Undisputed

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination delivers a strong 1080p and 1440p experience in Undisputed, with the data showing the GPU as the primary scaling factor at higher resolutions. This pairing ranks in the 46th percentile of tested combos, and the benchmark results indicate that while the 8-core Zen 5 processor provides ample headroom, the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus of the RTX 4060 define the performance ceiling at 4K.

FAQ

*Q: What is the overall performance ranking of this CPU and GPU combo in Undisputed?*

A: The combo ranks 1503 out of 2813 tested combinations, placing it in the 46.6th percentile of all tested systems.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 9700F compare to its nearest CPU rivals in general benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 7 9700F scores 36,470 in Passmark multithread and 4,691 in single-thread. It is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, and 0.9% ahead of the Intel Core i7-14700K, while being 0.2% behind the Intel Core i7-14700KF.

Q: What is the best frame rate achieved at 1080p?

A: The highest average frame rate at 1920x1080 is 271 FPS on Low settings. The Medium preset delivers 195 FPS average, High delivers 162 FPS, and Ultra drops to 104 FPS.

Q: Does the RTX 4060 maintain playable frame rates at 4K resolution?

A: Yes, but with significant variance. At 3840x2160, the Medium preset averages 89 FPS (min 76, max 103). High settings average 74 FPS, Low averages 124 FPS, and Ultra drops to 48 FPS.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and how does it affect performance?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 272.0 GB/s bandwidth. The data shows that at 4K Ultra (48 FPS), the frame rate drops by 46% compared to 4K High (74 FPS), indicating a memory bandwidth limitation.

Q: How does the RTX 4060 compare to its nearest GPU rivals in Passmark G3D scores?

A: The RTX 4060 scores 19,545 in Passmark G3D. It is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Radeon HD 7790, 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon 780M, and 0.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 560.

How This Combo Ranks

The data places this configuration at rank 1503 out of 2813 tested combos in Undisputed. That is a mid-pack position, suggesting that this pairing is neither a top-tier enthusiast setup nor a low-end entry. The CPU alone sits in the 94th percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 69,996. This is a high-performing chip, as evidenced by its near-tie with the Ryzen 9 7940HX (0.2% faster), which is a mobile flagship part, and its slight edge over the Ryzen 9 7950X (0.7% faster).

The GPU, however, is a different story. The RTX 4060 sits in the 61st percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17,639. Its nearest rivals in Passmark G3D are the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (0.2% slower), the Radeon 780M (0.3% faster), and the Radeon Pro 560 (0.5% faster). These are not modern high-end parts; the 780M is an integrated GPU, and the Pro 560 is a mobile workstation part. This indicates that the RTX 4060, while competent, is the limiting factor in this pairing. The CPU has significant headroom that the GPU cannot fully utilize at lower resolutions, but the combination still lands in the middle of the pack because the GPU's performance ceiling restricts the overall system capability. The rank of 1503 out of 2813 reflects this imbalance: the CPU punches above its weight class, but the GPU pulls the average down.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of GPU-bound scaling as resolution increases. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the combo achieves 162 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 High, the frame rate drops to 117 FPS, a 27.8% reduction. At 3840x2160 High, it falls further to 74 FPS, a 36.8% reduction from 1440p and a 54.3% reduction from 1080p. This steep drop-off indicates that the RTX 4060's 8 GB VRAM and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth are being saturated as pixel count increases.

The scaling is even more pronounced at the Ultra preset. At 1080p Ultra, the average is 104 FPS. At 1440p Ultra, it drops to 75 FPS (-27.9%). At 4K Ultra, it collapses to 48 FPS (-36% from 1440p, -53.8% from 1080p). The fact that the gap between 1440p and 4K at Ultra (36%) is nearly identical to the gap at High (36.8%) suggests a hard memory bandwidth limit, not a compute limit. The CPU, with its 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth and 32 MB L3 cache, is not the bottleneck here; the GPU's 128-bit bus is.

The Low preset tells the same story. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 271 FPS. At 1440p Low, it drops to 196 FPS (-27.7%). At 4K Low, it drops to 124 FPS (-36.7% from 1440p). The consistent ~27% drop from 1080p to 1440p and ~36% drop from 1440p to 4K across all presets confirms that the scaling is primarily a function of the GPU's memory subsystem, not the CPU or game settings complexity. The CPU is delivering enough data to keep the GPU fed at 1080p, but the GPU cannot maintain that throughput as the rendering load increases.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The benchmark data provides a complete picture of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets.

1920x1080: The Low preset achieves 271 FPS average, which is the highest frame rate in the entire dataset. Medium averages 195 FPS (min 166, max 225), High averages 162 FPS, and Ultra averages 104 FPS. The jump from Medium to High is a 16.9% reduction, while High to Ultra is a 35.8% reduction, showing that the Ultra preset is disproportionately demanding.

2560x1440: Low averages 196 FPS, Medium averages 141 FPS (min 120, max 162), High averages 117 FPS, and Ultra averages 75 FPS. The Medium preset here shows a min/max spread of 42 FPS, indicating some frame time variance but still well within smooth territory. The drop from High to Ultra is 35.9%, nearly identical to the 1080p drop, confirming the Ultra preset's heavy resource requirements.

3840x2160: Low averages 124 FPS, Medium averages 89 FPS (min 76, max 103), High averages 74 FPS, and Ultra averages 48 FPS. The 4K Medium preset is the only 4K row with min/max data, showing a 27 FPS spread. At 4K Ultra, the 48 FPS average is below the 60 FPS threshold typically considered smooth, making this the only configuration in the dataset that falls short of playable standards.

The progression across resolutions is linear for each preset. For Low, the averages are 271 → 196 → 124. For Medium, 195 → 141 → 89. For High, 162 → 117 → 74. For Ultra, 104 → 75 → 48. This linearity suggests that the game's engine scales predictably with resolution, and the RTX 4060's performance envelope is consistent across the board.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is built on the AD107 chip using a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die. Its clock speeds are 1830 MHz base and 2460 MHz boost. The memory operates at 2125 MHz (17 Gbps effective) across an 8 GB GDDR6 pool on a 128-bit bus, yielding 272.0 GB/s bandwidth. These specifications place the GPU in the 61st percentile of all GPUs, with a Passmark G3D score of 19,545.

In Undisputed, the data shows this GPU is the decisive factor at higher resolutions. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p at all presets, evidenced by the playable frame rates (104 FPS at 1080p Ultra, 75 FPS at 1440p Ultra). However, at 4K, the memory capacity and bandwidth become strained. The 4K Ultra result of 48 FPS is a 54% drop from 1080p Ultra, while the 4K High result of 74 FPS is a 54% drop from 1080p High. This consistent ~54% penalty from 1080p to 4K points to the 128-bit memory bus as the primary constraint.

The GPU's 3072 shading units and 48 ROPs provide a pixel rate of 118.1 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 236.2 GTexel/s. These compute resources are adequate for the game's sports genre graphics, but the data indicates that memory throughput, not raw compute, is the limiting factor. The FP32 performance of 15.11 TFLOPS is sufficient to push high frame rates at lower resolutions, but the bandwidth cannot keep up with the pixel fill demands of 4K. The 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores are present, but their impact is not visible in the measured data, as Undisputed likely does not heavily utilize ray tracing.

The GPU's production status is end-of-life, and it was released on 2023-05-17. Its direct predecessor is the GeForce 30 series and successor is the GeForce 50 series. The transistor density of 118.9M per mm² is high for a 5 nm part, indicating a dense design, but the 128-bit bus remains a bottleneck for high-resolution gaming.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data provides clear guidance on which preset to use at each resolution to balance frame rate and visual quality.

At 1920x1080, the High preset at 162 FPS is the sweet spot. It provides a 55.8% frame rate improvement over Ultra (104 FPS) while retaining most of the visual fidelity. The Medium preset (195 FPS) is only 20.4% faster than High, making High the better choice for those seeking a balance. The Ultra preset at 104 FPS is still smooth, but the 35.8% performance penalty compared to High is substantial for incremental visual gains.

At 2560x1440, the High preset at 117 FPS is recommended. It is 56% faster than Ultra (75 FPS) and provides a smooth experience on high-refresh-rate monitors. The Medium preset (141 FPS) is 20.5% faster than High, but the visual difference between Medium and High is often significant in sports titles. The Ultra preset at 75 FPS is playable but leaves little headroom for frame time spikes.

At 3840x2160, the Medium preset at 89 FPS is the only viable option for a smooth experience. The High preset at 74 FPS is acceptable for 60 Hz displays, but the Medium preset offers 20.3% more performance. The Ultra preset at 48 FPS is below the 60 FPS threshold and should be avoided. The Low preset (124 FPS) is overkill for 4K and sacrifices visual quality unnecessarily.

The data indicates that the Medium preset at 4K is the most balanced configuration overall, as it is the only 4K row with min/max data (76 min, 103 max) showing stable frame pacing. For 1080p and 1440p, the High preset offers the best combination of performance and visual quality. The Ultra preset is only recommended for 1080p, where the 104 FPS average remains fluid. The Low preset is unnecessary at any resolution, as it only provides marginal gains over Medium while significantly degrading visuals.