Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU Mobile

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU Mobile is an integrated graphics solution built on Intel’s Generation 12.1 architecture, using the Tiger Lake GT2 chip on a 10 nm process. It carries 640 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 raster operation units, with a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1100 MHz. The GPU is positioned at the 50th percentile among all GPUs in the database, indicating a mid-pack standing overall. Its production status is end-of-life, with a release date of 2020-09-01, and it is designed as an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with a Ring Bus interface.

Benchmark Performance

The data for this GPU shows an average benchmark score of 0, meaning no standardized performance metric has been recorded in this database. Consequently, direct numerical comparisons against rivals are not available from the fact pack, as the nearestRivals list is empty. The 50th percentile ranking, however, places it exactly in the middle of all GPUs tracked, suggesting that it outperforms roughly half of the field while trailing the other half. This percentile is a relative indicator rather than an absolute performance figure, and without rival scores, it cannot be translated into specific deltas.

The theoretical compute figures provide a glimpse of its raw capability. The GPU delivers 1,408.0 GFLOPS of FP32 performance and 2.816 TFLOPS of FP16 performance with a 2:1 ratio, meaning the FP16 throughput is double that of FP32. Pixel rate is 22.00 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 44.00 GTexel/s. These numbers are consistent with a low-power integrated part, but they are not directly comparable to any rival because no rival data is present in the fact pack. In the absence of benchmark scores, the percentile stands as the only meaningful comparative metric, and it indicates that this GPU does not excel nor fail dramatically within the broader database.

How It Compares

No nearest rivals are listed in the fact pack, so a positional analysis against specific competing GPUs cannot be performed. The percentile of 50 implies that the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU Mobile sits at the median point of the database’s GPU population. That means half of all tracked GPUs are expected to perform better, and half are expected to perform worse, based on the database’s ranking methodology. Without named competitors, the comparison must remain abstract: the data shows a balanced, average standing rather than a decisive advantage or disadvantage. For users familiar with integrated graphics, this placement is unremarkable, but it is not a bottom-tier result either. The lack of rival entries also means no percentage deltas can be cited, and any attempt to infer specific matchups would go beyond the provided facts.

Memory Subsystem

The memory configuration is entirely system-shared, with no dedicated VRAM. The size, type, and bus width are all listed as "System Shared," which means the GPU draws from the host system’s main memory rather than having its own pool. Bandwidth is described as "System Dependent," so actual throughput varies based on the platform’s memory architecture, such as dual-channel versus single-channel configurations and memory speed. This design is typical for integrated GPUs in laptops, where physical space and power constraints preclude separate memory chips. The clock for memory is similarly "System Shared," and no specific frequency is provided in the fact pack.

For high-resolution gaming or compute tasks, this shared memory arrangement imposes a practical limitation. Because the GPU competes with the CPU for the same memory bandwidth, performance can degrade when both are under load. The absence of a dedicated bus width figure means the theoretical maximum bandwidth is unknown, but the "System Dependent" label signals that results will vary widely between implementations. A system with faster, dual-channel memory will yield better GPU performance than one with slower, single-channel memory, though the fact pack does not quantify this difference. At resolutions like 1080p or higher, the memory subsystem could become a bottleneck, especially in titles with large texture pools, but no specific resolution-based benchmarks are available to confirm this.

FAQ

Q: What is the process node for this GPU?

A: The Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU Mobile is built on a 10 nm process at Intel’s foundry.

Q: How many shading units does it have?

A: It contains 640 shading units, along with 40 TMUs and 20 ROPs.

Q: What is the boost clock speed?

A: The boost clock is 1100 MHz, while the base clock is 300 MHz.

Q: Does this GPU have dedicated VRAM?

A: No, the memory size, type, and bus width are all "System Shared," meaning it relies on the host system’s memory.

Q: What API support does it offer?

A: It supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the power draw?

A: The TDP is listed as 15 W, which is typical for an integrated mobile GPU.

Q: Is this GPU still in production?

A: No, its production status is "End-of-life," and it was released on 2020-09-01.

Who Should Consider It

Given the 50th percentile ranking and the absence of benchmark scores, the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU Mobile is best suited for users with modest graphical demands. The FP32 throughput of 1,408.0 GFLOPS and the 22.00 GPixel/s pixel rate indicate it can handle basic 2D tasks, video playback, and light 3D workloads, but it is not positioned for high-end gaming or professional rendering. The system-shared memory and "System Dependent" bandwidth further suggest that performance will be inconsistent across different laptops, so the same GPU may feel faster or slower depending on the platform’s memory configuration.

For gaming, this GPU is appropriate for low-resolution, low-detail settings in older or less demanding titles. At 720p with reduced graphical presets, it might deliver playable frame rates in some games, but the lack of benchmark data means no specific performance guarantees can be made. At 1080p, users should expect to lower settings substantially, and even then, the shared memory bandwidth could cause stuttering in texture-heavy scenes. The 15 W TDP makes it a natural fit for thin-and-light ultrabooks where battery life and cooling are prioritized over raw graphics power. Users who need to run modern AAA games at high settings, or who require consistent performance for content creation, should look elsewhere, as this GPU’s mid-pack percentile and integrated nature point to a limited ceiling.

Power and Cooling

The TDP is 15 W, which is a low figure that aligns with its integrated design. This power draw is modest enough for passive or low-noise cooling solutions in laptops, and it does not require any dedicated power connectors, as none are listed. The suggested PSU is not specified, which is expected because the GPU is an IGP and draws power from the laptop’s main power delivery system rather than a separate graphics card slot. The slot width is "IGP," confirming that it is not a discrete card and does not require a PCIe power cable or a supplemental power supply unit.

Thermal management is likely straightforward due to the low TDP, but the actual cooling solution depends on the laptop manufacturer’s design. Because the GPU shares heat with the CPU on the same die, a well-designed cooling system is necessary to sustain boost clocks of 1100 MHz under sustained load. The die size is 146 mm², which is relatively large for an integrated GPU, but the 10 nm process helps keep power efficiency reasonable. Display outputs are "Portable Device Dependent," meaning the number and type of video outputs vary by laptop model. Users should not expect to upgrade or modify the cooling, as the GPU is permanently integrated into the system, and no power connector or PSU recommendation is applicable in this context.