Intel HD Graphics 3000
Intel graphics card specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
IntelIntel HD Graphics 3000 Specifications
HD Graphics 3000 GPU Core
Shader units and compute resources
The Intel HD Graphics 3000 GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.
HD Graphics 3000 Clock Speeds
GPU and memory frequencies
Clock speeds directly impact the HD Graphics 3000's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The HD Graphics 3000 by Intel dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.
Intel's HD Graphics 3000 Memory
VRAM capacity and bandwidth
VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The HD Graphics 3000's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.
HD Graphics 3000 Theoretical Performance
Compute and fill rates
Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the Intel HD Graphics 3000 against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.
Generation 6.0 Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The Intel HD Graphics 3000 is built on Intel's Generation 6.0 architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the HD Graphics 3000 will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.
Intel's HD Graphics 3000 Power & Thermal
TDP and power requirements
Power specifications for the Intel HD Graphics 3000 determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the HD Graphics 3000 to maintain boost clocks without throttling.
HD Graphics 3000 by Intel Physical & Connectivity
Dimensions and outputs
Physical dimensions of the Intel HD Graphics 3000 are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.
Intel API Support
Graphics and compute APIs
API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the Intel HD Graphics 3000. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.
HD Graphics 3000 Product Information
Release and pricing details
The Intel HD Graphics 3000 is manufactured by Intel as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the HD Graphics 3000 by Intel represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.
HD Graphics 3000 Benchmark Scores
No benchmark data available for this GPU.
About Intel HD Graphics 3000
Intel HD Graphics 3000 is an integrated graphics processor built by Intel with the chip designation Sandy Bridge GT2 and the architecture label Generation 6.0. The graphics generation field is recorded as "HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)". It was manufactured by Intel on a 32 nm process, integrating 624 million transistors into a die of 149 mm², for a transistor density of 4.2M / mm². The part is end-of-life and has a release date of January 31, 2011. Its base clock is 850 MHz and its boost clock is 1100 MHz; no game clock is listed. Memory is described as System Shared for size, type, and bus width, with bandwidth listed as System Dependent. The shading unit count is 96, the TMU count is 12, and the ROP count is 2, producing listed rates of 2.200 GPixel/s, 13.20 GTexel/s, and 211.2 GFLOPS for FP32.
Benchmark Performance
The benchmark section of the record contains no entries. The benchmarks array is empty, and the average benchmark score field is 0. Because no individual benchmarks are stored, the average of 0 should not be read as a measured zero-performance result; it is a placeholder indicating that no benchmark data has been aggregated for this part. The only comparative quantity in the benchmark database is the percentileVsAllGpus value of 50, which places the HD Graphics 3000 at the median of the database's GPU population. A 50th percentile standing is a midpoint ranking, but without a score distribution, the meaning is coarse.
The absence of nearestRivals data reinforces this limitation. There are no rival names, no rival scores, and no percentage difference values, so any statement about being a specific percentage ahead of or behind another product cannot be made from this record. The 50th percentile is the sole relative metric, and it cannot be translated into exact margins.
Given the empty benchmark table, the listed throughput figures are the only quantitative expression of graphics capability. The pixel rate of 2.200 GPixel/s corresponds to the 2 ROPs operating at the listed clocks. The texture rate of 13.20 GTexel/s is the product of the 12 TMUs and the boost clock. The FP32 rate of 211.2 GFLOPS represents the top shader throughput available from the 96 shading units. These are theoretical maxima, not measured application performance.
Memory behavior will affect how much of that throughput can actually be delivered. The bus width is System Shared, and bandwidth is System Dependent, meaning the graphics block relies on the host platform's memory subsystem rather than a dedicated framebuffer. The memory clock is also System Shared. As a result, the real data movement capacity can change from system to system without any change to the graphics processor itself.
The 50th percentile rank is not accompanied by a confidence interval or a standard deviation, so precision is unknown. What the data shows is a part with moderate theoretical throughput and no measured scores, occupying a median position in a broad GPU ranking. For a benchmark database, this is a record with structural information but little empirical performance evidence.
Power and Cooling
No TDP is listed for the HD Graphics 3000. The power connectors field is also absent, and no suggested PSU is provided. Because the slotWidth field is IGP, the part is an integrated graphics processor rather than a discrete expansion card, which is consistent with the absence of add-in power requirements. The record lists no dimensions for length, height, or width, so mechanical clearance is not a meaningful consideration for this component; installation depends on the motherboard platform.
The manufacturing facts relevant to power include the 32 nm process node and the 624 million transistor count on a 149 mm² die. Transistor density is 4.2M / mm². The process node is the lithographic generation, and the die size bounds the amount of silicon that could dissipate heat, but without a TDP figure, thermal limits cannot be quantified.
Cooling analysis must therefore stay qualitative. An integrated part with no power connector list and no PSU recommendation is expected to draw its power through the host motherboard, but that expectation is not backed by a wattage number. The absence of a TDP also means no cooler requirement can be stated. The memory subsystem is System Shared, so any memory-related heat is generated in system RAM rather than on a dedicated graphics card. The bus interface is Ring Bus, which ties the graphics block into the platform's interconnect rather than a separate memory bus. Display outputs are Motherboard Dependent, so the physical output stage is part of the motherboard design.
How It Compares
The nearestRivals array is empty. There are no adjacent GPU entries in the database, so a per-rival comparison cannot be written. There are no names to list, no scores to compare, and no percentage deltas to quote. The only comparative figure in the entire record is the 50th percentile against all GPUs.
That percentile places the HD Graphics 3000 exactly in the middle of the ranking distribution used by the database. Being at the median means an equal number of GPUs sits above and below it in a simple ordering. However, this does not identify which parts are immediately above or below. Without neighbor data, the percentile cannot be used to compute a percentage advantage or disadvantage over a specific product.
The empty rival list also means that the theoretical rates, such as 211.2 GFLOPS or 13.20 GTexel/s, cannot be benchmarked against alternative graphics chips in the record. For a product described as end-of-life and released on January 31, 2011, this is a notable gap in the dataset. The data supports only a single statement of relative position: the 50th percentile. Every other comparison is undefined.
Who Should Consider It
The HD Graphics 3000 is a candidate for systems that already have motherboard support for its integrated display outputs. Since display outputs are Motherboard Dependent, the available connectors are determined by the board, not by this component. Memory is System Shared, so the system RAM serves as the framebuffer; the bandwidth is System Dependent, meaning performance scales with the host memory installation.
In terms of raw graphics mass, the totals are 96 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 2 ROPs. The fill rate is 2.200 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 13.20 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput is 211.2 GFLOPS. These numbers describe a small fixed-function block. The feature set is capped by DirectX 11.1 at the 10_1 feature level and by OpenGL 3.1; Vulkan is not listed.
Because no game benchmarks exist in the record, no resolution-based or detail-settings-based recommendation can be grounded in measured scores. The absence of scores is a decisive limitation. For very light 3D workloads and desktop output, the geometric and fill rates may be sufficient, but no data in this record proves a specific playability target. The 50th percentile rank indicates that, among all GPUs in the database, this part sits in the middle, but an integrated part with System Shared memory and motherboard-dependent outputs is inherently tied to the rest of the platform.
The product is end-of-life. That status means it is not a forward-looking acquisition from the database's perspective; the relevant users are those maintaining or repairing an older platform. Consideration should be limited to situations where the existing platform and motherboard are the defining constraints, because the graphics processor cannot be separated from the motherboard integration it relies on.
Ray Tracing and Feature Set
The record lists no ray tracing cores and no tensor cores; both fields are null. This is consistent with a Generation 6.0 integrated block whose rendering resources are limited to the 96 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 2 ROPs. There is no secondary compute block listed for specialized tasks.
API support in the benchmark database is DirectX 11.1 (10_1), OpenGL 3.1, and no Vulkan. The 10_1 marker identifies the hardware feature level exposed through the DirectX 11.1 runtime, which restricts the set of DirectX features available to those in the 10_1 feature level. OpenGL 3.1 is the highest OpenGL version listed, which limits compatibility for software requiring later OpenGL revisions. Vulkan does not appear at all, so the Vulkan API path is unavailable.
The lack of RT cores means there is no hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The lack of tensor cores means there is no tensor acceleration block present. The 211.2 GFLOPS FP32 figure is the entire compute budget for the fixed-function list; no other accelerator block is listed.
Because the memory bus width is System Shared and bandwidth is System Dependent, even the listed feature set can be constrained by the memory subsystem. The Ring Bus interface and Motherboard Dependent display outputs complete the platform-integrated picture. For modern graphics APIs such as Vulkan, or for ray-traced and tensor-accelerated workloads, the data shows this part has no support.
Compare HD Graphics 3000 with Other GPUs
Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse GPUs