AMD Radeon HD 7560D IGP
AMD graphics card specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
AMDAMD Radeon HD 7560D IGP Specifications
Radeon HD 7560D IGP GPU Core
Shader units and compute resources
The AMD Radeon HD 7560D IGP GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.
HD 7560D IGP Clock Speeds
GPU and memory frequencies
Clock speeds directly impact the Radeon HD 7560D IGP's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The Radeon HD 7560D IGP by AMD dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.
AMD's Radeon HD 7560D IGP Memory
VRAM capacity and bandwidth
VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The Radeon HD 7560D IGP's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.
HD 7560D IGP Theoretical Performance
Compute and fill rates
Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the AMD Radeon HD 7560D IGP against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.
TeraScale 3 Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The AMD Radeon HD 7560D IGP is built on AMD's TeraScale 3 architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the HD 7560D IGP will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.
AMD's Radeon HD 7560D IGP Power & Thermal
TDP and power requirements
Power specifications for the AMD Radeon HD 7560D IGP determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the Radeon HD 7560D IGP to maintain boost clocks without throttling.
Radeon HD 7560D IGP by AMD Physical & Connectivity
Dimensions and outputs
Physical dimensions of the AMD Radeon HD 7560D IGP are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.
AMD API Support
Graphics and compute APIs
API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the AMD Radeon HD 7560D IGP. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.
Radeon HD 7560D IGP Product Information
Release and pricing details
The AMD Radeon HD 7560D IGP is manufactured by AMD as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the Radeon HD 7560D IGP by AMD represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.
Radeon HD 7560D IGP Benchmark Scores
No benchmark data available for this GPU.
About AMD Radeon HD 7560D IGP
The AMD Radeon HD 7560D IGP is an integrated graphics processor built on AMD's TeraScale 3 architecture, using the Devastator Lite chip fabricated on a 32 nm process at GlobalFoundries. The die measures 246 mm² and contains 1,303 million transistors, yielding a density of 5.3 million per square millimeter. Released on October 1, 2012, this part is now end-of-life, and its launch MSRP was 101 USD. The database places it at the 50th percentile of all GPUs, a median standing that invites closer examination of its specifications.
Benchmark Performance
The FACT PACK lists no benchmark scores and no nearest rivals for this IGP. The avgBenchmarkScore is 0, indicating no recorded performance data exists in the database. The percentile vs all GPUs is 50, placing it exactly at the median of the database's GPU population. This percentile is a positional metric rather than a performance score, and without benchmark numbers, the raw throughput figures must carry the analysis.
The FP32 compute rate is 389.1 GFLOPS. The pixel fill rate is 6.080 GPixel/s, derived from 8 ROPs. The texture fill rate is 12.16 GTexel/s, derived from 16 TMUs. The shading unit count is 256. These figures describe a low-throughput part by any standard. The pixel rate of 6.08 GPixel/s implies a modest fill capability that would limit resolution and detail settings. The texture rate of 12.16 GTexel/s suggests texture-heavy workloads will be constrained. The FP32 figure of 389.1 GFLOPS is the compute ceiling for shader workloads.
The 50th percentile is curious: it suggests the database considers this IGP to be median, yet the raw numbers are low. This could be because many entries in the database are even older or lower-end integrated parts. The data shows no rivals to compare against, so the percentile is the only relative measure. It sits at the midpoint of all GPUs, a surprisingly high standing for an integrated part from 2012. The absence of benchmark scores means no deltaPct values exist to cite, leaving the percentile and raw throughput as the only quantitative anchors.
Memory Subsystem
The memory configuration is entirely system-shared. The size, type, and bus width are all listed as "System Shared," and the bandwidth is "System Dependent." This means the IGP has no dedicated VRAM; it borrows from the host system's main memory. The bus width and bandwidth are not fixed specifications — they depend on the motherboard and CPU's memory controller.
The implication is that performance scales with the system's RAM configuration. A dual-channel high-speed memory setup would provide more bandwidth than a single-channel low-speed one, but the FACT PACK does not quantify this. For high resolutions, the lack of dedicated VRAM is a significant constraint. The system-shared memory must be used for both the CPU and the GPU, creating contention. The data shows no dedicated memory chips, no fixed bus width, and no fixed bandwidth. This is typical for an IGP, but it means the user's memory choice directly affects graphics performance. The "System Dependent" bandwidth is the key caveat: the same IGP could perform differently in two systems with different memory configurations. The pixel rate of 6.080 GPixel/s and texture rate of 12.16 GTexel/s are already modest, and the shared memory bottleneck compounds these limits.
Ray Tracing and Feature Set
The Radeon HD 7560D IGP has no ray tracing cores and no tensor cores. This is consistent with its TeraScale 3 architecture, which predates hardware-accelerated ray tracing and tensor processing. The API support is DirectX 11.2 (feature level 11_0), OpenGL 4.4, and no Vulkan. The DirectX 11.2 support with the 11_0 feature level means the hardware does not expose features beyond DirectX 11. The absence of Vulkan is notable; the FACT PACK lists no Vulkan support.
The OpenGL 4.4 support is present. The feature set is limited to what TeraScale 3 offers, which does not include mesh shaders, variable rate shading, or other modern features. The lack of RT and tensor cores means no hardware acceleration for ray tracing or AI-based upscaling. The DirectX 11.2 (11_0) designation indicates the feature level, not the full DirectX 11.2 API. This is an important distinction. The architecture is from the TeraScale 3 generation, with the chip codenamed Devastator Lite. The API support limits modern feature usage; games requiring Vulkan or DirectX 12 will not run on this part.
FAQ
Q: What is the launch MSRP of the AMD Radeon HD 7560D IGP?
A: The launch MSRP is 101 USD.
Q: What is the TDP of this IGP?
A: The TDP is 65 W.
Q: Does it support hardware ray tracing?
A: No, it has no ray tracing cores.
Q: What DirectX version does it support?
A: It supports DirectX 11.2 (11_0).
Q: How much dedicated VRAM does it have?
A: It has no dedicated VRAM; the memory size is "System Shared."
Q: What is the process node?
A: The process node is 32 nm, fabricated at GlobalFoundries.
Who Should Consider It
The data describes an integrated GPU with 256 shading units, 8 ROPs, and a peak FP32 rate of 389.1 GFLOPS. These numbers suggest a part aimed at basic desktop use rather than high-end gaming. The pixel rate of 6.080 GPixel/s and texture rate of 12.16 GTexel/s are modest. For gaming, the data implies playable performance only at low resolutions and low detail settings in older titles, but no benchmark scores are present to confirm this. The 50th percentile standing is the only relative measure.
The system-shared memory means that a system with fast dual-channel RAM would give better results than one with slow single-channel RAM. Users building a system for light, legacy gaming or general productivity could consider this IGP. The 65 W TDP means it is a low-power part. The lack of Vulkan support and the DirectX 11.2 (11_0) feature level limit modern game compatibility. For high-resolution or modern workloads, the data does not recommend this part. The 8 ROPs and 6.08 GPixel/s pixel rate are the limiting factors for resolution scaling. The 389.1 GFLOPS FP32 rate is sufficient for basic shader work but not for compute-heavy tasks.
Power and Cooling
The TDP is 65 W. This is the thermal design power, indicating the maximum heat the cooling solution must dissipate. No power connectors are listed, and no suggested PSU is given. As an IGP, the slot width is listed as "IGP," meaning it is not a discrete card. It draws power from the motherboard rather than a dedicated power connector. The absence of a suggested PSU is consistent with an integrated part; the system's existing power supply is sufficient.
The 65 W figure is the only power-related number in the FACT PACK. The cooling solution is motherboard-dependent. The data does not specify a cooler, so any capable cooling solution that fits the motherboard would work. The 32 nm process node and 246 mm² die size contribute to the power characteristics. The transistor count of 1,303 million is a measure of complexity. The 5.3M / mm² transistor density reflects the 32 nm process. These figures indicate a modest power envelope, appropriate for an integrated part.
How It Compares
The nearestRivals array in the FACT PACK is empty, so there are no direct rival comparisons with scores or delta percentages. The data provides a predecessor and successor: the predecessor is TeraScale 2 IGP, and the successor is GCN 2.0 IGP. These are architectural generations, not specific products. The Radeon HD 7560D IGP is based on TeraScale 3.
Compared to its predecessor, TeraScale 2, the newer architecture would be expected to offer improvements, but no numbers are provided. Compared to its successor, GCN 2.0, the newer architecture would offer feature advancements, but again no numbers are given. The percentile of 50 places it at the median of all GPUs in the database. Without rival scores, the comparison must be qualitative. The data shows no benchmark scores, so the 50th percentile is the only comparative metric. This suggests that, within the database's population, this IGP is neither a standout nor a laggard. The empty nearestRivals field means no deltaPct values exist to cite. The comparison section therefore relies on the architectural lineage and the percentile. The TeraScale 3 generation sits between two other IGP generations, and the 50th percentile position indicates a median standing in the broader GPU landscape.
The NVIDIA Equivalent of Radeon HD 7560D IGP
Looking for a similar graphics card from NVIDIA? The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 offers comparable performance and features in the NVIDIA lineup.
Popular AMD Radeon HD 7560D IGP Comparisons
See how the Radeon HD 7560D IGP stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare Radeon HD 7560D IGP with Other GPUs
Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse GPUs