Undisputed

# Undisputed with AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

This combo delivers strong 1080p and 1440p performance in Undisputed, with the Ryzen 5 8400F's six Zen 4 cores and the RTX 4060's Ada Lovelace architecture combining to keep frame rates well above playable thresholds across most settings. The measured data shows this pairing ranks 910th out of 1580 tested combinations, placing it in the upper-middle tier of the database—a solid result for a mainstream desktop setup.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 (Phoenix) architecture, built on TSMC's 4 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The chip carries 16 MB of shared L3 cache, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 KB of L1 per core, all feeding a dual-channel DDR5 memory controller with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. Its 3DMark multi-threaded scores progress from 6091 at 16 threads to 6165 at max threads, while single-thread performance sits at 951 in 3DMark and 3684 in PassMark.

In Cinebench, the multicore R23 score of 20851 and single-core score of 2943 indicate a balanced processor that doesn't bottleneck the GPU in a sports title like Undisputed. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking against all processors, with an average benchmark score of 25064, places it near the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X (25057, 0% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F (24993, 0.3% ahead of that rival). The 8400F's 12 threads handle the game's simulation and physics workloads without issue, as evidenced by the PassMark physics score of 1391 and integer math score of 74304.

For a boxing game where opponent AI and physics calculations occur continuously, the 8400F's single-thread strength matters more than raw core counts. The PassMark single-thread score of 3684 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 2943 show this chip can keep game logic responsive, while the multithreaded 24530 PassMark score ensures background tasks don't interfere with frame pacing. The CPU's 4 nm process and 25,000 million transistors in a 178 mm² die contribute to efficient sustained performance, which is relevant for long gaming sessions without thermal throttling affecting results.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 uses the AD107 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process, featuring 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. It runs at a base clock of 1830 MHz with a boost of 2460 MHz, paired with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus delivering 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The card's memory clock is 2125 MHz, translating to 17 Gbps effective. With 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6.

The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 19545 and average benchmark score of 23181 place it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6600M (23321, -0.6% delta from the 4060), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti (23338, -0.7%), Intel Arc B580 (23021, 0.7% ahead of the 4060), and AMD Radeon 760M (22999, 0.8% ahead). These close deltas indicate the RTX 4060 sits in a competitive mid-range tier, though its 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus limit extreme resolution performance.

In Undisputed, the RTX 4060's 15.11 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 236.2 GTexel/s texture rate handle the game's character models and arena environments. The 48 ROPs and 118.1 GPixel/s pixel rate become limiting factors at 4K Ultra, where the measured 48.4 FPS average reflects the card's bandwidth constraints. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p settings, but the 272.0 GB/s bandwidth shows strain as resolution increases, which is evident in the frame rate drops between Medium and Ultra presets.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

The measured data reveals a clear sweet spot at Medium settings across all three resolutions. At 1920x1080, Medium produces 196.5 FPS average, which is only 4.8% lower than the 271.4 FPS at Low but delivers substantially better visual quality. At 2560x1440, Medium yields 141.5 FPS, keeping gameplay well above the 60 FPS threshold while maintaining detail. Even at 3840x2160, Medium holds 90.7 FPS, making it the only preset that combines playable frame rates with acceptable visuals at 4K.

High settings are viable but with diminishing returns. At 1080p High, the combo achieves 162.4 FPS, still excellent for competitive play. At 1440p High, 118.6 FPS remains smooth. However, at 4K High, the average drops to 71.8 FPS, which is playable but leaves little headroom for demanding scenes. Ultra settings are only recommended for 1080p, where 105 FPS average is acceptable, but 1440p Ultra drops to 78 FPS and 4K Ultra falls to 48.4 FPS—below the 60 FPS target most players prefer.

For the best balance of visual fidelity and performance, Medium at 1440p (141.5 FPS) or High at 1080p (162.4 FPS) provide the most comfortable experience. The data shows a consistent pattern: each preset step up from Medium costs roughly 30-45% performance, while Low delivers marginal gains over Medium that don't justify the visual downgrade. At 4K, Medium is the only sensible choice unless the user accepts sub-60 FPS gameplay.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

This specific pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 ranks 910th out of 1580 tested combinations in Undisputed. This places it in the 57.6th percentile of all combos, meaning roughly 42% of tested configurations perform worse. The ranking reflects the balanced nature of this setup—neither component is a bottleneck, but neither is top-tier either.

The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking and GPU's 66th percentile ranking explain the combo's mid-tier placement. The CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU, suggesting that upgrading the graphics card would yield larger gains than a processor swap. The nearest CPU rivals—Ryzen 7 2700X at 0% delta and Ryzen 5 7500F at 0.3% delta—show the 8400F is competitively positioned, but the GPU's close competition from the RX 6600M (-0.6%) and GTX 780 Ti (-0.7%) means the 4060 is the limiting factor in this pairing.

Given that the combo sits at rank 910, there is significant room above it in the database. The measured FPS data confirms this: at 1080p Medium, the 196.5 FPS average is strong, but higher-end combos would push Ultra settings to higher frame rates. For a mainstream build, this ranking is respectable, but users seeking 4K Ultra performance would need to look at superior GPU options.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Undisputed at 4K?

A: Yes, but only at Medium settings, where it achieves 90.7 FPS average. High settings at 4K produce 71.8 FPS, while Ultra drops to 48.4 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold most players consider playable.

Q: What is the best resolution for this setup?

A: The data shows 2560x1440 at Medium settings provides 141.5 FPS average, offering a strong balance of visual detail and smoothness. 1080p Medium reaches 196.5 FPS for those prioritizing maximum frame rates.

Q: How does the RTX 4060 compare to its nearest rivals in this game?

A: The RTX 4060's average benchmark score of 23181 places it within 1% of the AMD Radeon RX 6600M (23321), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti (23338), Intel Arc B580 (23021), and AMD Radeon 760M (22999). The performance differences are minimal across these cards.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 8400F a bottleneck for the RTX 4060?

A: Based on benchmark scores, the CPU's 82nd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 66th percentile suggests the graphics card is the limiting factor. The 8400F's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20851 provides ample headroom for this GPU in a sports title.

Q: What frame rates can I expect at 1080p with this combo?

A: The measured averages range from 271.4 FPS at Low settings to 105 FPS at Ultra. Medium delivers 196.5 FPS and High produces 162.4 FPS, all well above the 60 FPS target.

Q: Should I use Low settings for competitive play?

A: Low settings at 1080p yield 271.4 FPS, which is significantly higher than the 196.5 FPS at Medium. However, the visual quality loss may not be worth the frame rate gain, as Medium already exceeds the refresh rate of most mainstream monitors.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its highest frame rates. Low settings produce an average of 271.4 FPS, Medium achieves 196.5 FPS, High reaches 162.4 FPS, and Ultra drops to 105 FPS. The progression shows a 38% reduction from Low to Medium, another 17% reduction to High, and a 35% reduction from High to Ultra.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong. Low settings average 196 FPS, Medium produces 141.5 FPS, High achieves 118.6 FPS, and Ultra falls to 78 FPS. The step from Medium to High costs only 16% performance, making High a viable option at this resolution, while Ultra's 45% drop from High makes it less attractive.

At 3840x2160, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus become apparent. Low settings manage 123.7 FPS, Medium holds 90.7 FPS, High drops to 71.8 FPS, and Ultra falls to 48.4 FPS. The gap between Medium and High is 21%, while the jump from High to Ultra costs 33% performance. Notably, 4K Low performs worse than 1440p High (123.7 vs 118.6 FPS), highlighting the resolution scaling limitations.

The overall pattern shows that 1080p and 1440p provide comfortable margins at all presets, while 4K requires Medium or lower for smooth gameplay. The data indicates this combo is best suited for 1440p Medium or High, where the balance between visual quality and frame rate is optimal.