ATI Radeon X1300 LE
AMD graphics card specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
AMDATI Radeon X1300 LE Specifications
ATI Radeon X1300 LE GPU Core
Shader units and compute resources
The ATI Radeon X1300 LE GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.
ATI Radeon X1300 LE Clock Speeds
GPU and memory frequencies
Clock speeds directly impact the ATI Radeon X1300 LE's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The ATI Radeon X1300 LE by AMD dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.
AMD's ATI Radeon X1300 LE Memory
VRAM capacity and bandwidth
VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The ATI Radeon X1300 LE's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.
ATI Radeon X1300 LE Theoretical Performance
Compute and fill rates
Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the ATI Radeon X1300 LE against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.
Ultra-Threaded SE Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The ATI Radeon X1300 LE is built on AMD's Ultra-Threaded SE architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the ATI Radeon X1300 LE will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.
AMD's ATI Radeon X1300 LE Power & Thermal
TDP and power requirements
Power specifications for the ATI Radeon X1300 LE determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the ATI Radeon X1300 LE to maintain boost clocks without throttling.
ATI Radeon X1300 LE by AMD Physical & Connectivity
Dimensions and outputs
Physical dimensions of the ATI Radeon X1300 LE are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.
AMD API Support
Graphics and compute APIs
API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the ATI Radeon X1300 LE. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.
ATI Radeon X1300 LE Product Information
Release and pricing details
The ATI Radeon X1300 LE is manufactured by AMD as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the ATI Radeon X1300 LE by AMD represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.
ATI Radeon X1300 LE Benchmark Scores
No benchmark data available for this GPU.
About ATI Radeon X1300 LE
The ATI Radeon X1300 LE is an entry-level graphics card from AMD, built on the 90 nm process at TSMC. It utilizes the RV515 chip and the Ultra-Threaded SE architecture, positioning it within the Radeon R500 PCIe generation. The card is a product of its era, featuring 107 million transistors on a 100 mm² die, and is now designated as end-of-life, having been released in October 2005.
Benchmark Performance
The benchmark data for the ATI Radeon X1300 LE is minimal, with an average benchmark score of zero and no recorded entries in the benchmark suite. The card sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs in the database, which places it squarely in the middle of the historical performance distribution. However, this percentile figure is misleading without concrete scores, as the absence of benchmark results indicates that the card was not subjected to standardized testing in the database’s current framework.
The nearestRivals array is empty, meaning there are no direct comparison points from the database to quantify its performance against contemporaries. In the absence of rival scores and deltaPct values, the analysis must rely on the card’s architectural specifications. The X1300 LE operates with a memory clock of 250 MHz, translating to 500 Mbps effective, and this low clock speed, combined with a 64-bit memory bus, fundamentally limits its throughput. The pixel rate is 1.800 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 1.800 GTexel/s, figures that are modest even for the mid-2000s.
Given the lack of benchmark scores, the data suggests that the X1300 LE was not a performance-oriented product. Its 50th percentile ranking is likely a reflection of the database’s inclusion of many lower-end and integrated solutions, rather than an indication of competitive strength. In practical terms, the card’s specifications indicate it would struggle with any demanding 3D workload from its generation, and the empty rivals list prevents any percentage-based comparisons. The card’s performance profile is best described as minimal, with the 4 TMUs and 4 ROPs representing the absolute baseline for processing geometry and pixels.
Ray Tracing and Feature Set
The ATI Radeon X1300 LE does not include any dedicated ray tracing cores or tensor cores, as these technologies were not part of the graphics landscape at the time of its release. The card’s feature set is defined by its API support, which includes DirectX 9.0c (shader model 9_3) and OpenGL 2.1. There is no Vulkan support listed, which further confirms its legacy status, as Vulkan was introduced years later.
The DirectX 9.0c support with the 9_3 feature level is a critical detail. This feature level was the standard for the era, enabling pixel shader 3.0 and vertex shader 3.0, which were prerequisites for many games released in the mid-2000s. However, the X1300 LE’s implementation is basic, with no advanced geometry or compute capabilities that later architectures would introduce. The card lacks any form of hardware-accelerated ray tracing, meaning any such effects would be entirely software-based, which is impractical given its low compute throughput.
The absence of tensor cores means there is no support for AI-accelerated features like DLSS, which is unsurprising for a card from 2005. The feature set is purely functional for its time, focusing on the DirectX 9.0c pipeline. The card’s display output is limited to a single VGA connector, which is consistent with its entry-level positioning, but it does not support the multi-monitor or digital output options that were becoming available in higher-end models. For a user of the X1300 LE, the feature set is sufficient for basic 2D desktop use and very light 3D applications, but it lacks any modern rendering capabilities.
Power and Cooling
The ATI Radeon X1300 LE is a single-slot card with no dedicated power connectors, which indicates a very low power draw. The suggested PSU rating is 200 W, which is modest and reflects the card’s efficiency-oriented design. The absence of a TDP value in the data prevents an exact wattage figure, but the lack of power connectors and the 200 W PSU recommendation clearly indicate that the system power requirements are minimal.
The card relies on passive or basic cooling solutions, given the single-slot design and the lack of external power inputs. The 90 nm process node, while not as efficient as later nodes, was adequate for the low transistor count and clock speeds of the RV515 chip. The card’s power delivery is entirely through the PCIe 1.0 x16 slot, which provides up to 75 W, though the X1300 LE likely draws far less than that.
For system integration, the 200 W suggested PSU is a critical specification. This means that even a basic power supply from the era could handle the card, making it an accessible upgrade for pre-built systems. The single-slot form factor also ensures compatibility with most cases, and the lack of power connectors eliminates the need for cable management. The thermal footprint is low, and the card should operate quietly, though the data does not specify a fan or heatsink design. The key takeaway is that the X1300 LE is a low-power, low-heat component that places minimal strain on the rest of the system.
FAQ
Q: What is the memory size and type of the ATI Radeon X1300 LE?
A: The card comes with 64 MB of DDR memory, which is a very small amount by modern standards but was typical for entry-level cards in its generation.
Q: What is the maximum API support of the X1300 LE?
A: The card supports DirectX 9.0c with a 9_3 feature level and OpenGL 2.1. It does not support Vulkan.
Q: What is the suggested power supply for a system with the X1300 LE?
A: The suggested PSU rating is 200 W, which is quite low. The card also requires no additional power connectors, drawing power solely from the PCIe slot.
Q: Does the X1300 LE support ray tracing?
A: No, the card does not have any ray tracing cores. Ray tracing is not supported in hardware, and the card’s feature set is limited to the older DirectX 9.0c pipeline.
Q: What is the bus interface of the X1300 LE?
A: The card uses a PCIe 1.0 x16 interface, which was the standard for its time. It is not compatible with older AGP slots.
Q: What is the production status of the X1300 LE?
A: The card is end-of-life, meaning it is no longer manufactured. Its release date was in October 2005, and it was succeeded by the Radeon R600 series.
Memory Subsystem
The memory subsystem of the ATI Radeon X1300 LE is one of its most defining limitations. It has 64 MB of DDR memory, which is a severe constraint for any 3D application. The memory type is DDR, not DDR2 or DDR3, and it operates at 250 MHz with a 500 Mbps effective data rate. The bus width is only 64 bits, which is half of what many contemporary cards used, and this narrow bus severely restricts the memory bandwidth.
The total bandwidth is 4.000 GB/s, a figure that is minuscule compared to even mid-range cards of the same era. For high-resolution gaming, this bandwidth is wholly inadequate. At resolutions like 1280x1024 or higher, the card would be unable to stream textures and geometry data fast enough, leading to significant stuttering and frame drops. The 64 MB frame buffer is also a bottleneck, as many games from 2005 already required more than 64 MB for medium-detail textures.
The combination of 64 MB VRAM and 4.000 GB/s bandwidth means the card is effectively limited to 800x600 or 1024x768 resolutions with low detail settings. The pixel rate of 1.800 GPixel/s further compounds this, as the card cannot fill pixels quickly enough for higher resolutions. The memory subsystem is the primary reason for the card’s low performance ceiling, and there is no headroom for overclocking or enhancement. For any modern use, the memory bandwidth is a hard stop, making the card unsuitable for anything beyond basic desktop productivity.
Who Should Consider It
The ATI Radeon X1300 LE is a product that should only be considered by users with very specific legacy needs. The data shows no benchmark scores, but the specifications point to a card that is only suitable for basic 2D tasks or extremely light 3D workloads. For gaming, the card is not viable at any modern resolution or detail setting, given the 64 MB VRAM, 64-bit bus, and 4.000 GB/s bandwidth.
The 50th percentile ranking might suggest average performance, but this is an artifact of the database’s inclusion of lower-end parts. In reality, the card is at the bottom of the performance spectrum for its generation. The card could be used for retro gaming at resolutions below 800x600, where the low pixel rate and texture rate might suffice for very old titles. However, even games from its own release period, such as those requiring DirectX 9.0c, would struggle due to the memory constraints.
The card is best suited for a user who needs a display output for a basic office machine or a home server. The single VGA output and low power consumption make it a straightforward solution for non-gaming builds. The 200 W PSU requirement ensures that it can be installed in older systems with small power supplies. There is no scenario where the X1300 LE is recommended for modern gaming or media consumption, and its end-of-life status means no driver updates are forthcoming. The card is a historical artifact, and its only practical use is as a diagnostic tool or for a very specific retro build where the lack of performance is not a concern.
The NVIDIA Equivalent of ATI Radeon X1300 LE
Looking for a similar graphics card from NVIDIA? The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 offers comparable performance and features in the NVIDIA lineup.
Popular ATI Radeon X1300 LE Comparisons
See how the ATI Radeon X1300 LE stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare ATI Radeon X1300 LE with Other GPUs
Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse GPUs