Valorant
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 551 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 395 | 414 | 435 | 629 |
| 1440p QHD | 494 | 518 | 544 | 678 |
| 1080p Full HD | 579 | 599 | 609 | 715 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Valorant with AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti combination delivers exceptional performance in Valorant, positioning itself in the top 6.6% of all tested system configurations for this title. The measured frame rates across all resolutions and settings presets are extraordinarily high, indicating that this pairing is far more capable than what Valorant’s competitive requirements demand. The data shows a system that is consistently GPU-bound at higher resolutions, yet capable of pushing frame rates well beyond the refresh rates of most high-end monitors.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a clear shift in the system's bottleneck. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the average frame rate is 715 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 Low reduces this to 678 FPS, a modest 5.2% drop. At 3840x2160 Low, the average falls further to 629 FPS, representing an 12.0% decrease from the 1080p figure. This relatively gentle scaling curve at Low settings suggests that the CPU is the primary limiting component at 1080p, as the RTX 3080 Ti has ample headroom to render frames faster than the Ryzen 7 9700F can feed it.
The scaling pattern changes significantly at higher settings presets. With High settings, the 1080p average of 599 FPS drops to 518 FPS at 1440p (a 13.5% decline) and then to 414 FPS at 4K (a 30.9% drop from 1080p). The Medium preset shows a similar trend: 609 FPS at 1080p, 544 FPS at 1440p, and 435 FPS at 4K. The Ultra preset delivers 579 FPS at 1080p, 494 FPS at 1440p, and 395 FPS at 4K. The progressively steeper percentage declines as resolution increases indicate that the GPU begins to take over as the limiting factor at 4K, particularly with more demanding graphics settings.
The delta between Low and Ultra settings at each resolution provides further insight. At 1080p, the gap between Low (715 FPS) and Ultra (579 FPS) is 19.0%, while at 4K, the same preset comparison shows a gap of 37.2% (629 FPS vs 395 FPS). This widening gap confirms that the GPU's workload scales more aggressively with both resolution and settings, while the CPU-bound nature of the game at lower resolutions keeps frame rates relatively high regardless of graphics configuration.
FAQ
Q: What is the highest average frame rate recorded for this combo in Valorant?
A: The maximum average FPS recorded is 715, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This represents the ceiling for this configuration, with the CPU likely being the limiting factor at this point.
Q: How does the frame rate drop when moving from 1080p to 4K at Ultra settings?
A: At Ultra settings, the average frame rate falls from 579 FPS at 1920x1080 to 494 FPS at 2560x1440, and finally to 395 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a cumulative 31.8% reduction from the 1080p baseline.
Q: What is the combo's ranking among all tested system configurations in Valorant?
A: This combination of AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti ranks 189th out of 2883 total tested combos for Valorant, placing it in the top 6.6% of all systems.
Q: Is there a significant performance difference between Medium and High settings?
A: The difference is minimal. At 1080p, Medium delivers 609 FPS while High delivers 599 FPS, a difference of just 1.6%. At 1440p, the gap is 5.0% (544 vs 518 FPS), and at 4K it is 5.1% (435 vs 414 FPS).
Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded across all tested configurations?
A: The only minimum FPS values recorded are at Medium settings: 370 FPS at 4K, 463 FPS at 1440p, and 518 FPS at 1080p. The lowest minimum of 370 FPS occurs at 3840x2160 resolution.
Q: How does the Ryzen 7 9700F compare to its nearest CPU rivals in overall benchmark scores?
A: The Ryzen 7 9700F has an average benchmark score of 69996, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (69875), 0.2% lower than the Intel Core i7-14700KF (70163), 0.7% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (69515), and 0.9% higher than the Intel Core i7-14700K (69355).
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is built on the Zen 5 architecture with a Granite Ridge codename, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process node. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The processor has a 65W TDP and supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 cache.
In the context of Valorant, the CPU's performance is critical because the game's engine is known to be sensitive to single-threaded performance. The Ryzen 7 9700F achieves a Passmark single-thread score of 4691, which is a strong indicator of its capability to handle the game's primary game logic and rendering thread. The multithread score of 36470 and the physics score of 2122 further support the CPU's ability to manage background tasks and game simulation without becoming a bottleneck.
The benchmark data shows that the CPU's performance relative to its nearest rivals is tightly clustered. The Ryzen 7 9700F's average benchmark score of 69996 places it within 0.9% of the Intel Core i7-14700K (69355) and within 0.7% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (69515). This indicates that the 9700F competes effectively with high-end desktop processors from both AMD and Intel, despite its lower TDP of 65W compared to typical desktop parts.
The CPU's percentile ranking of 94 among all CPUs underscores its high performance tier. In Valorant specifically, the measured FPS at 1080p Low (715 FPS) suggests that the CPU is the limiting factor at this resolution and settings combination, as the frame rate ceiling appears to be determined by the processor's ability to issue draw calls and process game state updates. The fact that the frame rate only drops modestly to 678 FPS at 1440p Low further supports this interpretation, as the GPU has sufficient headroom to handle the increased pixel count without becoming saturated.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers the highest average frame rate at 715 FPS. The Medium preset achieves 609 FPS with a recorded minimum of 518 FPS and maximum of 701 FPS. High settings produce 599 FPS average, while Ultra delivers 579 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra at 1080p is 136 FPS, indicating that the graphics settings have a measurable but not dramatic impact at this resolution.
At 2560x1440, the Low preset again leads with 678 FPS. Medium follows at 544 FPS (min 463, max 626), High at 518 FPS, and Ultra at 494 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 184 FPS, a wider gap than at 1080p. This suggests that the GPU is beginning to feel the increased pixel load, though the absolute frame rates remain exceptionally high.
The 3840x2160 results show the most significant impact of resolution. Low settings produce 629 FPS, Medium achieves 435 FPS (min 370, max 500), High delivers 414 FPS, and Ultra manages 395 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 234 FPS, representing a 37.2% reduction. The minimum FPS of 370 at 4K Medium is still well above the refresh rate of any mainstream monitor, demonstrating that this configuration never approaches a playability concern.
The Medium preset is the only one with recorded minimum and maximum values across all resolutions. This data shows that the frame time variance is relatively consistent, with the spread between minimum and maximum being 183 FPS at 1080p (518 to 701), 163 FPS at 1440p (463 to 626), and 130 FPS at 4K (370 to 500). The narrowing spread at higher resolutions suggests that the GPU's rendering time becomes more dominant, reducing the impact of CPU-side frame time spikes.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti achieves a rank of 189 out of 2883 tested combos in Valorant. This places the system in the top 6.6% of all configurations, a strong result that reflects the high-end nature of both components. The rank considers the complete system performance rather than individual component scores, accounting for how well the CPU and GPU work together in this specific game.
Given the frame rates measured, the ranking could be even higher than the raw numbers suggest. The 1080p Low average of 715 FPS is among the highest possible for any system, and the 4K Ultra score of 395 FPS is far above what most configurations can achieve at that resolution. The rank of 189 indicates that there are 188 other combos that perform better, likely featuring more recent flagship CPUs or GPUs that can push frame rates even higher in this CPU-bound title.
The CPU's nearest rivals provide context for its contribution to this ranking. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (avg score 69875, delta 0.2%), Intel Core i7-14700KF (70163, -0.2%), AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (69515, 0.7%), and Intel Core i7-14700K (69355, 0.9%) all have average benchmark scores within 1% of the 9700F. This indicates that the CPU is not the differentiator at this performance level; instead, the GPU's capabilities and the system's overall balance determine the final ranking.
Settings Recommendations
For competitive play where maximum frame rate is paramount, the Low preset at 1920x1080 is the optimal choice, delivering an average of 715 FPS. This setting minimizes GPU load, allowing the CPU to operate as the primary driver of performance. The frame rate at this configuration is so high that it would saturate any current display's refresh rate, providing a smooth and responsive experience.
For players seeking a balance between visual quality and performance, the Medium preset at 1440p offers a compelling option. The average of 544 FPS with a minimum of 463 FPS ensures that even in demanding scenes, the frame rate remains well above the 240 Hz or 360 Hz refresh rates found on high-end competitive monitors. The visual improvements over Low settings are noticeable while maintaining exceptional responsiveness.
At 4K, the High preset at 414 FPS average is the recommended configuration for those with ultra-high-resolution displays. The Ultra preset at 395 FPS is only 4.6% slower, making it a viable alternative for players who prioritize image quality above all else. The minimum FPS at 4K Medium (370 FPS) suggests that even the most demanding scenes will not drop below playable thresholds.
The data indicates that the system's performance at 1080p is so high that the choice of settings has minimal impact on gameplay experience. The difference between Low (715 FPS) and Ultra (579 FPS) at 1080p is 136 FPS, but both values are far beyond any display's refresh rate. The recommendation shifts at higher resolutions, where the GPU's workload becomes more significant and the settings choice has a more pronounced effect on the final frame rate.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture with the GA102 chip, manufactured on Samsung's 8 nm process node. It features 10,240 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units, along with 80 ray tracing cores and 320 tensor cores. The GPU has a base clock of 1365 MHz and a boost clock of 1665 MHz, with a memory clock of 1188 MHz (19 Gbps effective). It is equipped with 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 912.4 GB/s.
In Valorant, the GPU's role varies significantly with resolution and settings. At 1080p Low, the GPU is underutilized, as evidenced by the CPU-bound frame rate of 715 FPS. The GPU's compute capabilities—34.10 TFLOPS FP32 and a pixel rate of 186.5 GPixel/s—are far more than needed for this lightweight workload. As resolution increases to 4K, the GPU becomes more engaged, with the pixel rate and texture rate (532.8 GTexel/s) becoming relevant factors in maintaining high frame rates.
The GPU's benchmark scores provide context for its performance tier. The Passmark G3D score of 26896 and the average benchmark score of 41187 place the RTX 3080 Ti in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 (avg 40870, delta 0.8%), NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB (41707, -1.2%), NVIDIA Tesla M40 (41897, -1.7%), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 (40377, 2%). This tight clustering shows that the RTX 3080 Ti remains competitive with newer and professional-grade GPUs despite its end-of-life production status.
The GPU's memory subsystem is particularly relevant for 4K gaming. The 12 GB GDDR6X capacity and 912.4 GB/s bandwidth ensure that texture streaming and memory access are never bottlenecks, even at Ultra settings with high-resolution textures. The measured 4K results confirm this, with the GPU maintaining an average of 395 FPS at Ultra settings, a figure that requires rapid memory access and efficient shader execution.
The combination of the RTX 3080 Ti's high memory bandwidth and the Ryzen 7 9700F's strong single-thread performance creates a well-balanced system for Valorant. The GPU's ability to render frames quickly at high resolutions complements the CPU's capacity to feed it with game state data. The result is a system that exceeds the requirements of any current competitive display technology, making it a formidable choice for Valorant players seeking the highest possible frame rates.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 9700F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti in Valorant
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 629.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 435.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 414.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 395.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 678.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 544.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 518.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 494.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 715.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 609.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 599.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 579.0 |
Valorant with Ryzen 7 9700F + Other GPUs
See how Valorant performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Valorant with RTX 3080 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Valorant performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 9700F + RTX 3080 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.