Undisputed

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H paired with the AMD Radeon 890M presents a fascinating case study in integrated graphics performance for a sports title like Undisputed. This combo sits at the 2647th position out of 2813 tested combinations, placing it in the lower percentile of all systems. The data reveals a configuration that is heavily constrained by its graphical component, yet capable of delivering playable frame rates at more modest settings and resolutions.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a clear and dramatic inverse relationship between resolution and performance. At 1080p, the system delivers playable numbers across all settings, but the journey to 4K is punishing. The scaling from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 at High settings results in a drop from 67 FPS to 49 FPS, a reduction of approximately 27%. Pushing further to 3840x2160 at High settings yields only 31 FPS, which is less than half the 1080p figure. This steep curve indicates that the limiting factor is the GPU's raw pixel-pushing capability, not the CPU.

The pattern holds across all quality presets. At Low settings, the system manages 113 FPS at 1080p, which is an excellent result for smooth play. However, at 1440p Low, the frame rate falls to 82 FPS, and at 4K Low, it plummets to 52 FPS. This represents a 54% performance loss from 1080p to 4K at the lowest settings. The scaling is less severe but still pronounced at Medium settings, where the frame rate drops from 81 FPS at 1080p to 59 FPS at 1440p and finally to 37 FPS at 4K. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, with 43 FPS at 1080p, 31 FPS at 1440p, and a nearly unplayable 20 FPS at 4K.

This scaling behavior strongly suggests that the AMD Radeon 890M's memory bandwidth, which is "System Dependent," becomes a critical bottleneck at higher resolutions. The GPU relies on shared system memory, and the increased data throughput required for 4K textures and pixel shading likely exceeds what the dual-channel memory bus can provide. The result is that 4K gaming with this combo is only viable at the lowest settings, and even then, the 52 FPS average leaves little headroom for demanding scenes. The sweet spot for this configuration is clearly at 1080p, where the performance is more than adequate for the game's requirements.

How This Combo Ranks

In the grand scheme of tested hardware combinations for Undisputed, this pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and AMD Radeon 890M ranks 2647th out of 2813 total combos. This places it in the bottom 6% of all tested systems, a position that reflects the integrated GPU's limitations rather than the CPU's capabilities. The data indicates that in a game like Undisputed, which is a sports simulation likely to have moderate graphical demands, the GPU is the primary determinant of the final ranking.

The combo's rank is a direct consequence of the GPU's performance class. The AMD Radeon 890M's average benchmark score of 9210 places it at the 45th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in the GPU benchmark database include the AMD Radeon Vega 8 (with a deltaPct of -0.1), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 (deltaPct of -0.7), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 (deltaPct of -0.9). These are all older or lower-tier discrete graphics solutions, and the 890M is essentially competing with them in terms of raw compute power. For a modern integrated GPU, this is a respectable showing, but it still falls far short of what dedicated mid-range or high-end graphics cards can achieve.

The CPU, on the other hand, is a much stronger component. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H has an average benchmark score of 32697, placing it at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-14600T (deltaPct of 0), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (deltaPct of 0.1), and the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F (deltaPct of -0.2). The performance is essentially neck-and-neck with these desktop and mobile processors, indicating that the CPU is not a bottleneck in this system. The low combo rank is therefore almost entirely attributable to the GPU, highlighting a significant performance imbalance between the two components.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon 890M is the central figure in this system's performance story, and its characteristics explain the measured FPS results in Undisputed. This is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. It features 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units, along with 16 ray tracing cores. The chip operates at a base clock of 400 MHz and can boost up to 2900 MHz, which is a significant frequency range for an iGPU.

The most critical specification is the memory configuration, listed as "System Shared." This means the GPU uses the same DDR5 memory as the CPU, and its bandwidth is "System Dependent." The CPU's memory support is dual-channel with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, which is shared between the CPU and GPU. This shared memory architecture is the primary limiting factor for high-resolution gaming. The GPU's peak pixel rate is 92.80 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 185.6 GTexel/s, but these theoretical values cannot be fully realized without sufficient memory bandwidth.

The GPU's compute capabilities are modest, with an FP32 performance of 5.939 TFLOPS. In the context of Undisputed, this translates to the frame rates we see. At 1080p Medium, the 890M manages 81 FPS, which is a playable experience. However, the integrated nature of the GPU means it competes with the CPU for power and memory resources. The GPU's TDP is listed as 15 W, a very low power envelope that limits its sustained performance. The data shows that while the 890M can handle 1080p gaming with ease, it struggles to maintain playable frame rates at 1440p and 4K, especially on higher presets. The 31 FPS at 1440p High and 20 FPS at 4K Ultra are clear indicators that this GPU is not designed for high-resolution, high-detail gaming.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the system's capabilities across all major resolutions and quality presets. At 1920x1080, the system performs admirably. The Low preset delivers an average of 113 FPS, which is excellent for competitive or fast-paced play. Medium settings yield 81 FPS with a minimum of 69 FPS and a maximum of 93 FPS, indicating a smooth experience with minor fluctuations. The High preset produces 67 FPS, which is still very playable, while the Ultra preset drops to 43 FPS, which is on the edge of playability for a sports game.

At 2560x1440, the performance takes a noticeable hit. The Low preset is still quite good, averaging 82 FPS. Medium settings average 59 FPS, with a minimum of 50 FPS and a maximum of 68 FPS, which is acceptable for most players. High settings drop to 49 FPS, which is getting into the territory where some may find it less smooth. The Ultra preset at 1440p averages only 31 FPS, which is not a pleasant experience for a game that requires precise timing for punches and dodges.

Moving to 3840x2160, the system struggles significantly. The Low preset averages 52 FPS, which is the only setting that could be considered playable at this resolution. Medium settings fall to 37 FPS, with a minimum of 32 FPS and a maximum of 43 FPS, indicating stuttering and inconsistent frame times. High settings drop to 31 FPS, and Ultra settings are a slideshow at 20 FPS. The data clearly shows that 4K is not a viable gaming resolution for this combo, except at the lowest quality settings. The 1080p results are the standout, offering a range of options from high-refresh-rate play at Low to a more visually rich experience at High.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal experience for this combo is found at 1920x1080 resolution. The data suggests that the High preset is the best balance of visual fidelity and performance, delivering a 67 FPS average. This is well above the threshold for smooth gameplay in a sports title, and the visual improvements over Medium are likely to be noticeable. For players who prioritize a higher frame rate, the Medium preset at 81 FPS is an excellent choice, offering a 14 FPS increase over High with a modest reduction in graphical quality.

The Ultra preset at 1080p, with its 43 FPS average, is a more demanding option. While it may be playable for some, the lower frame rate could impact the game's responsiveness. The Low preset at 113 FPS is ideal for players who want the absolute smoothest experience, perhaps for online play or for those sensitive to frame pacing. At 1440p, the Medium preset is the only reasonable recommendation, with its 59 FPS average. The High preset at 49 FPS is borderline, and the Ultra preset at 31 FPS should be avoided.

For 4K, the data suggests that only the Low preset is worth considering, with its 52 FPS average. However, even this is not ideal, as the 37 FPS on Medium shows how quickly performance degrades. In summary, the best experience per the measured rows is at 1080p with the High or Medium preset. This combination offers a good balance of visual quality and smooth, responsive gameplay that is well-suited to the fast-paced nature of boxing matches. The system is best treated as a 1080p gaming machine for this title.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a powerful mobile processor that plays a supporting role in the gaming performance of this combo. It features 16 cores and 22 threads, derived from a hybrid architecture (Meteor Lake). The base clock is 3.80 GHz, which can boost up to 4.80 GHz. This is a high-performance CPU, and its benchmark scores reflect that. In Cinebench R23, it scores 15028 in multi-core and 1743 in single-core, which are solid numbers for a mobile chip.

The CPU's cache hierarchy includes 112 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and a 24 MB shared L3 cache. This configuration provides ample cache for the CPU's workloads. The processor supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, which is essential for feeding both the CPU and the integrated GPU. The PassMark multithread score of 24873 and single-thread score of 3468 are indicative of a capable processor that should not bottleneck a mid-range GPU in most scenarios.

In the context of Undisputed, the CPU's role is to handle game logic, physics, and AI calculations. With 16 cores and 22 threads, it has more than enough processing power for a sports game. The data suggests that the CPU is not the limiting factor in this system. When comparing the CPU's performance to the GPU's, the imbalance is clear. The CPU is in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is only in the 45th percentile. This means the GPU is far more likely to be the bottleneck, as evidenced by the resolution scaling. The high boost clock of 4.80 GHz ensures that the CPU can keep up with the GPU's frame output at lower resolutions, but at higher resolutions, the GPU's limitations become the dominant factor. The CPU's performance is more than sufficient for the task at hand.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to play Undisputed with this combo?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 offers the best performance across all settings. At 1080p High, the system achieves 67 FPS, while at 1440p High it drops to 49 FPS. The 1080p resolution provides the most headroom for a smooth experience.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Undisputed?

A: The measured results indicate that 4K gaming is only viable at the Low preset, which averages 52 FPS. Higher presets at 4K are not recommended, as the Medium preset drops to 37 FPS and the Ultra preset falls to 20 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU performance compare to its rivals?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H has an average benchmark score of 32697. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14600T, has a score of 32707 with a deltaPct of 0, showing they are essentially equal in performance. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is also close, with a score of 32662 and a deltaPct of 0.1.

Q: Is the GPU a bottleneck for this system?

A: Yes, the data strongly suggests the AMD Radeon 890M is the limiting component. The GPU's average benchmark score is 9210, placing it at the 45th percentile, while the CPU is at the 83rd percentile. The significant frame rate drops when moving from 1080p to 4K also point to the GPU as the primary constraint.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 113 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 43 FPS. This represents a 70 FPS difference, showing that the Ultra preset demands significantly more from the GPU.

Q: What are the minimum and maximum FPS recorded at Medium settings?

A: At 1080p Medium, the minimum FPS is 69 and the maximum is 93. At 1440p Medium, the minimum is 50 and the maximum is 68. At 4K Medium, the minimum is 32 and the maximum is 43.