ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP
AMD graphics card specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
AMDATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP Specifications
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP GPU Core
Shader units and compute resources
The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP Clock Speeds
GPU and memory frequencies
Clock speeds directly impact the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP by AMD dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.
AMD's ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP Memory
VRAM capacity and bandwidth
VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP Theoretical Performance
Compute and fill rates
Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.
TeraScale Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP is built on AMD's TeraScale architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.
AMD's ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP Power & Thermal
TDP and power requirements
Power specifications for the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP to maintain boost clocks without throttling.
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP by AMD Physical & Connectivity
Dimensions and outputs
Physical dimensions of the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.
AMD API Support
Graphics and compute APIs
API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP Product Information
Release and pricing details
The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP is manufactured by AMD as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP by AMD represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP Benchmark Scores
No benchmark data available for this GPU.
About ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP
The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP is an integrated graphics processor from AMD, built on the 55 nm process node with 181 million transistors on a 67 mm² die. It belongs to the TeraScale architecture generation, specifically the TeraScale IGP family, and was released on 2010-04-30. With a pixel rate of 1.520 GPixel/s, a texture rate of 1.520 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance of 30.40 GFLOPS, this IGP targets basic portable computing rather than demanding graphical workloads. The following analysis draws exclusively from the available data.
Benchmark Performance
The FACT PACK lists no individual benchmark scores for the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP, with an average benchmark score of 0 and no nearest rivals provided. However, its percentile rank against all GPUs is 50, which places it exactly at the midpoint of the performance distribution. This is a non-zero signal: half of all GPUs in the database perform worse or equal, and half perform better. Given the absence of comparative scores, the percentile must be interpreted carefully — it likely reflects the sheer number of legacy and low-end parts rather than any meaningful competitive standing.
The raw throughput numbers corroborate this middling position. The FP32 compute of 30.40 GFLOPS is extremely low by any modern standard, and the pixel rate of 1.520 GPixel/s combined with a texture rate of 1.520 GTexel/s indicates a part that can handle only the most elementary 2D or light 3D tasks. With 40 shading units, 4 TMUs, and 4 ROPs, the architecture is clearly minimal. Since there are no nearestRivals entries, no deltaPct comparisons can be made; the data simply shows a part that sits at the 50th percentile — a statistical artifact of a database dominated by equally weak or weaker integrated solutions.
Benchmark results indicate that this IGP is not designed for frame-rate-sensitive gaming. The 30.40 GFLOPS figure is roughly a tenth of what even entry-level discrete GPUs from the same era would offer, though that comparison is qualitative because no rival specs are provided. The 9 W TDP confirms that this is a power-constrained part, and the performance ceiling is set accordingly.
How It Compares
The FACT PACK provides no nearestRivals entries for the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP. Therefore, no direct percentage comparisons can be made against specific competing products. The only positional data is the 50th percentile rank, which suggests that within the database’s historical catalog, half of all GPUs are equal or worse. Without rival names or scores, any attempt to position this part against a specific product would be speculative and outside the permitted facts.
What can be stated is that this IGP succeeds the Radeon IGP and is succeeded by the TeraScale 2 IGP, according to the production lineage. Its end-of-life status means it occupies a niche in older portable systems. The lack of rival data implies that the database does not consider it competitive with any notable product — a reasonable conclusion given its modest specifications.
Memory Subsystem
The memory configuration is entirely system-shared. The size, type, and bus width are all listed as "System Shared," meaning the GPU borrows from the host system’s main memory rather than having dedicated VRAM. The bandwidth is described as "System Dependent," which indicates that performance will vary significantly based on the platform’s memory speed and configuration. This is typical for IGPs of this era, where the memory controller and RAM speed dictate the effective bandwidth.
For high resolutions, this is a severe limitation. Without dedicated VRAM, the GPU competes with the CPU for memory bandwidth. Even if the system has fast RAM, the shared nature introduces latency and contention. The 40 shading units and 4 ROPs are already bottlenecks, but the memory subsystem compounds the issue: texture reads and framebuffer writes all traverse the same system bus. At resolutions above 720p, the data suggests that the memory subsystem would saturate quickly, leading to stutter and low frame rates. The 1.520 GPixel/s pixel rate also caps fill-rate performance, so high-resolution output would be constrained by both bandwidth and pixel throughput.
FAQ
Q: What is the manufacturing process of the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP?
A: It is built on a 55 nm process node, with 181 million transistors on a 67 mm² die.
Q: How much dedicated VRAM does this GPU have?
A: It has no dedicated VRAM. The memory size, type, and bus width are all "System Shared," with bandwidth listed as "System Dependent."
Q: What is the power consumption of this IGP?
A: The TDP is 9 W, which is very low and typical for an integrated processor.
Q: Does this GPU support Vulkan?
A: No. The API support includes DirectX 10.1 (10_1) and OpenGL 3.3, but Vulkan is listed as null.
Q: What is the production status of this part?
A: It is marked as "End-of-life," with its successor being the TeraScale 2 IGP.
Q: Can this GPU handle modern games at high settings?
A: Based on the data, no. With an FP32 performance of 30.40 GFLOPS, 4 ROPs, and system-shared memory, it is only suitable for basic tasks. Its 50th percentile rank indicates average performance in a database of mostly low-end parts, but that does not translate to gaming capability.
Ray Tracing and Feature Set
The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP has no ray tracing cores and no tensor cores — both fields are null in the data. This is expected for a TeraScale-era part, as ray tracing acceleration did not exist in consumer hardware at that time. The feature set is limited to the rasterization pipeline of DirectX 10.1 (10_1) and OpenGL 3.3. There is no Vulkan support, which further restricts its compatibility with modern graphics APIs.
The 40 shading units handle vertex and pixel shading in a unified architecture, but with an FP32 output of only 30.40 GFLOPS, the compute capability is minimal. The texture rate of 1.520 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 1.520 GPixel/s indicate that even simple effects like anisotropic filtering or post-processing would tax the part. The absence of RT and tensor cores means no hardware acceleration for ray-traced lighting or AI-based upscaling; any such features would be entirely software-dependent and likely unplayable.
The PCIe 1.0 x16 bus interface is another legacy limitation. While it provides a dedicated link to the host, the bandwidth is far lower than modern PCIe versions. This, combined with system-shared memory, makes the feature set effectively obsolete for anything beyond 2D desktop usage or very old 3D titles.
Who Should Consider It
The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP is not a product for gamers or performance users. Its 50th percentile rank, while technically mid-pack, is achieved in a database filled with equally weak integrated parts. The FP32 performance of 30.40 GFLOPS and the 4 ROPs mean that even 720p gaming at low settings would be a struggle. The pixel rate of 1.520 GPixel/s caps the fill rate, and the system-shared memory with dependent bandwidth adds unpredictability.
This IGP is suitable for basic office work, web browsing, and video playback on older portable systems — tasks that do not stress the GPU. The 9 W TDP makes it a power-efficient choice for battery life, but that is its only practical advantage. For anyone considering this part today, the data suggests it is only viable for legacy 2D applications or as a display output for non-graphical workloads. High resolutions are out of the question; the memory subsystem and pixel rate cannot sustain them.
In short, the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP is a historical footnote. Its 50th percentile rank is a statistical curiosity, not a recommendation. Users with any 3D requirements should look to its successor, the TeraScale 2 IGP, or any discrete solution. The data is clear: this is a last-resort GPU for systems where performance is irrelevant and power conservation is paramount.
The NVIDIA Equivalent of ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP
Looking for a similar graphics card from NVIDIA? The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 offers comparable performance and features in the NVIDIA lineup.
Popular ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP Comparisons
See how the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP with Other GPUs
Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse GPUs