ATI Radeon X1300 PRO
AMD graphics card specifications and benchmark scores
ATI Radeon X1300 PRO Specifications
ATI Radeon X1300 PRO GPU Core
Shader units and compute resources
The ATI Radeon X1300 PRO GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.
ATI Radeon X1300 PRO Clock Speeds
GPU and memory frequencies
Clock speeds directly impact the ATI Radeon X1300 PRO's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The ATI Radeon X1300 PRO by AMD dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.
AMD's ATI Radeon X1300 PRO Memory
VRAM capacity and bandwidth
VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The ATI Radeon X1300 PRO's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.
ATI Radeon X1300 PRO Theoretical Performance
Compute and fill rates
Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the ATI Radeon X1300 PRO against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.
Ultra-Threaded SE Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The ATI Radeon X1300 PRO is built on AMD's Ultra-Threaded SE architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the ATI Radeon X1300 PRO will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.
AMD's ATI Radeon X1300 PRO Power & Thermal
TDP and power requirements
Power specifications for the ATI Radeon X1300 PRO determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the ATI Radeon X1300 PRO to maintain boost clocks without throttling.
ATI Radeon X1300 PRO by AMD Physical & Connectivity
Dimensions and outputs
Physical dimensions of the ATI Radeon X1300 PRO are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.
AMD API Support
Graphics and compute APIs
API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the ATI Radeon X1300 PRO. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.
ATI Radeon X1300 PRO Product Information
Release and pricing details
The ATI Radeon X1300 PRO is manufactured by AMD as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the ATI Radeon X1300 PRO by AMD represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.
ATI Radeon X1300 PRO Benchmark Scores
No benchmark data available for this GPU.
About ATI Radeon X1300 PRO
The ATI Radeon X1300 PRO by AMD quietly entered the mid-2000s graphics scene with modest ambitions but solid foundational design. Manufactured using a 90 nm process and built on the Ultra-Threaded SE architecture, this card featured 256 MB of DDR2 memory connected via a PCIe 1.0 x16 interface. Despite its age, the engineering behind the Radeon X1300 PRO reveals a conscious effort to balance performance and power efficiency, with a TDP of just 31 watts. It was clearly designed for systems where thermal headroom and energy consumption were concerns. While lacking in raw power by today’s standards, its release in November 2006 positioned it as a budget-friendly option during a transitional period in GPU evolution. Curiously, it did not support CUDA, as that technology was Nvidia’s proprietary framework, but its OpenCL compatibility remained limited due to driver and architectural constraints. The absence of modern compute API support makes it unsuitable for current parallel processing tasks. Still, its place in history offers insight into how integrated graphics solutions began shaping mainstream expectations.
When examining video editing performance, the ATI Radeon X1300 PRO by AMD reveals significant limitations rooted in its era and specifications. Without dedicated video encoding hardware or support for modern codecs, it struggles to accelerate even basic HD timeline previews in editing suites like Adobe Premiere or DaVinci Resolve. Its DDR2 memory bandwidth proves insufficient for handling multiple layers or effects in real time, leading to frequent rendering delays. Even in 2006, this model was more suited for display output than intensive creative workflows. The Radeon X1300 PRO was never intended for professional video production, and that becomes evident when testing it with contemporary software demands. Playback performance for standard-definition content was adequate at the time, but full HD editing was beyond its reach. This raises questions about how software developers adapted during that period to accommodate lower-end hardware. Today, its video editing utility is largely obsolete, serving more as a cautionary benchmark than a viable tool.
Software compatibility for the Radeon X1300 PRO tells a story of gradual obsolescence. AMD provided driver support for several years, but modern operating systems like Windows 10 and 11 no longer offer official GPU drivers for this model. As a result, users encounter compatibility warnings or fallback to generic display drivers with minimal 3D acceleration. Popular creative and gaming applications released after 2010 typically fail to initialize due to missing shader model support and outdated OpenGL versions. Even web browsers leveraging GPU acceleration can behave unpredictably when this card is detected. The lack of Vulkan or DirectX 11 support further isolates it from current software ecosystems. While it once ran Windows Vista’s Aero interface smoothly, today’s desktop environments expose its limitations. Investigating its software lifespan reveals how rapidly GPU requirements have escalated over the past two decades. The ATI Radeon X1300 PRO by AMD, once a functional desktop component, now exists mostly in legacy systems or collector setups.
From an enterprise standpoint, the Radeon X1300 PRO offers little in terms of modern features or manageability. It lacks support for multi-display digital signage configurations beyond basic dual-monitor setups, and without AMD’s Eyefinity or enterprise-grade virtualization features, its deployment in business environments is severely restricted. There’s no hardware-level GPU partitioning or remote management capabilities, which are now standard in professional-grade adapters. Its low TDP might suggest energy efficiency, but the absence of dynamic clock scaling or driver-level optimizations undercuts that advantage. Security features like memory encryption or secure boot integration with GPU firmware are nonexistent. For IT departments maintaining older workstations, the card may still function as a stopgap for legacy applications requiring specific display outputs. However, its inability to support modern encryption protocols or virtual desktop infrastructure makes it a liability over time. Ultimately, while the ATI Radeon X1300 PRO served a niche in entry-level office systems, its enterprise relevance has long since expired.
The NVIDIA Equivalent of ATI Radeon X1300 PRO
Looking for a similar graphics card from NVIDIA? The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 offers comparable performance and features in the NVIDIA lineup.
Popular ATI Radeon X1300 PRO Comparisons
See how the ATI Radeon X1300 PRO stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare ATI Radeon X1300 PRO with Other GPUs
Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse GPUs