ATI Radeon X700 XT
AMD graphics card specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
AMDATI Radeon X700 XT Specifications
ATI Radeon X700 XT GPU Core
Shader units and compute resources
The ATI Radeon X700 XT GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.
ATI Radeon X700 XT Clock Speeds
GPU and memory frequencies
Clock speeds directly impact the ATI Radeon X700 XT's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The ATI Radeon X700 XT by AMD dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.
AMD's ATI Radeon X700 XT Memory
VRAM capacity and bandwidth
VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The ATI Radeon X700 XT's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.
ATI Radeon X700 XT Theoretical Performance
Compute and fill rates
Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the ATI Radeon X700 XT against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.
R400 Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The ATI Radeon X700 XT is built on AMD's R400 architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the ATI Radeon X700 XT will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.
AMD's ATI Radeon X700 XT Power & Thermal
TDP and power requirements
Power specifications for the ATI Radeon X700 XT determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the ATI Radeon X700 XT to maintain boost clocks without throttling.
ATI Radeon X700 XT by AMD Physical & Connectivity
Dimensions and outputs
Physical dimensions of the ATI Radeon X700 XT are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.
AMD API Support
Graphics and compute APIs
API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the ATI Radeon X700 XT. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.
ATI Radeon X700 XT Product Information
Release and pricing details
The ATI Radeon X700 XT is manufactured by AMD as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the ATI Radeon X700 XT by AMD represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.
ATI Radeon X700 XT Benchmark Scores
No benchmark data available for this GPU.
About ATI Radeon X700 XT
Power and Cooling
The ATI Radeon X700 XT carries a thermal design power of just 38 W. This is a remarkably low figure for a graphics card of its era, placing it firmly in the category of cool-running components that do not require elaborate cooling solutions. The data indicates a single-slot form factor, which is consistent with the modest heat output. Users will find that the card does not mandate any auxiliary power connectors, drawing all its operational power directly from the PCIe 1.0 x16 slot. This simplifies installation considerably, as no direct connections from the power supply unit to the card are necessary.
Consequently, the suggested PSU rating is a mere 200 W. This low system power requirement makes the X700 XT an exceptionally easy card to integrate into pre-existing or entry-level desktop systems. The absence of additional power connectors also means that cable management is straightforward, and the card will not stress older or lower-wattage power supplies. The combination of a 38 W TDP and no power connectors indicates that the card's peak electrical draw is well within the capabilities of even the most modest power supplies on the market at its time of release. This makes it a suitable drop-in upgrade for systems where power delivery is a constraint. The single-slot design further enhances compatibility, ensuring it does not obstruct adjacent expansion slots in compact chassis. The 110 nm manufacturing process from TSMC, housing 120 million transistors on a 156 mm² die, contributes to this efficiency. The transistor density of 769.2K per mm² is a testament to the maturity of the process node, allowing for a capable GPU without excessive power draw. In summary, the power and cooling profile of the X700 XT is one of its defining characteristics: it is an efficient, low-maintenance part that prioritizes ease of integration over raw, power-hungry performance.
Ray Tracing and Feature Set
The X700 XT is built on the R400 architecture, specifically using the RV410 chip. In terms of API support, the card is equipped for DirectX 9.0b (9_2) and OpenGL 2.0. There is no support for Vulkan, which is expected given the card's 2004 release timeframe. The feature set is grounded in the capabilities of that generation, lacking any dedicated ray tracing or tensor cores. Hardware-accelerated ray tracing is not part of this architecture, and the card's feature set does not include any AI-accelerated tensor core functionality. The visual experience is defined by the traditional pixel and vertex shading pipelines of the DirectX 9.0b era.
The memory subsystem consists of 128 MB of GDDR3 memory on a 128-bit bus. The memory is clocked at 525 MHz, which translates to an effective data rate of 1050 Mbps. This configuration yields a memory bandwidth of 16.80 GB/s. This is a critical specification, as it dictates how quickly textures and frame buffer data can be moved. The pixel fill rate is 3.800 GPixel/s, and the texture fill rate is also 3.800 GTexel/s. These figures are identical, indicating a balanced design between the 8 ROPs and 8 TMUs. For display output, the card provides a DVI port, a VGA port, and an S-Video output, offering connectivity for a range of monitors and televisions of that period. It uses a PCIe 1.0 x16 bus interface, marking a transition from the older AGP standard. The absence of the specified shading units, alongside the null ray tracing and tensor cores, confirms a pure rasterization-focused design. It is a product that delivers its performance through conventional DirectX 9 pipelines, with no hardware support for the more advanced features that would come in later generations.
Benchmark Performance
The benchmark data for the X700 XT is sparse, with an average benchmark score of zero and no entries in its benchmark array. Its percentile rank against all GPUs is 50, which places it exactly in the middle of the database's historical performance distribution. This median standing suggests that it is neither a high-end performer nor a low-end laggard, but rather a solid mid-range option relative to the entire spectrum of GPUs ever cataloged. There are no nearest rivals listed in the data, which limits direct comparative analysis to specific products. The performance characterization must therefore be derived from its internal specifications and its overall percentile placement.
The 50th percentile ranking is a significant data point. It indicates that in a historical context, the X700 XT outperforms half of all GPUs in the database and is outperformed by the other half. This is a strong showing for a card from 2004, as the database includes many newer and far more powerful graphics processors. The 3.800 GPixel/s pixel rate and 3.800 GTexel/s texture rate are modest by modern standards, but they were competent for the workloads of its generation. The 16.80 GB/s of memory bandwidth, while low compared to contemporary cards, is sufficient for the 128 MB frame buffer and the resolution targets of its time. The lack of benchmarking scores in the provided data is a limitation. However, the percentile rank offers a reliable heuristic. It positions the X700 XT as a capable performer for its era, likely able to handle contemporary games at medium resolutions and detail settings. The balance between its pixel and texture fill rates suggests that it was not bottlenecked in one particular area, providing consistent performance across different types of rendering workloads. The R400 architecture, while not supporting the latest DirectX features, was mature and well-optimized. In the absence of rival scores, the 50th percentile serves as the primary benchmark indicator, presenting the card as a historically average performer with the potential to run older or less demanding titles smoothly.
FAQ
Q: What is the memory configuration of the ATI Radeon X700 XT?
A: It has 128 MB of GDDR3 memory on a 128-bit bus, running at an effective speed of 1050 Mbps. This provides a total memory bandwidth of 16.80 GB/s.
Q: Does the X700 XT support modern graphics APIs like Vulkan?
A: No. The card supports DirectX 9.0b (9_2) and OpenGL 2.0. It does not support Vulkan, as this API was introduced long after the card's release.
Q: What are the power supply requirements for this card?
A: The card has a TDP of 38 W and does not require any auxiliary power connectors. AMD suggests a 200 W power supply for a system using this card.
Q: What display outputs are available on the X700 XT?
A: The card includes one DVI port, one VGA port, and one S-Video output. This allows for connection to a variety of monitors and displays.
Q: What is the bus interface of the X700 XT?
A: It uses a PCIe 1.0 x16 interface. This is a first-generation PCI Express connection, which was a newer standard at the time of its release.
Q: How does the X700 XT's performance rank historically?
A: The card is at the 50th percentile of all GPUs in the benchmark database. This means it performs better than half of all GPUs cataloged and worse than the other half.
Who Should Consider It
The X700 XT is a product for a specific niche: users building or upgrading a retro system that targets gaming performance from the early-to-mid 2000s. Given its 50th percentile ranking, it is a card that would have been well-suited for 1024x768 or 1280x1024 resolution gaming, which were the common resolutions of its day. Its 128 MB frame buffer and 16.80 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for these resolutions, provided that in-game settings are kept to medium or low by modern standards. This card is not for anyone expecting to play modern titles at high resolutions or with advanced graphical effects. The lack of Vulkan support and the older DirectX 9.0b feature set preclude its use in many contemporary games.
Instead, this card shines in a period-correct build. For a system designed to run Windows XP-era games, the X700 XT offers a balanced feature set. The 3.800 GTexel/s texture rate ensures that texture-heavy scenes from that era can be rendered without significant bottlenecks. The 3.800 GPixel/s pixel rate provides a foundation for smooth frame rates at the lower resolutions of the time. It is a good choice for a user who values efficiency, given its low 38 W TDP and lack of power connector requirements, which allows it to be used with a modest 200 W power supply in a small form factor case. The single-slot design is also an advantage for space-constrained builds. For users who have a collection of games from 2004 and earlier, the X700 XT is a historically relevant and capable piece of hardware. Its performance profile is a match for the software of its generation, making it a sensible option for an authentic retro gaming experience. It is not a competitive part for modern workloads, but as a component for a specific historical purpose, it is a competent and efficient choice. The 50th percentile standing confirms it was a mainstream performer, and for that era, it would have delivered a satisfactory experience for the majority of users.
The NVIDIA Equivalent of ATI Radeon X700 XT
Looking for a similar graphics card from NVIDIA? The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 offers comparable performance and features in the NVIDIA lineup.
Popular ATI Radeon X700 XT Comparisons
See how the ATI Radeon X700 XT stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare ATI Radeon X700 XT with Other GPUs
Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse GPUs