GEFORCE

NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400

NVIDIA graphics card specifications and benchmark scores

32 MB
VRAM
MHz Boost
TDP
128
Bus Width

NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400 Specifications

⚙️

GeForce2 MX 400 GPU Core

Shader units and compute resources

The NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400 GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.

TMUs
4
ROPs
2
⏱️

GeForce2 MX 400 Clock Speeds

GPU and memory frequencies

Clock speeds directly impact the GeForce2 MX 400's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The GeForce2 MX 400 by NVIDIA dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.

GPU Clock
200 MHz
Memory Clock
166 MHz
GDDR GDDR 6X 6X

NVIDIA's GeForce2 MX 400 Memory

VRAM capacity and bandwidth

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The GeForce2 MX 400's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.

Memory Size
32 MB
VRAM
32 MB
Memory Type
SDR
VRAM Type
SDR
Memory Bus
128 bit
Bus Width
128-bit
Bandwidth
2.656 GB/s
📈

GeForce2 MX 400 Theoretical Performance

Compute and fill rates

Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400 against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.

Pixel Rate
400.0 MPixel/s
Texture Rate
800.0 MTexel/s
🏗️

Celsius Architecture & Process

Manufacturing and design details

The NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400 is built on NVIDIA's Celsius architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the GeForce2 MX 400 will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.

Architecture
Celsius
GPU Name
NV11B
Process Node
180 nm
Foundry
TSMC
Transistors
20 million
Die Size
64 mm²
Density
312.5K / mm²
🔌

NVIDIA's GeForce2 MX 400 Power & Thermal

TDP and power requirements

Power specifications for the NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400 determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the GeForce2 MX 400 to maintain boost clocks without throttling.

Power Connectors
None
Suggested PSU
200 W
📐

GeForce2 MX 400 by NVIDIA Physical & Connectivity

Dimensions and outputs

Physical dimensions of the NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400 are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.

Slot Width
Single-slot
Bus Interface
AGP 4x
Display Outputs
1x DVI1x VGA
Display Outputs
1x DVI1x VGA
🎮

NVIDIA API Support

Graphics and compute APIs

API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.

DirectX
7.0
DirectX
7.0
OpenGL
1.2
OpenGL
1.2
📦

GeForce2 MX 400 Product Information

Release and pricing details

The NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the GeForce2 MX 400 by NVIDIA represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.

Manufacturer
NVIDIA
Release Date
Mar 2001
Production
End-of-life
Predecessor
GeForce 256
Successor
GeForce 3

GeForce2 MX 400 Benchmark Scores

📊

No benchmark data available for this GPU.

About NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400

The NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400 card from NVIDIA targets entry‑level workstations that require modest graphics capability without inflating the budget. Built on a 180 nm Celsius architecture and equipped with 32 MB of SDR memory, it delivers sufficient performance for legacy 2D applications and basic 3D acceleration. Its AGP 4× interface ensures compatibility with a wide range of motherboards released in the early 2000s, simplifying integration into existing platforms. While the card lacks modern shader cores, the 32 MB VRAM is adequate for office productivity suites, web browsing, and older titles that do not demand high texture bandwidth. The value proposition of the NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400 card from NVIDIA lies in its low acquisition cost combined with reliable driver support for legacy operating systems. However, prospective buyers should weigh the limited future‑proofing against the immediate need for a cost‑effective graphics solution. For organizations that maintain legacy hardware for specific industrial or educational purposes, this GPU remains a pragmatic choice.

  • Value proposition: low cost with reliable legacy driver support.
  • Competitive alternatives: ATI Radeon 7500 and Matrox G200.
  • Future‑proofing: limited to legacy APIs and older software.

When evaluating competitive alternatives, the ATI Radeon 7500 and the Matrox G200 emerge as comparable options, each offering similar memory configurations but differing in driver ecosystems. The Radeon 7500 provides marginally higher fill‑rate, while the Matrox G200 excels in multi‑monitor support, making the selection dependent on the specific workload. Future‑proofing considerations are limited, as the NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400 card from NVIDIA does not support DirectX 9 or modern APIs, restricting its utility for contemporary software. Consequently, it is best suited for dedicated tasks such as point‑of‑sale terminals, digital signage, or legacy CAD applications that have been validated on this hardware generation. For new builds, pairing the GPU with a modest dual‑core processor and 512 MB of DDR RAM will prevent bottlenecks and maintain system stability. The NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400 card from NVIDIA can be mounted in compact chassis, allowing integration into space‑constrained enclosures without compromising airflow. Ultimately, the decision should balance immediate cost savings against the anticipated lifespan of the deployment, ensuring that the chosen graphics solution aligns with both performance requirements and upgrade pathways.

The AMD Equivalent of GeForce2 MX 400

Looking for a similar graphics card from AMD? The AMD Radeon RX 480 offers comparable performance and features in the AMD lineup.

AMD Radeon RX 480

AMD • 8 GB VRAM

View Specs Compare

Popular NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400 Comparisons

See how the GeForce2 MX 400 stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.

Compare GeForce2 MX 400 with Other GPUs

Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.

Browse GPUs