Undisputed

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER combination delivers a playable experience in Undisputed across most settings, with the CPU providing ample headroom while the GPU defines the performance ceiling. The data indicates this combo ranks 1177 out of 1580 tested configurations, placing it in the lower-middle tier of the database.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on the Zen 4 Raphael architecture using a 5 nm process at TSMC. Its base clock of 4.50 GHz and boost clock of 5.40 GHz give it strong single-threaded throughput, which is relevant for a sports title like Undisputed where simulation logic and physics calculations often rely on fewer threads. The CPU’s 32 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth help feed the GPU efficiently during intense fight sequences.

Benchmark data shows the 7700X achieves a single-thread score of 1090 in 3DMark, a Geekbench single-core score of 2985, and a Cinebench R23 single-core result of 4281. These figures position it as a high-performance desktop part, sitting in the 89th percentile against all CPUs. Multi-threaded results are equally strong: the Cinebench R23 multi-core score reaches 30325, while PassMark multithread shows 35686. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 8859 and max-thread score of 8852 confirm that scaling across all 16 threads is consistent.

In Undisputed, the CPU’s role is to ensure frame pacing remains stable when the action accelerates. The measured FPS data shows that at 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves 229.6 FPS, which is far beyond display refresh rates, indicating the CPU is not a limiting factor at lower graphical loads. Even at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, where the average drops to 41.9 FPS, the bottleneck shifts entirely to the GPU. The comparison with the nearest rivals reinforces this: the Intel Core i5-13500 scores 34175 (0.4% behind), the Intel Core i7-12800HX scores 34136 (0.5% behind), and the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H scores 34584 (0.8% ahead). The performance deltas are minimal, meaning the 7700X holds its own against contemporary alternatives.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

The measured FPS rows provide clear guidance for selecting settings based on your display resolution and target frame rate. At 1920x1080, the High preset delivers 137.3 FPS, while Medium yields 163.4 FPS and Low produces 229.6 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 86.2 FPS, which is still above 60 but represents a significant hit. For 1080p owners with a 144 Hz monitor, the Medium preset is the sweet spot, offering a substantial 26.1 FPS advantage over High while staying well above the refresh threshold. If you have a 240 Hz panel, Low settings at 229.6 FPS gets you closest to that ceiling without any compromise on smoothness.

At 2560x1440, the High preset averages 98.5 FPS, which is ideal for 100 Hz displays. Medium runs at 117.4 FPS, giving headroom for 120 Hz monitors. Ultra drops to 62.8 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for competitive play. Low runs at 168 FPS, which is overkill for most 1440p panels. The recommendation here is High for visual fidelity or Medium if you prefer a higher refresh rate buffer.

At 3840x2160, the situation tightens. High averages 63.7 FPS, which barely touches 60 FPS targets, while Medium runs at 73.8 FPS and Low at 102.3 FPS. Ultra falls to 41.9 FPS, which is below the playable threshold for most users. For 4K, the Medium preset offers the best balance, providing 73.8 FPS without the visual degradation of Low settings. The data suggests that High at 4K is viable if you can tolerate occasional dips below 60, but Medium is the safer choice for consistent performance.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo maintain 60 FPS at 4K with Ultra settings?

A: No. The measured average at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 41.9 FPS, which falls well short of 60 FPS. You would need to lower the preset to Medium for 73.8 FPS or High for 63.7 FPS to reach playable levels.

Q: What is the best preset for 1080p gaming with this setup?

A: For 1920x1080, the Medium preset at 163.4 FPS provides the best balance between visual quality and high frame rates. It is 26.1 FPS faster than High and still 77.2 FPS faster than Ultra, making it the recommended choice.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 7700X compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 34313. The Intel Core i5-13500 scores 34175 (0.4% behind), the Intel Core i7-12800HX scores 34136 (0.5% behind), the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H scores 34584 (0.8% ahead), and the AMD EPYC 4244P scores 34599 (0.8% ahead). The differences are negligible.

Q: Is the RTX 2060 SUPER better than the GTX TITAN?

A: The RTX 2060 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 19774, while the GTX TITAN scores 19706, a delta of 0.3% in favor of the RTX card. The RTX 2070 scores 19680, which is 0.5% behind, and the Quadro K5200 scores 19623, which is 0.8% behind.

Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1440p with High settings?

A: The measured average at 2560x1440 with High settings is 98.5 FPS. This is suitable for 100 Hz monitors and represents a solid balance between visual quality and performance.

Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU in this game?

A: No. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo reaches 229.6 FPS, which indicates the CPU has significant headroom. As resolution increases to 2560x1440 and 3840x2160, the frame rates drop progressively, confirming the GPU is the limiting factor.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER holds the 1177th position out of 1580 tested combos in Undisputed. This places it in the lower half of the database, reflecting the GPU’s age relative to the CPU’s modern performance. The CPU alone sits in the 89th percentile against all processors, while the GPU sits in the 63rd percentile against all graphics cards. This mismatch explains the ranking: the 7700X is capable of driving much higher frame rates, but the RTX 2060 SUPER caps the overall throughput.

The data shows that this combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it can deliver high refresh rates. At 4K, it struggles with the Ultra preset, and even High settings are borderline. The ranking suggests that if you already own the RTX 2060 SUPER, the 7700X provides a strong foundation for a future GPU upgrade, as the CPU will not need to be replaced when you move to a more powerful graphics card.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER is built on the Turing architecture with the TU106 chip at 12 nm. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock runs at 1470 MHz with a boost clock of 1650 MHz, and memory operates at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). With 2176 shading units, 136 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, the card provides 7.181 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. It also includes 34 RT cores and 272 tensor cores, though Undisputed is not a ray-tracing-heavy title, so these features have limited impact.

The GPU’s memory capacity and bandwidth are sufficient for the game’s textures at 1080p and 1440p. At 3840x2160 with High settings, the average FPS is 63.7, which suggests the 8 GB VRAM is adequate for this title’s asset sizes. The card’s benchmark scores show a PassMark G3D result of 16462 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2011. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 87670 and Vulkan score of 83503 indicate solid compute performance.

The RTX 2060 SUPER sits in the 63rd percentile against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19774. Its nearest rivals are all close: the GTX TITAN scores 19706 (0.3% behind), the RTX 2070 scores 19680 (0.5% behind), the Quadro K5200 scores 19623 (0.8% behind), and the Tesla K40m scores 19519 (1.3% behind). This clustering means the 2060 SUPER is effectively at the same performance level as these older cards, and the measured FPS in Undisputed reflects this mid-tier positioning.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its strongest results. The Low preset averages 229.6 FPS, Medium averages 163.4 FPS, High averages 137.3 FPS, and Ultra averages 86.2 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 66.2 FPS, while the gap between Medium and High is 26.1 FPS. The drop from High to Ultra is 51.1 FPS, which is the steepest single-step penalty, indicating the Ultra preset introduces effects that heavily tax the GPU.

At 2560x1440, the results scale down predictably. Low averages 168 FPS, Medium averages 117.4 FPS, High averages 98.5 FPS, and Ultra averages 62.8 FPS. The delta between Low and Medium is 50.6 FPS, and between Medium and High is 18.9 FPS. The Ultra preset at 62.8 FPS is just above the 60 FPS threshold, making it a marginal choice for 1440p users who prioritize visual quality over headroom.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. Low averages 102.3 FPS, Medium averages 73.8 FPS, High averages 63.7 FPS, and Ultra averages 41.9 FPS. The difference between Low and Medium is 28.5 FPS, while Medium to High is 10.1 FPS. The High to Ultra drop is 21.8 FPS, which brings the frame rate below 60 FPS. For 4K gaming, only Low and Medium settings provide a comfortable margin above 60 FPS, with High being borderline at 63.7 FPS.

Across all resolutions, the scaling pattern is consistent: the Ultra preset imposes a significant penalty, while Medium offers the best compromise between visual fidelity and frame rate. The data suggests that this combo is optimized for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it can leverage the CPU’s strength to maintain high averages. At 4K, the GPU’s limitations become apparent, and users should expect to run Medium settings for a smooth experience.