Undisputed

# Undisputed with AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti delivers a consistently high-refresh experience in Undisputed, with measured frame rates ranging from 65 FPS at 4K Ultra to 372 FPS at 1080p Low. The data shows this combo ranks 714th out of 2,813 tested combinations, placing it in the top 25% of all systems evaluated for this boxing title. The CPU sits at the 94th percentile among all processors tested, while the GPU holds the 83rd percentile among all graphics cards, indicating a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically bottlenecks the other across most settings.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K reveals how the workload shifts between CPU and GPU as pixel count increases. At High settings, the average frame rate falls from 222 FPS at 1920x1080 to 160 FPS at 2560x1440, then to 101 FPS at 3840x2160 — a 54% reduction from 1080p to 4K. This scaling pattern is typical of a game that remains partially CPU-bound even at higher resolutions, given that the 9700F's 8-core/16-thread configuration sustains very high frame rates at lower pixel counts.

The Medium preset shows a similar trajectory: 268 FPS at 1080p, 194 FPS at 1440p, and 122 FPS at 4K. The 4K Medium result includes a measured minimum of 104 FPS and maximum of 141 FPS, suggesting some frame-time variability exists at this resolution. When dropping to Low settings, the 1080p result reaches 372 FPS, while 1440p hits 269 FPS and 4K lands at 170 FPS — indicating that even at maximum frame rates, the GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution climbs.

Ultra settings produce the steepest scaling curve: 143 FPS at 1080p, 103 FPS at 1440p, and just 65 FPS at 4K. The 4K Ultra figure represents the only sub-100 FPS result in the entire measured set, showing that Undisputed's Ultra preset demands substantial GPU resources beyond what the RTX 3080 Ti's 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 34.10 TFLOPS of FP32 compute can deliver at 4K. The gap between 1080p Ultra and 4K Ultra (78 FPS difference) is nearly double the gap between 1080p High and 4K High (121 FPS difference), confirming that Ultra settings amplify the resolution penalty disproportionately.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F brings 8 cores and 16 threads from the Zen 5 architecture, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. Its base clock of 3.80 GHz boosts to 5.50 GHz, and the 32 MB of shared L3 cache helps maintain high throughput in Undisputed's simulation-heavy combat logic. In PassMark benchmarks, the CPU scores 36,470 in multithreaded tests and 4,691 in single-threaded tests, with an average benchmark score of 69,996 that places it at the 94th percentile of all CPUs.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the 9700F is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (69,875 average score, 0.2% higher) and the Intel Core i7-14700KF (70,163 average score, 0.2% lower). It edges out the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (69,515, 0.7% higher) and the Intel Core i7-14700K (69,355, 0.9% higher). These narrow deltas — all within 1% — mean the 9700F's compute performance is squarely in the flagship desktop tier, which explains why the CPU can feed the RTX 3080 Ti at 1080p without becoming a bottleneck.

The CPU's impact on Undisputed becomes visible when comparing Low and High settings at the same resolution. At 1080p, Low produces 372 FPS while High produces 222 FPS — a 150 FPS gap. Since the CPU's workload is largely independent of graphics settings, this gap reflects the GPU's additional work at High. At 4K, the same comparison shows 170 FPS versus 101 FPS, a 69 FPS gap that narrows because the GPU is already saturated. The 9700F's PassMark physics score of 2,122 and floating-point math score of 77,955 suggest adequate headroom for the game's physics calculations, which are likely per-frame and per-fighter.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Undisputed?*

A: The data shows 2560x1440 at High settings delivers 160 FPS average, which is well above the 122 FPS at 4K Medium and the 101 FPS at 4K High. This makes 1440p High the sweet spot for balancing visual quality and frame rate.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 9700F's average benchmark score of 69,996 is within 1% of four rivals: the Ryzen 9 7940HX (69,875, 0.2% higher), Core i7-14700KF (70,163, 0.2% lower), Ryzen 9 7950X (69,515, 0.7% higher), and Core i7-14700K (69,355, 0.9% higher). Performance parity is the norm here.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming?

A: Yes, but with caveats. At 4K Medium, the average is 122 FPS with a minimum of 104 FPS, which is playable. At 4K High, it drops to 101 FPS, and at 4K Ultra it falls to 65 FPS. The 4K Low preset reaches 170 FPS.

Q: What does the 83rd GPU percentile mean for this game?

A: The RTX 3080 Ti outperforms 83% of all GPUs in the benchmark database. In Undisputed, this translates to frame rates above 100 FPS at 4K High and 143 FPS at 1080p Ultra, indicating the card is well above the median for modern gaming.

Q: Is there a large difference between Low and Ultra settings?

A: Yes. At 1080p, Low yields 372 FPS while Ultra yields 143 FPS — a 229 FPS difference. At 4K, Low yields 170 FPS while Ultra yields 65 FPS — a 105 FPS difference. The Ultra preset nearly halves frame rates compared to Low at every resolution.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems?

A: The combo ranks 714th out of 2,813 tested combinations, placing it in the 74.6th percentile of all systems evaluated for Undisputed. This suggests the pairing is competitive but not at the very top of the performance hierarchy.

How This Combo Ranks

The 714th rank out of 2,813 tested combos places this pairing in the upper quartile of all systems measured in Undisputed. While the CPU's 94th percentile and GPU's 83rd percentile suggest both components are strong individually, the combined rank of 714 indicates that the overall system is outpaced by roughly 25% of tested configurations — likely those with newer GPUs or higher-end CPUs.

The CPU's nearest rivals all score within 0.9% of the 9700F, yet the combo rank suggests that Undisputed benefits more from GPU headroom than from marginal CPU differences. The RTX 3080 Ti's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 (0.8% higher average score), NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB (1.2% lower), NVIDIA Tesla M40 (1.7% lower), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 (2% higher). These deltas are small in synthetic benchmarks, but in Undisputed, the measured frame rates reveal where the GPU's real-world strengths lie.

At 1080p, this combo achieves 372 FPS on Low, which is near the practical limit for most displays. At 1440p, it stays above 160 FPS on High, and at 4K it remains above 100 FPS on Medium and High. The rank reflects that this is a capable high-refresh system for the game, even if it does not reach the top tier of 4K Ultra performance seen in higher-ranked combos.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, built on the Ampere architecture with the GA102 chip at 8 nm, provides 12 GB of GDDR6X memory across a 384-bit bus, delivering 912.4 GB/s of bandwidth. Its measured benchmarks include a PassMark G3D score of 26,896 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,077, with an average benchmark score of 41,187 that places it at the 83rd percentile of all GPUs.

The GPU's memory configuration is particularly relevant for Undisputed at 4K. The 12 GB capacity and 912.4 GB/s bandwidth allow the card to maintain 101 FPS at 4K High and 122 FPS at 4K Medium, with the 4K Medium run showing a minimum of 104 FPS and maximum of 141 FPS. The 4K Ultra result of 65 FPS indicates that the game's Ultra preset likely exceeds what the GA102's 10,240 shading units and 34.10 TFLOPS FP32 throughput can sustain at that resolution.

Compared to its GPU rivals in synthetic tests, the RTX 3080 Ti leads the NVIDIA Tesla M40 by 1.7% and the Tesla M40 24 GB by 1.2%, trails the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 by 0.8%, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 by 2%. These small synthetic deltas belie the measured FPS in Undisputed, where the RTX 3080 Ti's real-time performance at 1440p and 4K demonstrates the card's strength in a modern sports title. The pixel rate of 186.5 GPixel/s and texture rate of 532.8 GTexel/s support the high average frame rates observed across most settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo produces its highest frame rates. Low settings yield an average of 372 FPS. Medium settings produce 268 FPS with a minimum of 228 FPS and maximum of 308 FPS. High settings average 222 FPS. Ultra settings drop to 143 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 229 FPS, illustrating the substantial cost of the Ultra preset at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, frame rates remain high but scale down consistently. Low settings average 269 FPS. Medium settings produce 194 FPS with a minimum of 165 FPS and maximum of 223 FPS. High settings average 160 FPS. Ultra settings fall to 103 FPS. The 1440p results show a 166 FPS spread between Low and Ultra, with the Medium preset still delivering a smooth minimum above 165 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor. Low settings average 170 FPS. Medium settings produce 122 FPS with a minimum of 104 FPS and maximum of 141 FPS. High settings average 101 FPS. Ultra settings drop to 65 FPS. The 4K results show a 105 FPS spread between Low and Ultra, and notably, the 4K Ultra figure is the only measured average below 100 FPS across the entire dataset.

The Medium preset is the only settings level with full min/max data across all three resolutions. The minimum-to-maximum ranges are 80 FPS at 1080p (228 to 308), 58 FPS at 1440p (165 to 223), and 37 FPS at 4K (104 to 141). These ranges indicate that frame pacing is tighter at higher resolutions, where the GPU workload dominates and CPU-side frame generation is less variable.

Settings Recommendations

For 4K displays, the Medium preset is the recommended choice. It delivers 122 FPS average with a 104 FPS minimum, which keeps gameplay fluid while offering better visual quality than Low's 170 FPS. High at 4K still hits 101 FPS, but the Medium preset's minimum of 104 FPS provides more consistent pacing. The Ultra preset at 4K falls to 65 FPS, which may be acceptable for slower-paced sports gameplay but risks noticeable stutter during rapid exchanges.

For 1440p displays, High settings are the clear recommendation. The 160 FPS average exceeds the 122 FPS at 4K Medium and is well above the 103 FPS at 1440p Ultra. Players seeking maximum smoothness can use Medium at 194 FPS, but the High preset's visual uplift likely outweighs the 34 FPS difference for most users. The 1440p Low preset at 269 FPS offers minimal benefit over High for competitive play, as both exceed typical 144 Hz display refresh rates.

For 1080p displays, the High preset at 222 FPS provides an excellent balance. Medium at 268 FPS and Low at 372 FPS offer diminishing returns beyond High, unless the player owns a 240 Hz or higher refresh monitor. The Ultra preset at 143 FPS still clears 144 Hz, making it viable for players prioritizing visual fidelity, but the 79 FPS gap between Ultra and High suggests the extra graphical effects come at a significant performance cost. Given that the data shows no measured frame rate below 65 FPS across all settings, this combo can comfortably run Undisputed at any preset, with the choice depending on whether the player favors maximum visual quality or maximum frame rate headroom.