ATI Radeon E2400
AMD graphics card specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
AMDATI Radeon E2400 Specifications
ATI Radeon E2400 GPU Core
Shader units and compute resources
The ATI Radeon E2400 GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.
ATI Radeon E2400 Clock Speeds
GPU and memory frequencies
Clock speeds directly impact the ATI Radeon E2400's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The ATI Radeon E2400 by AMD dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.
AMD's ATI Radeon E2400 Memory
VRAM capacity and bandwidth
VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The ATI Radeon E2400's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.
ATI Radeon E2400 by AMD Cache
On-chip cache hierarchy
On-chip cache provides ultra-fast data access for the ATI Radeon E2400, reducing the need to fetch data from slower VRAM. L1 and L2 caches store frequently accessed data close to the compute units. AMD's Infinity Cache (L3) dramatically increases effective bandwidth, improving GPU benchmark performance without requiring wider memory buses. Larger cache sizes help maintain high frame rates in memory-bound scenarios and reduce power consumption by minimizing VRAM accesses.
ATI Radeon E2400 Theoretical Performance
Compute and fill rates
Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the ATI Radeon E2400 against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.
TeraScale Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The ATI Radeon E2400 is built on AMD's TeraScale architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the ATI Radeon E2400 will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.
AMD's ATI Radeon E2400 Power & Thermal
TDP and power requirements
Power specifications for the ATI Radeon E2400 determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the ATI Radeon E2400 to maintain boost clocks without throttling.
ATI Radeon E2400 by AMD Physical & Connectivity
Dimensions and outputs
Physical dimensions of the ATI Radeon E2400 are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.
AMD API Support
Graphics and compute APIs
API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the ATI Radeon E2400. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.
ATI Radeon E2400 Product Information
Release and pricing details
The ATI Radeon E2400 is manufactured by AMD as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the ATI Radeon E2400 by AMD represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.
ATI Radeon E2400 Benchmark Scores
No benchmark data available for this GPU.
About ATI Radeon E2400
The ATI Radeon E2400 is an embedded graphics processor from AMD, built on the TeraScale architecture using the RV610 chip. Fabricated on a 65 nm process at TSMC, it packs 180 million transistors into an 85 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 2.1M per mm². Released on June 27, 2007, this part is now end-of-life, but its specifications still define a distinct segment of mobile and embedded computing from that era.
Benchmark Performance
The benchmark data for the ATI Radeon E2400 is sparse, with no synthetic scores or workload results recorded in the database. Its percentile rank against all GPUs sits at 50, which places it in the exact middle of the historical performance distribution. However, the average benchmark score is listed as 0, indicating that no valid performance measurements have been captured for this part. This makes direct numerical comparison impossible.
What can be assessed is the theoretical compute output. The E2400 delivers 48.00 GFLOPS of FP32 performance, a figure derived from its 40 shading units operating at the given clock configuration. The pixel rate is 2.400 GPixel/s, and the texture rate matches at 2.400 GTexel/s. These figures represent the raw throughput limits of the architecture, but without benchmark scores, translating them into real-world application performance requires inference from the hardware design itself. With no nearest rivals listed, no delta percentages can be calculated, and the card’s standing relative to other products must be inferred from its class and era rather than measured data.
Ray Tracing and Feature Set
The E2400 does not feature any dedicated ray tracing cores or tensor cores. The architecture predates hardware-accelerated ray tracing entirely, so any such workload would be handled by the general-purpose shading units, which are 40 in number. This is not a card for modern lighting effects; its feature set is rooted in the DirectX 10.0 (10_0) API generation. It supports OpenGL 3.3, but Vulkan is not listed as an available API.
The lack of tensor cores also means no AI acceleration or DLSS-type functionality exists. For embedded applications, this is less of a limitation than it would be for gaming, but it squarely places the E2400 in the era of fixed-function pipeline transitions. The DirectX 10 support was significant at the time of release, allowing for unified shader architecture workloads, but modern titles requiring DirectX 11 or 12 will not run. The feature set is strictly tied to its 2007 origins, and the API list confirms this is a legacy part.
Power and Cooling
The thermal design power is rated at 25 W, which is exceptionally low by any standard. This makes the E2400 suitable for passively cooled or low-power embedded systems. The slot width is listed as "IGP," meaning it is an integrated graphics processor, not a discrete add-in card. Consequently, there are no power connectors required, and no suggested PSU wattage is provided in the data.
Cooling requirements are minimal given the 25 W envelope. The bus interface is MXM-II, a module standard used in laptops and small-form-factor systems. This means the card is not installed into a standard PCIe slot but rather soldered or slotted into a proprietary board. The display outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent," which indicates the outputs vary based on the host device’s design. Builders should treat this as a board-level component rather than a user-serviceable graphics card.
How It Compares
The database lists no nearest rivals for the ATI Radeon E2400. This absence of comparison points is telling. It suggests that the card occupies a niche with no direct competitors in the recorded dataset, or that its benchmark scores are too low to warrant comparative tracking. In the embedded market of 2007, typical alternatives would include other low-power mobile parts, but without specific names and scores, no quantitative analysis can be made.
Given the 50th percentile ranking, one can infer it sits at the midpoint of all GPUs ever benchmarked in this database, but that is a positional statement, not a performance one. The lack of an average benchmark score (0) reinforces that this is a non-tested or non-scoring part. In practical terms, the E2400 would be compared against integrated graphics solutions of its time, but again, no specific rival data exists. The conclusion is that this is a standalone entry with no measurable competition in the current database context.
Memory Subsystem
The E2400 comes with 128 MB of GDDR3 memory, which was a standard allocation for entry-level embedded parts of its generation. The memory clock runs at 700 MHz, translating to 1400 Mbps effective. The bus width is a narrow 64 bit, and the resulting bandwidth is 11.20 GB/s.
This memory configuration is a severe bottleneck for high-resolution workloads. With only 128 MB of VRAM, frame buffers for resolutions above 1080p would be entirely impractical. The 64-bit bus limits the data throughput, and the 11.20 GB/s bandwidth is insufficient for texture-heavy scenes. For embedded uses like basic 2D output, industrial displays, or low-resolution video playback, this is adequate. For 3D rendering, the memory subsystem would saturate quickly, causing stuttering or outright failure on any modern application. High-resolution gaming is out of the question; even 720p would strain the framebuffer capacity. The data suggests this is a 800x600 or lower resolution part in practice.
Who Should Consider It
This is not a card for gamers, enthusiasts, or anyone building a modern PC. The 48.00 GFLOPS FP32 performance and 128 MB memory cap make it unsuitable for any current 3D application. The DirectX 10.0 API limit means software requiring newer APIs will not function. The 25 W TDP and IGP slot width indicate a purpose-built embedded solution, not a consumer product.
Consideration is limited to those maintaining legacy embedded systems that specifically require an MXM-II module with these exact specifications. Industrial control panels, medical devices, or point-of-sale systems from the late 2000s might use this part. The 50th percentile ranking is meaningless in this context because the card was never designed to compete on raw performance. Its value lies in its fixed function for a specific hardware socket. If you are repairing or upgrading a system with an E2400, the only viable path is to source an identical replacement, as no modern equivalent with matching bus interface and power characteristics exists. For anyone else, the data clearly shows this is a part to avoid unless your hardware dictates otherwise.
The NVIDIA Equivalent of ATI Radeon E2400
Looking for a similar graphics card from NVIDIA? The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 offers comparable performance and features in the NVIDIA lineup.
Popular ATI Radeon E2400 Comparisons
See how the ATI Radeon E2400 stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare ATI Radeon E2400 with Other GPUs
Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse GPUs