NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
NVIDIA graphics card specifications and benchmark scores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 Specifications
GeForce GTX 275 GPU Core
Shader units and compute resources
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.
GTX 275 Clock Speeds
GPU and memory frequencies
Clock speeds directly impact the GeForce GTX 275's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The GeForce GTX 275 by NVIDIA dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.
NVIDIA's GeForce GTX 275 Memory
VRAM capacity and bandwidth
VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The GeForce GTX 275's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.
GeForce GTX 275 by NVIDIA Cache
On-chip cache hierarchy
On-chip cache provides ultra-fast data access for the GTX 275, reducing the need to fetch data from slower VRAM. L1 and L2 caches store frequently accessed data close to the compute units. AMD's Infinity Cache (L3) dramatically increases effective bandwidth, improving GPU benchmark performance without requiring wider memory buses. Larger cache sizes help maintain high frame rates in memory-bound scenarios and reduce power consumption by minimizing VRAM accesses.
GTX 275 Theoretical Performance
Compute and fill rates
Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.
Tesla 2.0 Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 is built on NVIDIA's Tesla 2.0 architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the GTX 275 will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.
NVIDIA's GeForce GTX 275 Power & Thermal
TDP and power requirements
Power specifications for the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the GeForce GTX 275 to maintain boost clocks without throttling.
GeForce GTX 275 by NVIDIA Physical & Connectivity
Dimensions and outputs
Physical dimensions of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.
NVIDIA API Support
Graphics and compute APIs
API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.
GeForce GTX 275 Product Information
Release and pricing details
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by NVIDIA as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the GeForce GTX 275 by NVIDIA represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.
GeForce GTX 275 Benchmark Scores
No benchmark data available for this GPU.
About NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
When the GTX 275 hit the market in early 2009, its $249 launch price raised eyebrows among budget‑conscious builders. At first glance the 896 MB of GDDR3 memory and a 219 W TDP seemed generous for a card positioned just below the flagship tier. Yet the real question is whether that price tag translates into tangible performance gains over the older 260 series. Considering the 55 nm Tesla 2.0 core, the chip delivers respectable shader throughput, but the lack of a unified memory architecture can bottleneck high‑resolution workloads. For gamers hunting 1080p frame rates in titles that were still DirectX 10‑centric, the cost‑to‑performance ratio feels borderline acceptable. If you can find a used NVIDIA's GTX 275 for significantly less than its original MSRP, the value proposition suddenly looks far more attractive.
In terms of segment placement, the NVIDIA's GTX 275 slots neatly between the entry‑level 260 and the premium 285, targeting enthusiasts who wanted a taste of high‑end features without breaking the bank. Its PCIe 2.0 x16 interface ensures ample bandwidth for the era, though modern motherboards will hardly notice the difference. Compared to contemporary AMD offerings, the card leans on a slightly higher core clock but falls short on memory bandwidth, which can be a decisive factor in texture‑heavy scenes. The decision to stick with GDDR3 rather than moving to GDDR5 was a cost‑saving measure that also limited future scalability. For users building a mid‑range system, the GTX 275 provides enough headroom for mainstream titles while still leaving room for a modest CPU upgrade. However, the absence of SLI support and a relatively high power draw make it a less flexible choice for those hoping to expand later.
When evaluating investment value today, the key is to balance the card’s age against the price you can acquire it for on the second‑hand market. If you can pick up an NVIDIA's GTX 275 for under $80, it becomes a viable backup GPU for systems that only need occasional 1080p gaming or media playback. Pair it with a modest quad‑core CPU from the same generation, such as an Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600, and you’ll avoid severe bottlenecks in most older titles. Adding a solid 500 W power supply will comfortably cover the 219 W draw, while a decent aftermarket cooler can keep temperatures in check during long sessions. For users who plan to dabble in newer, Vulkan‑based games, the card will quickly reveal its limitations, making it more of a stop‑gap than a long‑term solution. Ultimately, the decision hinges on whether you value immediate affordability over future‑proof performance, and that question is worth asking before you click “add to cart.”
The AMD Equivalent of GeForce GTX 275
Looking for a similar graphics card from AMD? The AMD Radeon RX 480 offers comparable performance and features in the AMD lineup.
Popular NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 Comparisons
See how the GeForce GTX 275 stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare GeForce GTX 275 with Other GPUs
Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse GPUs