NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile

How It Compares

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile occupies a solitary position in the benchmark database, with no nearest rivals listed and no benchmark scores recorded. Its percentile rank of 50 places it exactly at the midpoint of all GPUs tracked, indicating it sits in the median performance tier rather than at either extreme. This positioning suggests a device that is neither a flagship nor an entry-level part, but rather a capable middle-ground solution for professional mobile workloads.

Without rival data, the comparison must rely on architectural context. The TU106 chip is a Turing-generation part fabricated on TSMC's 12 nm process, a node that is now two generations removed from current offerings. The 10,800 million transistors packed into a 445 mm² die yield a transistor density of 24.3M per square millimeter, which is modest by modern standards but was competitive at the time of its 2019 release. The production status is end-of-life, and its successor is listed as Ampere-MW, confirming that this part has been superseded.

The absence of benchmark scores and rival comparisons means the data cannot show percentage deltas or relative performance leaps. Instead, the analysis must focus on the raw specifications and what they indicate about the device's capabilities within its own generation. The FP32 throughput of 5.299 TFLOPS and texture rate of 165.6 GTexel/s are concrete figures that define its compute ceiling, while the 160 W TDP suggests a power envelope typical of high-performance mobile workstation parts.

Ray Tracing and Feature Set

The Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile includes dedicated ray tracing hardware in the form of 30 RT cores, a defining feature of the Turing architecture. These cores are complemented by 240 tensor cores, which provide accelerated AI and deep learning inference capabilities. The presence of both core types indicates that this is not merely a rasterization-focused GPU, but one designed to handle real-time ray-traced workloads and neural network-based rendering techniques.

API support is comprehensive for its era. DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) is supported, which includes hardware-accelerated ray tracing, variable rate shading, and mesh shaders. OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4 round out the API suite, ensuring compatibility with professional CAD, DCC, and scientific visualization applications that rely on these interfaces. The Vulkan 1.4 support is particularly notable as it enables cross-platform ray tracing and compute workloads.

The memory subsystem consists of 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth. While 6 GB may seem limited for modern high-resolution textures, it was adequate for the professional workloads of its time, particularly in mobile workstation contexts where power and thermal constraints are paramount. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, with an effective data rate of 14 Gbps. The pixel rate of 88.32 GPixel/s and texture rate of 165.6 GTexel/s further delineate its fill-rate capabilities, which are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p rendering with ray tracing enabled, though 4K ray-traced scenes would likely strain the 6 GB frame buffer.

Who Should Consider It

Based on the specification data, this GPU is suited for professionals who require Turing-generation ray tracing and tensor core acceleration in a mobile form factor, but who do not need the absolute highest performance tier. The 50th percentile ranking indicates it will handle mainstream workloads competently, but users pushing extreme resolutions or complex ray-traced scenes may find it wanting.

For 1080p professional visualization tasks, the Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile provides a reasonable balance of compute and memory bandwidth. The 5.299 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput can handle moderate CAD model rotation and real-time design review, while the RT cores enable ray-traced previews without requiring a separate rendering farm. The 6 GB frame buffer is sufficient for 1080p textures and typical engineering assemblies, though large point clouds or high-detail 3D scans may exceed capacity.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes more constrained. The pixel rate of 88.32 GPixel/s allows for smooth interaction at this resolution in many applications, but ray-traced scenes with multiple light sources and reflective surfaces will likely cause frame rates to drop. The 336.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for the 192-bit bus, but texture-heavy workloads at this resolution will approach the limits of the 6 GB VRAM, potentially causing texture swapping or reduced quality settings.

Users working with machine learning or AI-assisted design tools will benefit from the 240 tensor cores, which accelerate inference tasks such as denoising and upscaling. However, for training models, the 12 nm process and 160 W TDP limit sustained compute performance compared to newer architectures. The 10.60 TFLOPS FP16 throughput (2:1 ratio) provides some headroom for mixed-precision workloads, but again, the age of the architecture shows.

This GPU is not recommended for 4K professional rendering or heavy simulation workloads. The combination of 6 GB memory and 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 places it firmly in the mid-range category, where it can serve as a competent companion for mobile workstations but cannot replace a desktop-class rendering solution.

FAQ

Q: Does the Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, it includes 30 dedicated RT cores, which provide hardware acceleration for real-time ray-traced rendering in supported applications.

Q: What is the memory capacity and type?

A: The GPU is equipped with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Which APIs are supported?

A: It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering all major modern graphics APIs.

Q: What is the power consumption?

A: The thermal design power is rated at 160 W, which is typical for a high-performance mobile workstation GPU of its generation.

Q: Is this GPU still in production?

A: No, the production status is listed as end-of-life, with the successor being the Ampere-MW generation.

Q: What is the manufacturing process?

A: The chip is fabricated on TSMC's 12 nm process, with 10,800 million transistors on a 445 mm² die.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark section for the Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile is notably sparse, with no recorded scores and no nearest rivals to compare against. The average benchmark score is listed as zero, and the nearestRivals array is empty, leaving the performance analysis to be inferred from architectural specifications alone. This is an unusual situation for a database entry, as most GPUs have at least one recorded data point.

The percentile rank of 50 provides the only quantitative performance anchor. This indicates that the GPU performs better than half of all GPUs in the database and worse than the other half. Given the age of the architecture (2019 release) and its mobile form factor, this median position is plausible. It suggests that while the GPU is not a high-end part by current standards, it remains competitive with a wide range of other GPUs, many of which are desktop parts or older generations.

The FP32 compute of 5.299 TFLOPS places it in a specific performance bracket. For context, this is roughly half the throughput of a desktop Turing-class GPU with the same architecture but higher core counts. The 1920 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 64 ROPs define the traditional rasterization pipeline, which delivers a pixel rate of 88.32 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 165.6 GTexel/s. These figures are consistent with a mid-range mobile part that can handle 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming or professional workloads at reasonable settings.

Without benchmark data, the user must rely on these specifications to estimate real-world performance. The 160 W TDP is notable, as it suggests the GPU is not power-constrained to the same degree as lower-wattage mobile parts, allowing it to sustain boost clocks closer to the 1380 MHz maximum. The base clock of 945 MHz provides a floor for sustained workloads, and the memory bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s is sufficient to feed the shading units without obvious bottlenecks in most scenarios.

The lack of rival data means no percentage deltas can be calculated, and no direct performance comparisons can be made. This is a limitation of the database entry rather than a reflection of the GPU's capabilities. In the absence of empirical scores, the specifications indicate a balanced mid-range professional mobile GPU that delivers Turing-generation features in a power envelope suited for workstation laptops. The 50th percentile ranking reinforces this assessment, placing it in the middle of the performance distribution where it can serve as a reliable baseline for professional visualization and compute tasks.