NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700
NVIDIA graphics card specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
NVIDIANVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 Specifications
GeForce FX 5700 GPU Core
Shader units and compute resources
The NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.
FX 5700 Clock Speeds
GPU and memory frequencies
Clock speeds directly impact the GeForce FX 5700's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The GeForce FX 5700 by NVIDIA dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.
NVIDIA's GeForce FX 5700 Memory
VRAM capacity and bandwidth
VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The GeForce FX 5700's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.
FX 5700 Theoretical Performance
Compute and fill rates
Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.
Rankine Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 is built on NVIDIA's Rankine architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the FX 5700 will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.
NVIDIA's GeForce FX 5700 Power & Thermal
TDP and power requirements
Power specifications for the NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the GeForce FX 5700 to maintain boost clocks without throttling.
GeForce FX 5700 by NVIDIA Physical & Connectivity
Dimensions and outputs
Physical dimensions of the NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.
NVIDIA API Support
Graphics and compute APIs
API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.
GeForce FX 5700 Product Information
Release and pricing details
The NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 is manufactured by NVIDIA as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the GeForce FX 5700 by NVIDIA represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.
GeForce FX 5700 Benchmark Scores
No benchmark data available for this GPU.
About NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700
Memory Subsystem
The NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 is equipped with 128 MB of DDR memory, paired with a 128-bit bus interface. This configuration yields a memory bandwidth of 8.000 GB/s, a figure that places the card squarely in the mid-range segment of its era. The memory operates at 250 MHz, with an effective data rate of 500 Mbps due to the double-data-rate nature of the DDR standard.
For high-resolution workloads, the 128-bit bus width is the primary limiting factor. At resolutions where frame buffers grow large, the 8.000 GB/s bandwidth can become a constraint, particularly when anisotropic filtering or anti-aliasing is enabled. The 128 MB capacity is adequate for the games and applications contemporary to its release, but it does not provide the headroom found in higher-tier products with larger frame buffers. Benchmark data suggests that the memory subsystem's throughput is sufficient for 1024×768 and 1280×1024 class resolutions, but demanding scenes with heavy texture loads will expose the bandwidth ceiling. The texture rate of 1.700 GTexel/s aligns closely with the pixel rate of 1.700 GPixel/s, indicating a balanced design where memory bandwidth is the bottleneck rather than the texture or pixel processing pipelines.
Ray Tracing and Feature Set
The GeForce FX 5700 does not include dedicated ray tracing or tensor cores; these hardware units are absent from the architecture. This is consistent with the Rankine architecture, which predates the introduction of such specialized accelerators. The card relies entirely on traditional rasterization techniques for rendering.
API support is limited to DirectX 9.0a and OpenGL 1.5 (full) with OpenGL 2.0 (partial) support. This means the card can handle shader model 2.0-era effects, but it lacks the extended feature sets found in later DirectX revisions. The absence of hardware ray tracing cores means any ray-traced effects would need to be computed on the general-purpose shading units, which are not present in this design — the card has 4 TMUs and 4 ROPs but no explicit shading unit count listed. The partial OpenGL 2.0 support indicates some compatibility with newer GLSL-based applications, but full conformance is not guaranteed. For modern workloads that require Vulkan or newer DirectX versions, the card offers no support; the Vulkan API field is null, and DirectX is capped at 9.0a.
Benchmark Performance
The GeForce FX 5700 holds a percentile ranking of 50 among all GPUs in the benchmark database, placing it at the exact midpoint of the performance distribution. This is a neutral position — neither a high performer nor a laggard. However, the average benchmark score is 0, which is anomalous and suggests that no standardized benchmark results have been recorded for this card in the database. This absence of concrete scores means the percentile ranking is derived from architectural characteristics and historical data rather than direct measurements.
Without nearest rival data or specific benchmark scores, a quantitative comparison is not possible from the available facts. The pixel rate of 1.700 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1.700 GTexel/s are the only performance metrics available. These rates indicate that the card can fill 1.7 billion pixels per second and apply 1.7 billion texture samples per second. In practice, these figures suggest the card is suited for DirectX 9.0a-era titles at moderate settings, but it will struggle with pixel-heavy effects at higher resolutions. The 50th percentile ranking confirms that the card sits in the middle of the pack; it is neither a bargain performer nor a premium option. The lack of recorded benchmark scores means that any claim about real-world performance must be tempered by the understanding that the data is incomplete.
FAQ
Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GeForce FX 5700?
A: The card has 8.000 GB/s of memory bandwidth, derived from 128 MB of DDR memory on a 128-bit bus, with memory clocked at 250 MHz (500 Mbps effective).
Q: Does the GeForce FX 5700 support DirectX 9.0a?
A: Yes, the card supports DirectX 9.0a. It also offers OpenGL 1.5 (full) and OpenGL 2.0 (partial) support, but no Vulkan support.
Q: What is the transistor count and die size of this GPU?
A: The NV36B chip contains 82 million transistors on a 133 mm² die, fabricated on a 130 nm process at TSMC. The transistor density is 616.5K per mm².
Q: What is the power consumption of the GeForce FX 5700?
A: The thermal design power (TDP) is 25 W, with a suggested power supply rating of 200 W. The card uses no power connectors and occupies a single slot.
Q: What is the pixel and texture fill rate?
A: Both the pixel rate and texture rate are 1.700 GPixel/s and 1.700 GTexel/s, respectively, driven by 4 TMUs and 4 ROPs.
Q: When was the GeForce FX 5700 released, and what are its predecessors and successors?
A: The card was released on October 22, 2003. Its predecessor is the GeForce 4 Ti, and its successor is the GeForce 6 AGP. The production status is end-of-life.
Q: What display outputs does the card offer?
A: The card provides one DVI output, one VGA output, and one S-Video output. It interfaces via AGP 8x.
How It Compares
The GeForce FX 5700 has no recorded nearest rivals in the database, and its average benchmark score is zero. This makes direct competitive positioning impossible from the available data. The 50th percentile ranking across all GPUs is a broad indicator that the card performs at the median level of the entire GPU landscape — but this is a historical comparison, as the card is end-of-life and predates modern architectures.
Without rival names or delta percentages, the comparison must rely on architectural context. The predecessor, GeForce 4 Ti, would have been the incumbent at the time of launch; the FX 5700 offers DirectX 9.0a support that the GeForce 4 Ti's DirectX 8.1-era architecture lacked. The successor, GeForce 6 AGP, would have brought improved shader performance and likely higher fill rates, but those specifics are not in the fact pack. The card's 25 W TDP and single-slot design indicate it was positioned as an efficient, mainstream option. The lack of power connectors and a 200 W suggested PSU reinforce this mid-range positioning. In the broader market, the card's 50th percentile ranking means it would have been outperformed by half of all GPUs ever benchmarked, while also outperforming the other half — a balanced, if unremarkable, standing.
The AMD Equivalent of GeForce FX 5700
Looking for a similar graphics card from AMD? The AMD Radeon RX 480 offers comparable performance and features in the AMD lineup.
Popular NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 Comparisons
See how the GeForce FX 5700 stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare GeForce FX 5700 with Other GPUs
Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse GPUs