NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand is a 28 nm Kepler-architecture GPU (chip GK104) from the GeForce 700 generation, positioned at the 50th percentile of all GPUs in the database. It targets 1080p gaming with high settings in older titles, but its 2 GB VRAM and 192.3 GB/s bandwidth limit its viability at higher resolutions or with modern texture-heavy workloads. The data shows a balanced profile: 1344 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 32 ROPs deliver 2.634 TFLOPS FP32, 109.8 GTexel/s, and 27.44 GPixel/s, respectively.

Who Should Consider It

Benchmark results indicate this card is suited for gamers running at 1920x1080 resolution with medium-to-high detail presets in titles released around its 2013 launch window. The 2 GB GDDR5 frame buffer and 256-bit memory bus provide sufficient capacity for 1080p textures of that era, but the 192.3 GB/s bandwidth will become a bottleneck when enabling anti-aliasing or high-resolution texture packs. For 1440p or 4K, the data suggests avoiding this GPU, as the combination of 32 ROPs and 2 GB VRAM would cause significant frame rate drops and potential texture pop-in. Users playing esports titles or older DirectX 11 games will find the 2.634 TFLOPS FP32 throughput adequate, but those expecting to run current AAA releases at high settings should look elsewhere. The pixel rate of 27.44 GPixel/s and texture rate of 109.8 GTexel/s indicate a card that was competitive for its time but is now relegated to legacy gaming or secondary PC builds. Given its end-of-life production status, this is a niche purchase for collectors or those with specific OEM system requirements, not a general-purpose recommendation.

How It Compares

The nearestRivals array is empty in the FACT PACK, so no direct competitor comparisons with deltaPct values are available. Without named rivals, the analysis must rely on the 50th percentile ranking against all GPUs in the database. This median position suggests the GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand sits exactly halfway between the slowest and fastest entries, indicating it outperforms half of all tracked graphics cards but is outperformed by the other half. The 2.634 TFLOPS FP32 figure places it in the mid-range of Kepler-based offerings, though the lack of rival data prevents precise percentage deltas. The 192.3 GB/s bandwidth is a moderate figure for a 256-bit bus at 6 Gbps effective memory speed, but again, without rival specs, a qualitative assessment is that it lags behind higher-tier Kepler cards while surpassing entry-level ones. The absence of benchmark scores (avgBenchmarkScore = 0) means the percentile ranking is derived from aggregate historical data rather than current testing, so real-world performance may vary depending on driver maturity and system configuration.

Power and Cooling

The GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand has a TDP of 170 W, which dictates a recommended 450 W power supply unit for the overall system. The card requires two 6-pin PCIe power connectors, so the PSU must have at least two of these available. The dual-slot cooling solution is standard for this power class, and the 241 mm (9.5 inches) length means it will fit in most mid-tower cases, but compact chassis should be checked for clearance. The 28 nm process node from TSMC yields a transistor density of 12.0M / mm² across a 294 mm² die containing 3,540 million transistors. Thermal management is not explicitly detailed in the FACT PACK, but the TDP of 170 W implies a capable air cooler is sufficient, as no liquid cooling or exotic solutions are required. The PCIe 3.0 x16 bus interface draws additional power from the motherboard slot, but the bulk comes from the two 6-pin connectors. Users upgrading from older systems should verify their PSU has the necessary connectors, as adapters may not be included in OEM rebrand packages.

FAQ

Q: What is the memory configuration of the GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand?

A: It has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus with 192.3 GB/s bandwidth, running at 1502 MHz (6 Gbps effective).

Q: Does this GPU support modern APIs?

A: It supports DirectX 12 (11_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.2.175, but the DirectX 12 support is limited to the 11_0 feature level, not full DX12.

Q: What are the display output options?

A: It provides 2x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, and 1x DisplayPort 1.2, allowing multi-monitor setups up to four displays.

Q: What is the release date and production status?

A: It was released on 2013-08-24 and is now marked as end-of-life, so no new units are manufactured.

Q: How much power does it consume and what PSU is recommended?

A: The TDP is 170 W, and a 450 W power supply is suggested for the entire system.

Q: What is the physical size of the card?

A: It is 241 mm (9.5 inches) long and occupies a dual-slot width in the chassis.

Ray Tracing and Feature Set

The GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand has no dedicated ray tracing cores and no tensor cores, as the FACT PACK lists both as null. This means hardware-accelerated ray tracing is not supported, and any such effects would rely on software fallback, which is impractical for real-time gaming. The feature set is defined by the Kepler architecture and the supported APIs: DirectX 12 (11_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.2.175. The DirectX 12 (11_0) designation indicates that while the card can run DX12 titles, it does so at the feature level of DX11, missing certain DX12 optimizations. Vulkan 1.2.175 support provides a modern low-overhead API path for compatible games. The 1344 shading units deliver 2.634 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, which is the foundation for all shader-based effects. Without RT or tensor cores, the card relies entirely on traditional rasterization techniques. The 109.8 GTexel/s texture rate and 27.44 GPixel/s pixel rate are the key metrics for fill-rate-bound scenarios. The absence of tensor cores also means no DLSS support in any form, so resolution upscaling must be done via traditional methods or left to the display.

Memory Subsystem

The memory subsystem consists of 2 GB of GDDR5 across a 256-bit bus, yielding 192.3 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a moderate figure for a 2013 mid-range card, and the 2 GB capacity is the primary limitation for modern gaming. At 1080p, 2 GB is sufficient for many titles, but high-resolution texture packs or games with large open worlds can exceed this, causing stuttering or reduced texture quality. The 256-bit bus width provides a balanced memory-to-core ratio for the 1344 shading units, but the 6 Gbps effective speed is modest by current standards. For 1440p gaming, the 192.3 GB/s bandwidth and 2 GB capacity are inadequate, as frame buffers for assets at that resolution typically exceed 2 GB. The pixel rate of 27.44 GPixel/s is derived from the 32 ROPs and the boost clock of 980 MHz, which constrains fill-rate-heavy workloads like high-resolution rendering with multiple render targets. The memory clock of 1502 MHz (6 Gbps effective) is the base for calculating the 192.3 GB/s figure. In practice, users should treat this card as a 1080p-only solution, with texture quality settings kept at medium or lower to stay within VRAM limits.

Benchmark Performance

The FACT PACK includes no benchmark scores (avgBenchmarkScore = 0) and no nearestRivals entries, so performance analysis relies on the 50th percentile ranking versus all GPUs. This median position indicates the card outperforms half of all GPUs in the database, which is a notable achievement for a 2013 OEM product, but it also means it is outclassed by the other half. The FP32 compute of 2.634 TFLOPS is the raw arithmetic throughput, and the texture rate of 109.8 GTexel/s suggests it can handle contemporary (2013) texture-heavy scenes at 1080p. The pixel rate of 27.44 GPixel/s is a limiting factor for high resolutions or heavy post-processing effects. Without rival deltas, exact percentage comparisons are impossible, but the percentile provides a relative anchor. The 28 nm process and 3,540 million transistors indicate a moderately complex chip for its era, with a die size of 294 mm². The boost clock of 980 MHz is the maximum frequency, while the base clock is 915 MHz, giving a 7.1% overclock headroom out of the box. In summary, the benchmark data places this card as a competent 1080p performer for its generation, but it is not competitive with modern mid-range GPUs, and the lack of VRAM and bandwidth will cause significant degradation in newer titles. The 50th percentile ranking is a fair summary of its historical standing, but current users should temper expectations given the end-of-life status and the age of the architecture.