GEFORCE

NVIDIA GRID K200

NVIDIA graphics card specifications and benchmark scores

256 MB
VRAM
MHz Boost
225W
TDP
256
Bus Width

NVIDIA GRID K200 Specifications

⚙️

GRID K200 GPU Core

Shader units and compute resources

The NVIDIA GRID K200 GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.

Shading Units
1,536
Shaders
1,536
TMUs
128
ROPs
32
⏱️

GRID K200 Clock Speeds

GPU and memory frequencies

Clock speeds directly impact the GRID K200's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The GRID K200 by NVIDIA dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.

GPU Clock
745 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz 5 Gbps effective
GDDR GDDR 6X 6X

NVIDIA's GRID K200 Memory

VRAM capacity and bandwidth

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The GRID K200's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.

Memory Size
256 MB
VRAM
256 MB
Memory Type
GDDR5
VRAM Type
GDDR5
Memory Bus
256 bit
Bus Width
256-bit
Bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
💾

GRID K200 by NVIDIA Cache

On-chip cache hierarchy

On-chip cache provides ultra-fast data access for the GRID K200, reducing the need to fetch data from slower VRAM. L1 and L2 caches store frequently accessed data close to the compute units. AMD's Infinity Cache (L3) dramatically increases effective bandwidth, improving GPU benchmark performance without requiring wider memory buses. Larger cache sizes help maintain high frame rates in memory-bound scenarios and reduce power consumption by minimizing VRAM accesses.

L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
L2 Cache
512 KB
📈

GRID K200 Theoretical Performance

Compute and fill rates

Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the NVIDIA GRID K200 against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.

FP32 (Float)
2.289 TFLOPS
FP64 (Double)
95.36 GFLOPS (1:24)
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
🏗️

Kepler Architecture & Process

Manufacturing and design details

The NVIDIA GRID K200 is built on NVIDIA's Kepler architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the GRID K200 will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.

Architecture
Kepler
GPU Name
GK104
Process Node
28 nm
Foundry
TSMC
Transistors
3,540 million
Die Size
294 mm²
Density
12.0M / mm²
🔌

NVIDIA's GRID K200 Power & Thermal

TDP and power requirements

Power specifications for the NVIDIA GRID K200 determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the GRID K200 to maintain boost clocks without throttling.

TDP
225 W
TDP
225W
Suggested PSU
550 W
📐

GRID K200 by NVIDIA Physical & Connectivity

Dimensions and outputs

Physical dimensions of the NVIDIA GRID K200 are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.

Slot Width
IGP
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Display Outputs
No outputs
Display Outputs
No outputs
🎮

NVIDIA API Support

Graphics and compute APIs

API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the NVIDIA GRID K200. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.

DirectX
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
OpenGL
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
Vulkan
1.2.175
Vulkan
1.2.175
OpenCL
3.0
CUDA
3.0
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
📦

GRID K200 Product Information

Release and pricing details

The NVIDIA GRID K200 is manufactured by NVIDIA as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the GRID K200 by NVIDIA represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.

Manufacturer
NVIDIA
Release Date
Jun 2013
Launch Price
235 USD
Production
End-of-life

GRID K200 Benchmark Scores

📊

No benchmark data available for this GPU.

About NVIDIA GRID K200

The NVIDIA GRID K200, released in mid-2013, targets a very specific professional niche rather than the mainstream gaming market. It's built on the Kepler architecture using a 28 nm process and connects via a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. Its most striking specification is the modest 256 MB of GDDR5 memory, which feels incredibly limited by modern standards. With a TDP of 225 W, this card demands substantial power and cooling for its era. The launch price was set at $235 USD, positioning it as a specialized tool rather than a budget performance option. Given these specs, one has to question how the NVIDIA GRID K200 fits into today's virtualization or server deployment scenarios. It represents an interesting evolutionary step in GPU virtualization technology. When analyzing the cost, the $235 launch price must be weighed against the card's severe memory constraints and vintage. The 256 MB VRAM allocation is the primary bottleneck, severely limiting the number of concurrent user sessions it can effectively handle. In a professional context where memory is king, this hardware seems priced more for its virtualization capabilities than its raw specifications. One might wonder if investing in more modern, even consumer-grade cards with more memory would offer better virtual desktop performance. The power consumption of 225 W also adds to the total cost of ownership over time. The NVIDIA GRID K200 therefore presents a complex value equation where the specialized feature set competes with very dated hardware limitations. It forces a tough decision between legacy support and modern efficiency. Segment placement for this card is clearly in the server and virtual desktop infrastructure market, specifically for entry-level grid computing. It was designed to slice a single GPU into multiple virtual instances for remote users, a concept that has evolved significantly since 2013. Does the Kepler architecture still hold up for basic remote graphics acceleration against modern integrated solutions? The PCIe 3.0 x16 interface ensures high bandwidth, but it's likely choked by the minuscule frame buffer in any multi-user scenario. This card sits in a strange spot where its purpose is clear, but its capacity feels immediately exhausted. For anyone considering the NVIDIA GRID K200, understanding this specific placement is crucial to avoid disappointment. It's a piece of hardware that asks more questions than it answers about resource allocation. Evaluating its investment value today requires a very forgiving perspective on its specifications. The 28 nm process and Kepler architecture are now over a decade old, lacking modern codec support and efficiency. While the concept of GPU virtualization is more relevant than ever, the 256 MB VRAM is a massive hurdle that's difficult to overlook. Is the hardware capable of delivering a smooth user experience with such a tiny memory pool, even for simple tasks? The 225 W power draw seems high for the minimal compute resources it provides in a modern context. For the NVIDIA GRID K200 to be a viable investment, the use case must be extremely narrow and tolerant of its limitations. Ultimately, this card serves as a historical footnote more than a practical recommendation for current infrastructure builds.

The AMD Equivalent of GRID K200

Looking for a similar graphics card from AMD? The AMD Radeon RX 480 offers comparable performance and features in the AMD lineup.

AMD Radeon RX 480

AMD • 8 GB VRAM

View Specs Compare

Popular NVIDIA GRID K200 Comparisons

See how the GRID K200 stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.

Compare GRID K200 with Other GPUs

Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.

Browse GPUs