Undisputed

FAQ

Q: What is the combo rank of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER in Undisputed?

A: The combo ranks 651st out of 3,718 tested combinations in this game, placing it in the top ~17.5% of all tested configs. That is a strong showing, especially for a CPU that was originally designed as an APU with integrated graphics.

Q: Which resolution delivers the highest average FPS for this combo in Undisputed?

A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo hits an average of 417 FPS, the highest measured value across all tested rows. The lowest measured average is 73 FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings.

Q: Is the RTX 4070 SUPER more likely a bottleneck at 1080p or 4K in this game?

A: The data shows a clear resolution-scaling trend. At 1920x1080, the average FPS ranges from 160 (Ultra) to 417 (Low), indicating the CPU and GPU are both heavily utilized. At 3840x2160, the average FPS drops to between 73 (Ultra) and 191 (Low), suggesting the GPU is the primary limiter at higher resolutions.

Q: What are the min and max FPS values recorded for this combo?

A: Only the Medium preset includes measured min and max FPS values across all resolutions. At 3840x2160 Medium, the range is 117 to 158 FPS; at 2560x1440 Medium, it is 184 to 249 FPS; and at 1920x1080 Medium, it is 255 to 345 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark scores?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700G has an average benchmark score of 27,051. It is 0.2% behind the Intel Core i9-9900K (27,097) and 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 (26,936). It is also 0.4% behind the Intel Core i5-14400T (27,166) and 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core i7-1370P (26,900).

Q: Does the GPU’s memory bandwidth play a role in 4K performance?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, with 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. In Undisputed, the 3840x2160 Ultra preset still averages 73 FPS, so the memory subsystem is sufficient even at high pixel counts, but the GPU’s compute power (198.0 GPixel/s pixel rate) becomes the limiting factor.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (Ada Lovelace architecture, 5nm process node) is the dominant performance driver in this combo for Undisputed. The GPU has 56 RT cores, 224 tensor cores, 224 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, with a boost clock of 2475 MHz and a base clock of 1980 MHz. Its memory configuration—12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth—allows it to handle high-resolution texture loads without stuttering. The GPU’s 35.48 TFLOPS FP32 compute is the reason why this combo pushes triple-digit FPS even at 4K Ultra.

At 3840x2160, the average FPS drops from 191 (Low) to 137 (Medium) to 113 (High) to 73 (Ultra). This steep scaling is a direct result of the GPU’s shading units (7,168) and texture rate (554.4 GTexel/s) being taxed by the increasing pixel count and visual complexity. The 504.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is enough to feed the GPU at 4K, but the compute units are the limiting factor. In contrast, at 1920x1080, the same GPU is overkill, producing 417 FPS on Low and 160 FPS on Ultra, indicating that the CPU or system memory bandwidth (51.2 GB/s for the Ryzen) becomes the limiting factor at lower resolutions.

The GPU’s 83rd percentile ranking vs all GPUs (avg benchmark score 43,223) confirms it is a high-end part. Its nearest rivals in benchmarks are the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (43,262, delta -0.1%), the RTX 5050 Mobile (43,268, delta -0.1%), and the RTX 4090 Mobile (43,667, delta -1%). This means the RTX 4070 SUPER is essentially tied with those parts in raw compute, but the 4070’s 12 GB VRAM and 5nm efficiency give it an edge in gaming workloads.

The measured FPS at 2560x1440 also shows the GPU’s strength: 301 FPS on Low, 217 FPS on Medium, 179 FPS on High, and 115 FPS on Ultra. The 1440p Ultra result is still above the 60 FPS threshold, and the min FPS of 184 at Medium indicates no stutter. The 4070 SUPER’s 56 RT cores and 224 TMUs are well-matched to sports titles like Undisputed, which rely more on consistent frame times than on complex physics. The GPU’s 1980 MHz base clock and 2475 MHz boost clock provide adequate headroom for the game’s shader-heavy ring lighting and crowd animations.

GPU Memory and Bandwidth Considerations

The 12 GB VRAM is not a limitation in any tested configuration, as even the 4K Ultra preset averages 73 FPS. However, the memory bus width (192-bit) is narrower than some rivals, but the 504.2 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for this title. If you were to push beyond 3840x2160, the bandwidth might become a constraint, but within the measured data, the GPU’s compute performance is the primary role. The 35.48 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1) also allows for potential future expansion into AI-enhanced features, but the game currently runs at native resolutions without issues.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G (Zen 3 Cezanne architecture, 7nm TSMC, 10,700 million transistors) is a 8-core, 16-thread processor with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. Its cache hierarchy includes a 16 MB L3 cache, 512 KB per core L2, and 64 KB per core L1. In Undisputed, this CPU provides enough single-core performance to feed the GPU at high framerates, but its role becomes more secondary at 4K where the GPU is the bottleneck.

The CPU’s benchmark scores show it is a solid mid-range part: single-thread score of 899 (3DMark) and 1494 (Cinebench R23), with multi-thread scores of 6629 (3DMark 16-threads) and 12830.5 (Cinebench R23 multi). These numbers are in the 79th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU’s performance is not dependent on the CPU’s multi-core strength, but the 5700G’s 8 cores and 16 threads are more than enough for sports games like Undisputed that typically use 4-6 threads. The 16 MB L3 cache helps with keeping game assets in-flight, but the CPU’s memory bandwidth (51.2 GB/s dual-channel) is the more critical factor for delivering large texture data to the GPU.

In this combo, the CPU is not a significant constraint. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 417 FPS, which is far beyond the fastest refresh rates in the market. Even at 1440p Ultra, the CPU can still drive the GPU to 115 FPS without stuttering. The CPU’s integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8) are irrelevant here, as the GPU handles all rendering. The CPU’s TDP of 65W is modest, but it also allows for headroom in the system’s power budget, though the GPU’s 220W TDP is the primary power consumer.

CPU and Game Logic

Undisputed is a sports title that relies on physics, AI, and animation logic. The 5700G’s 16 threads ensure that background simulation (crowd, referee, etc.) does not interfere with frame times. The CPU’s Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2107 is low, but the R23 score of 12830.5 is more representative of modern games. The CPU’s boost clock of 4.6 GHz is sufficient for single-threaded game logic, and the data confirms that at 2560x1440 High, the CPU maintains a 179 FPS average, which is a good indicator of CPU headroom.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo ranks 651st out of 3,718 in Undisputed, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all tested combinations. This is impressive because the CPU is a 5000-series APU with a lower-than-average benchmark score (27,051) compared to the GPU’s percentile (83rd). The ranking is driven by the GPU’s strength—the RTX 4070 SUPER is a high-end Ada Lovelace part—and the CPU’s ability to keep up in a game that is not CPU-heavy.

The combo’s rank is better than the CPU’s percentile (79) and slightly below the GPU’s percentile (83). This suggests that the game is not fully at the CPU’s mercy, but the GPU is the main reason for the high rank. The delta between the CPU and GPU percentiles is only 4 points, which is a good balance. In games that are more CPU-bound, the 5700G would likely drop the combo lower, but in Undisputed, the GPU carries the performance.

Relative to the CPU’s nearest rivals: the Intel Core i9-9900K (avg score 27,097) is 0.2% faster, but the 5700G has a lower TDP (65W vs. 95W for the i9) and a smaller die size (180 mm² vs. 256 mm²). The combo Rank does not directly compare to rival combos, but the 5700G is competitive with those CPUs in this title. The GPU’s nearest rivals are all NVIDIA parts, and the RTX 4070 SUPER is within 1% of the RTX 4090 Mobile in benchmark, but the 4070 SUPER’s 12 GB VRAM is more than enough for this game.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS rows, the Medium preset is the best balance of visual fidelity and performance. At 2560x1440 Medium, the average FPS is 217, with a min of 184 and a max of 249. This is above the 144 Hz refresh rate, and the min FPS ensures smooth motion. At 3840x2160 Medium, the average FPS drops to 137, with a min of 117 and max of 158, which is still above 60 FPS and suitable for most displays.

The Ultra preset is playable at 2560x1440 (115 FPS) and even at 3840x2160 (73 FPS), but the min FPS for Ultra is not listed in the data, so the stutter risk is unknown. For 1080p, the Medium preset yields 300 FPS (min 255, max 345), which is beyond the refresh rate of any mainstream monitor. The High preset is also strong across all resolutions: 248 FPS at 1080p, 179 FPS at 1440p, and 113 FPS at 4K. However, the Medium preset offers a significant FPS boost over High (a 23% increase at 1440p and 20% at 4K) with a minimal visual difference, based on the data.

The Low preset provides the highest FPS, but it sacrifices graphics quality. For competitive play, Low at 1080p (417 FPS) is the best, but for a balanced experience, Medium is the sweet spot. The data does not include a DLSS or upscaling setting, so the numbers reflect native render. The recommendation is to use Medium at 2560x1440 for a high refresh experience, or Medium at 3840x2160 for a 4K experience with a VRR display.

Measured FPS Breakdown

3840x2160 (4K UHD)

• Low: Average FPS 191, no min/max recorded.
• Medium: Average FPS 137, min 117, max 158.
• High: Average FPS 113, no min/max.
• Ultra: Average FPS 73, no min/max.

2560x1440 (QHD)

• Low: Average FPS 301, no min/max.
• Medium: Average FPS 217, min 184, max 249.
• High: Average FPS 179, no min/max.
• Ultra: Average FPS 115, no min/max.

1920x1080 (Full HD)

• Low: Average FPS 417, no min/max.
• Medium: Average FPS 300, min 255, max 345.
• High: Average FPS 248, no min/max.
• Ultra: Average FPS 160, no min/max.

The data reveals a consistent pattern: the Medium preset is the only one with min and max FPS values, which indicates the game’s performance is most stable at that setting. At 4K, the gap between Low and Ultra is wide (191 to 73 FPS), showing that the GPU’s pixel rate (198.0 GPixel/s) is the limiting factor. At 1080p, the gap is also wide (417 to 160), but the CPU’s 3.8 GHz base clock is sufficient to push the GPU to high frame rates. The 1440p results are a sweet spot, with even Ultra achieving 115 FPS, which is above the 60Hz threshold for most monitors.

The min FPS values at 3840x2160 Medium (117) and 2560x1440 Medium (184) are both above 60 FPS, ensuring a consistent experience. The max FPS values (158 and 249) show that the combo has headroom for future patches or more demanding scenes. The lack of min/max data for other presets is a limitation, but the average FPS numbers are sufficient for a baseline. In summary, this combo is capable of high-refresh 1080p and 1440p, and it can handle 4K at Medium settings with a strong average FPS.