RADEON

AMD Radeon R9 M275

AMD graphics card specifications and benchmark scores

2 GB
VRAM
925
MHz Boost
TDP
128
Bus Width

AMD Radeon R9 M275 Specifications

⚙️

Radeon R9 M275 GPU Core

Shader units and compute resources

The AMD Radeon R9 M275 GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.

Shading Units
640
Shaders
640
TMUs
40
ROPs
16
Compute Units
10
⏱️

R9 M275 Clock Speeds

GPU and memory frequencies

Clock speeds directly impact the Radeon R9 M275's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The Radeon R9 M275 by AMD dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.

Base Clock
900 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz 4 Gbps effective
GDDR GDDR 6X 6X

AMD's Radeon R9 M275 Memory

VRAM capacity and bandwidth

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The Radeon R9 M275's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.

Memory Size
2 GB
VRAM
2,048 MB
Memory Type
GDDR5
VRAM Type
GDDR5
Memory Bus
128 bit
Bus Width
128-bit
Bandwidth
64.00 GB/s
💾

Radeon R9 M275 by AMD Cache

On-chip cache hierarchy

On-chip cache provides ultra-fast data access for the R9 M275, reducing the need to fetch data from slower VRAM. L1 and L2 caches store frequently accessed data close to the compute units. AMD's Infinity Cache (L3) dramatically increases effective bandwidth, improving GPU benchmark performance without requiring wider memory buses. Larger cache sizes help maintain high frame rates in memory-bound scenarios and reduce power consumption by minimizing VRAM accesses.

L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
L2 Cache
256 KB
📈

R9 M275 Theoretical Performance

Compute and fill rates

Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the AMD Radeon R9 M275 against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.

FP32 (Float)
1,184.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (Double)
74.00 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate
14.80 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
37.00 GTexel/s
🏗️

GCN 1.0 Architecture & Process

Manufacturing and design details

The AMD Radeon R9 M275 is built on AMD's GCN 1.0 architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the R9 M275 will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.

Architecture
GCN 1.0
GPU Name
Venus
Process Node
28 nm
Foundry
TSMC
Transistors
1,500 million
Die Size
123 mm²
Density
12.2M / mm²
🔌

AMD's Radeon R9 M275 Power & Thermal

TDP and power requirements

Power specifications for the AMD Radeon R9 M275 determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the Radeon R9 M275 to maintain boost clocks without throttling.

📐

Radeon R9 M275 by AMD Physical & Connectivity

Dimensions and outputs

Physical dimensions of the AMD Radeon R9 M275 are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.

Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
🎮

AMD API Support

Graphics and compute APIs

API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the AMD Radeon R9 M275. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.

DirectX
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
OpenGL
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
Vulkan
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2.170
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
📦

Radeon R9 M275 Product Information

Release and pricing details

The AMD Radeon R9 M275 is manufactured by AMD as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the Radeon R9 M275 by AMD represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.

Manufacturer
AMD
Release Date
Jan 2014
Production
End-of-life
Predecessor
Solar System
Successor
Polaris Mobile

Radeon R9 M275 Benchmark Scores

📊

No benchmark data available for this GPU.

About AMD Radeon R9 M275

The AMD Radeon R9 M275 (AMD) entered the mobile graphics market in early 2014, targeting mid‑range notebooks that required a modest performance boost over integrated solutions. Built on the first generation of Graphics Core Next (GCN 1.0) and fabricated in a 28 nm process, the chip balances power consumption with respectable throughput for its era. It ships with a 2 GB GDDR5 memory pool running on a 128‑bit bus, delivering ample bandwidth for texture‑heavy titles at 1080p. The base clock of 900 MHz and a modest boost to 925 MHz place it in the same class as the desktop R7 260, yet the mobile form factor imposes tighter thermal envelopes. Its PCIe 3.0 ×16 interface ensures that the card can fully utilize the bandwidth provided by contemporary laptop chipsets. Despite its age, the architecture still supports OpenGL 4.3 and DirectX 11, allowing most legacy games to run without compatibility issues. Overall, the R9 M275 presents a solid, if dated, foundation for laptops that need more than basic graphics without draining the battery. When it comes to frame rates, the R9 M275 is comfortably suited for 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in titles that were current around its launch. In modern esports titles such as *League of Legends* or *CS:GO*, the card can often exceed 60 fps, thanks to its efficient GCN core and the speed of its GDDR5 memory. However, more demanding AAA releases will see the GPU struggling to maintain 30 fps at high settings, requiring players to dial back texture quality or resolution. The 2 GB VRAM ceiling becomes a limiting factor in games that employ large texture packs, leading to occasional stuttering when memory pressure spikes. Nonetheless, the card’s modest clock speeds and 128‑bit memory interface provide a predictable performance envelope, making it easier to tune settings for a stable experience. Its ability to handle 1920×1080 at 30‑40 fps in titles like *The Witcher 3* (with reduced settings) demonstrates that the R9 M275 still holds relevance for casual gamers. In short, the card delivers consistent output for mainstream titles, but it is not a candidate for ultra‑high‑resolution or high‑refresh‑rate gaming. Ray tracing and AI‑driven upscaling technologies such as DLSS are not part of the R9 M275’s feature set, as the GPU predates hardware‑accelerated ray tracing entirely. AMD’s FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR) can still be applied, but the performance gains are modest because the card lacks the raw compute headroom to benefit fully from the algorithm. The lack of dedicated RT cores means that any ray‑traced effects must be rendered via software, which imposes a severe performance penalty and is generally impractical for real‑time gameplay. Cooling solutions on laptops equipped with the R9 M275 typically consist of a dual‑fan design with a heat pipe that spreads thermal load across the chassis, yet the modest TDP of the chip keeps temperatures within acceptable limits under load. That said, sustained high loads can cause the GPU to throttle, especially in thin‑and‑light chassis where airflow is constrained. Users seeking smoother frame rates in newer titles may rely on FSR to upscale lower‑resolution renders, but expectations should be tempered by the card’s limited shader throughput. Consequently, the R9 M275 is best viewed as a platform for traditional rasterization rather than cutting‑edge visual effects. For the most appropriate deployment, the Radeon R9 M275 excels in budget‑oriented gaming notebooks and workstations that prioritize battery life over raw horsepower. Its 28 nm silicon and 2 GB of GDDR5 strike a balance that keeps power draw low enough for portable use while still offering enough performance for classic and less demanding modern games. Professionals who need modest GPU acceleration for tasks like video encoding or 3D modeling at entry levels will find the card sufficient, provided they do not rely on the latest CUDA‑ or OpenCL‑intensive workloads. The GPU’s age means that driver support is stable but may lack optimizations for the newest titles, so pairing it with AMD’s Radeon Software for regular updates is advisable. In environments where silent operation is crucial, the cooling design usually operates at a low acoustic footprint, though occasional fan ramp‑up is inevitable during intensive sessions. Ultimately, the R9 M275’s sweet spot lies in delivering dependable, mid‑range graphics for laptops that cannot accommodate larger, power‑hungry GPUs, making it a pragmatic choice for users who value a blend of performance, efficiency, and cost.

The NVIDIA Equivalent of Radeon R9 M275

Looking for a similar graphics card from NVIDIA? The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 offers comparable performance and features in the NVIDIA lineup.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

NVIDIA • 8 GB VRAM

View Specs Compare

Popular AMD Radeon R9 M275 Comparisons

See how the Radeon R9 M275 stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.

Compare Radeon R9 M275 with Other GPUs

Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.

Browse GPUs