RADEON

ATI All-In-Wonder 9200

AMD graphics card specifications and benchmark scores

128 MB
VRAM
MHz Boost
TDP
128
Bus Width

ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 Specifications

⚙️

ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 GPU Core

Shader units and compute resources

The ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.

TMUs
4
ROPs
4
⏱️

ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 Clock Speeds

GPU and memory frequencies

Clock speeds directly impact the ATI All-In-Wonder 9200's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 by AMD dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.

GPU Clock
250 MHz
Memory Clock
200 MHz 400 Mbps effective
GDDR GDDR 6X 6X

AMD's ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 Memory

VRAM capacity and bandwidth

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The ATI All-In-Wonder 9200's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.

Memory Size
128 MB
VRAM
128 MB
Memory Type
DDR
VRAM Type
DDR
Memory Bus
128 bit
Bus Width
128-bit
Bandwidth
6.400 GB/s
📈

ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 Theoretical Performance

Compute and fill rates

Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.

Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
1.000 GTexel/s
🏗️

Rage 7 Architecture & Process

Manufacturing and design details

The ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 is built on AMD's Rage 7 architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.

Architecture
Rage 7
GPU Name
RV280
Process Node
150 nm
Foundry
UMC
Transistors
36 million
Die Size
98 mm²
Density
367.3K / mm²
🔌

AMD's ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 Power & Thermal

TDP and power requirements

Power specifications for the ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 to maintain boost clocks without throttling.

Suggested PSU
200 W
📐

ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 by AMD Physical & Connectivity

Dimensions and outputs

Physical dimensions of the ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.

Slot Width
Single-slot
Bus Interface
AGP 8x
Display Outputs
1x VGA2x S-Video
Display Outputs
1x VGA2x S-Video
🎮

AMD API Support

Graphics and compute APIs

API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the ATI All-In-Wonder 9200. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.

DirectX
8.1
DirectX
8.1
OpenGL
1.4
OpenGL
1.4
📦

ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 Product Information

Release and pricing details

The ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 is manufactured by AMD as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 by AMD represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.

Manufacturer
AMD
Release Date
Jan 2004
Production
End-of-life

ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 Benchmark Scores

📊

No benchmark data available for this GPU.

About ATI All-In-Wonder 9200

The ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 was positioned as a versatile solution for professionals looking to blend multimedia capabilities with everyday workstation tasks. Powered by AMD’s Rage 7 architecture and built on a 150 nm process, this card offers a respectable 128 MB of DDR VRAM, making it suitable for a range of productivity applications. While it primarily targeted multimedia enthusiasts, its inclusion of TV tuner and video capture features hinted at a broader scope that could appeal to creative professionals and small business users alike. The AGP 8x interface facilitated decent bandwidth, but even by early 2000s standards, it left some room for doubt regarding its scalability for high-end professional workloads. The ATI All-In-Wonder 9200's stability largely depended on driver support, which has historically been a mixed bag for graphics cards that also serve multimedia functions, raising questions about long-term reliability in mission-critical environments. For workstation builds, its performance may appear modest, yet it could serve as a cost-effective option for lighter productivity setups, especially where integrated multimedia capabilities are prioritized over raw computational power. In terms of 3D rendering and professional workloads, the ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 doesn't position itself as a powerhouse but rather as an all-in-one multimedia solution with some graphical acceleration. While it can handle basic 3D tasks and display rendering, its older Rage 7 architecture and limited VRAM challenge its ability to manage complex scenes or high-resolution textures efficiently. The card's drivers, which are crucial for maintaining optimal performance and stability, historically lacked the robustness seen in workstation-grade hardware, leading to potential issues during prolonged or intensive use. For professionals seeking dependable driver support, this begs a question: can the ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 sustain demanding workloads without frequent crashes or driver conflicts? The absence of benchmarking data makes it challenging to objectively gauge its raw capabilities, so users must rely on community-driven reports or real-world testing to understand its limits within professional workflows. When integrating the ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 into workstation builds, compatibility and stability emerge as primary concerns. Its AGP 8x interface was standard for the era but offers limited future-proofing as PCIe rapidly matured soon after its release. The card's driver ecosystem, primarily optimized for multimedia and casual 3D tasks, may fall short in high-stakes professional environments requiring strict stability and optimized performance. For users contemplating a dedicated workstation or a multimedia-centric build, the ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 provides an intriguing middle ground, yet it prompts critical questions about longevity and support. Is this device suitable as a primary graphics solution in a demanding professional setting, or is it better reserved for supplementary tasks where its multitasking capabilities can shine without pushing its performance envelope? Ultimately, the ATI All-In-Wonder 9200's blend of features invites a cautious approach and demands thorough testing in real-world professional scenarios before deployment in critical workflows.

The NVIDIA Equivalent of ATI All-In-Wonder 9200

Looking for a similar graphics card from NVIDIA? The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 offers comparable performance and features in the NVIDIA lineup.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

NVIDIA • 8 GB VRAM

View Specs Compare

Popular ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 Comparisons

See how the ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.

Compare ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 with Other GPUs

Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.

Browse GPUs