Undisputed

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combination delivers a highly capable, if not entirely top-tier, experience in Undisputed. The data places this pairing at rank 2014 out of 3718 tested combos, which puts it solidly in the upper-middle tier of all possible hardware configurations for this title. The 20-core, 20-thread Arrow Lake-HX processor, with its 2.60 GHz base and 5.30 GHz boost clocks, provides ample headroom for the game's simulation and physics logic, while the RTX 4070's 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus ensures the visual presentation keeps pace. This analysis breaks down how these two components interact across resolutions and settings, using only the measured data to guide practical decisions.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX is a 20-core, 20-thread mobile processor built on Intel's Arrow Lake architecture at a 3 nm process node. Its configuration is unusual in that it offers 20 threads for 20 cores, meaning no hyper-threading, but the raw core count alone is substantial. With a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, the CPU has both the multi-core throughput and the single-core agility that sports simulations often require. In the broader benchmark landscape, this chip scores 40,642 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 5,737 in single-core, ranking in the 93rd percentile against all CPUs. The average benchmark score of 63,173 places it nearly dead even with its nearest rivals: it is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13790F and 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, while sitting 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G.

In Undisputed, the CPU's role is foundational but not always the primary bottleneck. The measured FPS data shows that at 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 271 FPS, which is likely far beyond what the display can show, but it indicates that the CPU is not limiting the frame rate in that scenario. The high core count and 5.30 GHz boost clock ensure that the game's AI, physics for punches and dodges, and the overall match logic never become a wall that the GPU runs into. The 30 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth further reduce any potential stutter from data streaming during a fight. This is a processor that comfortably feeds a mid-range GPU at high frame rates, and the benchmark results confirm that the 265HX is neither a weak link nor an overkill addition for this title; it is a balanced partner that allows the RTX 4070 to do most of the heavy lifting in visual fidelity.

FAQ

*Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX a strong performer for Undisputed?*

A: Yes. The CPU ranks in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40,642 and a single-core score of 5,737. Its 20 cores and 5.30 GHz boost clock provide more than enough processing power for the game's logic, allowing the GPU to become the primary performance limiter at most settings.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 compare to its closest rivals?

A: The RTX 4070 has an average benchmark score of 37,648, which is 0.1% ahead of the NVIDIA Tesla P4 and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56. It trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile by 1.3%, showing it is a solid but not top-of-the-line mobile GPU in this comparison set.

*Q: What is the best resolution to play Undisputed with this combo?*

A: The data shows 1440p is the sweet spot. At 2560x1440 with High settings, the average FPS is 117, which is smooth and visually detailed. At 4K with High settings, it drops to 74 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for a fast-paced sports game where reaction time matters.

*Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Undisputed?*

A: It can, but with compromises. At 3840x2160 with Medium settings, the average FPS is 89 with a minimum of 76, which is playable. However, at 4K Ultra, the average drops to 48 FPS, which is below the smooth threshold, so lowering settings is necessary for a good 4K experience.

Q: How does the CPU's performance affect the frame rate?

A: The CPU's strong single-core score of 5,737 in Cinebench R23 ensures that it does not bottleneck the GPU at lower resolutions. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 271 FPS, a figure that is likely monitor-limited, proving the CPU can push well beyond typical refresh rates.

Q: Is there a significant FPS drop between Medium and Ultra settings?

A: Yes, the drop is substantial. At 1440p, the average FPS falls from 141 on Medium to 75 on Ultra, a reduction of 66 FPS. At 4K, the drop is even steeper, from 89 FPS on Medium to 48 FPS on Ultra. This indicates that Ultra settings are very demanding on the GPU.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data across resolutions reveals a classic GPU-bound scenario for this pairing. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo produces 271 FPS, which is an enormous number that suggests the CPU is not the limiting factor; the game logic and physics are easily handled by the 20-core processor. As the resolution increases, the frame rate drops in a pattern that clearly implicates the GPU as the primary bottleneck. Moving from 1080p Low to 1440p Low, the average FPS falls from 271 to 196, a 27.7% decrease. Going further to 4K Low, the average is 124 FPS, which is a 36.7% drop from 1440p. These are large, consistent declines that point directly to the RTX 4070's rendering capabilities being stretched thinner at higher pixel counts.

The scaling becomes even more pronounced at higher settings. At High settings, the FPS drops from 162 at 1080p, to 117 at 1440p, and finally to 74 at 4K. The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K at High is 54.3%, which is a significant hit. This pattern is typical of a GPU that has a fixed amount of memory bandwidth (504.2 GB/s) and a finite number of shading units (5888). The CPU's performance remains constant across resolutions, but the GPU's workload increases quadratically with pixel count. The fact that the FPS does not plateau at any resolution indicates that the RTX 4070 is the limiting component in every scenario tested. The CPU, with its 93rd percentile ranking, is never the source of a frame rate cap; instead, it provides the headroom for the GPU to be the sole determinant of performance, which is the ideal scenario for a gaming system.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The data provides a clear picture of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the combo is exceptionally fast. Low settings produce an average of 271 FPS, which is the highest recorded in this dataset. Medium settings yield 195 FPS, with a minimum of 166 and a maximum of 225, showing a tight frame time distribution. High settings reduce the average to 162 FPS, and Ultra settings bring it down to 104 FPS. Even at 1080p Ultra, the frame rate is far above the 60 FPS threshold, making this resolution almost trivial for the hardware.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains very strong. Low settings average 196 FPS, which is still excellent for high-refresh-rate monitors. Medium settings average 141 FPS, with a minimum of 120 and a maximum of 162, indicating smooth gameplay even during intense moments. High settings average 117 FPS, which is ideal for a 120 Hz display. Ultra settings drop to an average of 75 FPS, which is playable but begins to show the strain on the GPU. The progression from Low to Ultra at 1440p shows a 61.7% reduction in average FPS, highlighting the cost of the highest visual fidelity.

At 3840x2160, the performance becomes more variable. Low settings average 124 FPS, which is still respectable for 4K. Medium settings average 89 FPS, with a minimum of 76 and a maximum of 103, proving that a consistent 60+ FPS experience is achievable. High settings average 74 FPS, which is on the edge of smoothness for some players. Ultra settings average just 48 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target and indicates that 4K Ultra is not a viable option for competitive play. The gap between Medium and Ultra at 4K is 41 FPS, demonstrating that the jump to the highest preset is extremely demanding on the RTX 4070.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 holds a rank of 2014 out of 3,718 tested combos in Undisputed. This placement puts it in the 54th percentile of all possible pairings, meaning it outperforms more than half of the tested configurations but is not near the top. The rank is influenced by both the CPU and GPU, but the GPU's percentile is notably lower at 81, compared to the CPU's 93. This suggests that the RTX 4070 is the more limiting component in this pairing, pulling the overall rank down from what the CPU alone might achieve.

Looking at the nearest rivals, the RTX 4070's average benchmark score of 37,648 is remarkably close to the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (37,628) and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (37,507), with deltas of 0.1% and 0.4% respectively. It is 1.3% behind the RTX 4080 Mobile, which explains why this combo does not rank higher. The CPU's rival set shows a similar clustering, with the 265HX being 0.1% ahead of the Core i7-13790F and 0.7% ahead of the Core Ultra 7 255HX. This data indicates that the combo is in a highly competitive tier where small performance margins separate the rankings. The 2014th rank is not a reflection of poor performance but rather a result of the extreme competition in the mid-to-high range of hardware, where many combos deliver nearly identical average scores.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

For players prioritizing a smooth and responsive experience, the data suggests that Medium settings are the optimal choice across all resolutions. At 1920x1080, Medium delivers an average of 195 FPS, with a minimum of 166, which is more than enough for any high-refresh-rate monitor. At 2560x1440, Medium averages 141 FPS, with a minimum of 120, ensuring that frame drops are rare and never severe. Even at 3840x2160, Medium holds up well with an average of 89 FPS and a minimum of 76, which is above the 60 FPS threshold for most displays. The Medium preset offers a substantial visual upgrade over Low while maintaining a significant performance headroom over High and Ultra.

High settings are a viable alternative for those with 1440p or 1080p displays who want better visual fidelity. At 1080p High, the average is 162 FPS, and at 1440p High, it is 117 FPS, both of which are smooth. However, at 4K High, the average drops to 74 FPS, which may be too low for players with 120 Hz or 144 Hz 4K monitors, making Medium the safer choice for 4K. Ultra settings should be avoided for competitive play, as the average FPS falls to 104 at 1080p, 75 at 1440p, and 48 at 4K. These numbers are below the ideal thresholds for fast-paced action, and the visual gains from Ultra over High are often marginal in a sports title. The data clearly shows that Medium provides the best balance of frame rate stability and visual quality, with High being a close second for lower resolutions.