Undisputed

The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 produces a combination that is heavily skewed toward CPU capability, yet the final experience in Undisputed is dictated by the GPU’s limits. Benchmark results show a playable setup at most settings, but the data reveals a clear bottleneck that shifts depending on resolution.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D is a desktop processor from the 9000 series, built on the Zen 5 architecture (Granite Ridge) using a 4 nm process. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The 96 MB of shared L3 cache is the defining characteristic here, providing a massive pool of fast memory that benefits gaming workloads. Its benchmark scores are exceptional: it hits 34004 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 4800 in single-core, with a PassMark multithread score of 40009.

These numbers place the CPU in the 90th percentile of all processors tested. Its nearest rivals in average benchmark score include the Intel Core i9-13900HK at 38020 (only 0.6% behind) and the Intel Core i5-13600KF at 38028 (0.7% behind). The 9800X3D essentially matches these chips in aggregate compute, but its edge in gaming scenarios typically comes from the L3 cache design, which excels at reducing memory latency.

In Undisputed, the CPU’s role is to feed the simulation and physics of the boxing matches. The data shows that at 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 207.5 FPS, which is far beyond what the GPU can handle at higher settings. This indicates the CPU is never the limiting factor in this game; even at its most demanding, the 9800X3D has ample headroom. The 3DMark scores reinforce this: 10081 in the 16-thread test and 8252 in the 8-thread test, showing strong scaling across core counts. For a sports title like this, where frame pacing matters for reaction-based gameplay, the CPU’s consistency is a major asset. The processor’s 120 W TDP and unlocked multiplier also suggest it can sustain high clocks without thermal throttling, though the measured FPS data does not capture thermal behavior directly.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is the clear performance ceiling for this pair. This is a Turing-architecture GPU (TU106 chip) built on a 12 nm process, featuring 1920 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. It has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 1365 MHz with a boost of 1680 MHz, and its FP32 throughput is rated at 6.451 TFLOPS.

The GPU’s benchmark scores place it in the 58th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 16074. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 7600S (0.5% ahead) and the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 (1.7% behind). The RTX 2060 is an older, end-of-life part, and the data reflects that: it struggles to maintain high frame rates at demanding settings.

In Undisputed, the GPU’s 6 GB VRAM is a potential constraint. At 4K Ultra, the combo drops to 39.7 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. The GPU’s DirectX 12 score of 53 in PassMark is notably low, suggesting the card is not optimized for modern API workloads. The 14 Gbps effective memory speed and 192-bit bus provide adequate bandwidth for 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K, the pixel rate of 80.64 GPixel/s and texture rate of 201.6 GTexel/s become limiting factors. The data shows a clear pattern: the RTX 2060 is the bottleneck at higher resolutions and settings, while the CPU remains idle, waiting for the GPU to catch up.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a dramatic scaling curve from 1080p to 4K, which reveals the limiting component. At 1080p High, the combo delivers 123.7 FPS. Dropping to 1440p High reduces that to 89.2 FPS, a 27.9% decrease. At 4K High, it falls to 59.2 FPS, another 33.6% drop from 1440p. This steep decline indicates the GPU is the primary constraint; if the CPU were the limit, the FPS would remain flat across resolutions.

The scaling is even more pronounced at Ultra settings. At 1080p Ultra, the combo hits 81 FPS. At 1440p Ultra, it drops to 56.5 FPS, and at 4K Ultra, it collapses to 39.7 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra settings at the same resolution is also telling. At 1080p, Low settings yield 207.5 FPS, while Ultra yields 81 FPS—a 61% reduction. This suggests that the game’s visual effects, likely shadow quality and post-processing, are heavily GPU-dependent.

The data indicates that for a consistent 60 FPS experience, the user must target 1440p High or 4K High, but the latter is marginal at 59.2 FPS. At 1080p, the combo has headroom to play at Ultra with 81 FPS, but the GPU’s VRAM and compute limits prevent it from scaling to 4K smoothly. The resolution scaling pattern is textbook: the RTX 2060’s 6 GB memory and 192-bit bus cannot feed the 4K framebuffer efficiently, while the CPU’s 96 MB L3 cache is unaffected by resolution changes.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations, this pairing of AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 ranks 1306 out of 1580 combos for Undisputed. This places it in the bottom 17% of all tested systems, which is a poor result given the CPU’s top-tier status. The rank is a direct consequence of the GPU’s age and limitations; the CPU is capable of far more than this GPU can deliver.

The combo rank is not a reflection of the CPU’s performance, which is in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. Instead, it is a measure of the system’s overall gaming capability in this specific title. The RTX 2060’s average benchmark score of 16074 is only slightly above the median GPU, and its percentile rank of 58 confirms it is a mid-range part. When paired with a high-end CPU, the result is a system that is CPU-overkill and GPU-constrained.

For context, the CPU’s nearest rivals in benchmark scores—the Intel Core i9-13900HK and i5-13600KF—would likely produce a similar combination rank if paired with the same GPU, since the limiting factor is the graphics card. The data suggests that to improve this combo’s rank, the user would need a GPU with higher memory bandwidth and more shading units, such as a card in the 70th percentile or above. As measured, this combo is a classic case of a powerful CPU being held back by an entry-level GPU.

Settings Recommendations

Given the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the target resolution. At 1080p, the data shows that High settings at 123.7 FPS provide a smooth experience well above the 60 FPS threshold, while Ultra at 81 FPS is still playable. For competitive play, Low settings at 207.5 FPS offer the highest frame rates, which could benefit reaction times in online matches.

At 1440p, Medium settings at 108.8 FPS are the best balance, as High at 89.2 FPS is also playable but leaves less headroom. Ultra at 56.5 FPS is below 60 FPS and should be avoided for a consistent experience. The 152.3 FPS at Low settings is excellent for high-refresh-rate monitors.

At 4K, the options are limited. High at 59.2 FPS is technically just below the 60 FPS target, making it a borderline choice. Medium at 67.8 FPS is the only setting that clears 60 FPS at this resolution, while Low at 94.6 FPS offers the most headroom. Ultra at 39.7 FPS is unplayable for a smooth experience.

The data clearly indicates that Medium settings are the sweet spot for this combo across most resolutions, providing a playable frame rate without sacrificing too much visual fidelity. For 1080p users, High is recommended for the best balance of quality and performance, while 4K users should stick to Medium or Low to maintain 60 FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data is as follows:

• 1920x1080: Low 207.5 FPS, Medium 148.3 FPS, High 123.7 FPS, Ultra 81 FPS.
• 2560x1440: Low 152.3 FPS, Medium 108.8 FPS, High 89.2 FPS, Ultra 56.5 FPS.
• 3840x2160: Low 94.6 FPS, Medium 67.8 FPS, High 59.2 FPS, Ultra 39.7 FPS.

At 1080p, the combo delivers playable frame rates at all settings, with Low exceeding 200 FPS for esports-level performance. The step from Medium to High costs 24.6 FPS, while the step from High to Ultra costs 42.7 FPS, showing diminishing returns at the highest settings.

At 1440p, the frame rates are still respectable, with Low and Medium both exceeding 100 FPS. The drop from Medium to High is 19.6 FPS, and from High to Ultra is 32.7 FPS, which is a significant hit for marginal visual gains.

At 4K, the combo struggles. Low is the only setting that comfortably exceeds 60 FPS, while Medium is just above the threshold at 67.8 FPS. High and Ultra both fall below 60 FPS, making them unsuitable for smooth gameplay. The data shows that 4K is only viable with Low or Medium settings for this GPU.

FAQ

Q: Is this combo capable of 60 FPS at 1080p Ultra?

A: Yes. The measured FPS at 1080p Ultra is 81, which is above the 60 FPS target, providing a smooth experience.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to maintain 60 FPS?

A: The data shows 1440p Medium at 108.8 FPS and 4K Medium at 67.8 FPS both exceed 60 FPS, but 1440p offers more headroom. For the highest quality, 1440p High at 89.2 FPS is also viable.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D has an average benchmark score of 37780, which is 0.1% behind the Intel Xeon 6353P and 0.6% behind the Intel Core i9-13900HK, making it statistically equivalent in aggregate compute.

Q: Is the GPU the bottleneck in this system?

A: Yes. The frame rate drops significantly from 1080p to 4K, and the CPU’s 90th percentile rank contrasts with the GPU’s 58th percentile, indicating the RTX 2060 is the limiting component.

*Q: Can this combo run Undisputed at 4K Ultra?*

A: No, not playably. The measured FPS at 4K Ultra is 39.7, which is well below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.

Q: What settings should be used for online competitive play?

A: At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 207.5 FPS, which is the highest frame rate measured, providing the lowest input latency for competitive matches.