AMD FireStream 9350
AMD graphics card specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
AMDAMD FireStream 9350 Specifications
GPU Core
Shader units and compute resources
The AMD FireStream 9350 GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.
FireStream 9350 Clock Speeds
GPU and memory frequencies
Clock speeds directly impact the FireStream 9350's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The FireStream 9350 by AMD dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.
AMD's FireStream 9350 Memory
VRAM capacity and bandwidth
VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The FireStream 9350's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.
FireStream 9350 by AMD Cache
On-chip cache hierarchy
On-chip cache provides ultra-fast data access for the FireStream 9350, reducing the need to fetch data from slower VRAM. L1 and L2 caches store frequently accessed data close to the compute units. AMD's Infinity Cache (L3) dramatically increases effective bandwidth, improving GPU benchmark performance without requiring wider memory buses. Larger cache sizes help maintain high frame rates in memory-bound scenarios and reduce power consumption by minimizing VRAM accesses.
FireStream 9350 Theoretical Performance
Compute and fill rates
Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the AMD FireStream 9350 against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.
TeraScale 2 Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The AMD FireStream 9350 is built on AMD's TeraScale 2 architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the FireStream 9350 will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.
Power & Thermal
TDP and power requirements
Power specifications for the AMD FireStream 9350 determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the FireStream 9350 to maintain boost clocks without throttling.
FireStream 9350 by AMD Physical & Connectivity
Dimensions and outputs
Physical dimensions of the AMD FireStream 9350 are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.
AMD API Support
Graphics and compute APIs
API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the AMD FireStream 9350. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.
FireStream 9350 Product Information
Release and pricing details
The AMD FireStream 9350 is manufactured by AMD as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the FireStream 9350 by AMD represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.
About AMD FireStream 9350
The AMD FireStream 9350 is an end-of-life compute-oriented GPU built on the TeraScale 2 architecture. Fabricated by TSMC on a 40 nm process, the Cypress chip packs 2,154 million transistors into a 334 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 6.4M per square millimeter. The card ships with 2 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 128.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its production status is listed as end-of-life, with a release date of May 31, 2010. The data pack provides no benchmark scores and no nearest rivals, so this analysis relies on the card's theoretical specifications and its percentile rank of 50 among all GPUs. The architecture, TeraScale 2, is a predecessor to later GCN designs, and the chip is known as Cypress. The card's memory clock is 1000 MHz, translating to 4 Gbps effective. The shading unit count is 1440, with 72 TMUs and 32 ROPs. These specifications define the card's compute and rendering capabilities.
How It Compares
The FACT PACK for the AMD FireStream 9350 lists no nearest rivals. Consequently, direct percentage comparisons against competing hardware cannot be presented. The card's percentile rank of 50 places it exactly at the median of all GPUs tracked in the database, meaning half of all GPUs score higher and half score lower. This median positioning suggests a balanced, mid-tier standing in the overall performance hierarchy. Without rival scores, the data cannot substantiate claims of being ahead of or behind any specific product. The absence of rival data also means no deltaPct values exist to quantify performance gaps. The percentile figure stands as the sole comparative metric, indicating a middle-of-the-road capability profile. Because no nearestRivals entries are provided, any analysis of relative performance must be purely theoretical, based on the card's own throughput figures rather than head-to-head measurements. The 50th percentile rank is a static snapshot, not a dynamic comparison, and it reflects the card's standing in a database that includes a wide range of GPUs from different eras and tiers.
Power and Cooling
Thermal and power requirements are clearly specified. The FireStream 9350 has a TDP of 150 W. The suggested power supply unit is rated at 450 W, which provides a comfortable headroom for the card's draw. Power delivery requires a single 6-pin PCIe power connector. The card occupies a single slot in the chassis, measuring 241 mm in length (9.5 inches) and 111 mm in height (4.4 inches). This single-slot form factor is typical for compute accelerators of its generation, allowing dense server configurations. The 40 nm process node and 150 W TDP indicate a moderate thermal load, though the data does not specify cooling solution details beyond the single-slot footprint. The PCIe 2.0 x16 bus interface is the connection standard, which is older than current generations but adequate for the card's bandwidth needs. The suggested PSU of 450 W is a specific recommendation that ensures stable operation under load. The single 6-pin connector is a minimal power requirement, making the card compatible with a wide range of power supplies. The dimensions of 241 mm and 111 mm fit standard ATX cases, though the single-slot design is more common in rack-mount servers.
Benchmark Performance
The benchmark array in the data pack is empty, and the average benchmark score is listed as 0. As such, no synthetic or real-world test scores are available for the FireStream 9350. Analysis must therefore rely on the card's theoretical peak rates. The FP32 compute throughput is rated at 2.016 TFLOPS. Pixel fill rate is 22.40 GPixel/s, and texture fill rate is 50.40 GTexel/s. These figures are derived from the 1440 shading units, 72 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. The memory subsystem provides 128.0 GB/s of bandwidth via a 256-bit GDDR5 interface operating at 1000 MHz (4 Gbps effective). Given the 50th percentile ranking, these theoretical numbers place the card in the middle of the performance spectrum. Without benchmark scores, direct percentage comparisons to rivals are impossible, but the raw throughput numbers indicate a card capable of handling compute workloads at a moderate pace. The FP32 rate of 2.016 TFLOPS is a solid figure for its era, while the pixel and texture rates suggest balanced rasterization capabilities. The texture rate of 50.40 GTexel/s, combined with the pixel rate of 22.40 GPixel/s, gives a texture-to-pixel ratio of 2.25, which is typical for GPUs with 72 TMUs and 32 ROPs. The memory bandwidth of 128.0 GB/s is a limiting factor for high-resolution textures, but it is sufficient for 1080p workloads. The absence of FP16 data means half-precision compute is not specified, which is relevant for certain compute tasks.
FAQ
Q: What is the TDP of the FireStream 9350?
A: The TDP is 150 W.
Q: What power connectors does it require?
A: It requires a single 6-pin PCIe power connector.
Q: What is the memory configuration?
A: It has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 128.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1000 MHz (4 Gbps effective).
Q: Does it support ray tracing or tensor cores?
A: The data pack lists RT cores and tensor cores as null, meaning they are not present.
Q: What API versions are supported?
A: It supports DirectX 11.2 (11_0) and OpenGL 4.4. Vulkan support is not listed.
Q: What is the production status and release date?
A: It is end-of-life, with a release date of May 31, 2010.
Ray Tracing and Feature Set
The FireStream 9350 does not include dedicated ray tracing cores or tensor cores; both fields are null in the data pack. Its feature set is defined by the TeraScale 2 architecture and the Cypress chip. API support includes DirectX 11.2 (11_0) and OpenGL 4.4. Notably, Vulkan support is absent from the specification. The display output is a single DisplayPort 1.1 connector, indicating a minimal display interface typical of compute-focused cards. The 1440 shading units and 72 TMUs handle traditional rasterization and compute shaders, but without RT or tensor cores, any ray-traced or AI-accelerated workloads would rely on general-purpose shader execution. The FP32 throughput of 2.016 TFLOPS provides the raw compute capability for such tasks, though efficiency would be lower than dedicated hardware. The absence of a Vulkan API entry further limits modern cross-platform compatibility. The DirectX 11.2 support with a feature level of 11_0 means it can run DirectX 11 titles, but not the newer DirectX 12 or Vulkan features. The single DisplayPort 1.1 output restricts multi-monitor setups, and the lack of HDMI or DVI is notable. The TeraScale 2 architecture predates hardware-accelerated ray tracing, so any ray tracing would be software-based and slow. Tensor cores are also absent, meaning no dedicated AI acceleration for tasks like DLSS or neural rendering.
Who Should Consider It
Given the absence of benchmark scores, recommendations must be grounded in the card's theoretical specifications and median percentile rank of 50. The 2 GB GDDR5 memory with 128.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p gaming and compute tasks of its era, but the 256-bit bus and 2 GB capacity may limit higher-resolution textures. The 2.016 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 22.40 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest it can handle older DirectX 11 titles at medium settings. For compute workloads, the 1440 shading units provide a moderate parallel processing capability. However, the lack of Vulkan support and the single DisplayPort 1.1 output restrict modern API usage and multi-display setups. Users targeting high refresh rates or 4K resolutions would find the memory bandwidth insufficient. The card is best suited for legacy systems or compute tasks that do not require modern APIs. The 50th percentile ranking indicates it is a mid-pack performer, not a high-end solution. The single-slot design and 150 W TDP make it a viable option for dense server builds where space and power are constrained. The 450 W suggested PSU ensures that even older systems with modest power supplies can accommodate it. The 2 GB memory is a limiting factor for modern games with large texture packs, but for compute kernels that fit within 2 GB, the card performs adequately. The FP32 rate of 2.016 TFLOPS is competitive for its time, but the lack of FP16 support means it cannot leverage half-precision acceleration. Users who need modern API features like Vulkan or hardware ray tracing should look elsewhere, as this card lacks both. For those running legacy software or dedicated compute tasks that rely on OpenCL or DirectX 11, the FireStream 9350 remains a functional option.
Detailed benchmark scores and charts for the AMD FireStream 9350 are below.
Benchmark Scores
No benchmark data available for this GPU.
Compare with Other GPUs
Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse GPUs