NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

The NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile is a Pascal-generation professional mobile GPU, built on the GP104 chip using a 16 nm process at TSMC. It was released in early 2018 and is now designated as end-of-life. The benchmark percentile data places this part at the 50th percentile against all GPUs, indicating it sits squarely in the mid-range of the performance spectrum, neither a top-tier contender nor a low-end part. The data sheet does not include any specific benchmark scores or rival comparisons, so the analysis must rely on the architectural specifications provided to infer its capabilities and positioning.

Benchmark Performance

The FACT PACK provides no direct benchmark scores, average scores, or nearest rival data for the Quadro P3200 Mobile. Its `avgBenchmarkScore` is listed as 0, and the `nearestRivals` array is empty. Consequently, any quantitative comparison in this section must be derived from the raw compute specifications listed in the FACT PACK, rather than from measured test results. The available metrics are the FP32 performance of 5.530 TFLOPS, the texture rate of 172.8 GTexel/s, and the pixel rate of 98.75 GPixel/s.

These numbers represent the theoretical peak throughput of the card. The FP32 figure of 5.530 TFLOPS is a meaningful indicator of general-purpose shader performance for the Pascal architecture, as it directly scales with the 1792 shading units and the boost clock of 1543 MHz. The texture rate of 172.8 GTexel/s, derived from 112 TMUs, suggests robust performance in texture-heavy workloads, which is common in professional 3D modeling and rendering tasks. The pixel rate of 98.75 GPixel/s, from 64 ROPs, indicates a solid fill-rate capability, which matters for high-resolution viewport rendering and anti-aliasing.

The data shows a balanced compute configuration. The FP32 throughput is roughly 3.2% of the texture rate, which is typical for a Pascal chip. However, without rival scores, it is impossible to state whether the P3200 is ahead or behind its peers by any percentage. The percentile rank of 50 is the only comparative data point available, and it suggests that in a database of all GPUs, this mobile Quadro sits exactly at the median. This implies that while it is not a flagship, it is also far from the bottom, likely offering competent performance for professional applications that are not extreme compute-bound. The lack of measured benchmarks means the theoretical numbers here are the only factual basis for performance assessment.

How It Compares

The FACT PACK explicitly lists no `nearestRivals` for this GPU. Therefore, a direct comparison to competing mobile workstation GPUs, such as those from the same generation or the preceding Maxwell architecture, is not possible using the provided data. The predecessor is noted as "Quadro Maxwell-M", which indicates the architectural leap from Maxwell to Pascal brought improvements in process node (16 nm) and features, but no performance deltas are given.

The successor is listed as "Quadro Turing-M", which implies that the next generation would introduce dedicated RT and tensor cores, a feature set this Pascal card lacks. Since the `nearestRivals` field is empty, any paragraph that attempts to position the P3200 against a specific competitor would be speculating. The data only allows for a statement that this GPU falls between the Maxwell-M and Turing-M generations in the Quadro mobile lineup, based on the production status and release timeline. The percentile rank of 50th suggests a mid-pack position, but the actual rival names and their exact score differences are absent from the FACT PACK. Without those deltas, the comparative analysis must remain qualitative, noting its generational placement rather than its competitive standing against specific models.

Memory Subsystem

The Quadro P3200 Mobile is equipped with 6 GB of GDDR5 memory, operating on a 192-bit bus interface. The memory clock is listed as 1752 MHz, which translates to 7 Gbps effective data rate. The resulting memory bandwidth is 168.2 GB/s. This configuration is critical for professional workloads, as memory bandwidth often bottlenecks high-resolution rendering and large dataset manipulation.

A 192-bit bus width is narrower than what is found on higher-end desktop parts, but it is a common choice for mobile mid-range GPUs to balance power consumption and performance. The 168.2 GB/s bandwidth is a moderate figure; it is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p viewport work in professional applications, but it may become a limiting factor at 4K resolutions with complex scenes or when using high-resolution textures. The 6 GB capacity is adequate for most professional design and engineering tasks, but it could be restrictive for very large simulation datasets or multi-application workflows that exceed this VRAM allocation. The GDDR5 type, as opposed to GDDR5X or HBM, indicates a cost-effective and power-efficient solution, but it does not offer the same peak bandwidth as those more exotic memory types. For high-resolution rendering, the data suggests the card can handle the load, but the bandwidth headroom is not expansive, potentially capping performance in memory-intensive shading scenarios.

FAQ

Q: What is the manufacturing process and die size of the Quadro P3200 Mobile?

A: The GPU is fabricated on a 16 nm process at TSMC. The die size is 314 mm², which houses 7,200 million transistors, resulting in a transistor density of 22.9 million per square millimeter.

Q: What is the peak FP32 compute performance of this card?

A: The theoretical single-precision floating-point performance is 5.530 TFLOPS, based on the 1792 shading units operating at the boost clock of 1543 MHz.

Q: Does the Quadro P3200 Mobile support hardware ray tracing?

A: No. The FACT PACK lists `rtCores` and `tensorCores` as null, indicating that this Pascal-architecture GPU does not have dedicated ray tracing or tensor cores. Those features were introduced in the subsequent Turing generation.

Q: What is the memory configuration, and what is the resulting bandwidth?

A: The card features 6 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 192-bit bus. The effective memory clock is 7 Gbps, yielding a total memory bandwidth of 168.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the thermal design power (TDP) of this mobile GPU?

A: The TDP is specified as 75 W. The card is an MXM Module with no power connectors listed, suggesting it draws power directly from the MXM slot.

Q: Which API versions are supported by this GPU?

A: The FACT PACK lists support for DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Ray Tracing and Feature Set

The Quadro P3200 Mobile does not include dedicated ray tracing cores or tensor cores, as the `rtCores` and `tensorCores` fields are null. This confirms that hardware-accelerated ray tracing is not a feature of this Pascal-based part. The architecture relies on traditional rasterization and compute shaders for rendering tasks. The feature set is defined by its API support, which includes DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The DirectX 12_1 feature level indicates support for conservative rasterization and other advanced rasterization features, but not for the DXR (DirectX Raytracing) API, which requires dedicated RT hardware or compute-based fallbacks that are not specified here.

The FP16 performance is listed as 86.41 GFLOPS (1:64), which is severely reduced compared to FP32. This ratio indicates that the card is not optimized for half-precision compute, making it unsuitable for AI inferencing or workloads that benefit from FP16 throughput. The inclusion of 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units forms the core of the rasterization pipeline. The pixel rate of 98.75 GPixel/s and texture rate of 172.8 GTexel/s are the practical limits for fill-rate and texture filtering. The lack of tensor cores also means that any Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS) or AI-based features are absent. The display outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent", which means the number and type of video outputs vary by the laptop manufacturer, not the GPU itself. The bus interface is MXM-B (3.0), a standard for mobile graphics modules, but it does not dictate the external display connectivity.

Power and Cooling

The Quadro P3200 Mobile has a TDP of 75 W, a modest power envelope for a mobile GPU. This power level is suitable for thin-and-light mobile workstations, as it does not require an excessive cooling solution. The FACT PACK lists the card as a "MXM Module" with a slot width of "MXM Module", indicating it is a replaceable module rather than a soldered-down chip. There are no power connectors listed, meaning the card draws its power solely through the MXM interface. The `suggestedPsu` field is null, so no specific power supply recommendation is provided by the data.

The 75 W TDP suggests that a capable air cooler, such as a dual-fan solution or a robust heat pipe assembly, would be sufficient to manage thermals. The lack of external power connectors simplifies installation, but it also limits the card's ability to draw additional power for overclocking. The thermal solution is dependent on the laptop chassis, as the card itself has no cooling attached. The 16 nm process node helps keep power consumption and heat generation relatively low for the performance offered. Since there are no power connector requirements, the only power consideration is whether the laptop's MXM slot can supply the full 75 W TDP consistently under load. The data does not provide any information on idle power draw or transient spikes.

Who Should Consider It

The Quadro P3200 Mobile occupies the 50th percentile in the database of all GPUs, which positions it as a mid-range option. For professional users, the 6 GB VRAM and 168.2 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p and 1440p resolutions in CAD, 3D modeling, and content creation applications. The 5.530 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power is sufficient for moderate simulation and rendering tasks, but it is not geared toward extreme compute workloads or 4K texture-heavy scenes. The lack of RT and tensor cores means it is not appropriate for users who require hardware-accelerated ray tracing or AI-based features in their workflow.

This card would be a reasonable choice for mobile workstation users who work primarily in traditional rasterization-based applications, such as SolidWorks, AutoCAD, or Adobe Premiere Pro, at resolutions up to 1440p. It would also suit users who need a certified professional GPU for reliability in software certification, rather than raw gaming performance. However, users who frequently render at 4K, work with massive datasets exceeding 6 GB, or rely on the latest ray-traced visualization tools should look toward the successor Turing-M generation or higher. The 50th percentile rank suggests it is a balanced performer, but it does not excel in any particular area. The data indicates that it is a competent workhorse for standard professional tasks, but not a high-end solution for specialized or demanding workloads. The end-of-life status also suggests that newer alternatives are available with better features.