Matrox QID LP PCI
Unknown graphics card specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
UnknownMatrox QID LP PCI Specifications
Matrox QID LP PCI GPU Core
Shader units and compute resources
The Matrox QID LP PCI GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.
Matrox QID LP PCI Clock Speeds
GPU and memory frequencies
Clock speeds directly impact the Matrox QID LP PCI's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The Matrox QID LP PCI by Unknown dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.
Unknown's Matrox QID LP PCI Memory
VRAM capacity and bandwidth
VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The Matrox QID LP PCI's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.
Matrox QID LP PCI Theoretical Performance
Compute and fill rates
Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the Matrox QID LP PCI against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.
MP Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The Matrox QID LP PCI is built on Unknown's MP architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the Matrox QID LP PCI will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.
Unknown's Matrox QID LP PCI Power & Thermal
TDP and power requirements
Power specifications for the Matrox QID LP PCI determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the Matrox QID LP PCI to maintain boost clocks without throttling.
Matrox QID LP PCI by Unknown Physical & Connectivity
Dimensions and outputs
Physical dimensions of the Matrox QID LP PCI are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.
Unknown API Support
Graphics and compute APIs
API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the Matrox QID LP PCI. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.
Matrox QID LP PCI Product Information
Release and pricing details
The Matrox QID LP PCI is manufactured by Unknown as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the Matrox QID LP PCI by Unknown represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.
Matrox QID LP PCI Benchmark Scores
No benchmark data available for this GPU.
About Matrox QID LP PCI
The Matrox QID LP PCI is a niche, end-of-life graphics card built around the proprietary MP-A4 chip on the MP architecture, produced by UMC. It holds a median position in the benchmark database, sitting at the 50th percentile against all GPUs, though its average benchmark score is zero, indicating that no standardized performance data has been recorded for it. The card was released on 2004-12-16, features a single-slot design, and targets a specific legacy market segment with its unique feature set.
How It Compares
The QID LP PCI has no listed nearest rivals in the benchmark database, which means direct comparative analysis against specific competing products is not possible from the available data. Its 50th percentile ranking places it exactly at the midpoint of all tracked GPUs, but this is a statistical position rather than a performance endorsement, as the zero average benchmark score suggests the card either has not been subjected to standard testing or produces results that fall below measurable thresholds.
Without nearestRivals data, the card’s competitive standing must be inferred from its architectural specifications. The MP-A4 chip, manufactured on an unspecified process node by UMC, delivers a pixel rate of 500.0 MPixel/s and a texture rate of 2.000 GTexel/s. These figures are modest by any modern standard, and the card’s end-of-life production status confirms it has been superseded. The absence of rival comparisons in the database means that any claims about its relative performance would be speculative, so the analysis must rely on its absolute specifications.
The card’s bus interface is PCI-X, which is a legacy server-oriented bus rather than the consumer PCIe standard. This limits its compatibility to older motherboards and reinforces its positioning as a specialized product for industrial or embedded systems. The display outputs are 2x LFH60, a connector type that requires adapter cables for standard monitors, further indicating a non-consumer focus.
Ray Tracing and Feature Set
The QID LP PCI does not include any ray tracing cores or tensor cores. The architecture MP, as implemented in the MP-A4 chip, provides no hardware acceleration for ray-traced lighting or AI-based tensor operations. This is consistent with the card’s release era and its DirectX 8.1 and OpenGL 1.5 API support, both of which predate any ray tracing or tensor core functionality.
The API support is limited to DirectX 8.1 and OpenGL 1.5, with no Vulkan support listed. This means the card cannot run modern graphics workloads that require DirectX 11 or later, Vulkan, or OpenGL 4.x features. The absence of these APIs effectively restricts the card to very old software titles or custom applications designed for its specific era.
The feature set is further defined by the absence of shading units (null), though it does include 8 texture mapping units (TMUs) and 2 render output units (ROPs). The texture rate of 2.000 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 500.0 MPixel/s are derived from these fixed-function units. The card’s memory operates at 300 MHz with 600 Mbps effective data rate, which is extremely low by contemporary standards.
Power and Cooling
The QID LP PCI has no listed TDP value, which is notable given the card’s age and architecture. However, the suggested PSU requirement is 200 W, indicating that the card is designed to operate within a low-power system envelope. The card requires no power connectors, drawing all its power from the PCI-X bus slot itself.
The cooling solution is a single-slot design, which means the card occupies only one expansion slot and uses a passive or low-profile active cooler. The physical dimensions are 168 mm in length (6.6 inches), with no height or width specified. This low-profile form factor (LP in the name) makes it suitable for compact chassis, though the PCI-X interface limits its installation to compatible motherboards.
The power connector requirement is listed as “None,” which simplifies installation from a cabling perspective. The absence of a TDP figure means that thermal management expectations must be inferred from the suggested 200 W PSU, which is a conservative recommendation for a system containing this card. The card’s end-of-life status suggests that long-term reliability in modern systems is not a primary consideration.
FAQ
Q: What is the release date of the Matrox QID LP PCI?
A: The card was released on 2004-12-16, and its production status is listed as end-of-life.
Q: What is the memory size and type on this card?
A: It has 128 MB of DDR memory with a 64-bit bus width, providing a bandwidth of 4.800 GB/s.
Q: Does the card support ray tracing?
A: No, the card has no ray tracing cores or tensor cores, and its API support is limited to DirectX 8.1 and OpenGL 1.5.
Q: What power supply is recommended for a system with this card?
A: The suggested PSU is 200 W, and the card requires no auxiliary power connectors.
Q: What type of display outputs does the card provide?
A: It features 2x LFH60 connectors, which are legacy multi-monitor outputs requiring adapters for standard displays.
Q: What is the card’s benchmark percentile ranking?
A: It sits at the 50th percentile against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of zero.
Benchmark Performance
The benchmark data for the QID LP PCI is sparse: the average benchmark score is 0, and the nearestRivals list is empty. This means there are no exact percentage deltas to report against competing products. The 50th percentile ranking is a statistical artifact that does not reflect actual performance, as the zero score indicates no measurable results from standard benchmark suites.
In the absence of rival scores, the card’s performance must be evaluated through its raw throughput metrics. The pixel rate of 500.0 MPixel/s and texture rate of 2.000 GTexel/s are the only quantitative performance indicators available. These figures are dramatically lower than any modern GPU, and even compared to mid-range cards from the same era, they would likely place the card in the entry-level segment.
The memory bandwidth of 4.800 GB/s, derived from a 64-bit bus and DDR memory at 300 MHz, is a severe bottleneck for any texture-heavy workload. The 128 MB VRAM capacity limits texture caching to very small scenes. The card’s API support for DirectX 8.1 and OpenGL 1.5 further caps its benchmark potential, as modern benchmarks will not run on this hardware. The data suggests that the card was never intended for performance benchmarking but rather for specific multi-display or embedded applications.
Who Should Consider It
Given the zero average benchmark score and the 50th percentile ranking, the QID LP PCI is not suitable for any gaming or general-purpose graphics workload. The card’s specifications — 128 MB VRAM, 4.800 GB/s bandwidth, and 500.0 MPixel/s pixel rate — indicate it can handle only the most basic 2D output or very low-resolution 3D tasks from the DirectX 8.1 era.
The card’s 2x LFH60 display outputs suggest it was designed for multi-monitor setups in industrial, medical, or financial environments where multiple low-resolution displays are required without high performance. The PCI-X bus interface and single-slot form factor make it a fit for legacy server or workstation motherboards that lack PCIe slots. The suggested 200 W PSU is low, making it suitable for power-constrained systems.
Users with modern software or high-resolution monitors should not consider this card, as its DirectX 8.1 and OpenGL 1.5 API support will not run contemporary applications. The end-of-life production status means no driver updates or support are forthcoming. This card is only relevant for those maintaining vintage hardware or needing a specific legacy multi-output solution.
Memory Subsystem
The memory subsystem of the QID LP PCI consists of 128 MB of DDR memory, which is minuscule by any modern standard. The memory type is DDR, operating at 300 MHz with a 600 Mbps effective data rate. The bus width is 64 bit, which is half the width of many entry-level cards from the same period, and the resulting bandwidth is 4.800 GB/s.
This bandwidth is sufficient for basic 2D framebuffer operations but will severely constrain any 3D rendering, especially at higher resolutions. The 128 MB capacity means that textures must be swapped frequently from system memory, and the pixel rate of 500.0 MPixel/s limits fill-rate-heavy effects. The ROP count of 2 further restricts the card’s ability to output pixels efficiently.
For high-resolution displays, the memory subsystem is inadequate. The 64-bit bus and low clock speed create a bottleneck that cannot be overcome by the MP-A4 chip’s other features. The card’s 2x LFH60 outputs are designed for low-resolution or text-based displays, not modern high-density panels. In practical terms, the memory subsystem limits the card to resolutions and color depths common in the early 2000s, with no headroom for today’s graphical demands.
The NVIDIA Equivalent of Matrox QID LP PCI
Looking for a similar graphics card from NVIDIA? The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 offers comparable performance and features in the NVIDIA lineup.
Popular Matrox QID LP PCI Comparisons
See how the Matrox QID LP PCI stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare Matrox QID LP PCI with Other GPUs
Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse GPUs