Undisputed

The Intel Core i5-13400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 delivers a robust performance profile in Undisputed, with benchmark data indicating a system that scales predictably across resolutions and settings. The measured results show this combination is capable of high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, while 4K performance remains playable but requires careful settings management. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS data, component roles, and ranking context to provide a clear picture of what this hardware delivers in this specific sports title.

Resolution Scaling

The performance drop from 1080p to 4K in Undisputed is significant, revealing a clear shift in the system's bottleneck. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 288 FPS, which drops to 208 FPS at 1440p and further to 132 FPS at 4K. This represents a 54.2% reduction in average FPS from 1080p to 4K at Low settings, indicating that the GPU is becoming increasingly stressed as pixel count rises.

The scaling pattern is consistent across all settings presets. For High settings, the average FPS goes from 171 at 1080p to 124 at 1440p and 78 at 4K — a 54.4% drop from 1080p to 4K. Medium settings show a similar trajectory: 207 FPS at 1080p, 150 FPS at 1440p, and 95 FPS at 4K, representing a 54.1% reduction. The Ultra preset exhibits the steepest relative decline, with 110 FPS at 1080p falling to 80 FPS at 1440p and just 50 FPS at 4K — a 54.5% decrease from the lowest to highest resolution.

These consistent percentage drops across all settings strongly suggest that the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The RX 7700's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 256-bit bus width provide ample bandwidth, but the raw compute demands of 4K rendering clearly tax the card. The data indicates that 1080p and 1440p are the sweet spots for this combo, where the CPU can keep up with the GPU's output. At 4K, the performance falls into a range where 60 FPS is only achievable on Low settings, with Medium hitting 95 FPS and High at 78 FPS.

Interestingly, the gap between 1080p and 1440p is smaller than the gap between 1440p and 4K, suggesting the GPU has enough headroom at lower resolutions but hits a more substantial performance wall as pixel throughput demands increase. This is typical behavior for a mid-range GPU in a modern title, where the transition to 4K often requires a significant settings compromise to maintain smooth gameplay.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7700, built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 32 chip, plays the dominant role in determining Undisputed's frame rates at higher resolutions. The GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides a theoretical bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s, which is sufficient for the texture and geometry workloads present in a sports title like this. The card's boost clock of 2459 MHz and game clock of 2041 MHz are relatively modest for the RX 7000 series, but they deliver consistent performance across the measured presets.

The GPU's benchmark scores place it in the 58th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15852. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, which scores 16129 (1.7% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 9060 at 16014 (1% higher). This positioning suggests the RX 7700 is a solid mid-range performer, but not a top-tier card. In Undisputed, this translates to excellent performance at 1080p and 1440p, with the card's 25.18 TFLOPS of FP32 compute proving more than adequate for the game's visual workload.

The VRAM allocation is a notable strength. With 16 GB available, the RX 7700 should handle even the most demanding texture packs and high-resolution assets without memory-related stuttering. The measured FPS data supports this, as the minimum FPS values at Medium settings (80 FPS at 4K, 127 FPS at 1440p, 176 FPS at 1080p) show no signs of memory pressure causing dramatic frame drops. The GPU's pixel rate of 236.1 GPixel/s and texture rate of 393.4 GTexel/s are adequate for the game's rendering demands, though the steep FPS decline at 4K Ultra (50 FPS average) indicates the compute units are reaching their limits.

The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support and Vulkan 1.4 compatibility mean it can leverage modern rendering APIs in Undisputed, though the game's performance profile suggests it is not heavily reliant on ray tracing or advanced features that would further tax the card. The 200 W TDP and dual-slot design indicate a power-efficient card that should maintain stable clocks during extended gaming sessions, which is reflected in the consistent average FPS measurements across repeated runs.

FAQ

Q: What is the maximum average FPS achievable with this combo at 1080p?

A: The highest measured average FPS is 288, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This drops to 207 FPS at Medium, 171 FPS at High, and 110 FPS at Ultra.

Q: Can this system maintain 60 FPS at 4K resolution?

A: Yes, but with limitations. At 4K, the average FPS is 132 on Low, 95 on Medium, and 78 on High, all above 60 FPS. However, at Ultra settings, the average drops to 50 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the RX 7700 compare to its closest rival, the RTX 3060 Ti?

A: The RX 7700 has an average benchmark score of 15852, while the RTX 3060 Ti scores 16129, making the NVIDIA card 1.7% faster in synthetic benchmarks. In Undisputed, the RX 7700's performance is sufficient for high-refresh gaming at 1440p.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset produces an average of 208 FPS, while Ultra produces 80 FPS. This represents a 61.5% reduction in performance when moving from the lowest to the highest settings.

Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU at 1080p?

A: The data suggests minimal CPU bottleneck at 1080p, as the average FPS reaches 288 at Low settings. The Intel Core i5-13400F's 10 cores and 16 threads, with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, appear sufficient to feed the GPU at this resolution, as evidenced by the high frame rates.

Q: What is the combo's overall ranking among tested systems in this game?

A: The combo ranks 1749 out of 3718 tested combinations, placing it in the upper half of all systems tested in Undisputed. This percentile position reflects its balanced performance across resolutions and settings.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations for Undisputed, the Intel Core i5-13400F and AMD Radeon RX 7700 combo holds a rank of 1749 out of 3718 total combinations. This places the system in the 53rd percentile of all tested hardware pairings, indicating a slightly above-average position among the full range of possible configurations. The ranking is determined by the overall performance across all measured resolutions and settings, weighted by the average FPS achieved.

The CPU's contribution to this ranking is notable. The i5-13400F has an average benchmark score of 25292, placing it in the 77th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (25284, 0% difference) and the Intel Core 5 120 (25362, -0.3% difference), showing that the processor is competitively positioned against other mid-range and upper-mid-range chips. This strong CPU performance helps boost the combo's ranking, particularly at lower resolutions where the processor can exert more influence on frame rates.

The GPU's contribution is more moderate. The RX 7700 scores in the 58th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15852. Its closest competitor, the Radeon R9 370X, scores 15862 (0.1% higher), while the RTX 3060 Ti is 1.7% faster. This GPU position pulls the combo's overall ranking down slightly, as the card is not a top-tier performer. However, the combination still lands in the upper half of all tested systems, which is a respectable result for a mid-range pairing.

The rank of 1749 suggests that many higher-end configurations with more powerful GPUs outperform this combo, but it also indicates that this system will comfortably handle the majority of gaming scenarios in Undisputed. For a sports title that prioritizes smooth frame delivery over extreme graphical fidelity, this ranking reflects a balanced setup that can deliver competitive performance without requiring top-tier components.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its highest frame rates across all settings. The Low preset yields an average of 288 FPS, which is more than sufficient for any high-refresh-rate monitor. Medium settings produce 207 FPS average, with a minimum of 176 FPS and maximum of 238 FPS, indicating consistent frame delivery. High settings average 171 FPS, providing excellent smoothness for competitive play. The Ultra preset drops to 110 FPS average, which remains highly playable and demonstrates the GPU's capability at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows the expected decline. Low settings average 208 FPS, Medium averages 150 FPS with a minimum of 127 FPS and maximum of 172 FPS, High averages 124 FPS, and Ultra drops to 80 FPS. The 1440p results indicate that this resolution is well-suited for the combo, with even Ultra settings maintaining a playable 80 FPS average. The minimum FPS at Medium (127 FPS) shows no significant frame drops, suggesting a stable experience.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor. Low settings average 132 FPS, which is still above 60 FPS and suitable for most displays. Medium settings average 95 FPS with a minimum of 80 FPS and maximum of 109 FPS, providing a solid 4K experience. High settings average 78 FPS, which remains playable but approaches the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra settings drop to 50 FPS average, which is below the ideal 60 FPS mark and may result in noticeable stuttering during fast-paced gameplay sequences.

The data shows a clear progression: at 1080p, the system has significant headroom, with even Ultra settings exceeding 100 FPS. At 1440p, performance remains high, with only Ultra falling below the 100 FPS mark. At 4K, the system requires settings management to maintain smooth frame rates, with Low through High all averaging above 60 FPS, but Ultra falling short.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings preset for this combo depends on the user's target resolution and refresh rate. For 1080p displays, the High preset (171 FPS average) offers the best balance between visual quality and performance, providing well over 100 FPS for smooth gameplay. The Ultra preset at 110 FPS is also viable, but the visual difference between High and Ultra may not justify the 35.7% performance reduction.

For 1440p, the Medium preset (150 FPS average) is the recommended choice for high-refresh-rate monitors, as it maintains a minimum of 127 FPS, ensuring no significant frame drops. The High preset at 124 FPS is also excellent for 60-120 Hz displays, while Ultra at 80 FPS is acceptable for 60 Hz panels but may not provide enough headroom for competitive play. The Low preset at 208 FPS is only recommended for esports-style play where maximum frame rates are prioritized over visuals.

For 4K, the Medium preset (95 FPS average) provides the best experience, as it delivers smooth gameplay while maintaining visual fidelity. The High preset at 78 FPS is also suitable for 60 Hz displays, but the minimum FPS data is not available for this setting, so frame consistency cannot be fully assessed. The Low preset at 132 FPS is recommended for those who prioritize frame rate above all else, while Ultra at 50 FPS should be avoided due to its sub-60 FPS average.

The data indicates that the Medium preset is the most versatile choice across all resolutions, offering a balanced combination of visual quality and performance. At 1080p Medium (207 FPS), 1440p Medium (150 FPS), and 4K Medium (95 FPS), the combo consistently delivers frame rates that are either above or near the 60 FPS threshold, with minimum FPS values that indicate stable performance. For users who prefer maximum visual fidelity, the High preset is a viable alternative at all resolutions, though 4K High may require a display with adaptive sync to mitigate any potential frame time inconsistencies.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-13400F plays a supporting but crucial role in Undisputed, particularly at lower resolutions where the GPU is not the primary bottleneck. This processor features 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. Its 20 MB of shared L3 cache and per-core L2 cache of 1.25 MB provide ample memory hierarchy for game logic and physics calculations.

The CPU's benchmark scores indicate strong multi-threaded performance. In Cinebench R23, it scores 22604 in multi-core and 3191 in single-core, while Geekbench shows 11068 multi-core and 1996 single-core. The 3DMark tests reveal a scaling pattern from 1880 (2 threads) to 7314 (16 threads), showing good thread utilization. In Passmark, the multi-thread score is 25032, with a single-thread score of 3634.

In the context of Undisputed, the CPU's role becomes more apparent at 1080p where frame rates exceed 200 FPS on lower settings. At these high frame rates, the CPU must process game logic, physics, and AI at a rate sufficient to feed the GPU. The data suggests the i5-13400F is up to this task, as the 288 FPS average at 1080p Low indicates no significant CPU bottleneck. The processor's 77th percentile ranking among all CPUs supports this, showing it outperforms the majority of installed processors.

However, at 4K resolution, the CPU's influence diminishes. The dramatic FPS drops observed when moving from 1440p to 4K are primarily attributable to the GPU's compute limitations, not CPU constraints. The CPU's 65 W TDP and Raptor Lake architecture provide efficient performance that does not throttle under sustained gaming loads, which is reflected in the consistent FPS measurements across the test suite. For a sports title like Undisputed, which likely benefits from high single-thread performance for game logic, the i5-13400F's single-core score of 3191 in Cinebench R23 indicates it has sufficient processing power to avoid becoming a limiting factor.