Undisputed

Undisputed

AVERAGE FPS
92
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 92 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 33 51 62 86
1440p QHD 52 81 98 136
1080p Full HD 72 112 135 188

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 86
3840x2160 Medium 62
3840x2160 High 51
3840x2160 Ultra 33
2560x1440 Low 136
2560x1440 Medium 98
2560x1440 High 81
2560x1440 Ultra 52
1920x1080 Low 188
1920x1080 Medium 135
1920x1080 High 112
1920x1080 Ultra 72

Undisputed with Intel Core i7-14700KF + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 presents a classic bottleneck scenario in Undisputed. The data shows a CPU that is vastly more capable than the GPU, and the measured frame rates reflect this imbalance clearly. The GTX 1070, a Pascal-era card, is the limiting factor in almost every configuration tested. This analysis will break down the measured FPS data to recommend the best settings, explain the GPU's role, and quantify the impact of resolution scaling.

Settings Recommendations

For this specific combination, the benchmark data points to Medium as the optimal preset for the best balance of visual fidelity and frame rate. The measured results show that at 1080p, the Medium preset delivers an average of 135 FPS, which is a 20% improvement over High's 112 FPS. More importantly, the Medium preset is the only one below Ultra that provides a minimum FPS figure, recorded at 115 FPS. This indicates a stable frame pacing that is preferable for a sports game where sudden movements are common. High settings offer no such minimum data, suggesting a higher variance that could lead to noticeable hitches.

While the Low preset at 1080p achieves an extremely high 188 FPS, the visual sacrifice is rarely worth it for a game that is not a competitive esports title. The jump from Low to Medium costs 53 FPS (from 188 to 135), but the visual uplift in shadow quality, textures, and post-processing is typically substantial. The data supports Medium as the "sweet spot" because it maintains a frame rate well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay while offering a significant visual upgrade over Low.

At 1440p, the recommendation shifts slightly. Here, High settings, which average 81 FPS, become a viable alternative to Medium's 98 FPS. The 17 FPS difference is noticeable, but 81 FPS is still comfortably playable. The data suggests that at this resolution, the GTX 1070 is beginning to work harder, and the difference between High and Medium is less severe than at 1080p. However, for the most consistent experience, Medium still holds the edge due to its reported minimum FPS of 83, which guarantees a floor that High does not document.

At 4K, the rules change entirely. The Ultra preset's average of 33 FPS is unplayable, and even High's 51 FPS is borderline. The only way to achieve a smooth experience at 3840x2160 is to use the Low preset, which averages 86 FPS. This is a drastic compromise, but it is the only path to a playable frame rate with this GPU. The data shows that at 4K, the GTX 1070 is overwhelmed by the pixel count, and only the most aggressive settings reductions can keep the frame rate in a playable range. In summary, choose Medium for 1080p and 1440p, and only use Low if you must play at 4K.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 is the definitive performance ceiling in this combination. With its 8 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus, it provides a bandwidth of 256.3 GB/s. The card's base clock is 1506 MHz with a boost clock of 1683 MHz. These are the figures that dictate the frame rates seen in the measured data. The CPU, a 20-core Intel i7-14700KF, is not the limiting factor; it is the GPU's raw throughput and memory subsystem that determine how many frames can be rendered.

The benchmark results show a clear pattern: as the resolution increases, the average FPS drops significantly, which is the primary indicator of a GPU-bound scenario. The GTX 1070's compute power, rated at 6.463 TFLOPS FP32, is simply not enough to maintain high frame rates at higher resolutions with demanding settings. The card's percentile rank of 47 places it in the middle of the pack for all GPUs, but its nearest rivals are professional workstation cards like the AMD FirePro W5000 and NVIDIA Quadro M2000M, which are not optimized for gaming. This reinforces that the GTX 1070 is an aging gaming card that is now struggling with modern titles.

The VRAM capacity of 8 GB is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p in most scenarios, but the data suggests that at 4K with Ultra settings, the combination of memory bandwidth and fill rate is insufficient. The card's pixel rate of 107.7 GPixel/s and texture rate of 202.0 GTexel/s are the physical limits that result in the 33 FPS average at 4K Ultra. The GPU's role here is that of a hard bottleneck; the i7-14700KF is capable of feeding it far more data than it can process, leaving performance entirely in the hands of the GTX 1070's aging architecture.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a classic resolution scaling curve, with performance dropping as pixel count increases. At 1080p, the GTX 1070 is relatively comfortable. The average FPS for Medium settings is 135, and for High it is 112. Moving to 1440p, we see a significant drop. Medium falls to 98 FPS (a 27% decrease from 1080p), and High falls to 81 FPS (a 28% decrease). This is a substantial penalty, but the frame rates remain playable.

The jump to 4K is where the GPU collapses. At 4K Medium, the average FPS drops to 62, which is a 37% reduction from the 1440p Medium result. For High settings, the drop is even more severe, falling from 81 FPS at 1440p to 51 FPS at 4K, a 37% decrease. This nonlinear scaling is a hallmark of a GPU that is running out of memory bandwidth and shading power. The pixel count quadruples from 1080p to 4K, but the GTX 1070's performance does not scale linearly; it degrades faster because it is hitting hard architectural limits.

The data indicates that the limiting component at all resolutions is the GPU. The i7-14700KF, with its 28 threads and boost clock of 5.60 GHz, does not become a constraint at any point in this dataset. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect the FPS to remain relatively flat across resolutions. Instead, the FPS drops consistently with each resolution increase, confirming that the GTX 1070's rendering pipeline is saturated. The takeaway is that this system is only suitable for 1080p and 1440p gaming in Undisputed, and 4K requires severe settings compromises that negate the visual benefits of the higher resolution.

FAQ

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1080p gaming with this hardware?

A: The data shows that the Medium preset is optimal, delivering an average of 135 FPS with a minimum of 115 FPS. This provides a high frame rate with a documented stability floor, making it preferable to High (112 FPS avg) or Low (188 FPS avg) for a balanced experience.

*Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Undisputed?*

A: Yes, but only with significant compromises. The Low preset at 4K achieves an average of 86 FPS, which is playable. However, the Medium preset drops to 62 FPS, and High falls to 51 FPS. The Ultra preset is unplayable at 33 FPS. The data suggests that 4K is not a practical resolution for this GPU unless you are willing to use the lowest visual settings.

Q: Is the Intel Core i7-14700KF or the GTX 1070 the limiting factor?

A: The benchmark data clearly indicates the GTX 1070 is the bottleneck. The FPS drops significantly as resolution increases from 1080p to 4K (e.g., 135 FPS to 62 FPS on Medium), which is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario. The CPU's high core count and clock speeds are not the constraint.

Q: How does the GTX 1070 compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 9780, placing it in the 47th percentile. Its nearest rival, the AMD FirePro W5000, scores 9803, a difference of -0.2%. Other close rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M (9832, -0.5%) and the NVIDIA Tesla M10 (9724, 0.6%). These are all professional cards, not gaming-focused alternatives.

Q: Is the Ultra preset ever worth using with this hardware?

A: Only if you prioritize visual fidelity over playability. At 1080p, Ultra averages 72 FPS, which is playable but lower than Medium. At 1440p, it drops to 52 FPS, and at 4K, it falls to 33 FPS. The data suggests that Ultra is only viable at 1080p, and even then, Medium offers a better frame rate with likely minimal visual difference.

Q: What is the expected frame rate at 1440p on High settings?

A: The measured average FPS for 1440p High is 81 FPS. This is a solid, playable frame rate. For comparison, the Medium preset at this resolution offers 98 FPS, which is a 21% improvement, making it the better choice for competitive play or high-refresh-rate displays.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-14700KF is a 20-core, 28-thread processor from the Raptor Lake Refresh generation. Its base clock is 3.40 GHz, and it can boost up to 5.60 GHz. It has a substantial 33 MB of shared L3 cache. In synthetic benchmarks, this CPU is a powerhouse, scoring 44,167 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 6,235 in single-core. This places it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, outperforming rivals like the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X by 0.9% and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K by 1% in average benchmark scores.

However, in Undisputed, this CPU's role is largely passive due to the GPU bottleneck. The measured FPS data shows no signs of CPU limitation. The frame rates are directly tied to the resolution and settings, which are GPU-bound variables. A CPU bottleneck would manifest as a performance ceiling that does not improve when lowering resolution. Here, lowering resolution from 4K to 1080p at Low settings increases the average FPS from 86 to 188, proving the CPU can handle the game's logic and physics with ease.

The CPU's high single-thread performance (6,235 in Cinebench R23) and massive multi-threading capability (44,167 in multi-core) are irrelevant to the final frame output because the GTX 1070 cannot keep up. The i7-14700KF is effectively "waiting" for the GPU to finish rendering each frame. In this pairing, the CPU provides a massive headroom for future GPU upgrades. The data suggests that if a more modern GPU were installed, the i7-14700KF would not become a limiting factor for a long time, given its top-tier benchmark scores.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following data is directly from the measured FPS table for the Intel Core i7-14700KF and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 combination.

1080p (1920x1080):

  • Ultra: Average 72 FPS. No minimum or maximum data provided.
  • High: Average 112 FPS. No minimum or maximum data provided.
  • Medium: Average 135 FPS, with a minimum of 115 FPS and a maximum of 155 FPS.
  • Low: Average 188 FPS. No minimum or maximum data provided.

At 1080p, the GTX 1070 is most capable. The jump from Ultra to High is a 40 FPS gain, and High to Medium is a 23 FPS gain. The Medium preset is the only one with a documented minimum FPS, suggesting it has the most stable performance. Low hits a very high average, but the gap to Medium is large, indicating Medium is the best visual-to-performance compromise.

1440p (2560x1440):

  • Ultra: Average 52 FPS. No minimum or maximum data provided.
  • High: Average 81 FPS. No minimum or maximum data provided.
  • Medium: Average 98 FPS, with a minimum of 83 FPS and a maximum of 112 FPS.
  • Low: Average 136 FPS. No minimum or maximum data provided.

Moving to 1440p, the FPS drops by approximately 28% across all settings compared to 1080p. The Ultra preset falls below the 60 FPS threshold, making it less desirable. High remains playable at 81 FPS, but Medium is again the most stable option, with the only minimum FPS data point (83 FPS) in this resolution.

4K (3840x2160):

  • Ultra: Average 33 FPS. No minimum or maximum data provided.
  • High: Average 51 FPS. No minimum or maximum data provided.
  • Medium: Average 62 FPS, with a minimum of 53 FPS and a maximum of 71 FPS.
  • Low: Average 86 FPS. No minimum or maximum data provided.

At 4K, the GPU is severely taxed. Ultra is unplayable at 33 FPS. High is borderline at 51 FPS. Medium is the only preset with a reported minimum (53 FPS), but its average of 62 FPS is below the ideal 60+ FPS for a smooth experience. Low is the only setting that provides a consistently playable frame rate at 86 FPS. The 4K data confirms that this GPU is not suited for high-fidelity 4K gaming, and only the lowest settings yield acceptable results.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i7-14700KF

Cores / Threads 20 / 28
Base Clock 3400 MHz
Boost Clock 5600 MHz
TDP 125W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070

VRAM 8 GB GDDR5
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1683 MHz MHz
TDP 150 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i7-14700KF + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 in Undisputed

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 86.0
3840x2160 Medium 62.0
3840x2160 High 51.0
3840x2160 Ultra 33.0
2560x1440 Low 136.0
2560x1440 Medium 98.0
2560x1440 High 81.0
2560x1440 Ultra 52.0
1920x1080 Low 188.0
1920x1080 Medium 135.0
1920x1080 High 112.0
1920x1080 Ultra 72.0

Undisputed with GTX 1070 + Other CPUs

See how Undisputed performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii7-14700KF + GTX 1070

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.