Undisputed

# Undisputed with Intel Core i5-12400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

The Intel Core i5-12400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 delivers a surprisingly versatile experience in Undisputed, with measured frames ranging from a playable 48 FPS at 4K Ultra to a blistering 271 FPS at 1080p Low. This combo ranks in the 54th percentile of all tested combinations (2014th out of 3718), suggesting it sits in the upper-middle tier of systems for this boxing title. The data reveals a configuration that can handle competitive play at high refresh rates or sacrifice resolution for visual fidelity, though the scaling patterns expose where the bottlenecks truly lie.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is dramatic and reveals a GPU-bound workload at higher resolutions. At High settings, the average frame rate falls from 162 FPS at 1920x1080 to 117 FPS at 2560x1440, then further to 74 FPS at 3840x2160. That represents a 54% reduction from 1080p to 4K, which is substantial and indicates the RTX 4060's 8 GB frame buffer and 128-bit memory interface become limiting factors as pixel count quadruples.

The scaling pattern shifts depending on settings preset. At Low settings, the drop is steeper proportionally: 271 FPS at 1080p falls to 196 FPS at 1440p and then to 124 FPS at 4K. This 54% decline from 1080p to 4K at Low settings mirrors the High preset's behavior, suggesting the GPU's raw throughput, not just memory capacity, is the constraint. The RTX 4060's boost clock of 2460 MHz and FP32 performance of 15.11 TFLOPS are simply insufficient to maintain high frame rates at 4K when the render load increases.

Medium settings tell a similar story with slightly different numbers: 195 FPS at 1080p, 141 FPS at 1440p, and 89 FPS at 4K. The min FPS values at Medium settings are telling — at 1080p the minimum is 166 FPS, at 1440p it drops to 120 FPS, and at 4K it falls to 76 FPS. These minimums suggest frame time consistency degrades as resolution climbs, with the gap between average and minimum FPS widening from 29 FPS at 1080p to 13 FPS at 4K. The 4K Ultra setting produces just 48 FPS average, which is below the 60 FPS threshold many consider the baseline for smooth gameplay.

The resolution scaling data implies that at 1080p, the CPU has headroom to push higher frame rates, but the GPU becomes the limiting component as resolution increases. The i5-12400F's 6 cores and 12 threads with a boost clock of 4.40 GHz appear sufficient for the lower-resolution scenarios, where the RTX 4060's shading units (3072) and texture units (96) are fully utilized.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination ranks 2014th out of 3718 tested combos in Undisputed, placing it in the 54th percentile of all systems evaluated. This is a middling position that suggests the combo is neither exceptional nor underperforming for this title. The rank reflects a balance between the CPU's 73rd percentile standing among all processors and the GPU's 61st percentile among all graphics cards.

The CPU's nearest rivals provide context for its contribution to this ranking. The AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS scores 19047 in average benchmarks, essentially identical to the i5-12400F's 19039 (0% delta). The Intel Core 3 201E trails by a mere 0.1%, while the Intel Core i5-1335U is 0.3% ahead and the AMD EPYC 7773X matches that 0.3% advantage. These sub-1% differences indicate the i5-12400F is in a tightly contested performance band, where single-digit benchmark points separate competitors.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals are less flattering. The AMD Radeon HD 7790 scores 17666, which is 0.2% above the RTX 4060's 17639 average. The AMD Radeon 780M is 0.3% behind, the AMD Radeon Pro 560 trails by 0.5%, and the AMD Radeon Pro 460 is 0.7% lower. These comparisons suggest the RTX 4060's benchmark scores are within a narrow range of much older or lower-tier parts, which is curious given its modern Ada Lovelace architecture and 5 nm process node.

The combo's rank in the lower half of the distribution likely stems from the GPU's modest standing relative to its generation. While the RTX 4060's percentile rank of 61 indicates it outperforms most GPUs, the competition in this game's tested combos includes many higher-end graphics cards that push the average up. The data shows a system that is competent but not dominant, with the 4K Ultra result of 48 FPS pulling the overall assessment down.

GPU Role

The RTX 4060 brings 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is the most likely culprit for the performance cliffs observed at 4K resolution. The memory clock runs at 2125 MHz with 17 Gbps effective speed, which is respectable for the class but insufficient for high-resolution textures in a modern sports title like Undisputed.

The GPU's boost clock of 2460 MHz and base clock of 1830 MHz are relatively high, and the 5 nm TSMC process allows for 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die. The shading units number 3072, with 96 texture mapping units and 48 raster output units. The pixel rate of 118.1 GPixel/s and texture rate of 236.2 GTexel/s provide the raw throughput that drives the 1080p results, where the GPU can operate near its theoretical limits.

The 4K Ultra result of 48 FPS is particularly telling. This is the only measured configuration that dips below 60 FPS, and it represents a 54% reduction from the 4K High result of 74 FPS. The jump from High to Ultra costs 26 FPS at 4K, which is a substantial penalty for what is typically a modest visual improvement. This suggests the 8 GB VRAM is being saturated at 4K Ultra, forcing the GPU to manage memory more aggressively and reducing effective throughput.

At 1440p, the RTX 4060 performs admirably, with the lowest measured average being 75 FPS at Ultra settings. This is a playable range for most users, and the Medium preset at 141 FPS with a 120 FPS minimum provides a smooth experience. The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support and Vulkan 1.4 compatibility ensure it can handle the game's modern rendering requirements without API-level bottlenecks.

The GPU's benchmark results show a PassMark G3D score of 19545 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2302, which position it as a mid-range performer. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 95057 and Vulkan score of 48643 indicate the compute capabilities are adequate, though not exceptional. These figures align with the observed gaming performance, where the GPU excels at lower resolutions but struggles to maintain high frame rates at 4K.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the RTX 4060 and i5-12400F combination delivers exceptional performance across all settings. Low settings produce an average of 271 FPS, which is more than enough for any high-refresh-rate monitor. Medium settings yield 195 FPS average with a minimum of 166 FPS and maximum of 225 FPS, providing a consistent experience. High settings drop to 162 FPS average, still well above the threshold for smooth competitive play. Ultra settings reduce the average to 104 FPS, which remains playable and suggests the CPU is not a limiting factor at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows the GPU beginning to strain. Low settings average 196 FPS, a 28% reduction from 1080p. Medium settings produce 141 FPS average with a 120 FPS minimum and 162 FPS maximum, maintaining smoothness. High settings fall to 117 FPS average, which is still comfortable for most displays. Ultra settings drop to 75 FPS average, which is borderline for competitive play but acceptable for casual sessions. The spread between minimum and maximum at Medium settings (42 FPS) indicates some frame time variance, but the 120 FPS floor keeps the experience above typical stutter thresholds.

At 3840x2160, the GPU's limitations become apparent. Low settings average 124 FPS, which is surprising given the 4K resolution but indicates the game is not overly demanding at lower presets. Medium settings produce 89 FPS average with a 76 FPS minimum and 103 FPS maximum, which is playable but not ideal. High settings drop to 74 FPS average, and the minimum is not recorded but the average suggests occasional dips below 60 FPS are possible. Ultra settings produce just 48 FPS average, which is below the standard for smooth gameplay and may result in noticeable judder during fast-paced boxing sequences.

The data shows a clear tiered structure: 1080p is GPU-limited but with massive headroom, 1440p is the sweet spot balancing quality and performance, and 4K is only viable at Low or Medium settings. The lack of min FPS data for most configurations makes it difficult to assess worst-case scenarios, but the Medium settings rows provide some insight into frame pacing.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo achieve 60 FPS at 4K?

A: Yes, but only at Medium settings or lower. The measured results show 89 FPS at 4K Medium and 124 FPS at 4K Low, while High settings drop to 74 FPS and Ultra falls to 48 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck at 1080p?

A: The data suggests the GPU is the primary constraint. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 271 FPS, which is far above typical display refresh rates and indicates the CPU can feed the GPU adequately. The RTX 4060's 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 performance is the limiting factor as settings increase.

Q: How does this combo compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 19039 is within 0.3% of its nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (19047) and Intel Core i5-1335U (18982). The GPU's average score of 17639 is within 0.7% of the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17666), AMD Radeon 780M (17588), and AMD Radeon Pro 560 (17551).

Q: What is the best resolution for competitive play?

A: At 1080p, all settings presets produce at least 104 FPS, with Low reaching 271 FPS and Medium at 195 FPS. This makes 1080p the clear choice for high-refresh-rate competitive play, as the minimum measured FPS at Medium settings is 166 FPS.

Q: Does the 8 GB VRAM limit performance at 4K?

A: The data indicates a significant performance drop at 4K Ultra (48 FPS) compared to 4K High (74 FPS), which is consistent with VRAM capacity being a limiting factor. The 128-bit memory bus and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth may also contribute to this constraint.

Q: Is the combo's ranking of 2014 out of 3718 a good result?

A: The rank places it in the 54th percentile of all tested combos, which is slightly above the median. This suggests the combo performs adequately but is not exceptional for Undisputed, with the GPU's 61st percentile ranking among all GPUs being the primary determinant of this position.

Settings Recommendations

For 1080p displays, the Medium preset offers the best balance of visual quality and performance, with an average of 195 FPS and a minimum of 166 FPS. This ensures the experience never drops below the refresh rate of most gaming monitors, and the 225 FPS maximum provides headroom for future driver optimizations. The High preset at 162 FPS is also viable for users who prioritize visual fidelity, while Ultra at 104 FPS remains playable but offers diminishing returns.

At 1440p, the Medium preset is the recommended choice, delivering 141 FPS average with a 120 FPS minimum. This configuration provides a smooth experience on 144Hz displays and maintains frame times above typical stutter thresholds. The High preset at 117 FPS is acceptable for 120Hz monitors, and the Ultra preset at 75 FPS is playable but may exhibit frame pacing issues during intense gameplay moments.

For 4K displays, the Low preset at 124 FPS is the only configuration that provides consistently high frame rates, though the visual compromise may be significant. The Medium preset at 89 FPS with a 76 FPS minimum is the best choice for users who want a balance of quality and performance, as it maintains frame rates above the 60 FPS baseline. High settings at 74 FPS are borderline, and Ultra at 48 FPS should be avoided for competitive play.

The data suggests that the Medium preset is the universal recommendation across all resolutions, as it provides the most consistent frame times (as evidenced by the min/max data) while maintaining solid average FPS. The 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus appear to handle Medium settings without significant bottlenecks, whereas Ultra settings at 4K expose the GPU's memory limitations.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-12400F contributes 6 cores and 12 threads with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and boost clock of 4.40 GHz. This Alder Lake-S architecture part features 80 KB L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB L2 cache per core, and 18 MB shared L3 cache. The CPU's benchmark results show a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12380 and single-core score of 1680, with a Geekbench multi-core score of 9472 and single-core score of 1964.

In Undisputed, the CPU's role appears secondary to the GPU at higher resolutions, but at 1080p the processor's capabilities are more relevant. The 271 FPS result at 1080p Low indicates the CPU can drive frame rates well beyond typical display capabilities, and the 12 threads provide sufficient parallelism for the game's simulation and AI logic. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 5895 and max-thread score of 5912 show near-linear scaling with thread count, suggesting the CPU handles multi-threaded workloads efficiently.

The PassMark multi-thread score of 19433 and single-thread score of 3481 place the CPU in the 73rd percentile of all processors. Its nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS and Intel Core i5-1335U, are within 0.3% in average benchmark scores, indicating the performance is well-matched for this class. The 65 W TDP and Intel Socket 1700 compatibility make it a mainstream option, and the DDR4/DDR5 memory support provides flexibility for system builders.

The CPU's impact on the combo's ranking is likely minimal, as the 4K results show the GPU becoming the limiting factor. At 1080p, the CPU provides enough headroom to allow the RTX 4060 to reach its full potential, as evidenced by the 271 FPS Low preset result. The 18 MB shared L3 cache and 12 threads ensure the game's background processes do not interfere with rendering tasks, maintaining consistent frame times across the measured configurations.