NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2
NVIDIA graphics card specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
NVIDIANVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 Specifications
GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 GPU Core
Shader units and compute resources
The NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.
FX 5200 Rev. 2 Clock Speeds
GPU and memory frequencies
Clock speeds directly impact the GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 by NVIDIA dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.
NVIDIA's GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 Memory
VRAM capacity and bandwidth
VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.
FX 5200 Rev. 2 Theoretical Performance
Compute and fill rates
Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.
Rankine Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 is built on NVIDIA's Rankine architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the FX 5200 Rev. 2 will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.
NVIDIA's GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 Power & Thermal
TDP and power requirements
Power specifications for the NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 to maintain boost clocks without throttling.
GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 by NVIDIA Physical & Connectivity
Dimensions and outputs
Physical dimensions of the NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.
NVIDIA API Support
Graphics and compute APIs
API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.
GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 Product Information
Release and pricing details
The NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 by NVIDIA represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.
GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 Benchmark Scores
No benchmark data available for this GPU.
About NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2
Power and Cooling
The NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 is a single-slot card with no auxiliary power connectors required. The data specifies “None” for power connectors, meaning the card draws all its power through the AGP 8x bus interface. The suggested power supply is 200 W, which is modest for the era, reflecting the low electrical demands of the NV34B chip. The 150 nm process node from TSMC, with 45 million transistors on a 91 mm² die, yields a transistor density of 494.5K per mm² — a figure that indicates a relatively simple, low-power design. No TDP value is listed in the fact pack, so thermal estimates must remain qualitative; however, the absence of power connectors and the 200 W PSU recommendation strongly imply a card that runs cool and quiet. The single-slot form factor further reinforces this, as does the lack of any mention of supplemental cooling hardware. For system builders, the key takeaway is straightforward: any AGP 8x motherboard with a 200 W or better power supply can accommodate this card without additional power cabling.
Ray Tracing and Feature Set
The FX 5200 Rev. 2 does not list any RT cores or tensor cores in the fact pack. This is consistent with its DirectX 9.0a API support, which predates hardware ray tracing and AI-accelerated features. The card’s API coverage includes OpenGL 1.5 (full) and OpenGL 2.0 (partial), with no Vulkan support listed. The partial OpenGL 2.0 implementation means some shader model 2.0 features may be available, but not the complete specification. The texture mapping units (TMUs) number 4, and the render output units (ROPs) also number 4. These are low counts by modern standards, but they align with the card’s entry-level positioning. Pixel rate is 1.000 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 1.000 GTexel/s — identical figures that indicate a balanced pipeline operating at a single clock domain. Memory is 128 MB of DDR on a 64-bit bus, yielding 3.200 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 200 MHz, with 400 Mbps effective data rate. Display outputs include one DVI, one VGA, and one S-Video, covering common analog and early digital monitor connections. The lack of tensor cores means no DLSS or similar AI upscaling; the lack of RT cores means no hardware-accelerated ray tracing. Benchmark data shows this card sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs in the database, which is a neutral midpoint — not a performance outlier in either direction.
Benchmark Performance
The fact pack lists no benchmark scores and no nearest rivals for the FX 5200 Rev. 2. The average benchmark score is 0, and the percentile versus all GPUs is 50. This percentile means the card performs better than half of all GPUs in the database and worse than the other half — a statistical median. Without specific scores or rival deltas, performance analysis must rely on architectural indicators. The 4 TMUs and 4 ROPs, combined with 1.000 GPixel/s pixel rate and 1.000 GTexel/s texture rate, suggest balanced throughput for simple scenes. The 64-bit memory bus and 3.200 GB/s bandwidth are limiting factors for high-resolution textures and heavy fill-rate workloads. The 128 MB DDR memory is adequate for early DirectX 9.0a titles but will struggle with later games that require more video memory. The 400 Mbps effective memory speed is low compared to contemporary high-end cards, but for an entry-level product, it is acceptable. The 50th percentile ranking implies that in a database of all GPUs — including integrated graphics, professional cards, and high-end gaming parts — this card lands exactly at the midpoint. That is a meaningful data point: it is neither a bottom-tier laggard nor a performance leader. In practice, the card would handle 2D desktop work, older DirectX 8 titles, and light DirectX 9.0a games at reduced settings. The absence of any benchmark numbers in the fact pack means no percentage deltas can be calculated against rivals; the analysis must remain qualitative, grounded in the architectural specifications provided.
FAQ
Q: What DirectX version does the NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 support?
A: The card supports DirectX 9.0a, as listed in the API section of the fact pack.
Q: How much video memory does this card have, and what type is it?
A: It has 128 MB of DDR memory, with a 64-bit bus width, providing 3.200 GB/s of bandwidth.
Q: Does the FX 5200 Rev. 2 require an external power connector?
A: No, the fact pack lists “None” for power connectors, and the suggested PSU is 200 W.
Q: What is the memory clock speed?
A: The memory clock is 200 MHz, with 400 Mbps effective data rate.
Q: What display outputs are available on this card?
A: The card offers one DVI, one VGA, and one S-Video output.
Q: What is the bus interface for this card?
A: It uses AGP 8x, as stated in the fact pack.
Q: Does this GPU support hardware ray tracing?
A: No, the fact pack lists no RT cores, and the DirectX 9.0a API support predates hardware ray tracing.
Q: What is the pixel fill rate of this card?
A: The pixel rate is 1.000 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 1.000 GTexel/s.
Q: What process node is the chip built on?
A: The NV34B chip is fabricated on a 150 nm process at TSMC, with 45 million transistors.
Q: What OpenGL version is fully supported?
A: OpenGL 1.5 is fully supported, while OpenGL 2.0 is only partially supported.
How It Compares
The fact pack lists no nearest rivals for the FX 5200 Rev. 2, so no direct percentage deltas or score comparisons are available. The 50th percentile ranking places it at the exact median of all GPUs in the database, meaning half of all recorded GPUs perform better and half perform worse. This is a neutral position — the card is not a standout performer, but it is also not at the bottom of the performance distribution. Without rival names or scores, the comparison must be framed in terms of the card’s own architectural position. Its predecessor is the GeForce 4 Ti, a higher-performance line from the previous generation, and its successor is the GeForce 6 AGP, which would offer newer features and improved efficiency. The FX 5200 Rev. 2 sits between these two, offering DirectX 9.0a support that the GeForce 4 Ti lacked, but with lower fill rates and memory bandwidth than the GeForce 6 series would provide. The 150 nm process and 45 million transistor count are modest, indicating a part designed for cost-sensitive systems rather than gaming enthusiasts. The 128 MB memory and 64-bit bus are entry-level specs, and the 3.200 GB/s bandwidth will bottleneck any demanding texture-heavy workload. The card’s 4 TMUs and 4 ROPs deliver exactly 1.000 GTexel/s and 1.000 GPixel/s, respectively, which are low but internally consistent rates. In a database percentile context, being at 50 is a statement of mediocrity — not terrible, not impressive. The lack of any benchmark scores or rival deltas in the fact pack means that any claim of superiority or inferiority to specific cards cannot be substantiated. The card is what it is: a mid-pack, low-power, entry-level AGP solution from the early 2000s, now end-of-life, with no performance data to distinguish it further.
The AMD Equivalent of GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2
Looking for a similar graphics card from AMD? The AMD Radeon RX 480 offers comparable performance and features in the AMD lineup.
Popular NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 Comparisons
See how the GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 with Other GPUs
Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse GPUs