Undisputed

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and AMD Radeon RX 7700 combination delivers a robust experience in Undisputed, with benchmark results showing a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions and settings. The data indicates that this pairing is well-balanced for high-refresh-rate gaming, though the CPU becomes more of a limiting factor at lower resolutions and higher frame rates. This analysis breaks down the measured performance data, contextualizes the components' roles, and offers practical guidance based strictly on the provided figures.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. It operates with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, which provides substantial single-thread headroom for game logic and physics calculations. The processor's 32 MB of shared L3 cache and 1 MB L2 cache per core help maintain low latency for frequently accessed data, which is critical for sports simulations like Undisputed that track many dynamic elements.

In synthetic benchmarks, the Ryzen 7 7700 demonstrates strong multi-threaded capability, scoring 18,760 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1,930 in single-core. Its 3DMark results are equally telling: 8,484 with 16 threads and 1,049 in single-thread. These scores place the CPU in the 87th percentile among all tested processors, with an average benchmark score of 40,081. The nearest rivals are extremely close, with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 having a deltaPct of +0.1% and the Intel Core 5 221E at -0.2%, indicating this CPU sits at a performance plateau where minor architectural differences do not translate into meaningful gameplay changes.

The measured FPS data reveals how this CPU interacts with the GPU across settings. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 288 FPS average, which is a very high frame rate that likely stresses the CPU's single-thread performance as it feeds the GPU. Moving to 4K Low, the average drops to 132 FPS, a 54% reduction, suggesting the GPU is becoming the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. However, at 1080p Ultra, the average is 110 FPS, which is lower than the 4K Low result despite fewer pixels, indicating that the Ultra preset's increased draw calls and game logic demands are heavily loading the CPU. The CPU's 3DMark 2-thread score of 2,043 and 4-thread score of 3,931 show that even moderate thread counts provide solid performance, but the game's scaling appears to benefit from the full 8-core allocation, as seen in the 8-thread score of 6,933 and max-thread score of 8,479.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 32 chip, featuring 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus. This provides a memory bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s, which is substantial for high-resolution textures and effects. The GPU's base clock is 1900 MHz, with a boost clock of 2459 MHz and a game clock of 2041 MHz, allowing it to maintain high throughput under sustained load. The 2,560 shading units and 96 ROPs deliver a pixel rate of 236.1 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 393.4 GTexel/s, which are key for rendering the detailed fighter models and arenas in Undisputed.

In GPU benchmarks, the RX 7700 scores 20,974 in Passmark G3D and 2,865 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. Its average benchmark score is 15,852, placing it in the 58th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals are notably close: the AMD Radeon R9 370X is -0.1% behind, the AMD Radeon RX 9060 is -1% behind, and the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 is +1.1% ahead. This clustering indicates the RX 7700 is a mid-range performer that trades blows with older and newer cards, but its 16 GB VRAM is a distinct advantage for modern titles that demand large texture pools.

The measured game performance shows the GPU scaling predictably with resolution. At 1080p High, the combo hits 171 FPS, while at 1440p High it drops to 124 FPS, and at 4K High it reaches 78 FPS. This scaling pattern suggests the GPU is well-utilized, with the 16 GB VRAM preventing any memory-related stutters. The Medium preset at 4K shows a minimum FPS of 80 and maximum of 109, with an average of 95, indicating smooth frame pacing. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, yielding only 50 FPS at 4K, which is the lowest measured result and highlights the GPU's limits when all graphical features are enabled at maximum resolution.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best 1080p setting for this combo in Undisputed?*

A: Based on the measured data, the Medium preset at 1080p provides an average of 207 FPS with a minimum of 176 and maximum of 238, offering a strong balance of visual quality and high frame rates. The High preset reaches 171 FPS, while Ultra drops to 110 FPS.

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K resolution?

A: At 4K, the Low preset achieves 132 FPS, Medium averages 95 FPS, High averages 78 FPS, and Ultra averages 50 FPS. The Medium preset is the only 4K setting with measured minimum and maximum values (80 and 109 FPS respectively), suggesting it is the most stable for 4K play.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this system?

A: The data shows a resolution-dependent bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the 288 FPS average suggests the CPU is the limiting factor, as the GPU is capable of higher output. At 4K Ultra, the 50 FPS average indicates the GPU is heavily constrained, while the CPU has more headroom.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested configurations?

A: The combo ranks 1284 out of 2813 tested combinations in Undisputed. This places it in the upper half of all configurations, indicating solid performance for the hardware.

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance like for this game?

A: The Ryzen 7 7700 scores 1,930 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 1,049 in 3DMark single-thread. These scores are sufficient to drive high frame rates at lower resolutions, as evidenced by the 288 FPS at 1080p Low.

*Q: Does the GPU's 16 GB VRAM affect performance in Undisputed?*

A: The 16 GB VRAM is more than adequate for this title, as no measured results indicate memory-related frame drops. The GPU's memory bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s supports high-resolution textures without stuttering, even at 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and AMD Radeon RX 7700 combination holds the 1284th rank out of 2813 tested combos in Undisputed. This position places it in the upper half of all configurations, roughly at the 54th percentile. The ranking suggests that while this system is not at the top tier, it outperforms a majority of competing setups in this specific game.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 40,081 places it in the 87th percentile among all processors, but its nearest rivals are within 0.6% performance delta. This means the Ryzen 7 7700 is essentially tied with several other CPUs, including the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 and Intel Core i9-13905H, in general processing power. However, the GPU's average score of 15,852 puts it in the 58th percentile, with rivals like the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti just 1.7% ahead. This GPU is the weaker link in the combo, pulling the overall rank down from what the CPU alone would achieve.

The combo's ranking is further contextualized by the game's performance scaling. At 1080p, the system delivers frame rates well above 100 FPS on all presets except Ultra, which still hits 110 FPS. This indicates that the combo is well-suited for high-refresh-rate monitors at standard resolutions. At 1440p, the frame rates remain playable, with High at 124 FPS and Medium at 150 FPS. The 4K results are more modest, with only Low and Medium presets exceeding 60 FPS. This performance profile suggests the combo is optimized for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K being a secondary consideration.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For 1080p, the Medium preset is the best choice for most players, delivering an average of 207 FPS with a minimum of 176 FPS. This ensures smooth gameplay even during intense boxing sequences with multiple on-screen elements. The High preset at 171 FPS is also viable, but the 36 FPS drop from Medium to High does not justify the marginal visual improvement for competitive play.

At 1440p, the Medium preset again stands out, with an average of 150 FPS and a minimum of 127 FPS. This provides excellent frame pacing and visual fidelity. The High preset at 124 FPS is acceptable for most displays, but the 26 FPS difference between High and Medium is significant. The Ultra preset at 80 FPS is playable but may show occasional dips during heavy action, making it less ideal for a smooth experience.

For 4K gaming, the recommended setting is Medium, which averages 95 FPS with a minimum of 80 FPS and maximum of 109 FPS. This is the only 4K preset with measured minimum/maximum values, indicating it is the most stable. The High preset at 78 FPS is technically playable, but the 17 FPS drop from Medium makes it less consistent. The Low preset at 132 FPS is the highest performance option, but it sacrifices too much visual quality for a 37 FPS gain over Medium. The Ultra preset at 50 FPS is not recommended for 4K, as it falls below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern across all resolutions and settings. At 1080p, the Low preset achieves the highest average at 288 FPS, followed by Medium at 207 FPS, High at 171 FPS, and Ultra at 110 FPS. The Medium preset shows a minimum of 176 FPS and maximum of 238 FPS, indicating a tight frame range. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a 62% reduction in average FPS, from 288 to 110.

At 1440p, the Low preset averages 208 FPS, Medium averages 150 FPS, High averages 124 FPS, and Ultra averages 80 FPS. The Medium preset has a minimum of 127 FPS and maximum of 172 FPS. The drop from Low to Ultra is 62%, from 208 to 80 FPS, consistent with the 1080p scaling. Interestingly, the 1440p Low result is close to the 1080p Medium result (208 vs 207 FPS), suggesting that resolution scaling is balanced with settings changes.

At 4K, the Low preset averages 132 FPS, Medium averages 95 FPS, High averages 78 FPS, and Ultra averages 50 FPS. The Medium preset is the only one with measured minimum and maximum values (80 and 109 FPS respectively). The reduction from Low to Ultra is 62%, from 132 to 50 FPS, matching the scaling seen at lower resolutions. The 4K results show that the combo is capable of handling 4K at lower settings, but the Ultra preset is the only one that falls below 60 FPS.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is consistent across settings, with each resolution step reducing performance by a similar percentage. At Low settings, the average FPS goes from 288 at 1080p to 208 at 1440p (a 28% drop) and then to 132 at 4K (a 37% drop from 1440p). This indicates that the GPU is becoming an increasingly significant bottleneck as resolution increases.

At Medium settings, the scaling is similar: 207 FPS at 1080p, 150 FPS at 1440p (a 28% drop), and 95 FPS at 4K (a 37% drop from 1440p). The High settings show 171 FPS at 1080p, 124 FPS at 1440p (a 27% drop), and 78 FPS at 4K (a 37% drop). The Ultra settings follow the same pattern: 110 FPS at 1080p, 80 FPS at 1440p (a 27% drop), and 50 FPS at 4K (a 38% drop).

This uniform scaling suggests that the system is GPU-limited at higher resolutions. The CPU's performance headroom is evident at 1080p Low, where the 288 FPS result is likely near the CPU's maximum frame output for this game, as the GPU would be capable of higher numbers if not constrained by the processor. At 4K, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor, as the 50 FPS Ultra result is far below what the CPU can support. The sweet spot for this combo is 1440p, where the balance between CPU and GPU utilization produces the most consistent frame rates relative to the visual quality. At 4K, the Medium preset is the recommended maximum, as it maintains an average above 90 FPS while providing a playable experience.