RADEON

ATI Radeon HD 3570

AMD graphics card specifications and benchmark scores

512 MB
VRAM
MHz Boost
30W
TDP
64
Bus Width

At a Glance

AMD
VRAM 512 MB
Shaders 40
Bus Width 64-bit
TDP 30W
Memory Type DDR2
Architecture TeraScale
nm
Process 55 nm
Released Jul 2010

ATI Radeon HD 3570 Specifications

ATI Radeon HD 3570 GPU Core

Shader units and compute resources

The ATI Radeon HD 3570 GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.

Shading Units
40
Shaders
40
TMUs
4
ROPs
4
Compute Units
2

ATI Radeon HD 3570 Clock Speeds

GPU and memory frequencies

Clock speeds directly impact the ATI Radeon HD 3570's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The ATI Radeon HD 3570 by AMD dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.

GPU Clock
796 MHz
Memory Clock
495 MHz 990 Mbps effective
GDDR GDDR 6X 6X

AMD's ATI Radeon HD 3570 Memory

VRAM capacity and bandwidth

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The ATI Radeon HD 3570's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.

Memory Size
512 MB
VRAM
512 MB
Memory Type
DDR2
VRAM Type
DDR2
Memory Bus
64 bit
Bus Width
64-bit
Bandwidth
7.920 GB/s

ATI Radeon HD 3570 by AMD Cache

On-chip cache hierarchy

On-chip cache provides ultra-fast data access for the ATI Radeon HD 3570, reducing the need to fetch data from slower VRAM. L1 and L2 caches store frequently accessed data close to the compute units. AMD's Infinity Cache (L3) dramatically increases effective bandwidth, improving GPU benchmark performance without requiring wider memory buses. Larger cache sizes help maintain high frame rates in memory-bound scenarios and reduce power consumption by minimizing VRAM accesses.

L2 Cache
64 KB

ATI Radeon HD 3570 Theoretical Performance

Compute and fill rates

Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the ATI Radeon HD 3570 against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.

FP32 (Float)
63.68 GFLOPS
Pixel Rate
3.184 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
3.184 GTexel/s

TeraScale Architecture & Process

Manufacturing and design details

The ATI Radeon HD 3570 is built on AMD's TeraScale architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the ATI Radeon HD 3570 will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.

Architecture
TeraScale
GPU Name
RV620
Process Node
55 nm
Foundry
TSMC
Transistors
181 million
Die Size
67 mm²
Density
2.7M / mm²

AMD's ATI Radeon HD 3570 Power & Thermal

TDP and power requirements

Power specifications for the ATI Radeon HD 3570 determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the ATI Radeon HD 3570 to maintain boost clocks without throttling.

TDP
30 W
TDP
30W
Power Connectors
None
Suggested PSU
200 W

ATI Radeon HD 3570 by AMD Physical & Connectivity

Dimensions and outputs

Physical dimensions of the ATI Radeon HD 3570 are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.

Slot Width
Single-slot
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Display Outputs
2x DisplayPort
Display Outputs
2x DisplayPort

AMD API Support

Graphics and compute APIs

API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the ATI Radeon HD 3570. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.

DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
OpenGL
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
Shader Model
4.1

ATI Radeon HD 3570 Product Information

Release and pricing details

The ATI Radeon HD 3570 is manufactured by AMD as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the ATI Radeon HD 3570 by AMD represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.

Manufacturer
AMD
Release Date
Jul 2010
Production
End-of-life
Predecessor
Radeon R500 PCIe
Successor
Radeon R700

ATI Radeon HD 3570 Benchmark Scores

No benchmark data available for this GPU.

About ATI Radeon HD 3570

The ATI Radeon HD 3570 is a GPU from AMD, built on the TeraScale architecture and using the RV620 chip. It was manufactured by TSMC on a 55 nm process, with 181 million transistors packed onto a 67 mm² die, for a transistor density of 2.7 million per square millimeter. The part belongs to the Radeon R600 generation, specifically the HD 3500 family, and it was released on July 4, 2010. Its predecessor is the Radeon R500 PCIe and its successor is the Radeon R700. In the current data, the product is marked as end-of-life, has an empty benchmark array, sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, and has an average benchmark score of 0. The nearestRivals list is also empty, so no direct competitor measurements are available for reference. The series field is null and no codename is recorded, leaving the RV620 chip and the TeraScale architecture as the primary identifiers.

Memory Subsystem

The memory subsystem consists of 512 MB of DDR2, connected across a 64-bit bus. The memory clock is 495 MHz, which translates to a 990 Mbps effective data rate and a peak bandwidth of 7.920 GB/s. The effective data rate of 990 Mbps is double the 495 MHz clock, matching the DDR2 designation. With a 64-bit wide data path, the aggregate peak is exactly 7.920 GB/s. These values define the practical envelope for texture fetching, depth buffering, and frame-buffer writes. For high-resolution operation, the 512 MB capacity is the first constraint: frame-buffer storage must fit within that limit, and large-resolution textures will exhaust it quickly. The 64-bit bus width is the second constraint: even if the memory clock were higher, the narrow data path would cap the transfer rate. As configured, the subsystem supports 7.920 GB/s of peak traffic; this bandwidth must feed the rendering pipeline's 3.184 GPixel/s pixel rate and 3.184 GTexel/s texture rate. In practical terms, the GPU can generate pixels and texture outputs at a rate that the memory interface is nominally able to supply, but any workload that significantly increases memory traffic—such as higher-resolution render targets or multi-sample anti-aliasing—will press against the bandwidth limit. The 512 MB capacity also limits the number of render targets and the size of the working set. A 64-bit DDR2 interface is a narrow, low-speed configuration relative to what high-resolution workloads demand, and this memory subsystem is the most likely bottleneck for modern rendering tasks. At high resolutions, both the pixel rate and the memory capacity interact: each additional pixel in the render target consumes space in the 512 MB frame buffer, and each texture access consumes bandwidth from the 7.920 GB/s pool. The data lists only this one memory configuration; no alternate sizes or types are present.

Ray Tracing and Feature Set

This GPU has no dedicated ray tracing cores and no tensor cores; both fields are null in the data. Consequently, there is no hardware-accelerated ray tracing and no hardware tensor-based processing. The feature set is anchored by the TeraScale architecture, which provides 40 shading units, 4 texture mapping units, and 4 render output units. The FP32 compute throughput is 63.68 GFLOPS. The API support is limited to DirectX 10.1 (10_1) and OpenGL 3.3; there is no Vulkan support. This means applications that rely on newer APIs or ray-traced effects will have no hardware path. The 40 shading units handle shader processing, the 4 TMUs process texture operations, and the 4 ROPs handle raster output. The chip's characteristics are set by its 55 nm process node, with 181 million transistors on a 67 mm² die, yielding a density of 2.7M / mm². The display connectivity consists of two DisplayPort outputs, which is the only display-output information in the record. The bus interface is PCIe 2.0 x16, giving a compatible slot requirement for the card. The DirectX 10.1 (10_1) feature level and OpenGL 3.3 support are the maximum API levels listed, and the absence of Vulkan narrows the possible rendering paths to those supported by these APIs. Without tensor cores, there is no tensor-based processing path in the hardware; the only compute resource is the FP32 path rated at 63.68 GFLOPS. The record does not list a Vulkan version, and the Vulkan field is null, which means the GPU's API coverage stops at OpenGL 3.3 in the data.

Who Should Consider It

Given the absence of benchmark scores, any use-case recommendation must be inferred from the specification data. The GPU's 50th percentile rank in the data is the only positional indicator, and the average benchmark score is 0, which reflects the empty benchmark array rather than measured performance. The memory subsystem's 512 MB capacity and 7.920 GB/s bandwidth point to low-resolution use, because the narrow 64-bit bus cannot sustain heavy frame-buffer traffic. The 30 W TDP, single-slot design, and lack of power connectors imply installation in chassis where a 200 W PSU is available and where power draw is a primary concern. The suggested PSU of 200 W should be read as a system-level recommendation; the card itself has no power connectors. The two DisplayPort outputs allow connection to two displays. The release date of July 4, 2010 and end-of-life status indicate that this is an older part; the data does not include any competitor to compare against. Users who need a card with a low electrical load and a minimal cooling footprint might consider it; users targeting modern high-resolution rendering would need more memory bandwidth and API support than this part provides. The render output rate of 3.184 GPixel/s and texture rate of 3.184 GTexel/s are further indicators that the pipeline is balanced for modest resolutions. The 4 TMUs and 4 ROPs are modest counts, matching the 40 shading units; this balance suggests a small pipeline rather than a wide one. Without Vulkan or ray tracing support, the feature set is aligned with legacy DirectX 10.1 or OpenGL 3.3 workloads. The 50th percentile placement among all GPUs is a mid-list position, but that rank is not a performance measurement in this record.

How It Compares

The data contains no nearestRivals entries, so there are no named competitor GPUs and no relative scores to cite. The only comparison metric available is the 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs in the database; this places the HD 3570 at the midpoint of the distribution. Its predecessor, the Radeon R500 PCIe, and successor, the Radeon R700, are listed in the product lineage, but neither has scores in this record. Without rival names, score deltas, or even benchmark results for this GPU, no competitive positioning can be quantified. The 50th percentile is a positional rank, not a measurement of speed; combined with the 0 average benchmark score, it signals that the part's standing in the data is based on its specification record rather than on performance testing. The HD 3570's competitive context is therefore limited to the product lineage and the percentile rank; there are zero competitor scores and zero percentage differences in the data.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark array is empty, the average benchmark score is 0, and the nearestRivals list is empty. This means no exact percentage deltas against any competitor can be computed, because there are no scores to compare. The 50th percentile vs all GPUs is the only statistical figure, and it does not derive from benchmark data in this record. If benchmark results had been present, percentage differences from nearestRivals would allow head-to-head comparisons; none are present. The FP32 throughput of 63.68 GFLOPS is the only compute performance number in the specification, but it is not a benchmark score and cannot be used to generate a delta. Similarly, the pixel rate of 3.184 GPixel/s and texture rate of 3.184 GTexel/s are specification rates, not measured application performance. Because the data contains no measured performance for this ATI Radeon HD 3570, the benchmark performance section cannot report any score, ranking change, or percentage difference. The quantitative result is a score of 0 across an empty array; a nonzero average would require actual benchmark entries, and none are listed.

The NVIDIA Equivalent of ATI Radeon HD 3570

Looking for a similar graphics card from NVIDIA? The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 offers comparable performance and features in the NVIDIA lineup.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

NVIDIA • 8 GB VRAM

View Specs Compare

Popular ATI Radeon HD 3570 Comparisons

See how the ATI Radeon HD 3570 stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.

Compare ATI Radeon HD 3570 with Other GPUs

Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.

Browse GPUs