RADEON

AMD Radeon R9 Nano

AMD graphics card specifications and benchmark scores

4 GB
VRAM
MHz Boost
175W
TDP
4096
Bus Width

AMD Radeon R9 Nano Specifications

⚙️

Radeon R9 Nano GPU Core

Shader units and compute resources

The AMD Radeon R9 Nano GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.

Shading Units
4,096
Shaders
4,096
TMUs
256
ROPs
64
Compute Units
64
⏱️

R9 Nano Clock Speeds

GPU and memory frequencies

Clock speeds directly impact the Radeon R9 Nano's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The Radeon R9 Nano by AMD dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.

GPU Clock
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz 1000 Mbps effective
GDDR GDDR 6X 6X

AMD's Radeon R9 Nano Memory

VRAM capacity and bandwidth

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The Radeon R9 Nano's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.

Memory Size
4 GB
VRAM
4,096 MB
Memory Type
HBM
VRAM Type
HBM
Memory Bus
4096 bit
Bus Width
4096-bit
Bandwidth
512.0 GB/s
💾

Radeon R9 Nano by AMD Cache

On-chip cache hierarchy

On-chip cache provides ultra-fast data access for the R9 Nano, reducing the need to fetch data from slower VRAM. L1 and L2 caches store frequently accessed data close to the compute units. AMD's Infinity Cache (L3) dramatically increases effective bandwidth, improving GPU benchmark performance without requiring wider memory buses. Larger cache sizes help maintain high frame rates in memory-bound scenarios and reduce power consumption by minimizing VRAM accesses.

L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
L2 Cache
2 MB
📈

R9 Nano Theoretical Performance

Compute and fill rates

Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the AMD Radeon R9 Nano against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.

FP32 (Float)
8.192 TFLOPS
FP64 (Double)
512.0 GFLOPS (1:16)
FP16 (Half)
8.192 TFLOPS (1:1)
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
🏗️

GCN 3.0 Architecture & Process

Manufacturing and design details

The AMD Radeon R9 Nano is built on AMD's GCN 3.0 architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the R9 Nano will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.

Architecture
GCN 3.0
GPU Name
Fiji
Process Node
28 nm
Foundry
TSMC
Transistors
8,900 million
Die Size
596 mm²
Density
14.9M / mm²
🔌

AMD's Radeon R9 Nano Power & Thermal

TDP and power requirements

Power specifications for the AMD Radeon R9 Nano determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the Radeon R9 Nano to maintain boost clocks without throttling.

TDP
175 W
TDP
175W
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Suggested PSU
450 W
📐

Radeon R9 Nano by AMD Physical & Connectivity

Dimensions and outputs

Physical dimensions of the AMD Radeon R9 Nano are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.

Slot Width
Dual-slot
Length
154 mm 6.1 inches
Height
112 mm 4.4 inches
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Display Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a3x DisplayPort 1.2
Display Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a3x DisplayPort 1.2
🎮

AMD API Support

Graphics and compute APIs

API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the AMD Radeon R9 Nano. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.

DirectX
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
OpenGL
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
Vulkan
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2.170
OpenCL
2.1
Shader Model
6.5
📦

Radeon R9 Nano Product Information

Release and pricing details

The AMD Radeon R9 Nano is manufactured by AMD as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the Radeon R9 Nano by AMD represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.

Manufacturer
AMD
Release Date
Aug 2015
Launch Price
649 USD
Production
End-of-life
Predecessor
Volcanic Islands
Successor
Arctic Islands

Radeon R9 Nano Benchmark Scores

📊

No benchmark data available for this GPU.

About AMD Radeon R9 Nano

The AMD Radeon R9 Nano presented a unique value proposition upon its release, targeting enthusiasts seeking maximum performance in a compact form factor. Its primary appeal lies in delivering flagship-level graphics capabilities with a remarkably low 175-watt thermal design power. This efficiency was achieved through advanced High Bandwidth Memory, which offered significant performance per watt advantages over contemporary alternatives. For professionals building small form factor workstations or gaming rigs, the R9 Nano eliminated the traditional compromise between size and power. The card's engineering demonstrated that high-end components could be integrated into a much smaller physical footprint without sacrificing output. This made the AMD Radeon R9 Nano a compelling choice for space-constrained environments where every millimeter counts. Its launch price reflected its niche positioning as a premium, specialized solution.

When considering competitive alternatives at the time, the R9 Nano occupied a distinct segment with few direct rivals. Competing cards with similar performance profiles typically required much larger cooling solutions and higher power draws, making them unsuitable for small cases. The investment value of the AMD Radeon R9 Nano must be evaluated against its longevity and unique feature set, particularly its HBM technology which was ahead of its time. While the initial cost was substantial, the card's efficiency and performance have allowed it to remain a viable option in secondary markets. For a certain class of builds, the R9 Nano continues to offer a blend of attributes that are difficult to find elsewhere. Its architecture represented a significant step forward in miniaturizing high-performance graphics hardware. This enduring relevance underscores the forward-thinking design of the Radeon R9 Nano.

Build recommendations for the AMD Radeon R9 Nano naturally focus on compact Mini-ITX or HTPC chassis where its small PCB is a major advantage. System integrators should pair the card with a capable, efficient power supply and a CPU that will not create a significant bottleneck. The 4 GB of HBM was well-suited for high-resolution textures at the time, making it a solid foundation for a premium SFF gaming system. Even by modern standards, a system built around the R9 Nano can deliver a satisfying experience in graphically demanding applications when settings are appropriately adjusted. The card's PCIe 3.0 interface ensures broad compatibility with a wide range of modern and legacy motherboards. Ultimately, the Radeon R9 Nano remains a testament to intelligent engineering focused on a specific user need. Its legacy is a reminder that raw power is not the only metric that defines value in component selection.

The NVIDIA Equivalent of Radeon R9 Nano

Looking for a similar graphics card from NVIDIA? The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 offers comparable performance and features in the NVIDIA lineup.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

NVIDIA • 8 GB VRAM

View Specs Compare

Popular AMD Radeon R9 Nano Comparisons

See how the Radeon R9 Nano stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.

Compare Radeon R9 Nano with Other GPUs

Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.

Browse GPUs