GEFORCE

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M

NVIDIA graphics card specifications and benchmark scores

1 GB
VRAM
MHz Boost
65W
TDP
256
Bus Width

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M Specifications

⚙️

GeForce GTX 260M GPU Core

Shader units and compute resources

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.

Shading Units
112
Shaders
112
TMUs
56
ROPs
16
SM Count
14
⏱️

GTX 260M Clock Speeds

GPU and memory frequencies

Clock speeds directly impact the GeForce GTX 260M's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The GeForce GTX 260M by NVIDIA dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.

GPU Clock
550 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz 1900 Mbps effective
Shader Clock
1375 MHz
GDDR GDDR 6X 6X

NVIDIA's GeForce GTX 260M Memory

VRAM capacity and bandwidth

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The GeForce GTX 260M's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.

Memory Size
1024 MB
VRAM
1,024 MB
Memory Type
GDDR3
VRAM Type
GDDR3
Memory Bus
256 bit
Bus Width
256-bit
Bandwidth
60.80 GB/s
💾

GeForce GTX 260M by NVIDIA Cache

On-chip cache hierarchy

On-chip cache provides ultra-fast data access for the GTX 260M, reducing the need to fetch data from slower VRAM. L1 and L2 caches store frequently accessed data close to the compute units. AMD's Infinity Cache (L3) dramatically increases effective bandwidth, improving GPU benchmark performance without requiring wider memory buses. Larger cache sizes help maintain high frame rates in memory-bound scenarios and reduce power consumption by minimizing VRAM accesses.

L2 Cache
64 KB
📈

GTX 260M Theoretical Performance

Compute and fill rates

Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.

FP32 (Float)
308.0 GFLOPS
Pixel Rate
8.800 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
30.80 GTexel/s
🏗️

Tesla Architecture & Process

Manufacturing and design details

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M is built on NVIDIA's Tesla architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the GTX 260M will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.

Architecture
Tesla
GPU Name
G92
Process Node
65 nm
Foundry
TSMC
Transistors
754 million
Die Size
324 mm²
Density
2.3M / mm²
🔌

NVIDIA's GeForce GTX 260M Power & Thermal

TDP and power requirements

Power specifications for the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the GeForce GTX 260M to maintain boost clocks without throttling.

TDP
65 W
TDP
65W
Power Connectors
None
📐

GeForce GTX 260M by NVIDIA Physical & Connectivity

Dimensions and outputs

Physical dimensions of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.

Slot Width
MXM Module
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Display Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Display Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
🎮

NVIDIA API Support

Graphics and compute APIs

API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.

DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
OpenGL
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
OpenCL
1.1
CUDA
1.1
Shader Model
4.0
📦

GeForce GTX 260M Product Information

Release and pricing details

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M is manufactured by NVIDIA as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the GeForce GTX 260M by NVIDIA represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.

Manufacturer
NVIDIA
Release Date
Mar 2009
Production
End-of-life
Predecessor
GeForce 100M
Successor
GeForce 300M

GeForce GTX 260M Benchmark Scores

📊

No benchmark data available for this GPU.

About NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M

The Radeon GTX 260, despite its compelling name, appears to be a misattribution, as the GTX 260M was actually released by NVIDIA under the GeForce brand, not Radeon. This confusion often arises due to the naming similarities between competing GPU lines from AMD and NVIDIA during the late 2000s. The actual Radeon counterpart to the GTX 260M would fall within AMD’s Mobility Radeon HD 4000 or 5000 series, making product identification crucial for accurate comparisons. Given that the GTX 260M is built on NVIDIA’s Tesla architecture with a 65nm process, it reflects the technological constraints and design philosophies of its era. With 1024 MB of GDDR3 memory and a PCIe 2.0 x16 interface, the card was positioned as a mid-to-high-tier mobile solution upon its March 2009 release. Understanding the correct branding and specs is essential before evaluating the Radeon GTX 260 in any meaningful context.

Assessing the value proposition of the so-called Radeon GTX 260 requires careful distinction between desktop and mobile GPU lineups from that period. The real NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M targeted gaming laptops aiming to deliver playable frame rates in late-2000s titles at moderate settings. A true Radeon equivalent would need to match its 65W TDP and mobile form factor, which narrows the field to AMD’s mobility offerings like the HD 4850 or HD 4870. Given the age of the hardware, the Radeon GTX 260 does not represent a viable purchase today due to limited driver support and poor performance in modern applications. Its original value has long been surpassed by newer integrated and discrete solutions. Buyers investigating the Radeon GTX 260 should proceed with caution, ensuring they’re not conflating outdated mobile GPUs with current or more capable models.

Competitive alternatives at the time of the GTX 260M’s release offered varied performance and efficiency trade-offs that could influence perceptions of the mythical Radeon GTX 260. AMD’s Mobility Radeon HD 4870, for example, delivered superior raw performance and used GDDR5 memory, giving it a bandwidth advantage over the GTX 260M’s GDDR3. Desktop counterparts like the NVIDIA GTX 260 (non-M) significantly outperformed the mobile variant, blurring the lines for consumers seeking power. The absence of benchmark data for the Radeon GTX 260 makes performance claims speculative at best. Today, even budget GPUs from the past decade outperform these legacy architectures in both gaming and general compute tasks. Any investigation into the Radeon GTX 260 must account for its historical context and the rapid advancements that followed.

From an investment value standpoint, the Radeon GTX 260 holds little appeal for modern users, whether for gaming, content creation, or productivity. Its 65nm process and Tesla architecture lack support for modern APIs like DirectX 12 and Vulkan, severely limiting software compatibility. System requirements today often demand PCIe 3.0 or higher, more VRAM, and considerably lower power consumption none of which align with the GTX 260M’s profile. While nostalgic for retro builds, the Radeon GTX 260 doesn’t justify acquisition unless part of a period-accurate restoration. Even then, reliability and availability of such aging mobile GPUs present additional hurdles. Prospective buyers should recognize that the Radeon GTX 260, whether real or misnamed, belongs in a historical discussion rather than a current purchasing decision.

The AMD Equivalent of GeForce GTX 260M

Looking for a similar graphics card from AMD? The AMD Radeon RX 480 offers comparable performance and features in the AMD lineup.

AMD Radeon RX 480

AMD • 8 GB VRAM

View Specs Compare

Popular NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M Comparisons

See how the GeForce GTX 260M stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.

Compare GeForce GTX 260M with Other GPUs

Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.

Browse GPUs