Valorant

Valorant

AVERAGE FPS
521
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 521 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 453 462 471 556
1440p QHD 490 501 507 599
1080p Full HD 518 527 533 631

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 556
3840x2160 Medium 471
3840x2160 High 462
3840x2160 Ultra 453
2560x1440 Low 599
2560x1440 Medium 507
2560x1440 High 501
2560x1440 Ultra 490
1920x1080 Low 631
1920x1080 Medium 533
1920x1080 High 527
1920x1080 Ultra 518

Valorant with AMD Ryzen 5 7600X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090, In-Depth Analysis

Valorant is a competitive FPS that responds dramatically to both CPU and GPU capabilities, and the pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 produces a data set that is more about bottleneck dynamics than raw graphical horsepower. The measured frame rates across three resolutions and four settings presets reveal a system that is overwhelmingly CPU-limited at lower graphical loads, while the GPU begins to assert its influence only at the highest resolution and quality settings. The data shows a combo that achieves extraordinarily high frame rates, yet the scaling patterns indicate that the RTX 5090 is largely idle in this title, with the Ryzen 5 7600X acting as the primary performance arbiter.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate deltas between 1080p and 4K are surprisingly modest, which is the first clear indicator of where the bottleneck resides. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 630.6 at 1920x1080 to 555.8 at 3840x2160, a reduction of approximately 74.8 FPS or about 11.9%. This is a small penalty for a 4x increase in pixel count, suggesting that the CPU is the limiting factor even at 4K Low. The gap narrows further when comparing High settings: 527.3 FPS at 1080p falls to 461.5 FPS at 4K, a drop of 65.8 FPS. The scaling pattern is consistent across all presets, with the 1440p results sitting almost exactly halfway between the 1080p and 4K figures, reinforcing the notion that resolution has a subdued impact on this particular game with this hardware combo.

The most telling observation comes from the Ultra preset, where the 1080p score of 518 FPS only decreases to 453.3 FPS at 4K, a delta of just 64.7 FPS. If the RTX 5090 were the primary driver, the 4K Ultra result would be significantly lower relative to 1080p, as the GPU would be taxed by both the higher resolution and the heavier graphical settings. Instead, the data shows that moving from 1080p Ultra to 4K Ultra costs less than 13% performance, which is a hallmark of a CPU-bound scenario. The limiting component is clearly the processor, as the GPU has ample headroom to render frames at higher resolutions without a proportional drop in throughput.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the benchmark database, this specific CPU-GPU combination achieves a combo rank of 149 out of 1650 tested combos for Valorant. This places it in the top 9% of all pairings tested, which is a strong showing, but the percentile ranking of the individual components tells a more nuanced story. The CPU has a percentileVsAllCpus of 83, while the GPU has a percentileVsAllGpus of 94, indicating that the RTX 5090 is a more exceptional part relative to its peers than the Ryzen 5 7600X. The combo rank being lower than the GPU percentile suggests that the processor is holding the pairing back from its full potential in this specific game.

The nearest rival data for the CPU further contextualizes this. The Ryzen 5 7600X has an avgBenchmarkScore of 26272, which is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U at 26262, the AMD Ryzen 7 7735U at 26305, and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE at 26320. The deltaPct values of 0, -0.1, and -0.2 respectively indicate that these processors are effectively interchangeable in synthetic benchmarks, yet the 7600X is a desktop part with a higher boost clock. This clustering suggests that Valorant's performance ceiling with this combo is not determined by the CPU's raw compute power but rather by its architectural efficiency and single-thread performance, which is where the 7600X excels relative to its mobile and lower-power rivals.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is a massive piece of silicon, built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with 21,760 shading units and 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus. The memory bandwidth is listed at 1.79 TB/s, and the boost clock is 2407 MHz. These specifications are far beyond what a game like Valorant requires, and the measured FPS data confirms that the GPU is not the determining factor in most scenarios. The VRAM capacity is effectively irrelevant at these resolutions and settings, as even the 4K Ultra preset does not come close to exhausting the available memory.

The GPU's synthetic benchmarks reinforce its position as a top-tier part, with a passmark_g3d score of 39650 and a passmark_gpu_compute score of 26756. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D with a deltaPct of 0.1, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile at 0.2, and the AMD Radeon PRO W6600 at 1.3. The fact that the RTX 5090's score is only 0.1% ahead of the RTX 5090 D suggests that the two are essentially identical in raw compute, yet neither is being fully utilized in Valorant. The GPU's role here is to provide a high enough frame ceiling that the CPU becomes the sole bottleneck, and at no point in the measured data does the GPU appear to struggle.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the data shows a clear progression from Low to Ultra. The Low preset delivers an average of 630.6 FPS, which drops to 532.9 FPS at Medium, then 527.3 FPS at High, and finally 518 FPS at Ultra. The gap between Low and Medium is substantial at 97.7 FPS, but the difference between Medium, High, and Ultra is much smaller, with only a 14.9 FPS spread between those three presets. This indicates that the CPU is the limiting factor once the settings go beyond Low, as the incremental graphical demands are not translating into proportional frame rate drops.

Moving to 2560x1440, the same pattern emerges. Low settings produce 599.4 FPS, which is only 31.2 FPS lower than the 1080p Low result. Medium comes in at 506.6 FPS, High at 500.6 FPS, and Ultra at 490.4 FPS. The spread between Medium and Ultra at 1440p is 16.2 FPS, which is similar to the 1080p spread of 14.9 FPS. This consistency across resolutions points to a persistent CPU limit that is independent of pixel count. At 3840x2160, the Low preset still manages 555.8 FPS, while Medium, High, and Ultra are clustered at 470.6, 461.5, and 453.3 FPS respectively. The 4K Ultra result of 453.3 FPS is still remarkably high, but the data shows that the CPU is the consistent constraint across all measured points.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS rows, the optimal settings preset for this combo is the Low preset at any resolution, as it provides the highest average frame rates. At 1080p Low, the system delivers 630.6 FPS, which is 112.6 FPS more than the Ultra preset at the same resolution. However, the practical benefit of this additional performance is questionable, as even the 4K Ultra result of 453.3 FPS exceeds the refresh rate of virtually all high-end gaming monitors. The data suggests that the Medium preset offers a better balance, as it provides a meaningful visual upgrade over Low while only sacrificing 97.7 FPS at 1080p, 92.8 FPS at 1440p, and 85.2 FPS at 4K.

For competitive play, the Low preset is the clear choice, as the frame rate advantage could translate to lower input latency. The difference between Low and Medium at 1440p is 92.8 FPS, which is a 15.5% improvement that could be significant in a fast-paced FPS. The High preset offers diminishing returns over Medium, with only a 6.0 FPS difference at 1080p, and the Ultra preset provides no measurable benefit for the performance cost. The data indicates that players should prioritize frame rate over visual fidelity with this combo, as the CPU-bound nature of the game means that higher settings do not yield a proportional improvement in image quality.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, with a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. It has a 32 MB shared L3 cache and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. These specifications are well-suited for Valorant, which is known to be sensitive to single-core performance. The CPU's cinebench_r23_singlecore score of 3406 and its 3dmark_single_thread score of 1060 are strong indicators of its capability in this regard, and the measured FPS data confirms that the 7600X is able to push very high frame rates in this title.

The CPU's avgBenchmarkScore of 26272 places it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rivals are all AMD processors with similar scores. The Ryzen 5 7600X is 0.2% faster than the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X, which has a score of 26214, but 0.1% slower than the AMD Ryzen 7 7735U and 0.2% slower than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE. This tight clustering indicates that the raw compute performance is not the distinguishing factor in Valorant; rather, it is the combination of high clock speeds and architectural efficiency that allows the 7600X to deliver the frame rates seen in the data. The CPU's role as the primary bottleneck is evident in the fact that the FPS numbers do not scale significantly with resolution, which is the expected behavior when the processor is the limiting component.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 7600X

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 4700 MHz
Boost Clock 5300 MHz
TDP 105W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

VRAM 32 GB GDDR7
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2407 MHz MHz
TDP 575 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7600X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 in Valorant

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 555.8
3840x2160 Medium 470.6
3840x2160 High 461.5
3840x2160 Ultra 453.3
2560x1440 Low 599.4
2560x1440 Medium 506.6
2560x1440 High 500.6
2560x1440 Ultra 490.4
1920x1080 Low 630.6
1920x1080 Medium 532.9
1920x1080 High 527.3
1920x1080 Ultra 518.0

Valorant with Ryzen 5 7600X + Other GPUs

See how Valorant performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Valorant with RTX 5090 + Other CPUs

See how Valorant performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 7600X + RTX 5090

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.