GEFORCE

NVIDIA GeForce 8200

NVIDIA graphics card specifications and benchmark scores

VRAM
MHz Boost
40W
TDP
Bus Width

NVIDIA GeForce 8200 Specifications

⚙️

GeForce 8200 GPU Core

Shader units and compute resources

The NVIDIA GeForce 8200 GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.

Shading Units
16
Shaders
16
TMUs
8
ROPs
4
SM Count
2
⏱️

8200 Clock Speeds

GPU and memory frequencies

Clock speeds directly impact the GeForce 8200's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The GeForce 8200 by NVIDIA dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.

GPU Clock
500 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
Shader Clock
1200 MHz
GDDR GDDR 6X 6X

NVIDIA's GeForce 8200 Memory

VRAM capacity and bandwidth

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The GeForce 8200's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.

Memory Size
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
VRAM Type
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
Bandwidth
System Dependent
📈

8200 Theoretical Performance

Compute and fill rates

Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the NVIDIA GeForce 8200 against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.

FP32 (Float)
38.40 GFLOPS
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
🏗️

Tesla Architecture & Process

Manufacturing and design details

The NVIDIA GeForce 8200 is built on NVIDIA's Tesla architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the 8200 will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.

Architecture
Tesla
GPU Name
C78
Process Node
80 nm
Transistors
210 million
Die Size
127 mm²
Density
1.7M / mm²
🔌

NVIDIA's GeForce 8200 Power & Thermal

TDP and power requirements

Power specifications for the NVIDIA GeForce 8200 determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the GeForce 8200 to maintain boost clocks without throttling.

TDP
40 W
TDP
40W
📐

GeForce 8200 by NVIDIA Physical & Connectivity

Dimensions and outputs

Physical dimensions of the NVIDIA GeForce 8200 are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.

Slot Width
IGP
Bus Interface
PCI
Display Outputs
1x DVI1x VGA1x S-Video
Display Outputs
1x DVI1x VGA1x S-Video
🎮

NVIDIA API Support

Graphics and compute APIs

API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the NVIDIA GeForce 8200. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.

DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
OpenGL
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
Shader Model
4.0
📦

GeForce 8200 Product Information

Release and pricing details

The NVIDIA GeForce 8200 is manufactured by NVIDIA as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the GeForce 8200 by NVIDIA represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.

Manufacturer
NVIDIA
Release Date
May 2008
Production
End-of-life
Predecessor
GeForce 7 IGP
Successor
GeForce 9 IGP

GeForce 8200 Benchmark Scores

📊

No benchmark data available for this GPU.

About NVIDIA GeForce 8200

The NVIDIA GeForce 8200 from NVIDIA debuted on May 6, 2008, positioning itself as an entry‑level solution for budget-conscious users. Built on the Tesla architecture and fabricated with an 80 nm process, the chip reflects the design philosophies of its era. Its 40 W TDP indicates a modest power envelope, making it suitable for systems with limited thermal headroom. The card connects via a standard PCI interface, a choice that predates the widespread adoption of PCI‑Express. Despite its age, the 8200’s design still offers insight into how early shared‑memory GPUs balanced cost and capability. For anyone studying the evolution of integrated graphics, this model serves as a useful reference point.

Unlike dedicated GPUs, the GeForce 8200 relies on system shared memory, meaning its VRAM capacity fluctuates with the host’s RAM allocation. This shared‑memory approach caps effective bandwidth, which in turn limits achievable frame rates at higher resolutions. In practice, the card can comfortably drive legacy titles at 800×600 or 1024×768, but modern titles quickly exceed its bandwidth ceiling. Advanced graphics features such as shader model 3.0 are present, yet the limited VRAM capacity hampers texture‑heavy scenes. Users who prioritize low power draw over raw performance may still find the 8200 from NVIDIA adequate for basic desktop tasks and older games. The absence of official benchmark data encourages enthusiasts to conduct their own tests to gauge real‑world performance.

Cooling considerations for this GPU are relatively straightforward, as the low TDP translates to minimal heat generation. Most reference designs employ a passive heatsink, though aftermarket solutions can improve airflow in cramped chassis. Optimal use cases revolve around legacy gaming, HTPC setups, or as a fallback graphics solution in industrial PCs. Because the card lacks modern power connectors, installation is simple on older motherboards that still feature a PCI slot. While benchmark numbers are scarce, the NVIDIA's GeForce 8200 remains a tangible example of early shared‑memory graphics engineering. Investigators interested in the trade‑offs between cost, power, and performance will find this model a compelling study subject.

The AMD Equivalent of GeForce 8200

Looking for a similar graphics card from AMD? The AMD Radeon RX 480 offers comparable performance and features in the AMD lineup.

AMD Radeon RX 480

AMD • 8 GB VRAM

View Specs Compare

Popular NVIDIA GeForce 8200 Comparisons

See how the GeForce 8200 stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.

Compare GeForce 8200 with Other GPUs

Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.

Browse GPUs