ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory
AMD graphics card specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
AMDATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory Specifications
ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory GPU Core
Shader units and compute resources
The ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.
ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory Clock Speeds
GPU and memory frequencies
Clock speeds directly impact the ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory by AMD dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.
AMD's ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory Memory
VRAM capacity and bandwidth
VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.
ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory Theoretical Performance
Compute and fill rates
Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.
R300 Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory is built on AMD's R300 architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.
AMD's ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory Power & Thermal
TDP and power requirements
Power specifications for the ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory to maintain boost clocks without throttling.
ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory by AMD Physical & Connectivity
Dimensions and outputs
Physical dimensions of the ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.
AMD API Support
Graphics and compute APIs
API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.
ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory Product Information
Release and pricing details
The ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory is manufactured by AMD as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory by AMD represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.
ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory Benchmark Scores
No benchmark data available for this GPU.
About ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory
The ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory is an AMD GPU built around the RV370 chip and the R300 architecture. It belongs to the Radeon R300 (X300) generation, fabricated by TSMC on a 110 nm process with 107 million transistors on a 74 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 1.4M / mm². The database entry lists no individual benchmarks: the benchmarks array is empty, the average benchmark score is 0, and the percentile versus all GPUs is 50. Since the nearestRivals list is also empty, no direct comparisons with other products can be drawn from the available numbers; the following analysis is based entirely on the listed technical data.
Benchmark Performance
Benchmark results for this card are not present in the database. The avgBenchmarkScore field is 0, and the benchmarks array has no entries. The only positional metric is percentileVsAllGpus = 50, which places the card at the midpoint of all GPUs in the database. A 50th percentile is a median placement, but it is not corroborated by any workload score, so it should be read as a database ranking rather than a measured performance claim.
Without score data, the card's throughput limits must be read from its fixed-function and memory specifications. The GPU has 4 texture mapping units and 4 render output units. The pixel fill rate is 1.300 GPixel/s, and the texture fill rate is 1.300 GTexel/s. Both rates are equal, which is expected from a design where the 4 TMUs and 4 ROPs are balanced. The memory subsystem consists of 128 MB of DDR memory on a 64-bit bus, running at 300 MHz with 600 Mbps effective data rate. This yields a memory bandwidth of 4.800 GB/s.
That bandwidth is the main limiting factor. A 64-bit bus with DDR memory at this effective rate provides a narrow data path relative to designs with wider memory buses. No FP32 or FP16 throughput values are listed, so compute capability cannot be quantified. No nearestRivals entries provide scores or deltaPct values, meaning percentage differences against specific competitors cannot be calculated. The 50th percentile is the only comparative number available, but it lacks supporting benchmark data.
Power and Cooling
The listed TDP is 30 W, and the suggested PSU is 200 W. The 200 W figure is best understood as a system-level recommendation rather than a card-only draw, since the TDP is much lower. The slot width is listed as single-slot, and no power connectors are recorded. The absence of power connector data means the physical power delivery setup is unspecified; the entry simply does not state whether any auxiliary connector is needed.
The manufacturing details provide context for the low TDP. The chip is built on TSMC's 110 nm process, and the die size is 74 mm². With 107 million transistors, the transistor density is 1.4M / mm². These figures describe a small, low-transistor-count GPU design. The card is marked end-of-life, which is consistent with a product from this process generation. A 30 W TDP, when combined with single-slot construction, points toward simple cooling requirements, but the fact pack does not specify cooler dimensions or heatsink design.
Who Should Consider It
The data does not contain resolution-specific or settings-specific benchmark results, so any recommendation must be inferred from the listed memory and rendering capabilities. The 128 MB frame buffer and 64-bit memory bus indicate that large textures and high-resolution buffers are not well supported. The 4.800 GB/s memory bandwidth, 1.300 GPixel/s pixel rate, and 1.300 GTexel/s texture rate collectively suggest a card intended for modest workloads. Users running older DirectX 9.0 software are the relevant audience, since the API list includes DirectX 9.0 and OpenGL 2.0. Vulkan is not listed, so Vulkan-only workloads are outside the card's feature set.
The suggested 200 W PSU makes the card easy to place in systems with modest power budgets, and the single-slot design reduces space requirements. The 30 W TDP reinforces that profile. However, because no benchmark scores exist, this page cannot offer a specific resolution or quality setting recommendation. The hardware characteristics point toward lower resolutions and reduced detail, but that is an inference from the memory and fill-rate numbers, not a measured result.
How It Compares
The nearestRivals field is empty. There are no named competing GPUs, no rival scores, and no deltaPct values. Consequently, no per-rival comparison paragraphs can be written from this data. The only positional reference is percentileVsAllGpus = 50, which places the card at the median of all GPUs in the database. Because this percentile is presented without a benchmark score, it does not indicate how close any particular rival is.
The database does list a predecessor and successor for the card: the predecessor is the Radeon R200, and the successor is the Radeon R400 AGP. These entries define its place in the product lineage, but no benchmark scores or percentage deltas are attached to either, so no numerical comparison between generations is possible. The card's architecture is R300, its chip is RV370, and its generation is Radeon R300 (X300); these identifiers separate it from other entries, but they do not substitute for benchmark data.
Ray Tracing and Feature Set
Ray tracing hardware is not listed for this card. The rtCores field is null, and the tensorCores field is null. In terms of API support, the entry lists DirectX 9.0 and OpenGL 2.0; Vulkan is null. This places the card in a graphics era before hardware ray tracing and tensor-accelerated features were part of the product data.
The rendering feature set is defined by the number of texture mapping units and render output units: 4 TMUs and 4 ROPs. The pixel rate is 1.300 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 1.300 GTexel/s. Memory is 128 MB of DDR on a 64-bit bus with 4.800 GB/s bandwidth. The display outputs are 1x DVI, 1x VGA, and 1x S-Video, providing analog and digital connectivity from the release period.
The feature set is therefore minimal by later standards. The card supports DirectX 9.0 and OpenGL 2.0 only, with no Vulkan support listed. No RT cores and no tensor cores are defined. This means hardware-accelerated ray tracing and tensor workloads are outside the scope of the entry.
FAQ
Q: What is the average benchmark score for the ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory?
A: The average benchmark score is 0. The benchmarks array is empty, and the percentile versus all GPUs is 50.
Q: What memory configuration does the card use?
A: The card has 128 MB of DDR memory on a 64-bit bus. The memory clock is 300 MHz / 600 Mbps effective, providing 4.800 GB/s bandwidth.
Q: What power supply is recommended for this GPU?
A: The suggested PSU is 200 W. The TDP is 30 W, and the card is listed as single-slot. No power connector information is present in the fact pack.
Q: Does the card support ray tracing or tensor cores?
A: No. The rtCores field is null and the tensorCores field is null. The API support is DirectX 9.0 and OpenGL 2.0; Vulkan is null.
Q: What display outputs are available?
A: The display outputs are 1x DVI, 1x VGA, and 1x S-Video.
Q: What is the bus interface and release date?
A: The bus interface is PCIe 1.0 x16. The release date is 2006-10-24. The production status is end-of-life.
The NVIDIA Equivalent of ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory
Looking for a similar graphics card from NVIDIA? The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 offers comparable performance and features in the NVIDIA lineup.
Popular ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory Comparisons
See how the ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory with Other GPUs
Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse GPUs