AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile

How It Compares

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile occupies a peculiar position in the hardware landscape. It is not a discrete graphics card but an integrated graphics processor (IGP) built into the Raven Ridge-M APU family. Its percentile rank of 50 against all GPUs places it squarely in the middle of the pack—not a performance leader, but far from a bottom-feeder. The data shows this is a part that trades raw power for efficiency and portability, with a 10 W TDP that makes it suitable for thin-and-light laptops.

Without a populated `nearestRivals` list in the fact pack, direct percentage comparisons against specific competing parts cannot be drawn from the data. However, the absolute figures tell a clear story. The FP32 throughput of 1.665 TFLOPS and the texture rate of 52.04 GTexel/s indicate a part that can handle esports titles and older AAA games at modest settings, but it will struggle with modern high-fidelity workloads. The 8 ROPs are a notable bottleneck for pixel-heavy operations, capping fill rate at 10.41 GPixel/s. This is a part that punches at roughly the level of a mid-range integrated solution from its era, not a gaming powerhouse.

The architecture is GCN 5.0, built on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries, with a die size of 210 mm² containing 4,940 million transistors. That transistor density of 23.5M per mm² is modest by today's standards, but it was competitive for a 2017 launch. The part is now end-of-life, succeeded by Navi II IGP, and its predecessor was the GCN 3.0 IGP. This lineage shows a clear evolutionary step, but the Vega 10 Mobile remains a product of its time—capable, efficient, but not future-proof.

Ray Tracing and Feature Set

The fact pack is explicit: this GPU has no ray tracing cores and no tensor cores. The `rtCores` and `tensorCores` fields are both null. This means hardware-accelerated ray tracing is entirely absent, and any ray-traced effects would have to be handled through compute shaders, which would be extremely slow given the 1.665 TFLOPS FP32 ceiling. For any modern title with mandatory ray tracing, this part is effectively non-functional.

The feature set is instead defined by its API support. DirectX 12 with feature level 12_1 is available, which covers most modern DX12 games, though it lacks some of the higher-tier features like mesh shaders or variable rate shading that newer GPUs offer. OpenGL 4.6 is fully supported, which is good for compatibility with older titles and emulators. Vulkan 1.3 is the standout API here—it is current and well-optimized, and the GCN architecture responds well to Vulkan's low-level overhead. This makes the Vega 10 Mobile surprisingly competent in Vulkan-based titles, where driver overhead is minimized and the limited shader count can be pushed harder.

The lack of dedicated hardware for AI or ray tracing means the feature set is purely rasterization-focused. This is not a part for content creators using AI-accelerated tools, nor for gamers seeking next-gen visual effects. It is a straightforward rasterizer with modern API hooks, which is exactly what you would expect from a 2017 integrated solution. The 640 shading units and 40 TMUs are the workhorses here, and they are best utilized in games that rely on traditional rendering techniques.

Benchmark Performance

The fact pack does not include any synthetic benchmark scores—the `benchmarks` array is empty and the `avgBenchmarkScore` is 0. This means we must rely on the computed specifications to derive performance expectations. The FP32 throughput of 1.665 TFLOPS is the single most telling figure. To put that in perspective, a typical discrete GPU from the same era with around 5-6 TFLOPS would be roughly 3-4 times faster in raw compute. The Vega 10 Mobile is therefore in the territory of entry-level discrete parts or premium integrated graphics.

The pixel rate of 10.41 GPixel/s is the hard limit for fill-rate-bound scenarios. At 1080p, that translates to roughly 9.6 pixels per frame at 60 FPS, which is adequate for simple scenes but will choke on heavy overdraw or high-resolution textures. The texture rate of 52.04 GTexel/s is more respectable, suggesting that texel-heavy workloads are less of a bottleneck than pixel throughput. This imbalance—good TMUs but weak ROPs—is typical of integrated parts that share memory bandwidth with the CPU.

In real-world terms, the data suggests this part can handle 720p gaming at medium settings in most titles, and 1080p at low settings in esports titles like CS:GO or League of Legends. The 50th percentile rank against all GPUs means it outperforms half of all GPUs ever tested, but that includes a vast number of ancient and low-end parts. Against modern integrated graphics, it would be competitive with entry-level Iris Xe parts but well behind the latest RDNA or Intel Arc iGPUs. The lack of a `nearestRivals` list means we cannot state exact deltas, but the absolute numbers are clear: this is a 720p/1080p-low part, not a 1440p or high-refresh solution.

FAQ

Q: Can the RX Vega 10 Mobile run modern AAA games?

A: The data indicates limited capability. With 1.665 TFLOPS FP32 and 8 ROPs, modern AAA titles at 1080p would require low settings and likely still struggle. It is better suited to 720p medium or esports titles.

Q: Does it support hardware ray tracing?

A: No. The fact pack lists no RT cores, so hardware-accelerated ray tracing is unavailable. Any ray-traced effects would have to be computed via shaders, which would be impractically slow.

Q: What API versions does it support?

A: It supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. Vulkan 1.3 is particularly useful for modern games and emulators that leverage low-level APIs.

Q: How much VRAM does it have?

A: The memory is system-shared, meaning it uses a portion of the system's main RAM. The bus width and bandwidth are also system-dependent, so performance varies with the laptop's memory configuration.

Q: Is this GPU still in production?

A: No, it is end-of-life. Its successor is the Navi II IGP, and it was preceded by a GCN 3.0 IGP. It was released on October 25, 2017.

Q: What is the power draw?

A: The TDP is 10 W, which is extremely low. This makes it suitable for fanless or passively cooled designs, but it also caps performance significantly.

Who Should Consider It

The RX Vega 10 Mobile is not a part you would choose today for a new build—it is end-of-life and aimed at a very specific use case. Benchmark results indicate it is best suited for users who need basic 3D acceleration in a low-power, portable device. If you are gaming, the data suggests sticking to 720p resolution with medium settings, or 1080p at low settings for less demanding titles. Esports games that are CPU-bound and light on GPU load will run acceptably, but anything with heavy particle effects or complex shaders will expose the 8 ROP limitation.

For productivity, the part is more than adequate for 2D workloads, video playback, and light photo editing. The Vulkan 1.3 support makes it surprisingly useful for emulation, where low-level APIs can extract more performance from the 640 shading units. However, for any serious 3D rendering, machine learning, or video encoding tasks, the lack of tensor cores and the modest FP32 throughput will be a significant handicap.

The 50th percentile ranking means it is an average GPU by raw performance, but that average is dragged up by many ancient parts. In a modern context, this is a low-end solution. If you are buying a used laptop with this IGP, expect it to handle office work, streaming, and light gaming. If you are considering it for a new purchase, the data strongly suggests looking at newer integrated solutions, which offer better performance per watt and more features.

Memory Subsystem

The memory configuration is entirely system-dependent. The VRAM size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all listed as "System Shared" or "System Dependent." This means the GPU does not have its own dedicated memory pool; it borrows from the system's main RAM. This has profound implications for performance.

First, the bandwidth is limited by the system memory's speed and the memory controller's configuration. In a dual-channel DDR4-2400 setup, the available bandwidth might be around 38 GB/s, but in a single-channel configuration, it could be half that. The fact pack explicitly states bandwidth is "System Dependent," so there is no fixed figure to cite. This means two laptops with the same GPU could perform differently based on their RAM.

Second, the shared memory architecture means the GPU and CPU compete for the same bandwidth. When the CPU is under load, GPU performance can suffer, and vice versa. This is a significant bottleneck for a part that already has a low pixel rate of 10.41 GPixel/s. At higher resolutions like 1440p or 4K, the memory bandwidth constraint will be even more pronounced, making those resolutions essentially impractical for gaming.

The lack of dedicated VRAM also means there is no fixed bus width to analyze. The ROPs must write to system memory directly, which adds latency compared to a discrete GPU with its own GDDR6 or HBM. For a 10 W IGP, this is an acceptable trade-off for cost and power savings, but it firmly places the Vega 10 Mobile in the "casual gaming and general use" category, not the high-performance segment. The memory subsystem is the weakest link in this part's chain, and it caps the GPU's potential regardless of the 1.665 TFLOPS compute capability.