Undisputed
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 117 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 42 | 68 | 79 | 112 |
| 1440p QHD | 65 | 101 | 124 | 174 |
| 1080p Full HD | 91 | 143 | 173 | 237 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Undisputed with Intel Core i5-10400F + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i5-10400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT delivers a 1080p experience in Undisputed that is firmly capable, though the data shows a steep price for maximum visual fidelity. The measured frame rates reveal that the "Ultra" preset is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, while the "Low" setting unlocks exceptional speed, indicating a system well-balanced for competitive play but less suited for maxed-out 4K.
Resolution Scaling
The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is dramatic and clearly demonstrates the GPU becoming the limiting component as resolution increases. At "Low" settings, the average frame rate falls from 236.6 FPS at 1920x1080 to 174.2 FPS at 2560x1440, a reduction of 62.4 FPS. Pushing further to 3840x2160 yields 111.5 FPS, which is less than half the 1080p figure. This steep descent indicates that even at low graphical fidelity, the pixel throughput demands of higher resolutions heavily tax the Radeon RX 7600 XT.
The scaling pattern is similar for the "Medium" and "High" presets, where the 4K results of 78.9 FPS and 68 FPS, respectively, are roughly 45% lower than their 1440p counterparts. However, the most extreme scaling is observed with the "Ultra" preset. Here, the average frame rate collapses from 90.7 FPS at 1080p to 64.6 FPS at 1440p, and finally to a playable-but-strained 41.7 FPS at 4K. This shows that the combination of high resolution and "Ultra" settings creates a demand that the GPU cannot sustain, making it the definitive limiting factor. At 1080p, the CPU still holds its own, but the data strongly suggests that as resolution climbs, the RX 7600 XT's rendering capabilities, not the processor's throughput, dictate the final frame rate.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-10400F provides a solid foundation with 6 cores and 12 threads, running at a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. Its performance profile, as indicated by an average benchmark score of 14168, places it in the 73rd percentile against all CPUs. This mid-range standing is sufficient to keep up with the GPU in most scenarios, particularly at 1080p, where the measured "Low" preset frame rate of 236.6 FPS shows no obvious signs of a CPU-imposed ceiling.
However, the processor's limitations become apparent when compared to its direct rivals. The data shows the i5-10400F is nearly identical in performance to the AMD EPYC 7552, with a deltaPct of only 0.4. It also trails the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C by 0.8% and the Intel Core i5-8500 by 1.1%. These margins are slim, indicating that this 10th-generation chip offers competitive multi-threaded performance for its class. The single-thread score of 688 in 3dmark is relatively modest, which could explain why the frame rates at "Ultra" settings, which often rely on more complex game logic, do not scale as well as the pure resolution tests. Overall, the CPU is a competent partner, but the benchmark results suggest it is not the star of this pairing; it serves to enable the GPU's performance rather than boost it.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is the dominant partner in this combination, and its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus is a key asset. With a memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s and a boost clock of 2755 MHz, the GPU demonstrates strong raw compute capability. Its average benchmark score of 20146 places it in the 63rd percentile against all GPUs, and the data shows it is nearly identical in performance to the AMD Radeon RX 7600, with a deltaPct of -0.6, while being 1.9% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER.
The GPU's heavy lifting is evident in the frame rate scaling. The transition from "Low" to "Ultra" settings at any resolution shows a significant performance cost. For example, at 1440p, the average frame rate drops from 174.2 FPS on "Low" to 64.6 FPS on "Ultra", a 62.9% reduction. This indicates that the "Ultra" preset is likely using the 16 GB VRAM buffer for high-resolution textures and other effects that demand significant shader and memory throughput. The GPU does manage to keep the 4K "High" preset at a playable 68 FPS, proving it can handle demanding loads, but the 41.7 FPS result at 4K "Ultra" shows it is not a card for maxed-out 4K gaming in this title. The GPU is clearly the workhorse, and its performance dictates the overall experience more than the CPU's modest clock speeds.
How This Combo Ranks
In the comprehensive database of tested combinations, this pairing of the Intel Core i5-10400F and AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT ranks 1027th out of 1580 combos for Undisputed. This places it in the lower third of all tested systems, a ranking that seems at odds with the solid frame rates seen at 1080p. The rank suggests that while the combo is perfectly capable of delivering high frame rates at standard resolutions, it is outclassed by many other pairings that feature newer or higher-end components.
The rank of 1027 indicates that there are many combinations that can achieve better performance, likely those with more powerful CPUs or GPUs. However, the data also shows this combo is not a weak performer; it sits above the midpoint mark, which, combined with its measured 1080p "Ultra" result of 90.7 FPS, makes it a more than adequate solution for 1080p gaming. The ranking is a relative measure against the entire spectrum of hardware, and in that context, this setup is a mid-tier contender, not a top-tier powerhouse.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured frame rates provide a comprehensive view of the combo's capabilities:
1920x1080: The lowest resolution tested shows the system's true potential. The "Low" preset achieves an average of 236.6 FPS, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. "Medium" yields a strong 173 FPS, while "High" drops to 142.5 FPS. The "Ultra" preset, while still playable, brings the average down to 90.7 FPS.
2560x1440: At this resolution, the GPU begins to feel the load. The "Low" preset still manages an excellent 174.2 FPS. "High" is very playable at 101.3 FPS, and "Medium" hits 123.7 FPS. "Ultra" falls to 64.6 FPS, which is still smooth for most gamers.
3840x2160: The 4K results are a mixed bag. The "Low" preset is surprisingly good at 111.5 FPS. "Medium" is borderline at 78.9 FPS, and "High" is just playable at 68 FPS. The "Ultra" preset, however, is not recommended for serious play, as it averages only 41.7 FPS.
Settings Recommendations
For the best balance of visual quality and performance, the "High" preset is the clear recommendation. At 1080p, it delivers 142.5 FPS, which is more than enough for a smooth experience, and at 1440p, it still achieves a very respectable 101.3 FPS. This setting offers a significant visual upgrade over "Medium" without the severe performance penalty of "Ultra".
If the goal is maximum competitive performance, the "Low" preset is the way to go, especially for 1080p or 1440p gaming where it achieves 236.6 FPS and 174.2 FPS, respectively. The "Ultra" preset, while offering the best visuals, should only be considered at 1080p, where the 90.7 FPS average is still playable, but the 41.7 FPS at 4K makes it an unwise choice for that resolution.
FAQ
*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Undisputed?*
A: The data shows that 1920x1080 is the optimal resolution, as it is the only one where all presets, including "Ultra", maintain an average frame rate above 90 FPS.
Q: How does this combo rank against all other tested combinations?
A: The combo ranks 1027th out of 1580 tested combinations, placing it in the lower third of all systems for this game.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 4K?
A: The GPU is the primary limiting factor at 4K. The frame rates at 3840x2160 are significantly lower than at 1080p, and the "Ultra" preset drops to 41.7 FPS, a clear sign of GPU-bound performance.
*Q: Can this system handle the "Ultra" preset in Undisputed?*
A: Yes, but only at 1080p, where it averages 90.7 FPS. At 1440p and 4K, the "Ultra" preset results in average frame rates of 64.6 FPS and 41.7 FPS, respectively, which are less desirable.
Q: How does the RX 7600 XT compare to its nearest rival, the RX 7600?
A: According to the benchmark data, the RX 7600 XT is 0.6% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 7600 in average score, making their performance nearly identical.
Q: What is the highest average frame rate this combo achieves?
A: The highest average frame rate is 236.6 FPS, which is achieved at 1920x1080 with the "Low" settings preset.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-10400F
AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-10400F + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT in Undisputed
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 111.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 78.9 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 68.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 41.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 174.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 123.7 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 101.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 64.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 236.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 173.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 142.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 90.7 |
Undisputed with ii5-10400F + Other GPUs
See how Undisputed performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Undisputed with RX 7600 XT + Other CPUs
See how Undisputed performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-10400F + RX 7600 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.