPU
NVIDIA graphics card specifications and benchmark scores
NVIDIA Xbox GPU Specifications
Xbox GPU GPU Core
Shader units and compute resources
The NVIDIA Xbox GPU GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.
Xbox GPU Clock Speeds
GPU and memory frequencies
Clock speeds directly impact the Xbox GPU's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The Xbox GPU by NVIDIA dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.
NVIDIA's Xbox GPU Memory
VRAM capacity and bandwidth
VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The Xbox GPU's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.
Xbox GPU Theoretical Performance
Compute and fill rates
Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the NVIDIA Xbox GPU against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.
Kelvin Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The NVIDIA Xbox GPU is built on NVIDIA's Kelvin architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the Xbox GPU will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.
NVIDIA's Xbox GPU Power & Thermal
TDP and power requirements
Power specifications for the NVIDIA Xbox GPU determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the Xbox GPU to maintain boost clocks without throttling.
Xbox GPU by NVIDIA Physical & Connectivity
Dimensions and outputs
Physical dimensions of the NVIDIA Xbox GPU are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.
NVIDIA API Support
Graphics and compute APIs
API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the NVIDIA Xbox GPU. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.
Xbox GPU Product Information
Release and pricing details
The NVIDIA Xbox GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the Xbox GPU by NVIDIA represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.
Xbox GPU Benchmark Scores
No benchmark data available for this GPU.
About NVIDIA Xbox GPU
The GeForce NVIDIA Xbox GPU was introduced at the turn of the millennium, targeting a niche of console‑level graphics within a PC‑compatible form factor. Its 64 MB of DDR memory, while modest by today’s standards, offered enough bandwidth for early professional applications such as CAD preview and basic video encoding. Because the card relies on the Kelvin architecture built on a 150 nm process, its compute units are not optimized for modern tensor workloads, limiting its appeal in heavy AI or deep‑learning pipelines. Nevertheless, the fixed‑function pipeline provides reliable rasterization performance for 2D‑heavy design tools, making it a viable entry point for budget‑constrained studios in 2001‑2002. The launch price of $299 positioned it competitively against contemporary workstation cards, though its lack of ECC memory and limited driver profiling kept it out of high‑end certification programs. When evaluating productivity, reviewers noted that the GPU’s deterministic frame times benefited time‑critical rendering tasks, despite the absence of advanced shading features. Overall, the card delivers a predictable baseline for office‑grade graphics workloads while leaving room for more specialized accelerators.
In the realm of 3D rendering, the NVIDIA Xbox GPU inherits the same Kelvin core that powered early GeForce 3 cards, delivering basic vertex processing and pixel shading at acceptable speeds for its era. Artists working with low‑poly models and simple lighting setups found the card capable of maintaining interactive rates in software such as LightWave 5 and early versions of 3ds Max. The 64 MB DDR buffer, however, quickly became a bottleneck when handling texture‑intensive scenes, leading to frequent texture swaps and noticeable pop‑in. Because the architecture predates programmable shaders, the GPU relies on fixed‑function texture combiners, which restricts the realism achievable in modern physically‑based rendering pipelines. Benchmark tests from that period showed consistent fill‑rate numbers around 1.2 GP/s, sufficient for preview renders but not for final production passes. Users who prioritized speed over visual fidelity could leverage the card’s stable rasterizer to accelerate viewport navigation, especially when paired with CPU‑based ray‑tracing extensions. Consequently, the NVIDIA Xbox GPU remains a reference point for evaluating how early‑generation hardware handled 3D workloads before the shader revolution.
Driver support for the GeForce Xbox GPU was delivered through NVIDIA’s early ForceWare suite, which emphasized compatibility with Windows XP and DirectX 8.1 rather than aggressive performance tuning. Stability reports from the community indicated that the Xbox GPU’s drivers rarely crashed under prolonged load, a crucial factor for long‑running render farms that relied on continuous operation. However, the lack of regular driver updates after 2003 meant that newer API features and bug fixes were never back‑ported, leaving the card vulnerable to compatibility issues with modern software. When considering multi‑GPU configurations, the Xbox GPU’s SLI implementation was rudimentary, offering only basic frame‑alternating modes without sophisticated load balancing. This limited scaling meant that adding a second card rarely doubled throughput, and in some cases introduced micro‑stutter due to driver synchronization overhead. For studios contemplating a dual‑card setup, the recommendation was to weigh the modest performance gains against the increased power draw and heat output of two 150 nm devices. In summary, while the Xbox GPU provides a historically stable platform, its driver ecosystem and multi‑GPU capabilities reflect the constraints of its generation.
- Professional workload baseline
- Basic 3D rendering performance
- Driver stability and legacy support
- Limited multi‑GPU scaling
The AMD Equivalent of Xbox GPU
Looking for a similar graphics card from AMD? The AMD Radeon RX 480 offers comparable performance and features in the AMD lineup.
Popular NVIDIA Xbox GPU Comparisons
See how the Xbox GPU stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare Xbox GPU with Other GPUs
Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse GPUs