Undisputed

# Undisputed with Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 delivers a compelling performance profile in Undisputed, a sports title that scales heavily with resolution and settings. This combo ranks 1503rd out of 2813 tested combinations, placing it in the 53rd percentile of all tested systems. The data reveals a setup that excels at 1080p and 1440p gaming, while 4K Ultra proves demanding enough to push the GPU to its limits. The following analysis breaks down the measured FPS across three resolutions and four quality presets, interpreting what these numbers mean for the CPU-GPU balance and overall gameplay experience.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS progression from 1080p to 4K tells a clear story about where the bottleneck lies in this system. At Low settings, the drop from 271 FPS at 1080p to 196 FPS at 1440p represents a 27.7% reduction, and further down to 124 FPS at 4K — a 54.2% total decline from the starting point. This steep scaling curve indicates that the RTX 4060 becomes increasingly stressed as pixel count rises, which is expected given its 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus.

Medium settings show a similar pattern: 195 FPS at 1080p, 141 FPS at 1440p, and 89 FPS at 4K. The percentage drops between resolutions are 27.7% and 36.9% respectively, with the 4K step being notably sharper. High settings follow the trend with 162 FPS at 1080p, 117 FPS at 1440p, and 74 FPS at 4K — reductions of 27.8% and 36.8% per step. Ultra settings compress the numbers further: 104 FPS at 1080p, 75 FPS at 1440p, and 48 FPS at 4K, with a 27.9% drop to 1440p and a 36% drop to 4K.

The consistent ~28% reduction from 1080p to 1440p across all settings suggests the GPU is the limiting factor even at lower resolutions, as the CPU has ample headroom. However, the 4K step reveals a more pronounced impact — roughly 37% losses — which aligns with the GPU's memory bandwidth constraints becoming critical at higher pixel densities. The 48 FPS at 4K Ultra is the only sub-60 result in the entire dataset, indicating that this resolution/settings combination stretches the RTX 4060 beyond its comfortable operating range.

Notably, the scaling between settings at a fixed resolution is also informative. At 1080p, moving from Low to Medium costs 76 FPS (from 271 to 195), while Medium to High costs 33 FPS, and High to Ultra costs 58 FPS. This non-linear pattern suggests that Ultra settings introduce effects that disproportionately tax the GPU, while Medium represents a sweet spot where the performance cost per visual gain is most efficient.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus brings substantial compute resources to this pairing: 24 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and boost clock of 5.50 GHz. This Arrow Lake Refresh chip, built on a 3 nm process with 36 MB of shared L3 cache, sits in the 96th percentile of all CPUs tested, with an average benchmark score of 93,785. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon 6520P at 93,786 (0% delta), AMD EPYC 4564P at 95,183 (-1.5%), AMD EPYC 9175F at 95,615 (-1.9%), and AMD EPYC 4565P at 95,764 (-2.1%) — all within a narrow band, indicating the 270K Plus is competitive with enterprise-grade silicon.

In the context of Undisputed, the CPU's role appears secondary to the GPU. The data shows that even at Low settings with 271 FPS at 1080p, the system is not CPU-bound — the frame rates are far beyond what most displays can show. The multi-core might of this processor, evidenced by Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44,253 and single-core of 2,439, provides more than enough processing power for a sports title that likely relies more on physics and AI than heavy simulation workloads. The PassMark multi-thread score of 68,574 further confirms this CPU's capability to handle any background tasks while gaming.

The fact that FPS scales consistently with resolution changes suggests the CPU is never the limiting factor in this configuration. The 24 threads are likely underutilized in Undisputed, but the high single-core performance (PassMark single-thread score of 5,068) ensures that any game logic or physics calculations are processed without creating a bottleneck. The L3 cache of 36 MB shared across all cores provides ample bandwidth for data-heavy workloads, and the dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 115.2 GB/s bandwidth prevents memory-related stuttering.

Settings Recommendations

For 1080p gameplay, every preset delivers playable frame rates, but the optimal choice depends on the user's refresh rate. Low settings produce 271 FPS, Medium 195 FPS, High 162 FPS, and Ultra 104 FPS. For a standard 144 Hz monitor, High settings at 162 FPS provide a comfortable margin above the refresh rate while maintaining visual quality. Ultra at 104 FPS is still smooth for 60 Hz displays but sacrifices 58 FPS compared to High for what may be marginal visual improvements.

At 1440p, the recommendation shifts toward Medium as the best balance. Medium delivers 141 FPS, which exceeds 120 Hz refresh rates, while High drops to 117 FPS — still playable but below 120 FPS thresholds. Ultra at 75 FPS remains viable for 60 Hz monitors but represents a significant step down from Medium's 141 FPS. Low at 196 FPS is overkill for most displays and sacrifices too much visual fidelity.

For 4K gaming, the options narrow considerably. Medium is the strongest recommendation at 89 FPS, offering the only preset above 60 FPS that maintains reasonable visual quality. High at 74 FPS is acceptable for 60 Hz displays but sits close to the threshold. Ultra at 48 FPS falls below playable standards for most users, and Low at 124 FPS, while smooth, undermines the purpose of 4K resolution by reducing graphical detail to minimum levels. The min FPS data for Medium at 4K shows 76 FPS, ensuring even the worst frame dips stay above 60 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

This combination of Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 ranks 1503rd out of 2813 tested combos in Undisputed, placing it in the upper-middle tier of all tested systems. The rank reflects a balanced pairing where the CPU's high percentile (96th) is somewhat offset by the GPU's more modest position (61st percentile of all GPUs). The RTX 4060's average benchmark score of 17,639 places it near the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17,666, -0.2% delta), AMD Radeon 780M (17,588, +0.3%), AMD Radeon Pro 560 (17,551, +0.5%), and AMD Radeon Pro 460 (17,509, +0.7%) — all within a razor-thin margin of performance.

The ranking suggests that while the CPU is overqualified for this game, the GPU determines the overall experience ceiling. The 1503rd position out of 2813 indicates that roughly 53% of tested combinations outperform this setup, but many of those likely feature more powerful GPUs. The data implies that the RTX 4060 is the constraining factor in this pairing — upgrading to a higher-tier GPU would likely yield substantial FPS improvements, whereas a CPU upgrade would provide minimal gains in Undisputed specifically.

The delta between the CPU's 96th percentile ranking and the GPU's 61st percentile creates an imbalance that manifests in the measured FPS. At 1080p Low, the 271 FPS result is likely close to the game's engine limit; however, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth become limiting at higher resolutions and settings, dragging the combo's overall rank down relative to what the CPU alone could achieve.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm process, features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 272.0 GB/s bandwidth. Its clock speeds range from a base of 1830 MHz to a boost of 2460 MHz, with memory running at 2125 MHz (17 Gbps effective). The GPU contains 3,072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output pipelines, along with 24 ray tracing cores and 96 tensor cores. Its FP32 performance of 15.11 TFLOPS places it as a solid mid-range offering, and its 61st percentile ranking among all GPUs confirms this positioning.

In Undisputed, the GPU's role is clearly dominant in determining frame rates. The measured FPS data shows that resolution and settings changes produce consistent, predictable drops that align with GPU workload scaling. The 4K Ultra result of 48 FPS is particularly telling — this is the only scenario where the GPU falls below 60 FPS, and it does so by a significant margin. The min FPS of 76 at 4K Medium and 120 at 1440p Medium indicate that the GPU maintains stable performance without severe frame drops when operating within its comfort zone.

The RTX 4060's nearest rivals in benchmark scores are all substantially older or lower-tier products (Radeon HD 7790, Radeon 780M, Radeon Pro 560/460), yet the performance deltas are minimal (within 0.7%). This suggests that the RTX 4060 delivers consistent, predictable performance relative to its class, but it does not punch above its weight in this title. The 8 GB VRAM capacity, while sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, may be a limiting factor at 4K Ultra where texture demands increase substantially. The GPU's 115 W TDP and 300 W suggested PSU indicate it is a power-efficient option, but the data shows this efficiency comes at the cost of raw performance at extreme settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Undisputed?

A: The data shows 1440p Medium delivers 141 FPS average with a min of 120 FPS, making it the sweet spot for high refresh-rate gaming. At 4K, Medium drops to 89 FPS (min 76), which is still smooth but below 120 FPS thresholds.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Undisputed?

A: Yes, but with limitations. The measured results show 74 FPS at 4K High and 89 FPS at 4K Medium, both above 60 FPS. However, 4K Ultra falls to 48 FPS, which is below playable standards for most users.

Q: How does the RTX 4060 compare to its closest rivals?

A: The RTX 4060's average benchmark score of 17,639 is within 0.7% of the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17,666), AMD Radeon 780M (17,588), AMD Radeon Pro 560 (17,551), and AMD Radeon Pro 460 (17,509). All four rivals are within a 0.9% performance band.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this system?

A: The GPU is clearly the limiting factor. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 271 FPS, and FPS drops consistently with resolution increases (196 at 1440p, 124 at 4K), indicating the RTX 4060 is the constraining component. The CPU, ranked in the 96th percentile, provides ample headroom.

Q: What frame rates can I expect at 1080p with High settings?

A: The measured data shows 162 FPS average at 1080p High. This is well above 60 FPS and 144 Hz thresholds, making it suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors. Ultra settings reduce this to 104 FPS.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems?

A: This combination ranks 1503rd out of 2813 tested combos in Undisputed, placing it in the upper-middle tier. The rank reflects the GPU's mid-range positioning (61st percentile) offsetting the CPU's high-end performance (96th percentile).

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its highest frame rates across all settings. Low settings produce 271 FPS average, offering the maximum possible performance for competitive play. Medium settings yield 195 FPS with a minimum of 166 FPS and maximum of 225 FPS, providing a balanced experience. High settings reduce the average to 162 FPS, still excellent for most displays. Ultra settings drop to 104 FPS average, which remains smooth but represents a significant 58 FPS reduction from High, indicating that Ultra's additional visual effects carry a substantial performance cost.

The 2560x1440 resolution shows the system's versatility. Low settings achieve 196 FPS, nearly matching the 1080p Medium result and highlighting the GPU's capability at this resolution with reduced detail. Medium settings deliver 141 FPS average with a minimum of 120 FPS and maximum of 162 FPS — the min FPS data confirms consistent performance without stuttering. High settings produce 117 FPS, which is above 60 FPS but below 120 FPS thresholds. Ultra settings drop to 75 FPS, which is playable on 60 Hz monitors but marginal for higher refresh rates.

At 3840x2160, the system's limitations become apparent. Low settings achieve 124 FPS, proving the GPU can handle 4K when detail levels are minimized. Medium settings deliver 89 FPS with a minimum of 76 FPS and maximum of 103 FPS — this is the recommended 4K preset, as the min FPS stays above 60. High settings reduce the average to 74 FPS, which is still playable but with less headroom. Ultra settings produce 48 FPS, falling below the 60 FPS threshold and representing the only unplayable configuration in the dataset.

The complete dataset reveals a consistent pattern: Medium settings offer the best balance of performance and quality across all resolutions, with the 1440p Medium result of 141 FPS being the standout combination. The system excels at 1080p and 1440p, handles 4K competently at Medium settings, but struggles with 4K Ultra due to the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory interface limiting performance at extreme settings.