Valorant

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X paired with the Intel Arc B370 delivers a highly capable Valorant experience, with benchmark results showing this combination ranks 2645th out of 2883 tested combos. The data indicates that this pairing is positioned in the lower-middle portion of the database for this specific title, yet the measured frame rates tell a story of smooth, competitive play across all tested resolutions and settings. This analysis examines the CPU and GPU roles, the measured FPS breakdown, and provides practical settings recommendations based strictly on the provided data.

FAQ

Q: What is the comboRankInGame for this CPU and GPU pairing in Valorant?

A: This combination ranks 2645th out of 2883 tested combos in Valorant, placing it in the 91st percentile of all tested configurations. While the rank might seem low, the actual measured frame rates are well above playable thresholds, indicating the ranking reflects the large number of high-end combos in the database rather than a deficiency in this pairing.

Q: What is the average FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings?

A: The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings is 299. This is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo across all tested configurations, making it the clear choice for maximum frame rates on standard 1080p monitors.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 5600X compare to its nearest rivals in overall CPU benchmark scores?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600X has an average benchmark score of 21771. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, scores 21749, which is a deltaPct of 0.1 percent (meaning the 5600X is 0.1 percent faster). The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and Intel Core i7-11700 both score higher at 21874 and 21891 respectively, showing a deltaPct of -0.5 percent, meaning the 5600X is 0.5 percent slower than both.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking compared to all other GPUs?

A: The Intel Arc B370 sits in the 5th percentile against all GPUs in the database. This low percentile is reflected in its nearest rivals, which include older cards like the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 and ATI Radeon HD 5770, showing the Arc B370 is positioned as a very low-power integrated-class solution rather than a discrete gaming powerhouse.

Q: What are the measured minimum and maximum FPS at 2560x1440 with Medium settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the measured average FPS is 168, with a minimum of 143 and a maximum of 193. This provides a solid frame time consistency for a 1440p experience, ensuring that dips stay well above the typical 60 FPS threshold.

Q: Does the GPU have its own dedicated VRAM?

A: No, the Intel Arc B370 uses System Shared memory, meaning its memory size, type, and bus width are all listed as "System Shared." Its memory bandwidth is also noted as "System Dependent," which means performance relies on the host system's memory configuration.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer. It operates on the AMD Socket AM4 platform and features a base clock of 3.70 GHz with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. This 7 nm chip from TSMC has a 65 W TDP and supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. Its cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a 32 MB L3 cache, which is crucial for gaming performance.

For Valorant, a game that is highly sensitive to single-thread performance, the 5600X's specifications are directly relevant. The processor's single-thread benchmark scores are strong, with a 3dmark_single_thread score of 917, a cinebench_r23_singlecore score of 1541, and a geekbench_singlecore score of 1989. These numbers indicate excellent per-core performance, which translates directly into high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. The 6 cores and 12 threads are more than sufficient for Valorant, which typically utilizes fewer threads, allowing the CPU to focus boost clocks on the primary game threads.

The CPU's percentileVsAllCpus is 75, meaning it performs better than 75 percent of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals in terms of average benchmark score are the AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (0.1 percent slower), the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U (0.5 percent faster), and the Intel Core i7-11700 (0.5 percent faster). This tight grouping shows that the 5600X is competitive with other mid-range and older high-end processors, making it a balanced choice for a game like Valorant where the CPU is often the primary bottleneck at lower resolutions and settings. The 3dmark multi-threaded scores, such as 5582 for 16 threads and 5588 for max threads, confirm that while multi-core performance is solid, it is the single-thread capability that drives Valorant's high frame rates.

How This Combo Ranks

The comboRankInGame of 2645 out of 2883 places this pairing in the lower portion of the database for Valorant. This rank is influenced by the GPU's 5th percentile standing, which drags the overall combo down despite the CPU's 75th percentile performance. The data shows a significant disparity between the CPU and GPU capabilities, where the Ryzen 5 5600X is a robust mid-range processor, while the Intel Arc B370 is an integrated-class GPU with a very low benchmark score of 1184 in 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12.

The GPU's nearest rivals, such as the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (deltaPct -0.2), ATI Radeon HD 5770 (deltaPct -0.5), and AMD Radeon HD 7650M (deltaPct -0.7), are all older, low-performance parts. This context is essential: the combo rank of 2645 is not a reflection of poor performance in Valorant, but rather a consequence of the GPU being compared against all GPUs, including high-end discrete cards. In actual gameplay, the measured FPS shows that this combo handles Valorant exceptionally well, with frame rates exceeding 120 FPS at 4K Ultra and reaching 299 FPS at 1080p Low. Therefore, while the rank is low, the practical experience is excellent for this specific game's requirements.

The rank also suggests that among the 2883 tested combos, a large majority feature more powerful GPUs. However, for a game as lightweight as Valorant, the combination of a strong single-threaded CPU and a modest GPU is often sufficient. The CPU's high single-thread scores (917 in 3dmark_single_thread, 1541 in cinebench_r23_singlecore) ensure that the game logic and rendering commands are processed quickly, while the GPU's limitations only become apparent at higher resolutions and settings, where the measured FPS still remains well above 120.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of performance across three resolutions and four settings levels. At 1920x1080, the lowest tested resolution, the combo achieves an average of 299 FPS on Low, 197 on Medium, 187 on High, and 178 on Ultra. The Medium setting also shows a minimum FPS of 167 and a maximum of 226, indicating good frame pacing. The jump from Low to Medium is significant (approximately 100 FPS drop), while the difference between High and Ultra is smaller (9 FPS), suggesting diminishing returns at the highest settings.

Moving to 2560x1440, the average FPS drops but remains highly playable. Low settings produce 255 FPS, Medium produces 168 FPS (with min 143 and max 193), High produces 160 FPS, and Ultra produces 152 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a reduction in frame rates, but the relative performance between settings remains consistent. The 1440p Low setting still offers over 250 FPS, which is ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the combo still delivers respectable numbers. Low settings yield an average of 204 FPS, Medium yields 134 FPS (min 114, max 154), High yields 128 FPS, and Ultra yields 122 FPS. This is impressive for a GPU with a 5th percentile ranking, showing that Valorant's engine is well-optimized for lower-end hardware. The difference between High and Ultra at 4K is only 6 FPS, indicating that the GPU is nearing its limits but still provides a smooth experience above 120 FPS.

The data reveals a pattern: at every resolution, the Low preset provides a massive frame rate boost over Medium, while the gap between Medium, High, and Ultra is relatively narrow. For instance, at 1080p, Low is over 100 FPS faster than Medium, but Medium to High only drops 10 FPS, and High to Ultra drops another 9 FPS. This suggests that the GPU's bottleneck is most pronounced at the Medium setting, where certain effects or rendering features cause a disproportionate performance hit.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B370 is an integrated GPU based on the Xe3-LPG architecture, with a chip codenamed Panther Lake. It features a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, with a TDP of only 25 W. The GPU has 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 raster output units, along with 10 ray tracing cores. Its theoretical pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance rated at 6.144 TFLOPS.

Crucially, the Arc B370 uses System Shared memory, meaning it has no dedicated VRAM. Its memory type, bus width, and bandwidth are all listed as "System Shared" or "System Dependent," relying entirely on the host system's DDR4 memory. This is a significant factor in its performance, as memory bandwidth is shared with the CPU and can become a bottleneck in memory-intensive scenarios. However, Valorant's relatively low memory requirements mitigate this issue, as evidenced by the high frame rates achieved.

The GPU's percentileVsAllGpus is 5, and its average benchmark score is 1184 from the 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 test. Its nearest rivals include the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (score 1186, deltaPct -0.2), ATI Radeon HD 5770 (score 1190, deltaPct -0.5), and AMD Radeon HD 7650M (score 1192, deltaPct -0.7). These are all legacy parts from over a decade ago, underscoring the Arc B370's position as a low-end, power-efficient solution rather than a gaming-focused GPU. Despite this, in Valorant, the GPU's role is secondary to the CPU. The measured FPS shows that the Arc B370 can handle the game's rendering at 1080p Low with nearly 300 FPS, proving that this game is not particularly demanding on GPU resources.

The boost clock of 2400 MHz is relatively high for an integrated GPU, helping to offset its low shader count. The 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest, but sufficient for a game like Valorant, which uses simple geometry and effects. The lack of dedicated VRAM means that texture quality and resolution scaling rely on system memory speed, which is where the Ryzen 5 5600X's dual-channel DDR4 support and 51.2 GB/s bandwidth come into play. Overall, the GPU's role in this combo is to provide a baseline level of rendering that, when paired with a strong CPU, achieves frame rates well beyond what is needed for competitive play.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the user's display and performance goals. For players with a 1920x1080 monitor, the Low preset is the clear winner, delivering 299 FPS, which is ideal for high-refresh-rate panels (240 Hz or higher). The Medium preset at 1080p still offers 197 FPS with a minimum of 167, which is excellent for 144 Hz monitors, providing a better visual experience without sacrificing smoothness. High and Ultra at 1080p (187 and 178 FPS respectively) are also viable for 144 Hz displays, but the visual gains over Medium are marginal relative to the FPS drop.

For 2560x1440 users, Low settings provide 255 FPS, which is perfect for 240 Hz 1440p monitors. Medium at 1440p yields 168 FPS (min 143), which is still above 144 Hz, making it a strong recommendation for those who want a balance between visual fidelity and high refresh rates. High and Ultra at 1440p (160 and 152 FPS) are acceptable for 144 Hz displays, but the difference from Medium is minimal, so Medium is the better choice for most players seeking a smooth experience.

At 3840x2160, the recommendations shift. Low settings provide 204 FPS, which is excellent for 4K 144 Hz panels. Medium at 4K drops to 134 FPS (min 114), which is still playable but may dip below 144 Hz in demanding scenes. High and Ultra at 4K (128 and 122 FPS) are best suited for 120 Hz displays, as they stay consistently above 120 FPS. For competitive play on 4K, Low is the only setting that guarantees high refresh rates, while for casual play, Medium offers a better visual experience with acceptable performance.

The data suggests a clear hierarchy: prioritize Low settings when frame rate is the absolute goal, especially at 1080p and 1440p. For users with 144 Hz monitors, Medium settings at any resolution provide a good balance, as the minimum FPS at Medium (167 at 1080p, 143 at 1440p, 114 at 4K) remains above typical V-Sync thresholds. High and Ultra are only recommended for users with 120 Hz displays at 4K or those who prefer visual fidelity over maximum frame rates, as the FPS difference between Medium and Ultra is consistently small (e.g., 19 FPS at 1080p, 16 FPS at 1440p, 12 FPS at 4K). Given that the GPU is the weaker component, choosing Medium over High or Ultra provides the most efficient use of its limited resources, ensuring a stable frame rate without unnecessary visual overhead.