NVIDIA P102-101

The NVIDIA P102-101 is a Pascal-generation mining GPU built on TSMC’s 16 nm process, packing 11,800 million transistors into a 471 mm² die. It is an end-of-life product with no display outputs, positioned entirely for compute workloads, and benchmark data places it at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, indicating a mid-pack standing despite its specialized design.

Benchmark Performance

The P102-101 delivers 10.69 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, a figure that anchors its performance in the mid-range of the GPU landscape. With a base clock of 1557 MHz and a boost clock of 1670 MHz, the chip sustains a pixel rate of 133.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 334.0 GTexel/s. These numbers translate to a balanced throughput for raw compute tasks, but the lack of any nearestRivals data in the benchmark database means no direct percentage comparisons can be made against specific competing cards. The percentileVsAllGpus score of 50 places it exactly at the median of the database’s GPU population, half of all tracked GPUs score higher, half lower. This suggests that while the P102-101 is not a top-tier performer, it is far from obsolete, offering a level of compute power that sits comfortably in the middle of the pack. The FP32 throughput of 10.69 TFLOPS is particularly relevant for workloads that rely on single-precision floating-point math, such as certain scientific simulations or rendering tasks. However, the FP16 performance of 167.0 GFLOPS (1:64) is drastically reduced, a 1:64 ratio indicates that half-precision operations run at a fraction of the speed of full-precision ones, making this card unsuitable for AI inference or training tasks that heavily leverage FP16 acceleration. In practical terms, the benchmark results indicate a GPU that excels at traditional FP32 compute but offers no meaningful advantage in mixed-precision or reduced-precision workloads. The absence of benchmark scores and rival deltas in the data means the analysis must lean on architectural characteristics rather than direct head-to-head numbers.

Memory Subsystem

The P102-101 is equipped with 10 GB of GDDR5 memory, connected via a 320-bit bus. This configuration yields a memory bandwidth of 320.3 GB/s, derived from a memory clock of 2002 MHz (8 Gbps effective). The 10 GB capacity is generous for a mining-focused card, allowing large datasets or multiple parallel compute jobs to reside in VRAM without spilling to system memory. The 320-bit bus width is narrower than what high-end consumer cards of the same era typically used, but the bandwidth figure of 320.3 GB/s remains competitive for 1440p and even 4K workloads, provided the compute tasks are not bandwidth-bound. For high-resolution rendering or texture-heavy workloads, the memory subsystem provides sufficient headroom to avoid stuttering, though the GDDR5 type (rather than faster HBM or GDDR6) caps the absolute throughput. The effective data rate of 8 Gbps per pin is standard for GDDR5, and the combination of 10 GB capacity and 320.3 GB/s bandwidth means the card can handle multi-GPU mining rigs or large-buffer compute tasks without bottlenecking at the memory interface. However, the lack of display outputs means this memory is never used for frame buffer output, it exists purely for compute and mining operations. In scenarios where memory capacity is the limiting factor, the 10 GB allocation is a strength; where raw bandwidth is the bottleneck, the 320.3 GB/s figure is adequate but not exceptional. The pixel rate of 133.6 GPixel/s, while tied to the ROP count, also depends on memory bandwidth to feed the render output units, and at this bandwidth level, the card can sustain high fill rates without memory-induced stalls.

Ray Tracing and Feature Set

The P102-101 is built on the Pascal architecture, which predates NVIDIA’s dedicated ray tracing hardware. The benchmark database lists no RT cores and no tensor cores, confirming that this GPU lacks hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI tensor operations. Instead, the card relies on 3200 shading units, 200 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units to handle compute and graphics workloads through traditional rasterization paths. API support includes DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, which ensures compatibility with modern graphics APIs, but the absence of RT and tensor cores means any ray-traced effects or DLSS-style features must be processed via compute shaders on the FP32 units, a slow and inefficient approach. The 1:64 FP16 ratio further limits any machine learning features that might otherwise run on tensor cores. In practice, the feature set is stripped-down: no display outputs, no RT acceleration, no tensor acceleration. This is a mining GPU through and through, designed to maximize FP32 throughput per watt for hash calculations. The DirectX 12_1 support is notable because it allows the card to run compute workloads under the latest API, but the lack of hardware ray tracing means it cannot compete with Turing or Ampere cards in any RT-enabled benchmark. For Vulkan 1.4, the API support is current, but again, the hardware is limited by the Pascal architecture’s lack of specialized cores. The texture rate of 334.0 GTexel/s, while high, is irrelevant for ray tracing, which requires BVH traversal hardware the P102-101 simply does not possess. Overall, the feature set is defined by what is absent, no RT, no tensor, no outputs, making it a pure compute tool rather than a graphics card.

How It Compares

The benchmark database provides no nearestRivals data, so a direct comparison against specific competing GPUs is not possible from the given information. The percentileVsAllGpus score of 50 places it in the middle of the database’s GPU hierarchy, meaning it outperforms roughly half of all tracked GPUs and underperforms against the other half. This mid-pack position suggests that while the P102-101 is not a flagship, it is also not a low-end part. The lack of any rival names, scores, or deltaPct values means no percentage-based comparisons can be made, the analysis must rely on the absolute specifications. Against hypothetical rivals, the 10.69 TFLOPS FP32 figure would place it in the range of a mid-to-high-end Pascal or early Turing card, but without concrete data, any such claim would be speculation. The 250 W TDP, combined with the dual-slot cooler and 2x 8-pin power connectors, indicates a power-hungry design typical of mining GPUs that prioritize raw throughput over efficiency. The 10 GB GDDR5 memory is a differentiator, many mining cards of that era shipped with less VRAM, so the P102-101’s capacity could be a selling point for datasets that exceed 8 GB. However, the 320-bit bus and 320.3 GB/s bandwidth are modest, suggesting the card is compute-bound rather than memory-bound. The absence of display outputs further distinguishes it from consumer cards, which all include at least one video output. In a broader context, the P102-101 occupies a niche: it is faster than entry-level GPUs in FP32 compute, but slower than high-end cards with larger memory buses and more shading units. The 50th percentile rank is a statistical anchor, the card is neither a standout nor a laggard.

Power and Cooling

The P102-101 has a TDP of 250 W, a figure that demands serious cooling and power delivery. The card ships as a dual-slot design, which provides adequate surface area for a capable air cooler, though the exact cooler type is not specified in the benchmark database. Power is supplied via 2x 8-pin connectors, which are standard for high-draw GPUs, and the suggested PSU rating is 600 W. This means a system with this card should have a power supply capable of delivering at least 600 W to the entire rig, accounting for CPU, motherboard, and other components. The 250 W TDP is moderate for a mining GPU, it is not as power-hungry as some dual-GPU cards, but it is also not energy-efficient by modern standards. The 16 nm process node, while older than current 7 nm or 5 nm parts, was a mature node at the time of production, and the 11,800 million transistor count at 471 mm² yields a transistor density of 25.1M per mm², a figure that reflects the architecture’s age rather than any density advantage. For cooling, the dual-slot form factor allows for a substantial heatsink and fan assembly, but the lack of display outputs means the card is likely intended to run in a closed mining rig with high ambient airflow. The 2x 8-pin connectors are a clear signal that the card expects clean, stable power delivery, daisy-chaining or low-quality PSUs could cause instability under sustained load. The 600 W PSU recommendation is a firm guideline: under load, the card draws 250 W, leaving 350 W for the rest of the system, which is sufficient for a typical mining motherboard with a low-power CPU and multiple risers. However, if the card is used in a multi-GPU setup, each additional P102-101 would require its own 250 W allocation and a correspondingly larger PSU. The 267 mm length (10.5 inches) means it fits in most full-tower cases but could be tight in smaller mid-towers. Overall, the power and cooling requirements are straightforward: a quality 600 W PSU, two 8-pin cables, and adequate case airflow are all that is needed to keep this card running at its 250 W TDP.