NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
NVIDIA graphics card specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
NVIDIANVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M Specifications
Quadro FX 1500M GPU Core
Shader units and compute resources
The NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.
Quadro FX 1500M Clock Speeds
GPU and memory frequencies
Clock speeds directly impact the Quadro FX 1500M's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The Quadro FX 1500M by NVIDIA dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.
NVIDIA's Quadro FX 1500M Memory
VRAM capacity and bandwidth
VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The Quadro FX 1500M's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.
Quadro FX 1500M Theoretical Performance
Compute and fill rates
Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.
Curie Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M is built on NVIDIA's Curie architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the Quadro FX 1500M will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.
NVIDIA's Quadro FX 1500M Power & Thermal
TDP and power requirements
Power specifications for the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the Quadro FX 1500M to maintain boost clocks without throttling.
Quadro FX 1500M by NVIDIA Physical & Connectivity
Dimensions and outputs
Physical dimensions of the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.
NVIDIA API Support
Graphics and compute APIs
API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.
Quadro FX 1500M Product Information
Release and pricing details
The NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M is manufactured by NVIDIA as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the Quadro FX 1500M by NVIDIA represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.
Quadro FX 1500M Benchmark Scores
No benchmark data available for this GPU.
About NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
The NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M is a mobile professional GPU built on the Curie architecture, utilizing the G71 chip. Fabricated by TSMC on a 90 nm process, it integrates 278 million transistors on a 196 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 1.4M per mm². Released on 2006-04-17, this part is now end-of-life. The database lists an average benchmark score of zero and an empty benchmark list, yet it holds a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs, indicating a median position derived from specification analysis rather than direct synthetic testing.
Who Should Consider It
This GPU is engineered for mobile workstations, as evidenced by its MXM Module form factor and MXM-II bus interface. The 512 MB frame buffer and 256-bit memory bus make it suitable for professional applications such as CAD and 3D modeling at moderate resolutions. The 45 W TDP allows integration into portable chassis without exotic cooling solutions. Given its 50th percentile standing, it is a median performer, not a high-end part. Users running legacy DirectX 9.0c applications or OpenGL 2.1 workloads will find it functional for their needs. However, the 512 MB capacity and 32.00 GB/s bandwidth limit its ability to handle high-resolution textures or large framebuffers. The data shows that this is a resolution-constrained part; it is not appropriate for 4K rendering or modern high-detail gaming. The lack of Vulkan support further confines it to older software ecosystems. It is best suited for professionals who need certified drivers for mobile work, but who do not demand extreme graphical throughput. The display outputs are portable device dependent, meaning the actual connectivity is dictated by the laptop manufacturer, reinforcing its mobile-only design.
Memory Subsystem
The memory subsystem consists of 512 MB of GDDR3, a 256-bit bus width, and a bandwidth of 32.00 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 500 MHz, which translates to 1000 Mbps effective. The 256-bit bus is a significant asset, providing a wide data path that partially compensates for the modest clock speed. However, the 32.00 GB/s bandwidth is low by current standards. For high resolutions, the combination of 512 MB capacity and 32 GB/s bandwidth means that large framebuffers will quickly exhaust the available memory, leading to texture thrashing and performance drops. The 6.000 GPixel/s pixel rate and 7.500 GTexel/s texture rate are derived from the 16 ROPs and 20 TMUs respectively. These rates indicate a mid-range throughput that aligns with the 50th percentile. The memory subsystem is balanced for its era, but it is a bottleneck for any workload exceeding its capacity. The 256-bit bus is a positive attribute, as wider buses are typically associated with better memory efficiency in professional rendering tasks.
How It Compares
The nearestRivals field is empty, meaning no direct rival names, scores, or deltaPct values are present in the database. Consequently, this analysis cannot provide specific percentage deltas against competing products. The only quantitative comparative anchor is the percentileVsAllGpus value of 50, which places this GPU exactly at the median of all GPUs in the database. This implies it outperforms half of the known GPUs and underperforms the other half. The predecessor, Quadro FX Go, and successor, Quadro Fermi-M, are listed but without any performance metrics. The data shows a clear generational progression: the Curie architecture here is older than the Fermi architecture of the successor, suggesting a substantial architectural leap. Without rival scores, the percentile serves as the sole comparison metric. The 50th percentile is a neutral, mid-pack position, indicating that this GPU is neither a low-end nor a high-end offering. Its 90 nm process node and 196 mm² die size are consistent with mid-range parts of its generation.
FAQ
Q: What is the memory size and type?
A: The Quadro FX 1500M has 512 MB of GDDR3 memory.
Q: What is the memory bus width and bandwidth?
A: It has a 256-bit bus and a bandwidth of 32.00 GB/s.
Q: What is the TDP of this GPU?
A: The TDP is 45 W.
Q: Does it support Vulkan?
A: No, Vulkan support is null; it supports DirectX 9.0c (9_3) and OpenGL 2.1.2 (full), with OpenGL 3.x only partially supported.
Q: What is the production status and release date?
A: It is end-of-life, and it was released on 2006-04-17.
Q: What is the pixel rate?
A: The pixel rate is 6.000 GPixel/s.
Ray Tracing and Feature Set
The Quadro FX 1500M has no ray tracing cores and no tensor cores, as both fields are null. This is consistent with the Curie architecture, which predates dedicated ray tracing hardware. The API support is limited to DirectX 9.0c (9_3) and OpenGL 2.1.2 (full), with OpenGL 3.x only partially supported. Vulkan is not supported. This feature set means the GPU cannot handle modern ray-traced workloads or machine learning tasks. The 20 TMUs and 16 ROPs define its texture and pixel processing capabilities. The texture rate of 7.500 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 6.000 GPixel/s are the maximum theoretical fill rates. For professional applications of its time, these were adequate, but they are obsolete for current feature demands. The absence of tensor cores also precludes any AI-accelerated features, which are now common in professional workflows.
Power and Cooling
The TDP is 45 W, which is a low power draw for a GPU. The slot width is MXM Module, and the bus interface is MXM-II. The power connectors field is "None", meaning the module draws power solely from the MXM slot. There is no suggested PSU listed, which is typical for a mobile module. The 45 W TDP implies that a modest cooling solution, such as a small heatpipe and fan, is sufficient to keep the chip within operating temperatures. Because the display outputs are "Portable Device Dependent", the cooling and power delivery are ultimately dictated by the laptop manufacturer's design. The data indicates a conservative power envelope that allows for thin-and-light mobile workstations. This low TDP also means that battery life is less impacted compared to higher-power discrete GPUs. The lack of external power connectors simplifies integration into existing laptop designs.
Benchmark Performance
The benchmark list is empty, and the average benchmark score is zero. Therefore, no direct synthetic scores are available to analyze. The percentileVsAllGpus is 50, which is the only performance ranking available. This percentile is a spec-based estimate, likely derived from the combination of 20 TMUs, 16 ROPs, and the 32.00 GB/s bandwidth. The pixel rate of 6.000 GPixel/s and texture rate of 7.500 GTexel/s are the maximum theoretical fill rates. Compared to a hypothetical average GPU, this part sits exactly at the midpoint. Without nearestRivals data, percentage deltas cannot be computed against specific competitors. The data shows that this is a mid-range mobile GPU from the Curie generation. Its performance is sufficient for legacy professional workloads, but it lacks the headroom for modern software. The absence of benchmark scores means that real-world performance must be inferred from the fill rates and memory bandwidth. The 50th percentile confirms its median status, suggesting that it offers a balanced, if unremarkable, performance profile for its era. The 6.000 GPixel/s pixel rate and 7.500 GTexel/s texture rate are the only concrete performance figures, and they indicate a throughput that aligns with its mid-pack percentile ranking.
The AMD Equivalent of Quadro FX 1500M
Looking for a similar graphics card from AMD? The AMD Radeon RX 480 offers comparable performance and features in the AMD lineup.
Popular NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M Comparisons
See how the Quadro FX 1500M stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare Quadro FX 1500M with Other GPUs
Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse GPUs