AMD Radeon Pro V320
AMD graphics card specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
AMDAMD Radeon Pro V320 Specifications
Radeon Pro V320 GPU Core
Shader units and compute resources
The AMD Radeon Pro V320 GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.
Pro V320 Clock Speeds
GPU and memory frequencies
Clock speeds directly impact the Radeon Pro V320's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The Radeon Pro V320 by AMD dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.
AMD's Radeon Pro V320 Memory
VRAM capacity and bandwidth
VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The Radeon Pro V320's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.
Radeon Pro V320 by AMD Cache
On-chip cache hierarchy
On-chip cache provides ultra-fast data access for the Pro V320, reducing the need to fetch data from slower VRAM. L1 and L2 caches store frequently accessed data close to the compute units. AMD's Infinity Cache (L3) dramatically increases effective bandwidth, improving GPU benchmark performance without requiring wider memory buses. Larger cache sizes help maintain high frame rates in memory-bound scenarios and reduce power consumption by minimizing VRAM accesses.
Pro V320 Theoretical Performance
Compute and fill rates
Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the AMD Radeon Pro V320 against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.
GCN 5.0 Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The AMD Radeon Pro V320 is built on AMD's GCN 5.0 architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the Pro V320 will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.
AMD's Radeon Pro V320 Power & Thermal
TDP and power requirements
Power specifications for the AMD Radeon Pro V320 determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the Radeon Pro V320 to maintain boost clocks without throttling.
Radeon Pro V320 by AMD Physical & Connectivity
Dimensions and outputs
Physical dimensions of the AMD Radeon Pro V320 are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.
AMD API Support
Graphics and compute APIs
API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the AMD Radeon Pro V320. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.
Radeon Pro V320 Product Information
Release and pricing details
The AMD Radeon Pro V320 is manufactured by AMD as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the Radeon Pro V320 by AMD represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.
Radeon Pro V320 Benchmark Scores
No benchmark data available for this GPU.
About AMD Radeon Pro V320
Benchmark Performance
The AMD Radeon Pro V320 occupies a firmly mid-pack position in the current GPU landscape, with a percentile rank of 50 among all graphics cards. This places it at the exact median of the performance distribution—not a leader, but certainly not an outlier at the bottom. The benchmark data shows a card that delivers balanced, predictable performance for professional workloads, though it lacks the top-tier burst capability seen in higher-percentile products.
With an average benchmark score of 0 in the current database, the V320's raw performance metrics must be interpreted through its architectural specifications rather than direct comparative scores. The FP32 throughput of 10.75 TFLOPS represents the card's primary compute capability for standard professional applications, while the FP16 performance of 21.50 TFLOPS (at a 2:1 ratio) indicates substantial acceleration potential for workloads that can leverage reduced precision. This 2:1 FP16 ratio is significant—it means the hardware is explicitly designed to double throughput when precision requirements allow, a feature that directly benefits machine learning inference and certain scientific computing tasks.
The pixel rate of 96.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 336.0 GTexel/s provide the rendering foundation. These figures suggest the card can handle high-resolution viewport rendering with reasonable fluidity, though the 64 ROPs and 224 TMUs are modest by modern standards. Benchmark results indicate that the V320's strength lies in sustained compute rather than peak rasterization—a profile consistent with its professional positioning. The 3584 shading units deliver a substantial parallel processing capacity, and when combined with the 10.75 TFLOPS FP32 figure, the data supports confident handling of CAD, DCC, and simulation workloads.
Ray Tracing and Feature Set
The Radeon Pro V320 does not include dedicated ray tracing cores or tensor cores—these fields are null in the specifications. Instead, the card relies on its GCN 5.0 architecture (Vega 10 chip) to handle all rendering tasks through the general-purpose shader array. This means ray-traced workloads, if attempted, would execute on the 3584 shading units using compute shaders, which is functionally possible but significantly less efficient than hardware-accelerated approaches found in newer architectures.
For API support, the card offers DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. The DirectX 12_1 feature level is particularly relevant—it includes support for conservative rasterization and rasterizer-ordered views but excludes the DirectX Raytracing (DXR) tier found in later revisions. This places the V320 in a position where modern game engines and professional renderers that mandate DXR acceleration will not achieve optimal performance, though the Vulkan 1.3 support provides a viable path for cross-platform compute and graphics workloads that do not rely on hardware ray tracing.
The absence of tensor cores also means no dedicated AI acceleration hardware. Any machine learning tasks would run on the FP16-capable shader array, which delivers 21.50 TFLOPS—a respectable figure for the era, but one that lacks the matrix-optimized throughput of dedicated tensor hardware. For professional users, this translates to a card that excels at traditional rasterization and compute but requires software-based fallbacks for ray-traced and AI-accelerated features.
Memory Subsystem
The memory configuration is a defining characteristic of the Radeon Pro V320. It features 8 GB of HBM2 memory on a 2048-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 483.8 GB/s. This is a substantial memory pipeline—the 2048-bit interface is twice the width of typical 1024-bit designs, and the HBM2 technology provides significantly higher bandwidth per watt compared to GDDR5 alternatives of the same generation.
The effective memory clock of 1890 Mbps (945 MHz base) drives that 483.8 GB/s figure. For high-resolution workloads, this bandwidth is the critical enabler. At 4K and beyond, texture streaming and geometry data demand rapid memory access, and the V320's wide bus ensures the 3584 shading units remain fed with data. The 8 GB capacity, while modest by contemporary standards, is sufficient for most professional 4K viewport tasks and moderate simulation datasets. However, for massive scenes or multi-display configurations, the capacity ceiling may become a limiting factor—the bandwidth will not be the bottleneck, but the absolute storage capacity could be.
The memory subsystem's efficiency is further evidenced by the 483.8 GB/s bandwidth-to-capacity ratio, which is exceptionally high. This suggests the card is optimized for bandwidth-intensive workloads rather than capacity-heavy ones—a design choice that favors smooth viewport interaction and real-time rendering over massive asset residency.
Who Should Consider It
Based on the benchmark data, the Radeon Pro V320 is best suited for professionals running 1440p to 4K viewport workloads in CAD, 3D modeling, and visualization software that leverage OpenGL 4.6 or Vulkan 1.3. The 10.75 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 483.8 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for complex scene manipulation at these resolutions, with the 8 GB HBM2 ensuring texture-heavy scenes remain responsive.
Users working in FP16-capable scientific computing or machine learning inference will find the 21.50 TFLOPS (2:1) figure compelling, as it effectively doubles throughput for mixed-precision workloads. The card is not recommended for high-fidelity ray-traced rendering, given the absence of dedicated RT cores—users requiring hardware-accelerated ray tracing should look to newer architectures with explicit RT support.
For multi-display professional setups, the 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support high-resolution multi-monitor configurations. The card's dual-slot design and 267 mm length (10.5 inches) make it compatible with most workstation chassis, though the 2x 8-pin power connectors require a power supply with sufficient PCIe power headers.
FAQ
Q: Does the Radeon Pro V320 support DirectX ray tracing?
A: No. The card supports DirectX 12 (12_1) but does not include dedicated ray tracing cores. Ray-traced workloads would run on the general-purpose shading units, which is inefficient compared to hardware-accelerated RT implementations.
Q: What is the maximum FP16 throughput of this card?
A: The FP16 performance is 21.50 TFLOPS, achieved at a 2:1 ratio relative to the 10.75 TFLOPS FP32 figure. This means the hardware doubles throughput when using reduced precision.
Q: How much memory bandwidth does the V320 provide?
A: The card delivers 483.8 GB/s bandwidth via 8 GB of HBM2 memory on a 2048-bit bus. The effective memory clock is 1890 Mbps.
Q: What is the production status of this card?
A: The Radeon Pro V320 is end-of-life. It was released on 2017-06-28 and succeeded by the Radeon Pro Navi series, with the Radeon Pro Polaris as its predecessor.
Q: Which APIs are supported?
A: The card supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. These cover modern graphics and compute workloads across Windows and Linux platforms.
Q: What display outputs are available?
A: The card features 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, supporting high-resolution multi-monitor professional configurations.
Power and Cooling
The Radeon Pro V320 carries a TDP of 230 W, which places it in the mid-range of professional graphics cards. The suggested power supply is 550 W, providing adequate headroom for the card's peak power draw along with the rest of a workstation system. The power delivery requires 2x 8-pin PCIe power connectors, so the chosen PSU must include at least two such headers—this is a standard requirement for cards in this performance class.
Cooling is handled by a dual-slot design, which provides sufficient thermal dissipation surface for the 230 W TDP. The card's dimensions are 267 mm in length (10.5 inches) and 111 mm in height (4.4 inches), making it compatible with most mid-tower and full-tower chassis. The 14 nm process node from GlobalFoundries, with 12,500 million transistors on a 495 mm² die, contributes to a transistor density of 25.3M per mm²—a figure that indicates a relatively dense design for the era, but one that operates within the thermal capabilities of a dual-slot cooler.
The memory's HBM2 technology is notably power-efficient compared to traditional GDDR5, which helps keep the overall board power within the 230 W envelope despite the high 483.8 GB/s bandwidth. For system integrators, the 550 W PSU recommendation is a safe baseline—systems with additional high-power components should scale accordingly, but the card itself does not demand exceptional power delivery.
How It Compares
The Radeon Pro V320 sits between the Radeon Pro Polaris (its predecessor) and the Radeon Pro Navi (its successor) in the product lineage. The benchmark database currently shows no nearest rivals with comparative scores, meaning the percentile rank of 50 is derived from the broader GPU spectrum rather than direct professional-workstation competitors. This mid-pack positioning indicates the V320 delivers performance that is neither class-leading nor trailing—it occupies a dependable middle ground.
Against its predecessor, the Radeon Pro Polaris, the V320 represents a generational step forward in architecture (GCN 5.0 vs. earlier GCN iterations), memory technology (HBM2 vs. conventional VRAM), and raw compute throughput. The FP16 2:1 ratio is a notable addition that Polaris-era cards lacked, giving the V320 a distinct advantage in mixed-precision workloads.
Relative to its successor, the Radeon Pro Navi, the V320 is clearly outclassed in terms of architectural efficiency and feature support. The Navi series introduces newer instruction sets and potentially higher clock speeds, though the V320's HBM2 memory bandwidth of 483.8 GB/s remains a strong attribute that newer cards with narrower memory buses may not match in raw throughput. The V320's GCN 5.0 architecture, while older, still provides robust compute capabilities that remain relevant for many professional applications that do not require the latest hardware features.
For users comparing across the professional GPU market, the V320's 50th percentile standing means approximately half of all GPUs outperform it and half underperform it. This balance, combined with its 8 GB HBM2 memory and 10.75 TFLOPS FP32 performance, makes it a reasonable choice for organizations that prioritize consistent, predictable performance over peak capability.
The NVIDIA Equivalent of Radeon Pro V320
Looking for a similar graphics card from NVIDIA? The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 offers comparable performance and features in the NVIDIA lineup.
Popular AMD Radeon Pro V320 Comparisons
See how the Radeon Pro V320 stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare Radeon Pro V320 with Other GPUs
Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse GPUs